<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolverine In 60 Seconds: Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Is Fox Addressing Fanboy Fears About Key &#8216;Wolverine&#8217; Characters? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-2/#comment-88550</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Fox Addressing Fanboy Fears About Key &#8216;Wolverine&#8217; Characters? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-88550</guid>
		<description>[...] primetime TV programming. These three trailers were titled “Outcasts”, “Brothers” and “Legends” and each focused on a different facet of Wolverine’s story (Click the names of the trailers to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] primetime TV programming. These three trailers were titled “Outcasts”, “Brothers” and “Legends” and each focused on a different facet of Wolverine’s story (Click the names of the trailers to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keyes</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-2/#comment-66874</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-66874</guid>
		<description>@ Kane,

That is a problem with how different he looks compared to the first X-Men movie but Schreiber is playing Sabretooth in this movie.

@ SK47,

I should of said this earlier but I love Cyclops too and Marsden was awesome for him in my opinion - they just wrote the character very poorly and heavily misused him :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kane,</p>
<p>That is a problem with how different he looks compared to the first X-Men movie but Schreiber is playing Sabretooth in this movie.</p>
<p>@ SK47,</p>
<p>I should of said this earlier but I love Cyclops too and Marsden was awesome for him in my opinion &#8211; they just wrote the character very poorly and heavily misused him <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-2/#comment-66185</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-66185</guid>
		<description>I know that Schweiber is credited as Sabertooth but it seems to me that he may just be playing &quot;Dog&quot; from orgins. At least that would explain the dramatic size difference from X1 to Wolverine Orgins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Schweiber is credited as Sabertooth but it seems to me that he may just be playing &#8220;Dog&#8221; from orgins. At least that would explain the dramatic size difference from X1 to Wolverine Orgins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65362</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanboy Rant: Has Fox Ruined Deadpool? Is Gambit Next? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65362</guid>
		<description>[...] it already was for this movie. These three trailers, titled “Outcasts,” “Brothers” and “Legends” showed us many scenes from Wolverine’s past as well as a pile of characters and action [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it already was for this movie. These three trailers, titled “Outcasts,” “Brothers” and “Legends” showed us many scenes from Wolverine’s past as well as a pile of characters and action [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Kalibur</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65205</link>
		<dc:creator>High Kalibur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65205</guid>
		<description>@ Rob Keyes

I&#039;m right there with you on that one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rob Keyes</p>
<p>I&#8217;m right there with you on that one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keyes</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65200</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65200</guid>
		<description>@ Rorschach,

That&#039;s a key point for me too. They&#039;ve avoided showing us any clips with Gambit talking and that&#039;s very worrying for me.

The eyes I can take, but if they drop the Cajun accent I will become a hater :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rorschach,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a key point for me too. They&#8217;ve avoided showing us any clips with Gambit talking and that&#8217;s very worrying for me.</p>
<p>The eyes I can take, but if they drop the Cajun accent I will become a hater <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Kalibur</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65186</link>
		<dc:creator>High Kalibur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65186</guid>
		<description>Screenrant, all you folks have an important appointment on May 1st with Wolverine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screenrant, all you folks have an important appointment on May 1st with Wolverine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65157</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65157</guid>
		<description>but that probably means Young Storm has  been ADDED to the DVD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but that probably means Young Storm has  been ADDED to the DVD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65156</guid>
		<description>Young Storm has been cut from the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Young Storm has been cut from the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John "Kahless" Taylor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65133</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Kahless" Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65133</guid>
		<description>@Jayme 
Does Scott have the visor on in this trailer? If not, I can understand why he didn&#039;t recognize Wolvie in the first movie, since he lost part of his memory in his youth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jayme<br />
Does Scott have the visor on in this trailer? If not, I can understand why he didn&#8217;t recognize Wolvie in the first movie, since he lost part of his memory in his youth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65127</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorschach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65127</guid>
		<description>also if you follow the comics(the movie wont).
if ya got young cyclops your gunna havta show his brother HAVOC !
but aperintly FOX likes 2 ruin comic readers Lives.
so (0)-well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also if you follow the comics(the movie wont).<br />
if ya got young cyclops your gunna havta show his brother HAVOC !<br />
but aperintly FOX likes 2 ruin comic readers Lives.<br />
so (0)-well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65124</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorschach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65124</guid>
		<description>still did&#039;et fix Gambit&#039;s eyes.
and again id like sum dialog of gambit&#039;s 2 see if they got the Accent or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still did&#8217;et fix Gambit&#8217;s eyes.<br />
and again id like sum dialog of gambit&#8217;s 2 see if they got the Accent or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65116</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65116</guid>
		<description>@Gigan

So many characters is indeed a concern, but it looks like they&#039;re going to be focusing on Wolverine, Sabretooth and possibly Deadpool.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gigan</p>
<p>So many characters is indeed a concern, but it looks like they&#8217;re going to be focusing on Wolverine, Sabretooth and possibly Deadpool.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigan300</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65111</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigan300</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65111</guid>
		<description>@oscar
the fact that it looks better to you and the fact that it sucks to me is just our opinions, and the fact is the movie has too many characters just like x3 and its probably gonna be about 90 minutes long which is not long enough, and the another reason they revealed enough of his origins in the x2 in my opinion making this film pointless, and they also might as well call it xmen 4 considering that all the other xmen films had wolverine as the central character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@oscar<br />
the fact that it looks better to you and the fact that it sucks to me is just our opinions, and the fact is the movie has too many characters just like x3 and its probably gonna be about 90 minutes long which is not long enough, and the another reason they revealed enough of his origins in the x2 in my opinion making this film pointless, and they also might as well call it xmen 4 considering that all the other xmen films had wolverine as the central character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65105</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65105</guid>
		<description>@Oscar

Sorry, just sounded a bit &quot;in your face&quot; when I read it. :-)

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Oscar</p>
<p>Sorry, just sounded a bit &#8220;in your face&#8221; when I read it. <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar!</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65103</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65103</guid>
		<description>What? It does suck for him, it looks better with every new trailer, not the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? It does suck for him, it looks better with every new trailer, not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65101</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65101</guid>
		<description>@Gigan300

Why, exactly? To me this is actually looking better with each new clip.

@Oscar

Come on, dude.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gigan300</p>
<p>Why, exactly? To me this is actually looking better with each new clip.</p>
<p>@Oscar</p>
<p>Come on, dude.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar!</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65096</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65096</guid>
		<description>sucks for you Gigan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sucks for you Gigan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigan300</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65087</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigan300</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65087</guid>
		<description>wow every time i see one of the trailers this movie looks more and more like garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow every time i see one of the trailers this movie looks more and more like garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reverend</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/wolverine-60-seconds-part-3-rob-5597/comment-page-1/#comment-65075</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5597#comment-65075</guid>
		<description>Scott looked like he was being chased by Sabretooth-- probably either to join weapon X or just join the &quot;bad guys&quot; -- they have always been after good ol&#039; Slim Summers.  For trailers that show so much, they sure do make us question more.

Rev</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott looked like he was being chased by Sabretooth&#8211; probably either to join weapon X or just join the &#8220;bad guys&#8221; &#8212; they have always been after good ol&#8217; Slim Summers.  For trailers that show so much, they sure do make us question more.</p>
<p>Rev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

