Comments on: Writer Hired For Spider-Man 5 & 6

By: Confirmed: Marc Webb is Directing Spider-Man Reboot - Screen Rant

Confirmed: Marc Webb is Directing Spider-Man Reboot - Screen Rant — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:36:58 +0000

[...] they already had screenwriter James Vanderbilt working on scripts for the next two Spidey films (Spider-Man 5 & 6) well before Raimi and Sony parted ways. These scripts were planned to be used as a reboot if Raimi [...]

By: Story For Spider-Man Reboot Already Exists - Screen Rant

Story For Spider-Man Reboot Already Exists - Screen Rant — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:00:11 +0000

[...] Sony actually was pretty fond of Vanderbilt’s ideas however, so they hired him again to write Spider-Man 5 & 6 with with the plan that if Raimi and his cast were not to return for the 5th and 6th interconnected [...]

By: Confirmed: Spider-Man 4 Delayed - Screen Rant

Confirmed: Spider-Man 4 Delayed - Screen Rant — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:18:03 +0000

[...] Raimi and the studio should part ways and start again. We already know the scripts for Spider-Man 5 & 6 are being written in a way that would allow them to act as a franchise reboot of sorts if Raimi and [...]

By: Sam Raimi Discusses Spider-Man 4 Villains - Screen Rant

Sam Raimi Discusses Spider-Man 4 Villains - Screen Rant — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:35:39 +0000

[...] countless reports and speculation about what storylines it may follow, the start of development for Spider-Man 5 & 6, and discussions of what villains will be the focus of the fourth installment in the super [...]

By: John K.

John K. — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:37:45 +0000

I used to be as surprised as you when people were horsing slaps of metal chains on Spiderman 3 but then i saw all it`s problems, let me just say that LAURA ZISKIN AND OTHERS WHO PRODUCED @ DIRECTED THE FIRST SPIDERMAN MOVIE I CAN`T BELIEVE YOU HAD TO ALREADY USE GREEN GOBLIN IN THE FIRST ONE THAT WAS A MISERABLE MISTAKE ALSO PETER LIFTING A WHOLE BUS STOPPING A WHOLE TRAIN WT@ I CAN`T BELIEVE YOU DID ALL THESE THINGS IN THIS FRANCHISE WHY DID YOU HAVE TO DO THIS WITH SPIDERMAN WHY NOW MY FAVORITE SUPERHERO IS RUINED YOU WENT TOO CRAZY USING ANY VILLAIN YOU WANT YOU SEE THAT`S THE PROBLEM WITH STUDIOS THEY`RE NEVER AWARE TO NOT OVERDO A PLOT/THEME OF A MOVIE OR ELSE IT CAN`T CARRY ON FOR MANY OTHER MOVIES THEY`RE NEVER AWARE NOT TOO USE ANY BADDIE AT THE WRONG TIME I`M SORRY BUT THERE ARE JUST SO MANY THINGS WRONG WITH THIS FRANCHISE THAT I JUST CAN`T GET EXCITED ABOUT ANY MORE OF THESE FILMS I`M SORRY BUT I WISH THINGS WERE MORE DISCRETIONIZED AND ORGANIZED WELL IN THIS WORLD OR LOOK AT THAT IT ALL POPS OUT LIKE TARTAR SAUCE I CAN`T BELIEVE THIS FRANCHISED HAD TO GET RUINED I DON`T KNOW WHAT TO THINK I`M SORRY BUT I`M DONE WITH SPIDERMAN MOVIES EVERYTHING I LOVE GETS DEMOLISHED INTO A PILE OF ****!!!!!

By: Venom Updates: How Will It Tie Into Spider-Man Franchise? - Screen Rant

Venom Updates: How Will It Tie Into Spider-Man Franchise? - Screen Rant — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:58:28 +0000

[...] we do know about the future Spider-Man movies are that Sony hired James Vanderbilt to pen scripts for Spider-Man 5 and 6. The interesting part about the news was that the scripts would act as a franchise reboot should [...]

