Aquaman and Wonder Woman are the only DC movies in recent years to receive good reviews, and it seems like, in addition to being decent movies in their own right, one of the main reasons they were well received, while other movies weren't, was because there was nothing to compare the adaptations to (at least outside of the source material).
One of the most exciting aspects of the unofficially titled DC Extended Universe is that it gives WB the opportunity to explore popular (and perhaps even some relatively unknown) comic book characters for the first time on the big screen. Connecting those characters to an overarching shared universe certainly helps, but giving audiences DC superheroes to watch other than Batman and Superman, who've dominated Hollywood for years, is the right direction they need to be taking. And it's working!
So far, James Wan's Aquaman and Patty Jenkins' Wonder Woman have done exceptionally well, both critically and commercially, and there are several reasons for their success. But what's interesting is that the last two Batman and Superman-centric films - Zack Snyder's Man of Steel and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, not to mention Bryan Singer's Superman Returns - haven't received the same acceptance. Why?
- This Page: Batman & Superman's Movies & Letting Go Of The Past
- Next Page: Why Marvel Doesn't Have This Problem & DC's Future
Batman and Superman Have Had Well Received Movies in the Past
Batman and Superman are two of the oldest superheroes in comic book history, so it's no wonder they were among the first characters to be adapted for the small and big screens. To put things into perspective, Superman debuted in 1938 and received his first live-action movie adaptation in 1948, just 10 years later. Batman, on the other hand, debuted in 1939 and received his first live-action movie adaptation in 1943, only a couple of years after his first comic book appearance.
Ever since then, Batman and Superman have continuously appeared in all sorts of media forms, from television and movies to video games and theme park attractions. They've become the go-to characters when people think of superheroes around the world, which is why they've received so many adaptations over the years, and quite of a few of those have been stellar. For Superman, the widely-accepted definitive version is Christopher Reeve's Superman. Even Tom Welling's Clark Kent on Smallville won over critics and audiences alike, though.
For Batman, the definitive version means something different for each generation: Michael Keaton in Tim Burton's Batman and Christian Bale in Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight trilogy. And while Ben Affleck's version of Batman has been certainly praised, his portrayal was obviously scrutinized and compared to what people consider were "better" and "more accurate" versions of the character; unfortunately, the same thing applied to Henry Cavill's Superman as well. And therein lies the problem.
People Can't Let Go of Previous Interpretations
It's natural for people to compare things to the past, but when there's nothing to compare a movie with, then that project can stand on its own. For Batman and Superman, that simply wasn't an option. As previously mentioned, Reeves' Superman is still, by and large, considered the definitive version of the Last Son of Krypton. While Snyder's Man of Steel aimed to tell a modern and more grounded story, one that deconstructed not only who Clark Kent/Kal-El was as an alien living a human life, but also why Clark chose to bear his family's crest and protect the world as Superman. It touched upon aspects that weren't explored on film before.
Unfortunately, the "grittier" take on Superman was a turn off for many people, and that's what ultimately led to WB's poorly-conceived iteration as a result of Joss Whedon's Justice League reshoots. And then Affleck's Batman joined the fold in Batman V Superman, which spawned numerous arguments against the Caped Crusader's older depiction. One of the biggest gripes was that Affleck's Batman killed people. While a majority of those deaths happened in Snyder's Knightmare sequence, the core reason behind the murderous Batman was because the superhero had lost Robin to the Joker, and that fundamentally changed his perspective.
Considering how well received Bale's Batman was, and how opposed that version was to killing, general audiences who hadn't read the comics were turned off by Affleck's portrayal because it, in part, wasn't what they had come to know about the superhero. What's more, these comparisons extend to Batman and Superman's supporting characters and their villains. In the DCEU, Cavill's Superman, Affleck's Batman, Jessie Eisenberg's Lex Luthor, and Jared Leto's Joker were all compared to previous versions, but Margot Robbie's Harley Quinn wasn't. Part of the reason for that is Robbie's Harley Quinn is the only live-action version of the character; Arrow planned on introducing Harley Quinn at one point, but what was shot down by WB.
Page 2 of 2: Why Marvel Doesn't Have This Problem & DC's Future
- Shazam! (2019) release date: Apr 05, 2019
- Joker (2019) release date: Oct 04, 2019
- Birds of Prey (And the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) (2020) release date: Feb 07, 2020
- Wonder Woman 1984 (2020) release date: Jun 05, 2020