• Great movie if you dont know much about the "real" xmen history and storyline. It is without a doubt supercool and has plenty of badass action sequences along with some "science" thrown in to make it all come together.

    I read up a little on the history of the x-men via wikipedia after seeing this movie, and Im sure to hardcore fans the movie was irritating.
  • Foopher
    I liked the movie, but i thought the part where he cuts down the fire escape was a little corny. But it was still good
  • GUNSMITH
    IF YOU HAVE A DIFFRENT DIRECTOR FOR WOLVERINE 2-ZACK SNYDER ZACK SNYDER ZACK SNYDER ZACK SNYDER ZACK SNYDER
  • james
    I loved this movie compared to the previous 3 x-men movies.
  • Jonesy
    To all those who keep commenting on Ryan Reynolds playing Wade Wilson and then weapon XI, he DID NOT play weapon XI in this movie. It was played by Scott Adkins.
    Here:
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458525/fullcredits...
  • Michael
    GREAT MOVIE
  • not surprisingly, i found myself wanting more of Ryan Reynolds being himself... his presence in any movie makes it automatically funnier / more entertaining
  • John "Kahless" Taylor
    @Andy S
    I think it is a definite that a sequel will happen, especially after one of the special endings and the stellar gross.
  • Andy S
    Ok, I realize that this is a little late, but I FINALLY saw Wolverine today and I absolutely loved it. I give it a 4 out of 5. I thought Jackman was, again, awesome as Wolverine. I thought they did a great job of keeping the movie within the continuity of the films (not the comics). There were a couple of over-the-top scenes (the aforementioned gun reload-then again, that might be his mutant ability-manipulating firearms?), but I really enjoyed this movie and I thought the action sequences were fantastic.

    Now bear in mind I am NOT a reader of the X-men comics, so I don't know everything there is to know about the characters as some on this board do. However, I think they did a pretty good job of explaining why Wolverine doesn't remember Scott or any of the other mutants.

    I enjoyed it so much, I might end up seeing it again next week during a matinee. I will definitely be buying the DVD (or Blu-Ray if I have a player by then). I'm just hoping for a Wolverine II....
  • Daniel F
    I liked Tropic Thunder while I don't agree that it's a 5/5 I do agree that it did what it set out to do a lot better than Wolverine did what he was suppose to. I think the film was ok it was entertaining enough, but lets face it the movie couldn't even keep continuity of it's on film franchise. I'll forget how it related to the comics and talk about what should bother everyone. The CGI had a lot of bad moments. The changes to claws look awful. The previous x films did a much better job at the animantium bonding scenes than the origins movie did.The narrative had a lot of issues as did the plot. There was to much happening that it never really stopped to tell a story. One of my biggest issues is that it had to many plot holes. Normally I hate that term because usually I consider plot holes to mean the person watching it wasn't paying attention. The majority of plot holes usually aren't really there it's just the viewer not understanding what happened. However Wolverine has real actual plot holes. Complete lacks in logic. Most focusing around the fake death of Silver fox and the magic bullet.
  • Ken J
    @ Daniel

    Regarding Equilibrium feeling like a B movie... well, it WAS a B movie... lol
  • John "Kahless" Taylor
    I, too, enjoyed Tropic Thunder. I wouldn't give it 5/5 but a definite 4/5. Robert Downey Jr. is just amazing.
  • @Gingerbeer

    What can I say? I thought Tropic Thunder was hysterically funny and did what it set out to do. This film did have problems, but I enjoyed it as a popcorn flick.

    Vic
  • Gingerbeer
    I thought it was great, IMO better than all three Xmen movies (garbage) put together... I agree they changed some things, like deadpool, but what they did change worked and i throughly enjoyed it...

    I'm shocked at your 3/5 review, considering you gave films like tropic thunder a 5/5....
  • @Taylor

    Well I did say "one of." :-P

    I guess I should have said "mainstream" or "well known."