By: Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:57:42 +0000

HOW THE **** COULD NOBODY CARE ABOUT WAT JOHN SAID???? I HONESTLY NEVER UNDERSTOOD WHY SO MANY PEOPLE WERE SO MISERABLY LET DOWN BY SM3, YES THERE WERE BAD MOMENTS IN THEIR BUT HOW THE HELL COULD IT HAVE NOT BEEN BETTER THAN THE FIRST 2 MOVIES, YOU PEOPLE WHO TRASH SPIDERMAN 3 SAYING IT SUCKED THAT BAD ACT LIKE COMPLETE CRYBABIES, YOU JUST THINK YOU`RE SO COOL FOR GETTING FED UP OVER THIS ” TOO MANY VILLAIN” THING, HUH, WHAT JOHN K. SAID IS RIGHT, SO IF YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT A CERTAIN NUMBER OF VILLAINS ALL YOU`RE DOING IS DRIPPING THE COST OF THE ELEMENT, STOP NEEDING TO CRITICISE SPIDERMAN 3 OVER IT`S NUMBER OF VILLAIN FACTOR AND ADMIT THAT U AGREE WITH JOHN K., IF YOU DON`T CARE ABOUT HIS FIRST SENTENCE I FEEL REALLY SORRY FOR YOU, SO JUST EXCEPT THE CONCEPT INSTEAD OF BLOWING IT!!!!!!!

By: stycr

stycr — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:45:51 +0000

In consideration of every burly point of chemistry people have made over centuries, i am really surprised u just avoided what John K. said, Shamose. It seems people are mocking his opinion by not seeming to understand his statements, he just said something very important and you don`t care at all, wow, i think sometimes people get way off from being trapped in damp air of their mind configuration systemic space.

By: John K.

John K. — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:25:20 +0000

If people don`t care that they waited sooner to see Spiderman face a bigger challenge in SM3 than an easier challenge in SM4 then they`re really not helping themselves, sometime they`re going to see it in the future that they feel disappointed they couldn`t care, and somehow even if he has brutality somehow they can still keep the glace at PG-13, it doesn`t have to be THAT violent, it`s ok if they tone him down, but no maybe i`m not sure if i can actually say i have hope for him to be in the movie, they`re already writing the screen, and i think people are way too intimidated by this whole number-of-villain issue, many movies have made it work, if they are set and and/or have a relationship together and if they have enough time too make a balanced organized script and take as long as they need to make the villains work on screen then why are people so worried, i think it was just a bit-too-early for him to face 3 villains in one film, maybe that was the problem. How could it please u guys if spiderman doesn`t face as big of a challenge in this one than the last one, i think we should just face it, there`s no way to consolidate this frachise into shape because there are many mistakes that they made like putting Green Goblin already in the first film and there are other problems such as Tobey Maguire looking alot like Spiderman but being too old to pen the role, i just don`t know what to say or think.

By: Shamose

Shamose — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:52:47 +0000

no need for vernacular and poor grammar kids, if you arent happy with the sequels tn dont watch them, pretty simple really.

Carnage NEEDS brutality and violence, following wolverines lack of either I dare say carnage wouldnt work so they should definitely leave him out of the big screen.

By: Rogers

Rogers — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:54:48 +0000

And Spiderman 5 and 6? ARE YOU SLOGGING ME??? If they do more than 4 of these films i`m going straight under the sag of their high railings, come on, the third movie was such a piece of ****, doing more than 4 Spidermans will only make this franchise worse, and what the hell was that **** moment in sm3 where Peter was straying down the street thinking he`s so cool with his black suit, that just didn`t didn`t maKE sense, I SWEAR, I MIGHT SUE THEM FOR THAT ONE CRAPPY MOMENT IN SM3 MAKING THE MOVIE LOOKING LIKE SIDEPLACE OF NIGRO, THAT WAS JUST RIDICULOUS!!! And wat is this “Venom spinoff” idea, that doesn`t sound like a good idea at all, COME ON, IF THEY DO A VENOM FILM, I`M GOONA STRIKE THEM WITH A *****!!!

By: stycr

stycr — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:59:46 +0000

doesn`t anybody agree with John?

By: Rob Keyes

Rob Keyes — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:52:19 +0000

Hey all,

Bruce Campbell to have “Major Role” in Spidey 4 and many speculate that means he could play a villain.

http://screenrant.com/bruce-campbell-spiderman-4-villain-rob-25476/

Any guess as to who?

