Comments on: The Wolverine Movie Leak: Truth And Consequences

By: Leaked Movie Info » Retreat 2011

Leaked Movie Info » Retreat 2011 — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:31:02 +0000

[...] The Wolverine Movie Leak: Truth And Consequences | Screen Rant MOVIE NEWS; MOVIE REVIEWS; MOVIE TRAILERS; TV NEWS; GALLERIES; PODCASTS; VIDEO GAMES … How Can A Movie Get Leaked? Does that really matter? There are so many different … [...]

By: Leaked Movie Info » Paranormal Activity 3

Leaked Movie Info » Paranormal Activity 3 — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:19:44 +0000

By: Twilight Lexicon » Blogging Courtesy

Twilight Lexicon » Blogging Courtesy — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:34:09 +0000

[...] turn a blind eye to full versions of their material slated for theaters or TV stations. Whatever you do, DONT upload full movies or TV episodes or you will get sued, it’s copyright v… Summit Entertainment currently has legal action pending against people who took their hacked into a [...]

By: Nick1173

Nick1173 — Mon, 31 May 2010 00:09:42 +0000

So,
It’s 5/30/2010 and I went to the local BlockBuster in Colchester CT and they are viewing Alice and Wonder land and this is technicaly leaking the film.

By: pirate4

pirate4 — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:40:08 +0000

You're dumb.

By: Sickofcomplainers

Sickofcomplainers — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:05:56 +0000

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not for stealing or piracy but I just find it funny how everyone is so offended by pirating. Before you get all insulted by people watching the movie before hand, find out the statistics on piracy. Did you know that due to the MPAA and the lawsuits producers are allowed to start that these companies like fox are actually making more money on the movie than they originally would have? Yes thats right. Wolverine may have been the exception because so many people downloaded it, but when a movie like iron man is released on DVD there are about 50,000 people who download it. When these producers win a lawsuit against these torrent site they win up to $10 million. Most copyright cases end up in millions in restitution. Well assuming those 50,00 people had all bought the dvd instead, that would result in 50,000 people * $20 a person = 1 million in sales – tax and disc costs = less than the companies win in lawsuits. So please shut up.

By: Sickofcomplainers

Sickofcomplainers — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:05:56 +0000

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:21:30 +0000

now we're talking…

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:15:24 +0000

downloading is not illegal. if you give me something illegal over the internet,you should get prosecuted,not me.
you make it available,i just download it…;)

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:11:30 +0000

way to go cowboy. 100% behind you on this.

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:05:25 +0000

once again you do not know what you're talking about.I make a copy of a film and for that, the prices in cinemas and the prices of a bought dvd in stores goes up?
what world do you live in?
to justified your comment, you would actually have to quantify the loss due to ” piracy” before.
which as never been done because it's impossible to quantify something you do not know…AND a pirated film does NOT mean a lost sale or anything.Know your facts: people downloading a film, most of the time ( not always;)) WILL go to the theatres to watch it too, and sometimes more than once.So,following your ” logic”,if you go more than once to see a film that means they are making more profits and so the price for the tickets would go down…oh,wait…that will never happen because they are after the MONEY,not trying to get you fairer deal tickets…

*MOD – John I've edited your comments. You're welcome to your opinions but not the personal attacks. Play nice. Thanks.*

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:52:38 +0000

you do not get it.digital content is NOTHING like the real thing.you get a COPY of the film. that means the ORIGINAL is STILL in the hands of it's makers. do NOT compare things that are NOT comparable.Stealing a car and having a copy of a film are two DIFFERENT things.For crying out loud:get a grip!!!

*MOD – John, calling the owner of the website an idiot for having an opinion that differs from you is a quick way to get banned from commenting at all. Once again, no more personal attacks.*

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:46:54 +0000

you buy a dvd for the film itself, but they put you some tons of advertising in it.this is not what you've asked for.
pirated films are stripped of ALL that advertising.
waiting for a film to air on tv? you would have to wait for a year…and you would have to watch the ads as well…so you would spend 1h50mn watching a film that lasts for 1h30mn. DISGUSTING!!!

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:21:30 +0000

now we're talking…

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:15:24 +0000

downloading is not illegal. if you give me something illegal over the internet,you should get prosecuted,not me.
you make it available,i just download it…;)

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:11:30 +0000

way to go cowboy. 100% behind you on this.

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:05:25 +0000

once again you do not know what you're talking about.I make a copy of a film and for that, the prices in cinemas and the prices of a bought dvd in stores goes up?
what world do you live in?
to justified your ( stupid ) comment, you would actually have to quantify the loss due to ” piracy” before.
which as never been done because it's impossible to quantify something you do not know…AND a pirated film does NOT mean a lost sale or anything.Know your facts: people downloading a film, most of the time ( not always;)) WILL go to the theatres to watch it too, and sometimes more than once.So,following your ” logic”,if you go more than once to see a film that means they are making more profits and so the price for the tickets would go down…oh,wait…that will never happen because they are after the MONEY,not trying to get you fairer deal tickets…god,get a brain!!

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:52:38 +0000

you do not get it.digital content is NOTHING like the real thing.you get a COPY of the film,idiot.that means the ORIGINAL is STILL in the hands of it's makers. do NOT compare things that are NOT comparable.Stealing a car and having a copy of a film are two DIFFERENT things.For crying out loud:get a grip!!!

By: john

john — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:46:54 +0000

By: RightBrain

RightBrain — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:08:08 +0000

I agree with “Mark” in a previous post: “I want quality.. i reward quality.”

In the days of vinyl you bought the quality albums, otherwise, you bought cheap singles.
Later came cassettes. Again you bought or re-bought the quality (It doesn’t matter who the artist is. Just what ever you consider “quality”) and made home copies of the rest.
Then came CD’s. Again, I re-bought the quality and then I dowmoaded cheap (or free) of the rest.
Same goes for movies. VHS came out, I bought the quality movies, dubbed the rest.) DVD came out, I bought the quality copied and downloaded the rest.
My point is this. I feel I’ve paid my dues. Everytime a new technology becomes available, I am expected to re-buy my libraries. I don’t mind buying and even re-buying quality, but buying crap is just a waste.