Avengers: Endgame Doesn't Have To Be A Good Film

What if Avengers: Endgame is bad? The hype for Avengers 4, direct sequel to Infinity War and swansong to the original roster of Earth's Mightiest Heroes, is presently reaching to Titan and back. In fact, it's so anticipated and well-established by the past 11 years of Marvel Studios, that the film may even be able to weather being a disappointment.

2019 sees the "end" of many major franchises. Game of Thrones season 8 airs its finale in May, Toy Story 4 closes off Woody's journey in June and Star Wars 9 ends the Skywalker Saga in December. But before all them, the MCU's 22-movie Infinity Saga wraps up with Avengers: Endgame. Now, technically none of these are the true final entry of their series - the MCU will move into Phaes 4, Star Wars has multiple spinoff series in development, Game of Thrones has a prequel coming next year and Toy Story Toons will undoubtedly continue - but each of these stories still has a real sense of finality.

Nevertheless, with finality a key marketing tactic, the pressure is on to get it right. Most of these series have a fair few skeptics - Star Wars' sequel trilogy has proven divisive, Game of Thrones had a rocky penultimate season, and skepticism over another Toy Story is high - but one that feels untouchable is Avengers: Endgame. The movie's intense excitement has only begotten extreme confidence, to the point that it seems impossible to will disappoint. And that may because it marks the point where the MCU experiment has transcended traditional elements: if Avengers: Endgame is bad, it wouldn't even matter.

This Page: Why Avengers: Endgame Can Be "Bad" And Still Succeed
Page 2: What Avengers: Endgame Disappointing Would Mean To The MCU's Future

Real Talk: How Could Avengers: Endgame Be "Bad"?

Avengers Endgame Release Date Trailer Poster Update

Avengers: Endgame isn't going to be a standard film by any measure. A three-hour epic (the longest tentpole in over a decade), it's the second part to Infinity War, which was certainly a different movie to what most blockbusters deliver. It can be read as following a three-act structure but the canvas is so wide that the flow is alien. What holds everything together is Thanos and his twisted "hero's journey". This has led many to describe him as the film's protagonist, but while he fits that role on paper, there's no hiding his villainy. None of this hurts the film (unconventional structure is certainly no bad thing), which has so much tied together. What it does, though, is put a lot of weight on emotional connection and character; Infinity War's critics tend to hone in on the impenetrable onslaught of quickly-defined ideas and open ending, with what appeals to its fans being the various heroes.

Being a glorified Part 2, Avengers: Endgame will undoubtedly repeat these aspects, with the extended runtime (it will clock in over 20 minutes longer) putting it at the risk of bloat and disparate meaning.

Specific concerns come from Avengers: Endgame's likely use of time travel. Ever since set photos from the back-to-back shoot of Avengers 3 & 4 showed Ant-Man and a blond Tony Stark in The Battle of New York, the presiding theory for Endgame is that the heroes will attempt to undo Thanos' snap by going back to the previous movies. An onslaught of evidence ties the film to the Quantum Realm and its time vortexes, while footage from the set photo sequence appeared in the latest trailer digitally altered. The fear with this is that time travel is inherently illogical and nigh-on impossible to keep within the confines of its own rules; a problem exacerbated by the MCU's already confused timeline. As Back to the Future proves, making sense can be secondary to entertainment, but it's nevertheless a concern for a culminating film.

None of this are to say that Avengers: Endgame will be bad, merely to show how something of this scale certainly runs the risk of missteps. You need only look to the second Avengers film, Age of Ultron, to see how a multitude of intriguing elements can come unsatisfyingly; Joss Whedon's second MCU film was the product of immense production debate (it led to the disbanding of Marvel's Creative Committee) and that push and pull is at the forefront of the confused movie regularly cited in the bottom strata of the MCU.

Avengers: Endgame Will Satisfy Even If It's Not "Good"

Thor, Captain America, and Iron Man approach Thanos in The Avengers: Endgame

The positivity that Marvel has built up around the MCU over the past decade is incredible. At the core is the basic fact that the movies are uniformly good, with even the more disappointing entries still maintaining a basic level of "fun" quality. This, coupled with the interconnected world despite narratively-singular films that rewards deeper exploration, keeps the entire franchise bolstered. While low-end films like Ant-Man and the Wasp are rightly criticized and bold entries like Thor: Ragnarok prove divisive, there's evident goodwill towards the MCU from the majority.

