5 Things We Learned From ‘X-Men: First Class’

Published 3 years ago by , Updated February 15th, 2014 at 4:27 pm,

X Men First Class Riptide 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

When we posted our preview for the 2011 Superhero Movie Showdown, we said that X-Men: First Class was going to be the biggest wildcard of the summer 2011 Movie Season.

The movie had a lot of issues from the get go – a rushed production schedule, a loose interpretation of X-Men lore, no headlining stars, confusion over its continuity – but it also had the promise of  a great director (Matthew Vaughn), some great leading actors (James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender) and the return of X-Men movie guru Bryan Singer to the franchise he started back in 2000.

Now that X-Men: First Class has debuted in theaters to critical acclaim but a lukewarm first-week box office, it seems that all the uproar and debate that erupted in comment threads all over the Internet for years now will end without any clear “winner” being decided. The angry fanboys who claimed the film would be a stillborn bastard weren’t correct in their assessment – and neither were the unabashedly optimistic believers who said the film would be the best X-Men and/or comic book movie ever. As always, the truth ended  up somewhere in the middle…

So, it is that even-keeled middle ground we will stand on as we explore “The 5 Things We Learned from X-Men: First Class.

Before we begin, be sure to read our official X-Men: First Class review to know where we stand in regard to the film.

-

5. You Can’t Rush a Movie to Greatness

As much as I enjoyed First Class, one thing that irked me while watching it (and will likely irk me forever) was seeing all the points where “the seams” of the film showed through. By “seams,” I mean all the places where there clearly wasn’t time or attention given to touch up a shot, or polish some hokey dialogue; time to sit back and look at the script and decide which themes and aspects of the story were working most effectively (Xavier / Magneto), and which ones needed to be toned down or outright cut from the story (the auxiliary mutants who served little purpose).

If you really watch First Class closely, the lack of revision and refinement slowly becomes more and more apparent. There was definitely a great film in there, somewhere – but unfortunately I don’t believe Matthew Vaughn had adequate time to reach it, despite the praises of some fans and critics.

'First Class' director Matthew Vaughn and co-writer Jane Goldman

Green Lantern and Captain America are two more comic book movies that are racing to meet strict deadlines, and both of them have had longer production schedules than First Class‘s ridiculously short 10-month production schedule. When you have a film that requires a large ensemble cast, shooting locations all over the world, a complicated multi-storyline script, and plenty of effects-heavy action sequences, there needs to be ample time to fit all the many pieces together into a cohesive, polished, final product.From what we’ve heard, Matthew Vaughn’s experience making First Class included everything from on-the-fly script rewrites and reshoots, to eleventh-hour races to get all the effects in place for opening day.

Having been in the writing game for a decade now, I can tell: you can indeed produce something good in a rushed fashion, if the deadline demands it and you have the focus; however, something great absolutely requires time for a creator to be able to step back, assess his/her work, and decide what improvements should be made. Revision is the key to brilliance. You take away that time from any creative artist, and the art is ultimately going to be diminished. First Class was no exception.

Like I said, watching this movie in the future is really going to irk me: there’s nothing worse than looking at what is, while constantly imagining what could’ve been. Just ask my ex-girlfriend about that one ;-).

-

The bad side of brand recognition…

–~~~~~~~~~~~~–

X Men First Class Reviews Previews 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

4. Brand Recognition Has Its Downside

It’s a popular trend in Hollywood (right now?) to try and make box office profits from established brands, even when those brands are something you would never, ever, expect to be the basis of a movie. This brand recognition thing has gone so far that our immediate future is peppered with movies based on board games (BattleshipMonopoly, Candyland), toys (TransformersStretch Armstrong) and countless “re-imaginings” of classic literary works (Snow WhiteThe Wizard of OzThe Three Musketeers).

However, X-Men: First Class has proven that brand recognition doesn’t automatically equal box office fortune – especially when your brand has been tainted. First Class made $56 million its opening weekend, which is the lowest opening for an X-Men movie, ever. (Some people point to Bryan Singer’s first X-Men and its opening weekend take of about $54 million, but if you account for inflation in years between 2000 and 2011, that number would be considerably higher by today’s standards.)

