Recent Related Items:

28 Comments


Foopher says:

Cool

Shockwave says:

it should be 300 Reborn. just kidding, i don’t have a clue.

RastaZen says:

I have great faith in Frank Miller and in Snyder as well …… BUT……. I think having another go at 300 is a bad idea.

I will be delighted if Miller and Snyder prove me wrong.

GUNSMITH says:

OUGHTA LEAVE IT ALONE, IT KINDA STANDS ALONE…WHY DO A SEQUEL?

NDH says:

I’d like to see what they could come up with. I know the end of 300 left me wanting more

LikeItMuch says:

i’m intrigued on seeing how they come up with the story, hopefully its epic

piratedan says:

well I, for one, am secretly pushing for the next film to be titled as 302, Electric Bugaloo ;-) (of course, ymmv)

stuntmanJ says:

Zack Snyder is the least creative mind on the A-list directors group. If he wants a movie he should write it himself. If he wants a Watchmen sequel, he should write it himself, his two big movies were complete adaptations, any changes he made were bad choices and for some reason a naked blue guy was important enough to leave in. Make your own material Snyder.

piratedan says:

@stuntman

what are you smokin man? Directors having to produce their own material just to get movies made? What did the guy ever do to you to draw that reaction? Ummm to be honest there are LOADS of directors that adept other people’s materiel, ummm Peter Jackson comes to mind. Not everyone out there is Woody Allen man…. sheesh

The Big Dentist says:

Or Stanley Kubrick…

Tim "Cloverfield" says:

Vewry cool….this could work.

craig says:

gotta believe it’s more of a part 2, or completely different story. Could be the continuation of the war with Sparta, but def won’t be called 301, doesn’t even make sense. Will be a completely new title, not even a 300 part 2.

Paulie says:

how many battles happened from the death of the 300 to Dilios’ speech? they’re needs to be some action to build a sequel around or fail.

Daniel F says:

Is that really him having good news for the fans. It wasn’t great, but I kind of enjoyed 300 to a point, but there is no sequel there. It’s just a bad idea. If there were more good story to be told fine, but that’s not the case.I understand most sequels are all about money, but normally there is still a 10% in there that is more story to be explored this is a 100% money move and nothing good can come of it.

790 says:

One of these days I’ll be drunk enough to watch the “300″ dvd someone gave me.

Daniel F says:

Certainly not a terrible movie 790, but really no reason to watch the movie a second time for sure. I would be upset if I owned the DVD because I only like to have DVD’s of movies I can watch more than once and 300 has no reason for a second viewing. I will say it’s enjoyable enough that you only need to be buzzed to watch and enjoy it don’t need fully drunk.

The Big Dentist says:

300’s definitely one to get messed-up and watch with your mates, 790! A history lesson it is not, but neither were Troy or Gladiator, and it knees both of them in the groin. Makes Oliver Stone’s Alexander (which actually was an attempt at historical accuracy) look like a basket of kittens as well.

It’s respectful to both the look and the spirit of Miller’s comic. By the time Watchmen came around the novelty of, ah, “faithful adherence” had worn off somewhat (and don’t get me started on Watchmen or I may have to find a lump of wood to chew on). Miller’s 300 was at least an attempt to get into the Spartan mindset, and featured some of Lyn Varley’s most beautiful colour work…but then three years later came The Dark Knight Strikes Again: inexplicably, bizarrely rubbish. Lazy on all levels to an almost surreal degree. When Miller’s good he’s unique and unparalleled; if he’s simply going to hack it out for the sake of a tenuous follow-up, then (a) The result can’t possibly have the same resonance as the original, and (b) I’ll be giving it a miss unless someone puts on the DVD when I’m too battered to resist or remember it…

790 says:

(Didn’t buy it) friend of mine gave me the 2 disc speical edition copy a while back. I have quite a backlog of dvd movies on my shelf.

Sometimes if the film really sucks I’ll throw it in the trash. That’s what I did to “Burn After Reading”.
I’m about to do the same thing to “War Inc”.

Lol, Big D, 8-)
I think I’m gonna go full drunk mode when I watch 300.

The Big Dentist says:

Whiskey. The more aggressive the better, I find. I’m just a baaaad influence…

Daniel F says:

I didn’t think Burn after Reading was that bad. Not good and really just a watch one time kind of film, but it had some decent parts. I liked it more than 300 for sure.

War Inc was terrible. I get sad every time I have to say that. I’m a big Cusack fan, but that movie was awful. I think you might like the message behind it though 790. I wasn’t a fan, but you might actually enjoy that part at least.

viper moon st1 says:

If you guys love drinking wile watchin a movie do the Shogun Assassin Drinking game all ya need is a copy of Shogun Assassin on DVD shot glasses and some High grade Sake now every time Lone Wolf cuts off a head take a shot

790 says:

“Burn after Reading” was like watching a 90 min deleated scene. 8-O
I would have actually burned the dvd if it didn’t put out deadly fumes.

Yeah Daniel, I popped “War Inc” in the dvd player a few nights ago and wow it was like watching a trippy sequel to “Toys”…
Except this time Robin Willaims was played by Dan Aykroyd and Joan Cusack was just plain freaking me out…..
The message? You mean the same message that was in “Wag the Dog?”
Needless to say I couldn’t stand “War Inc” even enough to finish it (beer failed to help)
Sucks because I was really looking forward to it after reading the credits and dvd cover art.
Cusack usually puts out some good stuff. Eeh,,

Daniel F says:

Yea Cusack is usually very good, and in this he wasn’t exactly bad. The movie was so bad though that you couldn’t even see a good performance in it.

Andy S says:

I enjoyed “300″, but I can’t ever see myself watching it again. I watched it out of curiousity because of all the great word of mouth I heard about it. It was ok, but not nearly as good as it was made out to be. There would be no way I would head to a theater to watch a sequel, although I would probably get it through Netflix.

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.