<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolverine Reshoots = More Trouble?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah Hex Reshoots Underway - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-174346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah Hex Reshoots Underway - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-174346</guid>
		<description>[...] for the reshoots, much like when Superman director Richard Donner was allegedly brought in to “consult” for Wolverine director Gavin Hood during reshoots on that film (and we all know how Wolverine turned [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the reshoots, much like when Superman director Richard Donner was allegedly brought in to “consult” for Wolverine director Gavin Hood during reshoots on that film (and we all know how Wolverine turned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Brad Pitt In Guy Ritchie&#8217;s Sherlock Holmes? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-121141</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Brad Pitt In Guy Ritchie&#8217;s Sherlock Holmes? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-121141</guid>
		<description>[...] tentpole film is in trouble, and the last time something like this happened with a major movie it was with Wolverine, and we all know how THAT film turned [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tentpole film is in trouble, and the last time something like this happened with a major movie it was with Wolverine, and we all know how THAT film turned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolverine Re-Shoots = More Deadpool? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-59565</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolverine Re-Shoots = More Deadpool? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-59565</guid>
		<description>[...] to IESB, the recent new Wolverine movie reshoots consisted mainly of additional scenes between Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) and Deadpool (Ryan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to IESB, the recent new Wolverine movie reshoots consisted mainly of additional scenes between Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) and Deadpool (Ryan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolverine Re-Shoots = More Deadpool? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-59566</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolverine Re-Shoots = More Deadpool? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-59566</guid>
		<description>[...] to IESB, the recent new Wolverine movie reshoots consisted mainly of additional scenes between Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) and Deadpool (Ryan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to IESB, the recent new Wolverine movie reshoots consisted mainly of additional scenes between Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) and Deadpool (Ryan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JessSayin'</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-59198</link>
		<dc:creator>JessSayin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-59198</guid>
		<description>@Vic,

Thanks for the &#039;facts&#039; I was referring to..
I stand corrected.

&quot;Yours is the superior intellect&quot;
-Wrath of Khan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vic,</p>
<p>Thanks for the &#8216;facts&#8217; I was referring to..<br />
I stand corrected.</p>
<p>&#8220;Yours is the superior intellect&#8221;<br />
-Wrath of Khan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-59122</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-59122</guid>
		<description>@Zipper Stevens and Ken j,

Clooney manages to balance his career. He makes one for himself and another for the studio. 
The movies he makes that don&#039;t tend to make money are :
a) quite cheap
b) awards films that get enough critical kudos to make them profitable on DVD or abroad. 

A perfect example would be Good Night, Good Luck. It only grossed about $30 million - but it only cost about $10 million to produce. Good for everyone involved.

That clear it up?

Niall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zipper Stevens and Ken j,</p>
<p>Clooney manages to balance his career. He makes one for himself and another for the studio.<br />
The movies he makes that don&#8217;t tend to make money are :<br />
a) quite cheap<br />
b) awards films that get enough critical kudos to make them profitable on DVD or abroad. </p>
<p>A perfect example would be Good Night, Good Luck. It only grossed about $30 million &#8211; but it only cost about $10 million to produce. Good for everyone involved.</p>
<p>That clear it up?</p>
<p>Niall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-59024</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-59024</guid>
		<description>George Clooney, lol. The only place where he&#039;s a big star is in his overly inflated head...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Clooney, lol. The only place where he&#8217;s a big star is in his overly inflated head&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zipper Stevens</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-58966</link>
		<dc:creator>Zipper Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58966</guid>
		<description>@ Niall:

Good follow up.  But, couldn&#039;t you say the same thing about George Clooney?  I think he&#039;s had a few tankers but still makes movies.  If three strikes is true, then some actors are immune to it...