    Vic
  • Daniel F
    Sorry guys for another post just noticed the talking about Equilibrium had to say I loved that movie. I loved the idea behind it. The action was fairly cool and I really liked the idea. Good story though at times it started to feel like a B movie. I think with a better budget and a little more attention to detail that movie could of been huge and amazing. A good film that had so much potential.
  • Daniel F
    My dislike for the orignial doesn't have much to do with the bad special effects or sets that's to be expected from it's budget and time period. I hated the corny stories and ridiculous plot points. I also think that Will Shatnar is the worst actor to make it to the mainstream in the last 50 years. I think that Paris Hilton has more talent and I'm not exaggerating I truly believe that. I never liked the 60's Batman show or the Original Star Trek for pretty much the exact same reasons. They were very cheesy and riddled with bad acting. TNG had the most amazing cast and took it's self seriously it wasn't just a big joke. I loved that.

    JC in Chicago See I've seen more things from JJ and haven't liked any of it. I mean I can't think of many popular TV shows that I hate more than lost. It's one ridiculous plot device after another. The show started with a semi interesting idea a dramatized version of Gilligans island and they turned it in to this weird show lacking anything similar to logic that takes 4 years to explain even the smallest of plot points. Cloverfield was horrible as well the acting was the only strong point in that movie. The big reveal of the monster was disappointing. I was so hyped for that film and let down in a big way. The monster could of at least looked semi cool. Then there was all those over grown spider monkeys and it was just bad. I think there was about 5 min in the film that I wasn't rolling my eyes. I thought Fringe was promising and I enjoyed it for about 4 episodes and lost all interest. Joshua Jackson was the only thing good about that show after awhile and I really couldn't care about the main chick at all. Don't even get me started on Felicity. Alias was just a typical "Lets make a bad ass female character" story. Get an attractive girl and make her kick ass. I never understood the popularity of that genre (for lack of a better term). I will admit I kind of liked Joy Ride.
  • Taylor
    oh and Ken... god i loved Equilibrium, for all of its stupidity. And yes, those reloads were insane, the way the pistols realign in a straight line to be concealed and everything... sick.
  • Taylor
    Vic, you mentioned Wolverine being one of the most brutal super heroes ever... i think we're forgetting Rorschach a little too early.
  • Quicksilver
    well, i think some of the bloggers in here already know my take on the wolverine movie, as a result of reading some of the stuff i have been saying about past superhero flicks. Obviously, people who are not fans/fanatics when it comes to the comics, would enjoy the flick. I think some of you had good arguments as to why the movie smelled, therefore i don't have to mention the main reason as to why the movie should have been rated a 2.5 (because they did not follow the comic...not even a little bit). Maybe later.
  • Ken J
    Oh hey Vic, I forgot to mention this, but seeing the movie, I saw the reload thing with Agent X...

    LMAO!!! I laughed out loud in the theater when that happened!! I can't believe there were some ooohs, aahs, and whoas in the audience, seriously, I don't think you need to be familiar with weapons to realize how dumb that was...

    The best unrealistic reload of dual wield handguns was in Equilibrium. That was freakin awesome, lol.
  • Guys, I saw Star Trek already.

    The original series is my favorite, but you have to remember I was watching it 30 years ago when VFX weren't great. I still love it for the stories and the character relationships. While I loved TNG when it came out, looking back it's just too politically correct - which is something I abhor.

    Vic
  • JC in Chicago
    John,
    Not to take the tongue out of your cheek, but-because the thought of "converting" a black man is anathema and the epitomy (sp?) of racism.

    On another topic, note how quickly the Wolverine thread lasted before we meandered to Trek and Terminator...it's the biggest way to tell this movie was a fan flop.
  • John "Kahless" Taylor
    @JC in Chicago
    Why it gotta be black??!! See, that's what's wrong with this country...always coming down on the black man!!! It's the imperialistic and capitalistic society that's holding back the black brotha's!!! We didn't land on Plymouth Rock, Plymouth Rock landed on us!!!