The problem? A film with no big stars on the marquee (some solid and rising stars, but no headliners like Halle Berry or Patrick Stewart), combined with a bad taste still swirling in the mouths of moviegoers who felt once-or-twice burned by the franchise’s lackluster previous offerings, X-Men: The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine.

x men 4 team roster 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

You still have nightmares about us, don’t you?

In the end, First Class wasn’t able to sell itself as something fresh enough for moviegoers to give it the required fresh chance. Confusion about whether the film was a prequel to Singer’s films or a reboot of the franchise – and the greater confusion when it was announced that it was both a prequel and reboot – didn’t help to provide moviegoers (geek and non-geek alike) with any serious incentive to approach the film as a clean slate.

Sure, many of the people who actually saw First Class ultimately realized that all those negative early impressions were unfounded… but they had to actually pay for a ticket and sit in the theater first. A lot of people simply weren’t willing to take the chance of being burned a third time.

-

Fanboy Stubbornness…

–~~~~~~~~~~~~–

The angry fanboy 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

3. Fanboy Stubbornness Knows No End

When the X-Men: First Class trailers started hitting the Web, there was  quick turnaround in opinion. Before the trailers, only a small, dedicated few believed in director Matthew Vaughn so blindly that they thought this project had hope. Even amongst that minority, most were worried that the narrow production schedule, combined with the possibility of Vaughn (again) facing possible creative friction with FOX, would make First Class crash and burn.

Like everyone else, your average X-Men fanboy was pretty upset when First Class was announced. But where many movie fans were willing to give the film a chance once they saw some good stuff in the trailers and character trailers, the most hardcore holdouts in the X-Men fanboy inner circle remained unswayed – and still remain unswayed to this day.

The problem was continuity. Hardcore X-fans said that Matthew Vaughn and Co. had “re-imagined” the X-Men’s origins so drastically that First Class – while promising – bore so little resemblance to anything in the X-Men Universe that the very title “X-Men” was unfitting. I for one figured that – as is usually the case with such naysayers – the lures of opening day and positive viewer reactions would cause even the biggest holdouts to do a 180° turn and head to the theater. But this was not the case. At all.

X Men First Class Reviews 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

"We ain't ya daddy's X-Men"

Despite what you want to say about the quality of First Class (or lack thereof), there is clearly a contingent of fans who are making their voices heard through their wallets: They want this franchise (and all its convoluted and/or broken continuity) out of FOX’s hands, while the rights to the property get reverted back home to Marvel Studios.

Would a return of the X-Men rights to Marvel guarantee a fresh and better start for the X-Men franchise? While certain fanboys may blindly believe that, it’s far from guarantee. Then again, many are saying that Matthew Vaughn has given the franchise a fresh start with First Class…so I guess it depends on which side of the debate you fall on.

What we have learned, though, is that a lot of fanboys are only open to so much change being made to their beloved source material. Push them too far, and apparently they will indeed bail on you. It’s also a very important lesson for any major studio currently mishandling a movie franchise: people have longer memories than you think, and they won’t keep paying out and showing up just because a film bears a familiar name. The franchise must be worthy.

-

Great ideas don’t just come from the comic books…

–~~~~~~~~~~~~–

xavier vs magneto xmen first class 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

2. Altering The Source Material Can Be A Good Thing

I’m sure I’m going to lose that aforementioned contingent of hardcore fans that don’t like their comic book mythos messed with, but I’m going to say it regardless: Sometimes (admittedly rare times) there are ideas that comic book movie makers introduce into the mythos, which are simply more logical, organized, or downright better than what the comics have established. Such was the case with the Xavier/Magneto backstory in First Class

I’ve always thought that Sam Raimi’s introduction of organic web-shooters for his movie version of Spider-Man was smart and logical; I feel the same way about a lot of the details Chris Nolan put into Batman Begins, in order to explain the character’s origins in a more modern, realistic way. The fact is, great creative visionaries come in a variety of different forms – whether they be comic book writers or movie makers. More to the point: comic books have always been about creative collaboration and creative evolution, so I’ve never understood why (or how) some people believe that a comic book movie should be this heavily restricted form of storytelling.  At the end of the day, for me, a good idea is a good idea.

