Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald may introduce a major Harry Potter retcon to fix a plot hole in the first film. J.K. Rowling is a master storyteller with an unparalleled skill for weaving the most complex plots together. Still, the Fantastic Beasts films are a unique challenge to the author, in that they're essentially a Harry Potter prequel story she never really planned to tell.
The prequel films are introducing a whole host of characters fans have only ever heard of before: protagonist Newt Scamander had previously been known as the author of one of Harry's textbooks; Nicolas Flamel, confirmed to appear in Fantastic Beasts 2, was an important background figure in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone but never actually met Harry, Ron, and Hermione; and The Crimes of Grindelwald will also reveal the secret history behind Nagini, Lord Voldemort's snake.
But as the timeline gets more crowded, and the details begin to get filled in, even a writer of J.K. Rowling's caliber faces the possibility that she'll unwittingly cause a continuity gaffe. Surprisingly, there is one such continuity error in Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them - and Rowling's efforts to fix the issue may be the key to the next movie.
- This Page: The Elder Wand Risks Creating A Fantastic Beasts Plot Hole
- Next Page: How Fantastic Beasts 2 Could Retcon Harry Potter
Grindelwald Should Have The Elder Wand In Fantastic Beasts (But Doesn't)
The problem lies with Gellert Grindelwald, the dark wizard Voldemort figure of the Fantastic Beasts films. The Harry Potter books established that, back when they were teenagers, Grindelwald and Albus Dumbledore were close friends. The two wizards were obsessed with the Deathly Hallows, three artifacts that they believed could make them "Masters of Death", including the Elder Wand. What's so unique about the Elder Wand is that it has an "allegiance" to a master, which can only be claimed by another when that master is defeated. That means the most powerful (and evil) wizards have typically pursued the power of the Elder Wand, bragging to the world that they own it but also drawing rivals who seek to prove their superiority. It's possible to trace the Elder Wand's footprints through history, even if - at the time Dumbledore and Grindelwald were working together - it had disappeared again.
According to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, after he parted ways with Dumbledore, Grindelwald heard rumors that the Elder Wand was owned by the European wandsmith Gregorovitch. He broke into Gregorovitch's workshop, stunned the wizard to beat him in battle and thus he won the Elder Wand's allegiance. In the books, Grindelwald is specifically described as being a young man with blond hair during this confrontation. That means these events were supposed to happen shortly after he and Dumbledore had their falling out.
The problem comes with Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, which shows an older Gellert Grindelwald who doesn't wield the Elder Wand. From an out-of-universe perspective, it makes sense; Rowling was trying to surprise viewers with Grindelwald's reveal, and the minute any Harry Potter fan saw the Elder Wand on the screen, they'd know just who Colin Farrell's Graves really was. It even works from a story perspective, too, as Grindelwald would presumably have to use Graves's wand in order to pretend to be him.
But it nevertheless creates a substantial continuity problem due to the Elder Wand switching allegiance whenever its master is defeated. As seen in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, it doesn't matter whether you're using the Elder Wand at the time or not; the second you're beaten, you've lost the Elder Wand. And, although Grindelwald was captured by one of Newt's creatures in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, he was disarmed by Tina. That means he would no longer be Master of the Elder Wand - it should have passed on to Tina.
J.K. Rowling is a master storyteller. There's no way she hasn't spotted this plot hole, and she certainly will try to resolve it. And so we get to an interesting theory: what if Grindelwald doesn't have the Elder Wand yet?
Is Grindelwald Getting The Elder Wand in Fantastic Beasts 2?
The Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald trailers have made clear that the Elder Wand is an important part of the plot - several of the scenes featuring Grindelwald have now shown him wielding it, and the symbol of the Deathly Hallows crops up repeatedly in posters. These details raise the possibility that Grindelwald didn't use the Elder Wand in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them because he simply hadn't found it yet.
It's possible that the Elder Wand only resurfaces in 1927, during the events of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. According to this theory, Gregorovitch would obtain the Deathstick and begin to spread rumors of his acquisition in the hopes he'd make a profit from it. These rumors would reach both Gellert Grindelwald and, of course, Albus Dumbledore. The Harry Potter series revealed that, after his friendship with Grindelwald, Dumbledore lost confidence in his ability to resist the lure of power. He'd never dare to go seek out the Elder Wand himself, for fear of what he might do with it. But he likewise couldn't afford to leave it for Grindelwald. Thus he'd send an agent, the one man he knows has never shown any hint of a desire for power: Newt Scamander.
If this theory is correct, the Elder Wand is the driving plot of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. This is the prize Grindelwald has sought out in Paris, and Newt is there desperately attempting to deny it to him. Sadly, of course, Newt is destined to fail.
Page 2 of 2: How Fantastic Beasts 2 Could Retcon Harry Potter
- Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald/Fantastic Beasts 2 (2018) release date: Nov 16, 2018