    Sorry..couldn't help myself. 8-)
  • JC in Chicago
    What I hope is NOT in JJ Abram's Star Trek:

    * Kirk facing the camera at the end of the movie, with starry eyes, reciting platitudes about love or truth or the human race.

    * Furthering the ridiculous habit of "humanizing" alien characters. This is so opposite of Roddenberry's vision of a multicultural future. This trying to prove that Vulcans (-or androids or changelings or holo doctors) are "human" is like...I don't know, trying to make a black man more pale or something.
  • JC in Chicago
    Daniel, finally someone who I agree with on this bit of Trek heresy:

    >>while I’m a semi trek fan I never liked the original show I thought it was horrible I only liked TNG and DS9.<<

    I was a very young sci fi fan when Star Trek aired. I couldn't handle the corny fake styrofoam sets or the melodrama. Okay, it was watchable but I [rolled eyes] a lot.

    I could tolerate Voyager & Enterprise also.

    Since "Star Trek Zero" never caught on, I'm calling this "JJ Abrams' Star Trek." I've only seen his LOST and Cloverfield, and am impressed by both. I hope JJ resurrects the franchise by scrapping all but the *spirit* of the original series.
  • John "Kahless" Taylor
    @Vic
    Does this mean you already saw Trek?

    I saw Wolvie this weekend and I did enjoy it. Theres no need for me to go into the flaws, as Rob, I think, was spot on. I would probably give it 3.5 (maybe even 4) out of 5. Come to think of it, 3.5 would be my rating. Agent Zero's gun play was outrageous but it was a comicbook movie, so I took it as such. Me and my boys really enjoyed the acrobatics and I was never bored. Too bad they didn't make an R-rated version to show just how beserk Wolvie can be.
  • Gambit
    So. First off, I have always hated Star Trek. Always. I’ve given it many chances, watched different episodes of every series, watched most movies. Really can’t get into it. This one however, I am excitied about. Like haven’t been this excited for a movie in forever, aside from Wolverine (which was amazing once again). Zachary Quinto as Spock - Perfect casting. Despite never enjoying star trek, Spock was always cool. And the scene in the preview when Kirk introduces himself to McCoy as “Jim Kirk” blows my mind. Not really sure why, cause like i said, not a trek fan and it was far from the coolest scene in the preview. Just something about that moment made me think, this is going to be one of the best movies of the year.

    And also, Christian Bale as John Connor. Going to be sick. Something else I just can't wait for. Going to be the best Terminator flick to date...at least i hope so. I can't see myself being disapointed with it, but anythings possible. My biggest worry is my expectations getting too high and winding up being disapointed that a great film was only great and not spectacular.
  • Daniel F
    Vic Star Trek is one of the films i'm unsure of. The Trailers look great and the cast seems to be great, but while I'm a semi trek fan I never liked the original show I thought it was horrible I only liked TNG and DS9. Also there is the matter of JJ I'm not generally a fan of his work. Off the top of my head I can't think of anything he has done that I am a fan of though I'm sure there is something and I'm just missing it right now.

    Positives for Trek are one I like Trek in general, the trailers look great, and the cast is good.

    Negatives are JJ, it's based on the original and then the random factor that even something with a good trailer can suck.

    Terminator is the film I'm looking forward to more than anything this year.
  • jago
    @VIC
    28 days later looked sooooo good in the trailer and lots of people were giving it good reviews... "tv based" that is... didn't use the internet to really find out... and i mean if it weren't for this big breasted lady sitting kind of under me where i was able to catch a peek of something that was more interesting... i would have walked out of a movie theater for the first time in my life. So star trek... eventhough the trailers are extremely awesome... just based on the show and cloverfield i'm going in with very low expectations which hopefully it will be as good as they say to those who are not a fan of the show.
blog comments powered by Disqus