X-Men: First Class is a perfect example. For all the movie’s flaws, one point of consensus is that the relationship between Charles Xavier (James McAvoy) and Erik Lensherr (Michael Fassbender) is the most spectacular aspect of not just this film, but of any comic book movie to date. And (gasp!) most of the pivotal relationship depicted in First Class was original material created for the film…not a retelling of the comic books.

x men first class professor x and magneto 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

From their first meeting to their fledging friendship and ultimate falling out, First Class presented the Xavier/Magneto relationship in a way that (in my opinion) vastly improved on all the comic mythos of the last half-century – while still preserving the core essence of the respective characters and their themes.

Magneto as a super-powered man of espionage, hunting down Nazi war criminals? Much better than the guy in the comics, who tried to live peaceful for a time on a mystical mountain of animal people, only to eventually slide into mutant terrorism. How about Xavier as a dangerously naive young rascal who had no tact to go along with his invasive mind powers? For my money, that was much better than a perennial saint/zen master who has only had his bald head tarnished in recent decades.

First Class took two characters who have been done to do death (and back, and dead, and back again) and still managed to make them something fresh, dynamic, relatable and exciting. If I could have it my way, the comics would incorporate the mythology of First Class Xavier and Magneto into the canon, and would be all the better for it.

X Men First Class Kevin Bacon Sebastian Shaw 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

Just like in the comics...oh, wait.

Others are going to point to other liberties First Class took – Havok and the White Queen’s ages, the almost unrecognizable roster of X-Men, Kevin Bacon’s “lean, mean” Sebastian Shaw – and admittedly some of those changes did fall flatter than others. However, for all the failed experimentation, I still feel that the movie succeeded with its new ideas more than it didn’t. More importantly, I don’t think I ever want to see the day where filmmakers stop taking risks. Sure nothing would be lost – but nothing potentially great would be gained, either.

-

What matters most, now matters less…

–~~~~~~~~~~~~–

New Longer X Men First Class Trailer 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

1. The Quality of a Film Isn’t All That Matters (Though it Should Be)

It is (sadly) the case with comic book movies in particular that the actual quality of the film – as a standalone work of artistic expression – is a diminishing topic in the public discourse surrounding the film. Thanks to the nature of the comic book medium and its fanbase, questions of continuity, interpretation, casting choices, creative liberties and/or changes and even studio ownership are now debated long and hard before someone even asks the question, “Does this film tell a complete story in an engaging, interesting and/or fun way?”

Some fans have already claimed that X-Men: First Class is a fantastic superhero summer action blockbuster…it’s just not a good “X-Men” movie. That’s a debate for the comment section, for sure, but I do know this: In my understanding, it has always been the job of a filmmaker and his/her crew to convey a story that is complete and well-told. A movie is meant to stand on its own two legs and hold itself up effectively. I had serious problems with Iron Man 2 over this exact issue.

IM2 might’ve “honored” the source material and kept the continuity of the first film intact – but as a standalone feature film I still view it as failure. Instead of a self-contained, cohesive narrative, IM2 was a “bridge-piece” meant to foster the larger Marvel Movie universe, thereby compromising basic narrative flow and logic in the process.

"People say that I am a proper comic book movie."

If you can’t tell from my phrasing, I can see how the opposing case could be made for X-Men: First Class: a film that breaks from source material and continuity, but is able to stand firm on its own as a self-contained story about hope, prejudice, friendship, betrayal, politics and personal values. It’s too bad that all that other stuff got in the way, because a good film should be able to be appreciated for what it is, on its own – independent of where and how it fits into the larger scheme of things.

Franchise movie making is great, as is the idea of large cinematic universes; however, as The Matrix and Pirates of the Caribbean franchises have proven with their respective sequels, few people walk away from a two-plus-hour film pleased with only half a story having been told – no matter how many great setups and Easter eggs get planted. For my money, I’d much rather get a complete and fulfilling X-Men experience, rather than a film that has to bend, twist and compromise itself for the sake of comic book fidelity or movie continuity – especially when the films it’s trying to fit itself with are X-Men: The Last Stand and Wolverine. But that’s just me.

