First Blood was adapted from the novel of the same title by author David Morrell. The Rambo from the book is a different character than the one Sylvester Stallone would portray. While still a tragic figure, that version of Rambo had no issue killing anyone standing in his way, and he’s eventually killed in the closing chapter. When Stallone took the role it was decided to make him more sympathetic. The only casualty in the movie is caused by an act of self-defense and the ending makes it clear Rambo’s actions were triggered by deep-rooted trauma.
The character became the prototypical action hero in the next two entries, with a greater focus on his muscles and use of heavy weaponry. Rambo: First Blood Part II would cement his pop culture status, with the image of a sweaty, bandana-clad Stallone armed with a rocket launcher becoming the dominant image of Rambo. When the actor finally returned to the role after a 20-year absence, he felt the sequels had strayed a little too far into glorifying war, and wanted to return to the angry quality found in David Morrell’s novel.
Stallone has been the creative driving force behind the Rambo series, and just like he’s done many times with Rocky, each entry feels like a fresh chapter in the character’s journey. He set to bring the franchise to a close with Rambo V: Last Blood this year, but before he dusts down the bazooka one final time, let’s look back on the saga thus far and see which movie comes out on top.
4. Rambo III (1988)
Where First Blood was a relatively grounded survival drama, Part II put the focus firmly on explosions and firepower. The massive success of the second movie told producers they were moving in the right direction, so Rambo III needed to be bigger – but not necessarily better. The film certainly adopts that mantra, with Stallone having muscles that would be put a Greek god to shame. Whereas the climax of First Blood had two men firing guns at each other in a cramped police station, Rambo III has the title character ramming a helicopter with a tank. The plot, on the other hand, couldn’t be simpler; Rambo’s mentor Colonel Trautman gets captured by Russian forces in Afghanistan and it’s up to Rambo to save him.
Rambo III was by far the biggest production of the franchise, and there’s an impressive sense of scale to it, from the expanse landscape to the vast armies that stomp across it. The making of the movie was somewhat messy, with original director Russell Mulcahy (Highlander) fired early on, and the movie went through four different DPs. The original script was more complex also, with a subplot involving Rambo saving Afghan children with the help of a female physician. An escalating budget found the plot and themes being pared back in favor of more action.
Despite Rambo III’s flimsy story, there’s still fun to be had. The action scenes are well staged and effectively crunchy, and a sequence where Rambo stalks unlucky Russian troops in a dark cave is surprisingly eerie. The relationship between Trautman and Rambo has a lot of warmth to it, and after being so racked by guilt and trauma it’s nice to see the title character crack the occasional gag. That said, the movie’s narrow focus on Rambo and Trautman comes at the expense of pretty much every other character, with the central villain barely registering.
Rambo III is ultimately a serviceable 80's action movie with good setpieces but lacking somewhat in terms of personality. The movie grossed significantly less than the previous entry too, and Stallone would later state the reason he came back for a fourth movie was dissatisfaction with Rambo III.
Rambo forms something of a duology with Rocky Balboa, in that both found Sylvester Stallone revisiting an iconic character long after a disappointing "final" chapter and redeeming the franchise. In the 20 year gap that followed Rambo III, Stallone had resisted a pitch that found Rambo rescuing the President from a takeover of Camp David and mulled adapting Chuck Logan’s novel Homefront as a fourth movie, which would have found Rambo with a child and taking on drug dealers. Stallone’s script was later used for Homefront’s 2013 adaptation with Jason Statham.
The eventual movie would find Rambo living in Thailand where he captures snakes for a living and is hired by a group of Christian missionaries to sneak them into Burma. When they’re later captured, Rambo leads a group of mercenaries back in for a rescue mission. Stallone co-wrote and directed this entry himself, which put a spotlight on some of the very real atrocities happening in Burma. This gives the violence extra bite and the film is by far the bloodiest of the entire saga. Rambo has the highest body count of the series and depicts scenes of genocide and torture, with men, woman and children meeting brutal ends.
Related: 12 Facts You Didn’t Know About Rambo
Needless to say, Rambo’s tone is much darker as a result. The character himself is closer to the angry, bitter version found in the First Blood novel and Stallone says the film’s aggressive camera style is inspired by Rambo’s personality. There are no shirtless scenes or exploding arrows to lighten the mood here. The film moves at a propulsive pace, and once the second half begins it rarely lets up. Stallone still understands the need for some catharsis though; after building up how truly evil the bad guys are for over an hour, the final battle sees Rambo manning a gigantic machine gun and cutting down an entire army like a lawnmower to grass, only much gorier.
The darkness of Rambo sets it apart from the rest but the film’s humorless, dour approach can be a little off-putting too. In spite of its flaws, Rambo stands as one of the leanest action films of its era, and provided something of a happy ending for the tortured hero, as he returns home after decades in self-imposed exile.