@Joshi:

True about the albatross.  And like it, someone at FOX has killed theirs... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Niall:</p>
<p>Good follow up.  But, couldn&#8217;t you say the same thing about George Clooney?  I think he&#8217;s had a few tankers but still makes movies.  If three strikes is true, then some actors are immune to it&#8230;</p>
<p>@Joshi:</p>
<p>True about the albatross.  And like it, someone at FOX has killed theirs&#8230; <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-58849</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58849</guid>
		<description>I bet Jackman  would love to have a hit that isnt connected to the X-Men franchise.
But if Wolverince succeeds I am sure he will take it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet Jackman  would love to have a hit that isnt connected to the X-Men franchise.<br />
But if Wolverince succeeds I am sure he will take it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silvereagle</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-58837</link>
		<dc:creator>Silvereagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58837</guid>
		<description>Wow! FOX is giving Wolverine&#039;s mutant healing factor a really good workout! He may even not survive at all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! FOX is giving Wolverine&#8217;s mutant healing factor a really good workout! He may even not survive at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keyes</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-58836</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58836</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true, I love Jackman, but his non X-films have all done poorly.

I really liked Swordfish personally at the time though. Oh, and I loved The Prestige - but that was an ensemble cast.

That&#039;s probably a big reason why they did things like throw in Gambit into Wolverine.

If Wolverine does well, there will be two sequels to it and even if the story is horrid (very likely with Fox), it will still bring in loads of $$$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true, I love Jackman, but his non X-films have all done poorly.</p>
<p>I really liked Swordfish personally at the time though. Oh, and I loved The Prestige &#8211; but that was an ensemble cast.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s probably a big reason why they did things like throw in Gambit into Wolverine.</p>
<p>If Wolverine does well, there will be two sequels to it and even if the story is horrid (very likely with Fox), it will still bring in loads of $$$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INK</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-2/#comment-58829</link>
		<dc:creator>INK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58829</guid>
		<description>@Niall

Perhaps it is not so much him as an actor but his decision making process in the lead roles he accepts. The movies you mentioned above held absolutely no interest for me when i saw the trailer and it had nothing to do with the lead actor.

There are only a hand full of actors/actresses that based on them being in the movie alone, I go and see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Niall</p>
<p>Perhaps it is not so much him as an actor but his decision making process in the lead roles he accepts. The movies you mentioned above held absolutely no interest for me when i saw the trailer and it had nothing to do with the lead actor.</p>
<p>There are only a hand full of actors/actresses that based on them being in the movie alone, I go and see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshi</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-1/#comment-58824</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58824</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, he isn&#039;t a leading man, the only movie off the top of my head that I can remember him being a leading man in was Snakes on a Plane, everything else he usually shares billing with someone else or, as you say, plays the side kick, but I would say he&#039;s a star in his own right, and I&#039;d say Jackman, while not as big, is also a star in his own right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, he isn&#8217;t a leading man, the only movie off the top of my head that I can remember him being a leading man in was Snakes on a Plane, everything else he usually shares billing with someone else or, as you say, plays the side kick, but I would say he&#8217;s a star in his own right, and I&#8217;d say Jackman, while not as big, is also a star in his own right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-1/#comment-58822</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58822</guid>
		<description>@ Joshi

I&#039;d say that Sam Jackson is an actor and not a leading man. He&#039;s often the sidekick or the supporting actor - not the star. That&#039;s not to say he&#039;s never top billed though (or been the lead).

@ Vic,

I agree - contrary to what people now seem to believe following these Wolverine articles, I am a Jackman fan and I&#039;ve pretty much seen all his stuff on the bigscreen. Even Someone like You!

However, at some point people will stop paying him top dollar once his movies have some sort of low grossing pattern.