-

x men movie logo 5 Things We Learned From X Men: First Class

X-Men: First Class has another week for positive word a mouth to bring it some extra box office cash (the only big opening this week is J.J. Abrams’ mysterious (too mysterious?)  Super 8) – after that, Green Lantern will smash into theaters and capture the attention of the superhero movie crowd (and probably a much wider audience than that). When that happens, First Class will be all but dead in the water (at least in the U.S.).

The future of the X-Men movie franchise is unclear right now. Will Matthew Vaughn be back for an X-Men: First Class sequel? One that perhaps steers the franchise back into more familiar waters? Or will FOX move ahead with plans for X-Men 4 X-Men 5, bringing the franchise back to the modern era and continuity established in the original trilogy?

I’m sure we’ll know more details very soon – in the meantime, debate all the hype, hoopla, and quality of X-Men: First Class in the comment section below.

« 1 2 3 4 5View All»

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: x-men, x-men: first class

755 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. X-man first class movie is differ from other movie that I’m watched.

    • First class was ok… I personally loved the other x-men.

      • I disagree. I have to hear rogue/Ana Paquin scream again in a X-men movie then I’m gonna give up on the entire franchise. Where is the Southern girl brawler? Not with gambit (ggggrrrr) that’s where.

        And where was Storm’s Egyptian accent?

        • Storm is from Kenya.

  2. This film was horrible on all methodologies. Saying shifting supply content can be a great element is just obscene, when you take into consideration that the company name X-Men is a COMIC PROPERTY and it is well-known because of the STORY. Changing situation changes the whole 50 season historical past. Which is what causes the fanboy anger. It creates no feeling to take home that is very well-known because of it’s story and then modify almost the complete story and anticipate it to do well. Along with this was a terrible toss.

  3. So we have an unpolished film with an ensamble cast that didn’t seem to fit together (or maybe just weren’t given the time to gel). A story line that is so insular that it lends itself only to it’s own pocket universe rather than being in the same world as all the other Marvel titles. Now as an old school fan of the X titles, I have to say that I found your article to be somewhat offensive. As you poke at “fan boys” for not being willing to accept this tour de crap, when from the first trailer it seems you were hellbound to like it in some stranger geek-hipsteresque want to be outside the box from the real fans… Like you had this inner monologue saying “I’ll be cool and geek-subversive by liking this movie no matter what!” This movie was on par with X-3, which only makes it slightly better than “Manos: The Hands of Fate”. Seriously I would rather watch “Night of The Lepus” in a stroke theater while severely constipated then ever watch X-3, Origins:Wolverine, or First Class ever again. Regardless of your feelings about the comics all 3 of these films where rushed, poorly editted, and had horrible syfy channel quality scripts.

  4. ok first off…the person who wrote this is a off…”no headlining stars” they say….then wtf do you call Kevin Bacon….someone who has an actual game named after him…”6 degrees from Kevin Bacon” where people are give another star and Kevin Bacon, and you have to make a connection in six movies…i mean really??? really??

  5. Author makes no sense. Continuity is good, but altering source material is also good? As for rushing it and “seams”, there is not one actual example. Dumb.

  6. BLAH, BLAH, BLAH! This movie was not just altered a bit from the comic story line, it destroyed it….and all the talk of how picky fanboys are??? Who in the hell do you think have kept the entire comic book industry in business all these years? Keep the “creative interpretation” for something that doesn’t already have a huge loyal fanbase.

    • That’s a big no on fanboys keeping the industry alive. If anything they’ve done everything in their power to absolutely destroy it. And the lion’s share of creators out there can’t stand them, and they continue to be blind to this. Pathetic.

      • You must be joking. Fans are people who line up in theatres instead of waiting for it to appear at the video store or on their Netflix queue or online for free. Fans are people who tell their friends to go to see the movie and spread word of mouth. Fans discuss movies online. Yes, even when they trash a movie they make people think “I want to go see what they are talking about”. People rush to see movies so they can tell their friends what they thought and they try to get there before their friends so they won’t be spoiled. If creators can’t stand fans then creators are biting the hands that feed them.

        • I get what you’re saying, but I think the other person means the hardcore fan base of the original material. The people who think it ought to be EXACTLY like the source material. So, in this case it would be the x-men comics’ fanboys. SOME OF THEM are seem too stubborn to be able to let a story stray from what they expect… which is a near exact replica of the story in the comics. And if it strays from that, then revenues tend to go down – at least initially.

