‘World War Z’ May Be The First In A Trilogy

Published 2 years ago by , Updated September 18th, 2012 at 8:31 am,

world war z movie World War Z May Be The First In A Trilogy

Paramount Pictures’ adaptation of Max Brooks’ popular allegorical zombie novel, World War Z, has attracted its fair share of controversy due to a handful of issues – including, plans for the $125 million project to be Rated PG-13 and the substantial narrative differences between Brooks’ book and its cinematic counterpart.

Today, we have another piece of World War Z-related news that is also bound to be divisive; it turns out that the Brad Pitt-starring movie could kick off a new trilogy of zombpocalyptic flicks.

The LA Times is reporting that Paramount executives and World War Z helmer Marc Forster view the project as the first in three flicks which would blend “the grounded, gun-metal realism of [the Jason Bourne series with] the unsettling end-times vibe of AMC’s The Walking Dead.” The publication also compares the first WWZ film to Steven Soderbergh’s Contagion, with regards to its “geo-political bent” and how it functions as part social commentary, part Hollywood blockbuster.

Here is an official plot synopsis for the World War Z movie:

The story revolves around United Nations employee Gerry Lane (Pitt), who traverses the world in a race against time to stop the Zombie pandemic that is toppling armies and governments and threatening to decimate humanity itself.

As was noted in our WWZ movie vs. book breakdown, it sounds as though Forster’s adaptation basically abandons the narrative structure of Brooks’ source material, in favor of a more generic reluctant-hero-saves-the-world thriller (ex. Armageddon, The Day After Tomorrow, etc.). While there have been entertaining films of that ilk released in the past, the storyline departure has understandably left many WWZ novel fans frustrated.

Brad Pitt on the set of 'World War Z'

Hollywood’s love affair with franchises has (in all honestly) been going on for almost the entirety of its existence. All the same, there’s been an observable increase in the number of titles manufactured to immediately lend themselves to a sequel (or more) in recent years.

Sometimes, those attempts pay off handsomely (see: Sherlock Holmes) while other times those films seem to suffer from being pre-packaged as the first installment in a new movie property (see: Green Lantern). Upcoming new spins on old ideas, including titles such as Snow White and the Huntsman and The Amazing Spider-Man, are likewise hoping to prove lucrative enough to inspire multiple followups.

That’s all to say: with its familiarly dark and gritty tone, traditional blockbuster plotline, and built-in sequel(s) potential, World War Z reads as being as ordinary a Hollywood blockbuster as any being made nowadays. Whether or not it will ultimately be any good, though, remains to be seen.

Look for World War Z to lumber into theaters around the U.S. on December 21st, 2012.

Source: LA Times

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: world war z

55 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. If it is going to be a trilogy….I hope Brad Pitt stays on as the main actor! Saw it yesterday it was great. Worth going to see!

    • I saw it today and thought it was very good it keeps you on the edge of your seat from start to finish.i do hope they do a sequal and hope brad stars in that one also…..

  2. Perhaps I can hope for a reboot of this title.

    We might get a version where the next director tries something edgy, like actually trying to echo the book’s structure and features in a meaningful way.

    This movie had little of the distinctiveness of the book. One exceptional bit was the discussion of North Korea. This specific moment involved no effects budget, but was deeply evocative of a world facing horror and how one might respond. I did like that passing moment of world building.

  3. I had the pleasure of seeing an almost original hollywood movie this evening. I must say so far it was the most entertaining movie I’ve seen this summer. However the only downside to this movie was indeed the fact that the zombies were not what l had expected. Well they weren’t your typical human meateating living dead. That was kind of a set back and that was what would’ve made this adaption of zombie horror complete. However I must say, that it didn’t take much away from the movie itself. It was still exciting and entertaining to watch and l enjoyed it. I hope that the sequel will be a step up and hope that they began the next phase of zombie-izm.

    • that WAS the next phase of what u said since evolution required the same malady to exist.

  4. decimate means 1 in 10… not really impressive zombies.

  5. it is not castrophic if an asset is there to respond and act selflessly.

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

Be Social, Follow Us!!