Niall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Joshi</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that Sam Jackson is an actor and not a leading man. He&#8217;s often the sidekick or the supporting actor &#8211; not the star. That&#8217;s not to say he&#8217;s never top billed though (or been the lead).</p>
<p>@ Vic,</p>
<p>I agree &#8211; contrary to what people now seem to believe following these Wolverine articles, I am a Jackman fan and I&#8217;ve pretty much seen all his stuff on the bigscreen. Even Someone like You!</p>
<p>However, at some point people will stop paying him top dollar once his movies have some sort of low grossing pattern.</p>
<p>Niall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-1/#comment-58818</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58818</guid>
		<description>@Niall

Thanks for clearing that up. I find it interesting that Jackman (who I hear is a REALLY nice guy) is so popular yet the non-Wolverine movies he appears in don&#039;t seem to reflect that.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Niall</p>
<p>Thanks for clearing that up. I find it interesting that Jackman (who I hear is a REALLY nice guy) is so popular yet the non-Wolverine movies he appears in don&#8217;t seem to reflect that.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshi</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-1/#comment-58817</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58817</guid>
		<description>One could argue the same about Sam Jackson and there&#039;s no doubt he&#039;s a successful actor. Frankly, as long as studios keep paying Jackman money to appear in movies, he&#039;s a success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could argue the same about Sam Jackson and there&#8217;s no doubt he&#8217;s a successful actor. Frankly, as long as studios keep paying Jackman money to appear in movies, he&#8217;s a success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-1/#comment-58816</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58816</guid>
		<description>RE: &quot;teetering on life support”

Going by the three strike rule in Hollywood - The Fountain grossed $10 million, Deception grossed $4.5 and Australia eeked out $48 since it was released (from a $130 mil + budget)They&#039;re all US grosses.

I&#039;d say that Jackman needs Wolverine if he wants to be seen as bankable. In fact, as much as I like him he has never really headlined a major hit on his own.Van Hesling is the closest and that limped tp $120 million and was pretty much sold on concept and not the star.

I hope that clears up the  &quot;teetering on life support” comment.

Niall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: &#8220;teetering on life support”</p>
<p>Going by the three strike rule in Hollywood &#8211; The Fountain grossed $10 million, Deception grossed $4.5 and Australia eeked out $48 since it was released (from a $130 mil + budget)They&#8217;re all US grosses.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that Jackman needs Wolverine if he wants to be seen as bankable. In fact, as much as I like him he has never really headlined a major hit on his own.Van Hesling is the closest and that limped tp $120 million and was pretty much sold on concept and not the star.</p>
<p>I hope that clears up the  &#8220;teetering on life support” comment.</p>
<p>Niall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-1/#comment-58805</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58805</guid>
		<description>@Zipper

Yeah, I thought that was a bit over the top... probably should have snipped that line out before publishing the post.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zipper</p>
<p>Yeah, I thought that was a bit over the top&#8230; probably should have snipped that line out before publishing the post.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshi</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-1/#comment-58803</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58803</guid>
		<description>Way I remember it, albatross was a ship&#039;s good luck,&#039;til some idiot killed it.

But it&#039;s true, granted, some people didn&#039;t like Australia, but there&#039;s no doubt his career is doing fine, he may not be A-List, but he&#039;s a decent actor who never seems to be out of luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way I remember it, albatross was a ship&#8217;s good luck,&#8217;til some idiot killed it.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s true, granted, some people didn&#8217;t like Australia, but there&#8217;s no doubt his career is doing fine, he may not be A-List, but he&#8217;s a decent actor who never seems to be out of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zipper Stevens</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-reshoots-trouble-niall-5059/comment-page-1/#comment-58799</link>
		<dc:creator>Zipper Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5059#comment-58799</guid>
		<description>Serious question:  How is Jackman&#039;s career &quot;teetering on life support&quot;?  I&#039;m no huge fan of his and I haven&#039;t seen any of his non-x related work, but the guy seems to be steadily employed, making the talk show rounds, and on the cover of a magazine or two.  Yes, FOX has become an albatross to their own name, but that isn&#039;t killing HJ&#039;s career. Wolverine may very well tank but I bet he still gets work afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serious question:  How is Jackman&#8217;s career &#8220;teetering on life support&#8221;?  I&#8217;m no huge fan of his and I haven&#8217;t seen any of his non-x related work, but the guy seems to be steadily employed, making the talk show rounds, and on the cover of a magazine or two.  Yes, FOX has become an albatross to their own name, but that isn&#8217;t killing HJ&#8217;s career. Wolverine may very well tank but I bet he still gets work afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