          In my opinion, this makes absolutely no sense to me. All of these movies – of which the source material is comics, books, other movies, etc – never claim to be replicas of the source material, they claim to based on the source material. So, people should expect, just from that, that the movie isn’t going to be the same…
          And why would you want to see something EXACTLY the same anyways? Just read/watch/etc the source material. It is cool to identify differences and similarities. Some people just need to learn to compromise. The standard of which SOME PEOPLE hold movies based off their favourite comic/book/etc shouldn’t be measured by how close it was to the original…

          • Yes but most of these people are still going to see the movie and talk about it online. If they complain about the movie and filmmakers don’t like it then filmmakers need to develop thicker skins.

            At the same time, fanboy complaints need to be reasonable. If Scott Summers and Jean Grey were teenagers in the 70s then they were only little kids in the 60s. What Singer did was make Alex the older brother instead of Scott so now Beast, Havok and Banshee were the first X-Men rather than Beast, Angel, Iceman and Cyclops. That’s really a minor change if you ask me.

            There were a lot of homages to the source material. For example, in the comics Magneto amassed wealth by stealing Nazi gold. That obviously happened in the movie continuity but we weren’t shown it. Instead, Singer came up with his own story of how Xavier and Magneto met and made their meeting concurrent with the formation of the original group of X-Men. It’s a compromise: they take elements from the comics and combine them to make their own continuity.

            It will be interesting to see what they do in sequels. Will they show Cyclops joining the X-Men or will they just pick things up in the 70s with Scott already in the group? And if they show Cyclops joining the X-Men will they do it in a way that completely invalidates the X-Men Origins: Wolverine movie? It’s the kind of question a fanboy might ask but it is a good question if you like to rewatch the movies on DVD, never mind expecting continuity between the movies and the comics.

      • I said “comic book industry”, if you think the casual reader keeps up the hype on these titles, you’re just plain wrong. All of these titles are hits because of the comic book behind them. The fans don’t get mad if something is altered a little to help the story, but First class had things just way off base, which also means any movie made after it will have to deviate that much further from the mark. In the end, you have a movie franchise that shares the title “X-men”, but has little to do with X-Men.

  7. Xmen: First Class & Captain America were really impressive, regardless of the schedule or inconsistencies whined about by fanGIRLS, whereas Green Lantern was nothing but an embarrassment. I can’t believe that some actually wasted words and oxygen by saying Green Lantern was “the best superhero movie ever”, and that was said more than once. It was shocking to hear that just once even before I saw the film, but it was said numerous times and after seeing the film itself, I was even more agitated by the people who said that! Green Lantern was a pile of Chihuahua turds compared to even the worst 5 minutes of The Dark Knight, which is arguably the best superhero movie ever.

    Anyway, screw this stupid article past just the first part. If you compare Captain America and Xmen to Green Lantern in any way, other than saying, “They are movies released the Summer of 2011″, then you’re a waste of time. Period.

    • >>fanGIRLS
      Haha its funny because women are inferior to men. Who else stopped reading at that point?

  8. Enjoyed X-Men First Class immensely. Couldn’t give a darn about any deviation from original material, it was better for it. The actors were spot, especially James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender.
    Agree some of the secondary characters were a bit pointless but the main X-Men were good.
    Really don’t care for fan boys and their demands….who gives a damn. Hopefully they’ll make a sequel just to wind up the fan boys.

  9. very nice collection.

  10. I loved X-Men First Class, I thought it was amazing. I think the problem with most people is they forget “the movie rules” in which there is a line about no movie ever completely fitting a book (or in this case a comic). They also began when viewing previews or trailers to make up their own movie in their heads and when this movie doesn’t live up to their dreams they bash it, which is both sad and wrong. I still love the movie and have it to order for my birthday, *happy birthday to me!!!*

  11. What I learned from “X-Men First Class” was 1)the black guy always dies first, 2)Hispanic women in movies are low class strippers who will turn traitor as soon as someone asks them to, 3)despite the laws of physics, it is apparently possible to use a two ton aircraft as a platform to lift a 100 ton boat, 4) when talking about slavery you should always have your camera pan to the face of the only black character in the film, 5) they should really stop making X-Men films until they can find someone who can write a coherent script.

