Financiers Could Make ‘World War Z’ Undead at Paramount

Published 4 years ago by

world war z movie Financiers Could Make World War Z Undead at Paramount
Last week, it was reported that Paramount might be in a bit of a bind with their upcoming adaptation of World War Z. The studio’s interest in the project has remained steadfast since they acquired the screen rights to Max Brooks’ post-apocalyptic horror novel back in 2006 – but the film’s projected $125 million price tag is evidently a burden that they can no longer bear on their own.

Paramount revealed that they might be forced to pull the plug on World War Z if they failed to lock down additional financing for the production. Fortunately, it looks like comparisons to the recent At The Mountains of Madness debacle can be put to rest. Even with its intimidating budget, World War Z probably remains a very attractive business proposition.

It has Brad Pitt – one of the biggest movie stars in the world – attached to star (his production company Plan B is also producing) and director Marc Forster (Quantum of Solace) ready to call the shots. It also has a script that’s been generating extremely positive buzz within the industry for several years – and the added allure of a demographic-pleasing PG-13 rating. So it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that Paramount has already found several financiers who might be ready to step in and save the day.

According to Deadline, the studio is currently having serious discussions with David Ellison’s Skydance Productions and two other unnamed investors. Skydance previously partnered with Paramount to co-finance True Grit and Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol.  If all goes well, World War Z could finally go before cameras as early as June.

Deadline mentions that because of the film’s many delays, there is now a considerable amount of similarly-themed competition hitting the big screen over the next few years – including Warm Bodies, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, The Kitchen Sink, Resident Evil 5, as well as the oft-rumored follow-up to Zombieland, and another 28 Days Later sequel (and that’s just naming a few).

Will the over-saturation of zombies in pop-culture leave audiences disinterested in World War Z by the time it rolls around? As a huge fan of the book, I really don’t think that the filmmakers have anything to worry about.

World War Z movie with Brad Pitt Financiers Could Make World War Z Undead at Paramount

The novel features a series of interviews conducted by an agent of the United Nations Postwar Commission and, through the individual accounts of the participants, it charts the history of mankind’s war against the undead as well as how civilization was rebuilt in the aftermath. That format might not seem particularly conducive to a film adaptation, but J. Michael Straczynski’s original script was extremely faithful to the book. He kept the structure intact, but chose to make the interviewer (Pitt) World War Z’s main character. Brooks praised Straczynski’s take on the material and admitted that his approach really tied everything together.

I know that many fans don’t like the idea of centering the story around the interviewer, but I have to disagree. I actually really enjoy the idea of focusing on one guy who starts to get a sense of the larger picture by connecting the dots of all these separate stories. I’m sure there are many of you who believe that a series of vignettes would work just as well, or that a faux documentary format would be more appropriate – but in my opinion, that’s just not as interesting thematically.

I think watching how these interviews begin to affect Pitt’s character and his point of view on the war will be just as important to the film as the stories themselves. At one point, Forster compared the film to All The President’s Men and if you’re familiar with that movie (or the non-fiction book it was based on), I think you might be able to see the potential in presenting World War Z in that context.

I don’t find the PG-13 rating to be quite as encouraging, but if The Walking Dead can push the limits of what’s acceptable on television – perhaps World War Z will still be able to surprise us as well.

Source: Deadline

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. A zombie movie cannot be PG-13.

    As for The Walking Dead, it has Frank Darabont, it airs on AMC, and I don’t know how they get away with a TV-14 rating but that is a TV show, not a movie.

    For the past decade, TV has become better on cable and movies have become to PC.

    • And when it was first announced, many were skeptical that TWD would work on that channel and thought it would be better suited to a network like HBO or Showtime.

      Obviously it’s a show and not a movie. I was only using at as an example of a zombie story that was able to hold its own despite its limitations.

  2. Man, I hope they do this up in a BIG way! The book was off the charts crazy. I’m looking fwd to this.

  3. Worried that they will not be able to get the book into a movie. There’s a lot of people who were “interviewed” and I’m worried about a 2 hour movie leaving too much out. The book delt with more then the obvious “what did you do when the zombies took over and how did you suvive.” The economics of the country, and trying to find a “cure” came into play. Not to mention the political aspects of the rebuilding and trying to maintain order. I dunno they may have it all figured out and there is nothing to worry about. Although I think the troops in Yonkers thought the same way….

  4. The best thing they could have done is do something like a 10 Part series with a 14A rating. Band of Brothers was great and focused on many parts of the war and this book has many layers to it, many perspectives and cannot be told in 2 hours. 10 1hr parts would be great and do it justice. But PG-13? Maybe if you find Twilight gory and scary you would like it.

  5. Yeah , im glad they are still moving forward with this movie, its a great book , and like many books today id rather see them get the Hbo mini series treatment, that way they can fit more into it, but MJS is an amazing writer and I do like the idea of the sindle interviewer and putting the story together from that prespective should be intresting and it is something different from the way we usally see zombie movies, and with the overly saturated market with zombies, this will be a good way to seperate its self from the “herd”

    • Don’t you mean “Hoard” lol