And Avengers: Endgame is the pinnacle of this. It's got direct connections back to every previous movie - whether that's directly continuing Avengers: Infinity War's cliffhanger or rounding off character arcs begun last decade - and, given the Russos previous three Marvel movies, competency of production isn't treated as a question. But what really nullifies the quality concerns raised above, at least from a general audience perspective, is how so much of what Endgame is trying to do has already been done.

When the movie kills whoever it's going to kill - Iron Man and Captain America are obvious favorites given how Robert Downey, Jr. and Chris Evans' Marvel contracts are up - or the snap victims are brought back to life, Avengers: Endgame will be providing moments so impactful from a plot perspective that how they're delivered almost won't matter. We've had 21 movies of setup, this is just the final step, meaning so much of the excitement the Russos want to cultivate is already inferred. Barring something truly contradictory, audience satisfaction feels almost guaranteed.

Page 2 of 2: What Avengers: Endgame Disappointing Would Mean To The MCU's Future

Avengers: Endgame Is Truly Critic-Proof At The Box Office

As if to prove Avengers: Endgame's indestructibility, the film is already showing legs that make financial failure impossible. It smashed pre-sale records, beating previous holder Star Wars: The Force Awakens' first day in six hours, and the trailers (when they arrived) have likewise become the most viewed in the first 24 hours. As it stands, the film could be tracking as high as a $800 million opening weekend (a $200 million increase on Avengers: Infinity War last year, although a big portion of the leap comes from a concurrent opening with China).

This alone highlights how "critic-proof" Endgame will be. It's a smash hit before anybody's seen it, pretty much for certain, and it's not a bold claim to say that opening won't be impacted too much by reviews even if they're bad because everybody will still want to see for themselves. The size of this event insures against a drop comparable to Batman v Superman, where scathing reviews and just-as-bad word-of-mouth saw a stunning 58.6% drop Friday-to-Sunday.

Long term it would be possible for Avengers: Endgame's box office to taper off; weaker word of mouth and fewer rewatches could have an impact (especially considering Marvel has direct competition in the form of Detective Pikachu just two weeks into release). However, comparing to other so-called "disappointments" such as The Dark Knight Rises show that scale of the movie doesn't just shield problems, it helps keep it moving; that followup made $82 million more than The Dark Knight.

Whether Endgame can match Avengers: Infinity War's $2 billion is in question even with that redefining opening, and some negative responses are likely to leave a dent.

What Would Avengers: Endgame Being Bad Means For The MCU's Future

The one area of concern when it comes to Avengers: Endgame being underwhelming isn't to the excitement of the release or how well it does at the box office - it's what it means for the MCU's future.

Looking back to Avengers: Age of Ultron, this may not seem to be much of a problem. While for some it highlighted issues baked into the MCU both in terms of storytelling and corporate structure, few of those complaints stuck. The Creative Committee, who are credited with many of Phase 2's controversial decisions (as well as holding back more diverse heroes), disbanded around this time and Joss Whedon stepped away from the franchise, giving Avengers reins to the Russo Brothers. Captain America: Civil War marked a whole new era and gave everything a necessary reinvigoration.

The situation is a little different this time around. Marvel has been very smart with their post-Endgame plans, only confirming Spider-Man: Far From Home as a result of the Sony deal. While it's known that Black Widow, The Eternals, Black Panther 2, Doctor Strange 2, Shang-Chi and Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 are all on the way (with the former two set to enter production soon for a 2020 release), the lack of any official confirmation funnels all excitement into the self-proclaimed finality of Avengers: Endgame.

This raises an interesting question about a shared universe at supposed critical mass: does the constant evolution of the MCU, with a new movie every few months and fresh characters always entering the fray, avoid dwelling on mistakes until it's too late? And, directly applied to Endgame, could the culmination - and all the retrospection brought with it, be the point of damaging? If the entire Infinity Saga ends on a bum note, there's going to be considerably less faith that whatever's next is going to satisfy either, hurting both big events and the more random elements that make up the whole.

Hopefully, the Russos deliver.

Next: Every Avengers: Endgame Update You Need To Know