    • As if Erik lifted metallic objects by carrying their weight through his own body. Hello? 100 tons? He affects magnetic fields. Mag fields dont weigh on their emitter. They affect metallic masses without their weight transfering to anything but the fields themselves.

    • In all fairness most of the women in these movies have not been portrayed well at all, First Class just kind of hit the peak with it. Emma Frost was pretty much a Stepford Wife in the movie, and even McTaggart ran around in her under ware because that is what a CIA agent would do to infiltrate a suspects hideout.

      You also forgot to mention how Azazel and Riptide not only hung around after Shaw got killed and the missiles were heading for them (either one of them could have just left on their own power), they also sided with Magneto even though they didn’t know him and he actually tried to kill them in the submarine earlier. Frost also goes with him at the end even after he tried to strangle/crush her (because a bed post is denser the diamonds).

  12. i thought first class was a great movie maybe not quite as good as x-men 1 and 2 but much much better than “last stand” or “wolverine” for many reasons, but most of all i didn’t feel like all the special fx and the easter eggs were there to cover up or distract from the flaws of the movie but was just an added bonus with what you got which was a great story and great acting and that understood what the x-men was essentially about.

    i could nitpick and say that Magneto’s accent was all over the place and the reused scene from the nazi camp was pointless and Emma Frost was dull but these are small problems.

  13. I really liked this film, but I’m a pretty big comic book fan and just couldn’t overcome the idea that Alex Summers (Scott Summer’s younger brother in the comics) was near the same age as Xavier.

  14. It’s funny how as special effects have gotten better, plot and dialog have continually gotten worse. Most of you need to stop grading films on a curve. As much as I like a good effects film, a good script and a good cast always trump budget… P.S. First class lacked a good script (regardless of comic continuity) had a loose cast, I hate Joss Whedon but any episode of firefly was better than any sci-fi/fantasy block buster that has come out in the last 25 years (excepting of course fellowship and the two towers)

  15. i realy do like so much the X-men:first class coz it is how they re discovers theyre superpowers on theyre own and James Mcaboy teach each one of them on how theye control theyre magnificent extra powers so thats why i like it so much coz James Mcaboy teach this teenage students to how they discover and control theyre superpowers is just like this other movie Chonicles that this movie is something similar to X-men:first class that,s why i like it so much coz it is how they control theyre psychik abilities that,s all like this old season of siereis of Heroes with this director Tim Crim that,s all

  16. First of all, I use to read the X-Men comics when I was a kid (back when we rode dinosaurs, hahaha). And I remember several story archs, Ultimate, Uncanny, just to name two, that changed things from the original X-Men line. And sometimes the solo adventures changed things as well. Then there was time travel. That’s got to be a bit much. So when the movies change things, I’m not too upset over it as long as they make sense and keep the overall character theme. Besides, Stan Lee was one of the executive producers. So he did bless the changes.
    Despite being a fangirl of the original comics, I still liked the movie. In fact, I liked all the X-Men movies, overall. Even though I’m not a big Bryan Singer or Halle Berry fan. But she did make Storm her own. And although I love Sir Ian, he wouldn’t have been my first choice. But I think he did an awesome job. And Patrick Stewart was the only choice for Prof. X, IMO.
    In First Class, I liked the changes to Charles and Erik’s back story. They made sense. They worked for me. And Raven’s introduction was a nice touch, too. And I thought her being jealous of the girl with the green/blue eyes Charles was coming on to was a nice touch. And when in Erik’s bed, her changing into Rebecca, also a nice touch/cameo.
    Changing the original X-Men team didn’t bother me either. I prefer Alex Summers to Scott any day. I always thought Scott was a boring character with a boring power. But it was a nice touch, by Stan, making the power always on. And they did show Scott when Charles was using Cerebro for the first time, the kid with the glasses and the baseball glove. And Storm was also one of the kids he saw through Cerebro.
    A comment on Alex being the same age as Charles, Alex seemed to be late teens early twenties, maybe, and Charles was 30. So although their ages were closer than the comics, they weren’t really that close.
    And Wolverine, nice. I liked the cameo. And they did keep with the “he could be older than you,” comment by Jean to Prof. X in the first movie. And the Origins: Wolverine. And his comment, “go f#$% yourself,” definitely something he would say. And the choice of Hugh Jackman as Wolverine didn’t bother me either, the height issue. Hugh definitely did a spot on job.
    Something that did bother me, was the same one that bothered me with the first X-Men movie. The additional villains being seen and not heard. Riptide said nothing, Toad had, what, one line. Even Azazel and Sabertooth, had so few lines.
    What I wasn’t so bothered about, that seemed to bother most other women, was the chauvinistic view of women. Angel being a stripper. Emma getting the ice for the man. I’m surprised he didn’t put his feet on her lap and tell her to massage them for him. For 1962, definitely. For 2012, no way.
    And as for the racial issues, at least they didn’t make Darwin drink from a different water fountain. That’s definately the kinds of things that happened in the 60′s and was nicely left out.
    The times they have changed.
    As for making Moira a CIA agent instead of a scientist. I’m indifferent about. Her dedication to Charles. Still there. Him wiping her mind of his location. There are drugs and torture methods. And with Striker and his hatred for mutants. If they keep him to the way I remember him from the comics, and the previous movies, I can see him torturing Moira for a location. Everyone has a breaking point. The ends justify the means. But it really wouldn’t be too hard to figure out the location. It is Charles’ property.
    Well, I can’t think of anything else that jumps out at me right now. So overall, I liked this and all the X-Men movies. And am waiting the next installments, X-Men: Days of Future Past and The Wolverine. As titled on IMDb ATT.

