Individuals looking forward to Stable Diffusion 2.0 should first find out how removing adult content and specific artists affect their AI art. These days, many individuals look toward technology-advanced Artificial Intelligence to do work for them. It can help save a lot of time and even money.Stability AI released Stable Diffusion 2.0 in November with highly requested features. The platform's original AI art generator became one of the more popular software among users and developers. They are often known to bring innovation to the AI art industry. Their leading models were why many people looked forward to the enhancements in the new release. The upgrade came with enhanced resolution, Depth-to-image Diffusion Model, an update to Inpainting Diffusion Model and new Text-To-Image Diffusion Models. But, the Text-To-Image Diffusion Model has sparked a controversy regarding the integrity of AI art.RELATED: What Is TikTok's 'Reverse AI Filter' Trend & Should You Be Worried?Stability AI’s latest update to Stable Diffusion came with many cool new features, but it also filtered its database to appease users concerned about Not Safe For Work content. Additionally, it scaled back the software’s ability to create art in the likeness of specific artists. While some may see this as a drawback to the application it is a significant growth in terms of the ethics of AI art presently to many others.

The Ethics Of Artificial Intelligence Art

Background with robot computer AI image and tech with decorative text that says, 'Ethics VS Quality'.

While many adults have no issue seeing nudity and violence, many individuals point out that not all adults are comfortable with it. In fact, for many individuals, it can be a trigger that exposes them to a past trauma. Imagine using what should be an innocent AI art generator just to need to schedule a therapy session because of a surprise inappropriate addition to the art. The most critical concern is that AI could accidentally create child pornography. If the database contains kids and sexual images, the generator can create unspeakable content. Anyone upset by Stable Diffusion 2.0's changes should remember that the platform was never meant to display sexual or violent content in the first place. In Stable Diffusion’s Dream Studio’s Terms of Service under Prompt Guidelines, the platform forbids the use of NSFW material which includes lewd or sexual material, as well as violent imagery.

Stable Diffusion’s change to the updated version’s training model is a significant precedent for AI art's ethics. Many users are upset that they can no longer copy the style of a particular artist by including their name in the prompt. Additionally, it makes it harder for users to recreate a likeness to celebrities. It is an important victory for artists losing to AI art on search engines. It is also a positive development for famous individuals whose work involves using their faces to promote brands and products. Still, users are pointing out that the output of Stable Diffusion 1.5 is better than 2.0, and it’s probably because of the software changes. Levlsio is one user who took to Twitter to prove this quality difference in a side-by-side comparison of two photos created with each AI version.

Is there a middle ground? Stable Diffusion 1.0 was not illegal, but they still had to answer these ethical questions. For now, these changes are warranted, given the number of experts who spoke about the dangers of AI NSFW art and artists who have been harmed monetarily by AI art. However, technology is advancing, and AI is not going away. It is up to developers, like the creators of Stable Diffusion, to find a way to improve their software for users and preserve morality.

NEXT: AI Was Used For Darth Vader’s Voice, Could This Replace Voice Acting?Sources: Stability AI, Levlsio/Twitter