Related Posts:

10 Comments


Gravatar
Brian said,
April 15th, 2005 

First of all, the Blade trilogy sucked (except for the original… sort of), and it made less money than the X-Men movies. I don’t see anything wrong with a PG-13 rating for Wolverine. It’s the development of the character and the telling of the story that matters, not the level of gory detail that is shown, IMHO. As you said, the PG-13 rating would open up a far bigger potential audience, and I will be shocked if the studio signs up for an R rating, given the target audience. Still, The Matrix movies were rated R, and they did very well at the box office (the original even deserved it), so who knows?

Brian

Gravatar
April 15th, 2005 
Most times subject matter should drive the rating. With a character like Wolverine who goes into berserker rages with the weapons at his disposal, it would make sense for it to be R.

They just barely touched on his true nature in X-Men 2 during the school invasion.

Vic

Gravatar
Brian said,
April 15th, 2005 

Point taken, but would it be wise at this point to stray from the Wolverine character who is already familiar to audiences?

Brian

Gravatar
Sam said,
May 17th, 2005 

The Wolverine film should be rated at least R. I’m sure that they are going to screw this one up, just like the X-Men films. They made him a pansy, too tall, too skinny, and too short sideburns. With no offense meant to Mr. Jackman, he did good with what he had to work with.
I am currently involved in making an independant fan-film based on the characters early years (can’t be specific to avoid ruining it for those that already know about the film). I co-wrote, and star in the film. I am about 5′6″, 185+lbs., have 4″ long chops, and am pretty well built and cut.
We are on hold for a short time right now, due to shoulder injury, and we decided that I should bulk up to around 210lbs., to look almost identical to Wolverine (issues 1-4 new run).
All thoughts and comments are welcome back.
Thanks.

Gravatar
May 18th, 2005 
Sam, good luck with that. I really don’t think they’ll rate it R, and to be honest I think that even in the comics (the one’s I’ve read, anyway) they’ve always had to water down the character as well.

Of course these days they get away with a lot more in comics by coloring the blood black instead of red. :confused:

Vic

Gravatar
ButNothing said,
May 26th, 2006 

Please, let it be R-rated! Anything but PG-13 or (vade retro) PG.

I totally agree with you, Vic: most comics are watered down. Wolverine deserves a dark, bitter and slightly twisted movie, with due realism. The characater could be so much more than what he is in the x-flicks and comics. So much more.

I just saw X3 yesterday and I was sadly let down by it. Don’t get me wrong, it was an OK action movie, but after X2 I was expecting something better, not something OK. And ’cause of that, I’m a bit inclined to fearing, that our hopes on a R-rated Wolvie-movie are in vain. You know how it is. Money talks and…

Tough if they’d actually make it, I’d be the first in line to see it twice on screen AND to buy the DVD (and not to wait for years for the price to sink as I’m going to do with X3). And the T-shirt, novel, comic… :wink:

Gravatar
Vic said,
May 30th, 2006 
Sorry to hear you were disappointed in X3. I’ve heard that it’s great on the action front but a step down in regards to character development. I haven’t had the time to check it out yet myself.

Vic

Gravatar
Simone said,
June 1st, 2006 

Go on and see it Vic, I should be VERY interested in your review of it. :wink:

Gravatar
Vic said,
June 1st, 2006 
Your wish is my command… review of “X-Men: The Last Stand” is posted. :D
Vic
Gravatar
Simone said,
June 2nd, 2006 

Fantastic! I’ll go there now! :D