    • I understand your view on changes and you have some good points. but you didnt mentioned X-3 which almost all X-men fans dislike a great deal.

      For storm who is my favorite: in my opinion angela bassett would have been a perfect storm. she is a feiry actress and in most of her roles when she is annoyed or upset, it appears she would put a lightning bolt up someone’s butt.

      my main issues with the characters misplacement, is lack of continuity. Changes are good, but there is a reason why the characters are the people they have become is through their past experiences and what we as fans have seen the most, either through cartoons or comics.
      for example,

      Wolverine and sabertooth: Even if wolverine didnt know who he was, sabertooth did, nothing was wrong with his memory, therefore there shold have been some brotherly dialogue.

      Wolverine and Lady deathstrike: both had somewhat of their memories so he should have known her since he almost married her and she should have hated him since she believes he killed her father. She also had no sentences to speak in X-Men 2.

      I wont even speak on x-3- Wolverine killing Jean Grey/the Pheonix; Not in any universe.
      Just continuity, and things that make sense. I’m not a hardcore comic fan, i guess i just want to see what I grew up with. But this is just my opinion

      • They probably didn’t mention X3 because as you said “almost all X-men fans dislike a great deal.” So it’s pointless to try to compare that horrible travesty (Why Charles and Jean why?…..Phoenix I can understand cause I just wanted her dead from the time she fully formed but those two? Who’s going to find the mutants who need help through Cerebro now?) to any of the other X-men franchise movies.

        And I don’t think it was mentioned in any of the Wolverine/X-men movies that Lady Deathstrike and Wolverine knew each other in that movie universe. Plus remember Deathstrike was under Striker’s mind manipulation serum control so she wouldn’t have been able to say anything for herself.

        And yeah totally agree with you on the whole Wolverine Sabertooth part. No brotherly lines kinda made it weird but remember X-men Origins: Wolverine was made after X-men so I don’t think the writers of the X-men trilogy knew about the relationship until X-men Origins: Wolverine came out (which came out after the X3 movie did so it’s kind moot point there).

        Also I do want to this say anyways: I personally liked the First Class movie and can’t wait for the sequel.

        My favorite thing though was the relationship between Eric and Charles (and the fact that they kept the chess games continuity through all the films).

        My most hated thing: Darwin’s death. Why create a character that cool (and by cool I mean power wise) and then just kill him off so easily 10 minutes later? Just makes no sense to me. Well okay him and Hank’s appearance through all the movies (furry by the end of First Class, non-furry in X2, and then furry again by Last Stand. Make up your minds people!).

  17. Wow, this entire read is funny. Besides for X2, First Class blows every other X-Men film out of the water easily. I prefer it over X2 as well, but X2 comes in a close second.