By: Bruce Campbell as a Spider-Man 4 Villain? - Screen Rant

Bruce Campbell as a Spider-Man 4 Villain? - Screen Rant — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:50:11 +0000

[...] Tags: spider-man 4 Recent Related Items:Writer Hired For Spider-Man 5 & 6 [...]

By: John K.

John K. — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:21:37 +0000

HEY, I`M SERIOUS, SONY IF YOU DO MORE THAN 4 SPIDERMAN`S I WILL BE REALLY INFURIATED USE VENOM, CARNAGE, AND LIZARD CARACTERS IN THIS ONE AND THAT`S THE FInal FILM AND THAT`S IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT`S BEST TO TRY WHAT CAN FIX UP SOMETHING, SO ENOUGH SAID FOR SM4!!!!

By: Rogers

Rogers — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:53:02 +0000

Hey, who said give Spidey a child in Sm4? WHAT, ARE YOU SERIOUS THEY`RE GOING TO MAKE pTER AND MJ GET MARRIED AND HAVE A CHILD THAt quickly, WTH! THAT`S ZIPPING ON 2 FAST, MARVEL YOU`RE WRONGH U CAN`T MAKE THAT DECISION TOO FAST R U CRAZY CANCEL THAT FROM THE SM4 SCRIPT PLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!

By: John

John — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:38:20 +0000

Those won`t give Spidey harder than 3, seriously

By: Shamose

Shamose — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:28:26 +0000

Electro yes. Molten man no.

Hobgoblin, Lizard, vultue, morbius, kraven and electro are my picks

Hobgobln could work like Joker in TDK, dont give him a backstory just have him find normans old goblin stash and just have him in costume for the whole film.The goblins are by far spidermans most fierce opponenets

By: michael

michael — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:53:09 +0000

the molten man and electro should be picked as possible villians for spiderman 3&4,they will make very fine choice’s

By: John K.

John K. — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:23:13 +0000

I`m honestly sick of hearing this “too many villain” opinion gossip, if u go down to 1 or 2 villains all that is is an easier take for Spiderman, and i couldn`t be surprised it worked for TDK, but i`ve seen Superman 2 work ok with 3 villains, and superman was a much harder franchise to shoot than Spiderman. Any amount of villains can work if there`s a great script and if they take as long as they need to make each villain work. SM3 only failed because they didn`t have enough time or that the movie wasn`t long enough. I really don`t see why people accuse S3 over it`s “number of villains” or “length”. What would be so wrong with using lots of villains once in a while, there`s plenty of time in about 2 hrs. and 15 min. to get each villain fighting Spiderman if you take as long as you need. It`s just each of the villain`s screentime gets sacrificed. But it doesn`t matter depending how well they`re all built up together, and in S3 Spiderman was only facing one villain at a time until the end. So the” number of villains” in 3 pretty much equaled 2 villains, if they couldn`t even handle 2 villains in a SM film i`d be so confused and really angered, also what was interesting about SM3 is that none of those villains had a relationship with eachother, so wen u have 3 villains with nothing in common except that they`re all extreme it should be cool how they`re all mixed in, you know. Probably the reason why 2 of them team up is because spiderman already took them down 1 at a time, hencing how u can make them have a believable relationship there. Also the “length” i feel is such a tiny thing to complain about it`s not even worth explaining why. But seriously, this franchise is completely messed up. I don`t know about doing more than 4 movies guys, Lots of the good villains were used too early, like the Green Goblin. Green Goblin shouldn`t have stopped waiting until Spiderman 3, also the Lizard? I think it`s much late to bring his story in, i actually think that part 2 would`ve been the right time for Lizard. But it doesn`t really matter cuz all SMs have still sucked, and for the ones who disagree about 2, the film just wasn`t action-packed. So the only way to make this franchise right is if Spidey and Venom team up against Carnage/Lizard, that`s the way the franchise is supposed to go, now WHy do we need to change that? villains like Shocker, Rhino, Vulture, the “classic” comic book villains would be too ordinary for the trail of the series, and it`s the only way to have a bigger challenge than Sandman and Venom, but they`re probably not going to do that cuz they`re already writing the script, i don`t know what to say guys, there are many problems that consist from the beginning of this franchise.