Zack Snyder's Man of Steel – despite the divisive reaction from fans and critics – has proven itself a success, leading many to wonder exactly how Warner Bros. would proceed with its upcoming superhero films. Would the studio stick to its long-rumored 2015 release date for Justice League, possibly even rushing a Man of Steel sequel into production as well?
After all, the Justice League film already almost happened back in 2007 with Mad Max director George Miller at the helm. The scrapped project was set to star D.J. Cotrona (G.I. Joe: Retaliation) as Superman and Armie Hammer (The Lone Ranger) as Batman. However, now that we're living in a post-Avengers world, Hammer has his doubts about whether or not Justice League could work after all.
In an interview on Australian talk show The Feed, Hammer explained how poor timing killed his chance at Justice League film. Here's what he had to say:
"[Australia, where the film was going to shoot] had an election and changed [its] Prime Minister who changed the tax rebate incentive program. Then we had a writer’s strike in the US so we couldn’t change anything in the script and everybody wanted to change things. So it was a perfect storm. It would have been the perfect combination, of the realistic grittiness of the 'Dark Knight' series mixed with the amazing detail and sort of tactile nature of the 'Star Trek' series."
Hammer's shout-outs to The Dark Knight and Star Trek series as examples of the kind of tone the film was shooting for isn't surprising, especially considering that Man of Steel similarly tried to duplicate the more somber, emotionally impactful style that Christopher Nolan implemented in his Batman films.
The actor went on to tackle the lingering question of whether or not he would still be open to accepting the role of Batman, now that The Dark Knight Rises seems to have closed the book on Christian Bale's take on Bruce Wayne.
"I don’t know, man. That was before Marvel had crushed it with everything. It doesn’t seem like it would have been executed as well as Marvel’s done theirs. What they did is they created a following for each of the individual characters and then put them together in a movie, so you had all the people who were Thor fans, all the people who were Hulk fans, all the people who were Iron Man fans, all came together to watch this one mega movie. That was a great idea."
The argument of whether or not DC and Warner Bros. should pursue solo films before finally launching into their Justice League film has been a hot one, even among us here at Screen Rant. It's widely expected hoped that Warner Bros. will make some announcement regarding their upcoming superhero slate at Comic-Con later this month.
However, what is becoming increasingly clear is the studio's desire to hew closely to the formula that Nolan and screenwriter David S. Goyer established first with Batman and now with Superman. Likely, Warner Bros.' move to take greater control of their superhero properties is aimed at capitalizing on a long-term plan similar to Marvel's. Sticking with the aesthetic of their most recent DC films (rather than taking any inspiration from failed efforts like Green Lantern) just makes logical business sense and helps to differentiate DC's style from Marvel's more light-hearted approach.
As for Hammer's potential involvement, The Lone Ranger's less-than-stellar initial performance at the box office (along with poor reviews) may have placed a damper on the actor's mega-star prospects. As it stands, his chances of being asked to assume the cape and cowl on the streets of Gotham in Justice League (or any future Batman reboot) may be slimmer than ever before.
Do you think Hammer would still make a good Batman, Screen Rant readers? How do you think DC should go about setting its Justice League strategy apart from Marvel's gold-paved road to The Avengers? Let us know in the comments section below.
As always, stay tuned to Screen Rant for any further updates on the inevitable Justice League film.
Source: The Feed [via Bleeding Cool]