Matt Reeves & Tony Scott On Shortlist To Direct ‘Wolverine 2′

Published 4 years ago by , Updated February 15th, 2014 at 4:30 pm,

x men wolverine Matt Reeves & Tony Scott On Shortlist To Direct Wolverine 2

Considering the Comic Con buzz surrounding Thor, Captain America, and The Green Lantern, news on the Wolverine sequel has been a bit light. Last we heard, Christopher McQuarrie was hired a few months ago to write the script – otherwise there hasn’t been much information on the film.

But today we’re finally getting some intriguing news – 20th Century Fox has apparently narrowed their choices down to two directors: Matt Reeves (Cloverfield) and action veteran Tony Scott (Man on Fire).

The Playlist reports that the directors have been selected by Fox from a long list of potential helmers which also included Oscar winner Kathryn Bigelow and Wanted director Timur Bekmambetov. Bigelow and Bekmambetov would certainly have brought something different to the comic book sequel – but both were also unlikely choices.

Reeves has become something of a low-level auteur after directing the J.J. Abrams’ produced Cloverfield and the forthcoming remake of Let the Right One In (re-titled Let Me In).

Scott has directed a variety of big budget action films for nearly thirty years including The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 and Top Gun.

On paper Reeves would appear to be the best option – since he’s got less on his plate, after he puts the finishing touches on Let Me In, he’d have a lot of time to dedicate to the film. Most of all, from the Studio’s perspective, Reeves would be cheaper and more malleable than Scott – who is extremely well established and currently has several projects in pre-production stages.

Matt Reeves

Scott however, brings his Scott Free production company to the table (which he shares with his brother Ridley) – so his number is obviously on studio-boss speed-dial. Though, even with Scott Free at his back, his last two films have struggled a bit, The Taking of Pelham 123 underperformed at the box office despite the combined star power of Denzel Washington and John Travolta. His latest action film Unstoppable faced a few production delays due to budgetary reasons.

As a result, stepping into an established franchise would be a way of keeping Scott’s commercial viability active, it wouldn’t be the first time the British director helmed a sequel, as he also took over directing duties on Beverly Hills Cop 2, despite not taking part in the original.

The downside for Scott is he’s set to direct Potsdamer Platz in the new year – just when Wolverine 2 is set to shoot. However, Wolverine 2 may soon be facing a delay – putting Scott back in the running.

Tony Scott

At this stage, nothing is remotely set in stone, and both directors could simply drop out or reject an offer. During production of  X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Australian director Gavin Hood faced a lot of problems with Fox honcho Tom Rothman – Hood was later replaced by Superman director Richard Donner for re-shoots. Would Scott or Reeves be up for this challenge?

If Wolverine 2 does intend to shoot in January then I’m sure we’ll hear an announcement soon. Wolverine (and the X-Men) is a big franchise for 20th Century Fox, so you would imagine that they’d want their director to spend a solid amount of time on pre-production.

That is unless they want it to end up like X-Men: The Last Stand.

We’ll keep you posed on any further Wolverine 2 news as we get it.

Source: The Playlist

TAGS: the wolverine

29 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. Matt Reeves is my choice. I loved Cloverfield, and Let Me In looks Ok. Besides, it’s like he can make it any worse than the first film.

    • Got that right. Worst comic book adaptation to date. So much promise with a character like Wolverine but they have to play it safe for the kids to go see it. News Flash–Christopher Nolan,Dark Knight. He did not bow down to the mainstream and instead whether he thought about it or not, made it for the real Batman fans. The ones out reading the graphic novels and following the story lines. They need a director who actually gives a crap about the real fans of that character and not just a bunch of eight year olds who are distracted by fancy CG so story development doesn’t matter.

  2. cloverfield was pretty good to a point , and man on fire was also good. but i would go with Tony Scott. saying that he is a vetran so ya, i would go with the more experienced

  3. The problem I had with Cloverfied was that we hardly saw the monster during the movie. And the movie was partly about this thing ripping through the city. So if he gets the chair then we won’t see any of the main characters in this next X-film.

    • Just b/c that film was filmed that way, doesn’t mean it would done again.

  4. why is there a sequel being made???

    • The first made a lot of funny despite being a POS(imo).

      • MONEY, not funny lmao.

  5. Wow, I would LOVE to see what Tony Scott could do with Wolverine. Neither director ever “connected” with me, although I do find their movies quite good. But Scott’s style and vision could be interesting when applied to wolverine.

    • i really cant see Scott doing this, it’d be a waste of his talents. for all the people out there that said Wolverine sucked, i just cant understand why other than moey, which was obvious. theres no real reason for it to be done, money isnt a real reason either lol

      • Money’s not a real reason? You’re kidding me right? That’s the main thing studios care about. All film is made for the money.

        • actually im not kidding you, and no crap. we all know movies are made for me, just seriously doubt considering most of the audience that saw wolverine thought it absolutely sucked. considering that, the studios cant predict what the audiences will like, dislike, see or go to see.

          • How do you “most of the audience” thought the movie sucked? The people on here, yes, but that’s only a small percentage of people. That still leaves about a million other people. The general audience (the one’s who matter) seemed to have enjoyed it. That’s going by the amount of money the film made, and that all the Blu-ray/DVD sales.

            • not the audience i was in there with man, my family, friends, all flet as i did….to each his own

  6. All I can say is despite toning down the 1st film for kiddies it was pretty good but wolverines past was hardcore animal insticts rage bloody and more we didn’t see much of that in the 1st film so I think it needs to be an R rated sequel to make it work and bring the fans what they want

    • they wont make an R rated sequel to it though. it would mean(ghasp!!)less revenue.

  7. There should be no discussion. Tony Scott needs to make Wolverine 2. That’s the only way i would be interested in this movie. Say what you want about his style, he always makes solid films with solid characters which is something the Wolverine franchise desperately needs. I mean, the first one is one of the worst comic-book films I’ve ever seen. With Tony Scott, not even Rothman could mess it up, though you never know, Rothman has a supernatural ability to ruin films over at FOX.

  8. As long as Gavin Hood and Mark Steven Johnson stay as far away from this movie, I will be perfectly fine with seeing this one.

    The first had problems all over do to rushing and premature death scenes. such as the effects. That bothered me the most when Wolverines claws didn’t come out of his hands naturally like the other films (Look closely and you’ll see the claws twitch when coming out.). Also the fat suit on Blob looked so fake i was about to leave the theater. The only good about that movie was Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool (NOT WEAPON XI!!!)

    So my best hope is that this movie doesn’t get rushed or get a bad choice in director.

  9. Tony Scott, should be the only choice.

  10. Tony Scott. nuff said.
    He’s consistently puts out a High drama,high action and a top notch scripy in all his films-he’s also a veteran at not only scripts and screenplays but of film as well..he’s had a great run on action flicks(True Romance,Beverly Hills Cop 2,Days of Thunder,Top Gun,Man on Fire,Domino)but he’s also gotten older and that has reflected in his last batch of flicks especially with Denzel Washington as his main foil,Deja Vu,Pelham(remake)and then Unstoppable(another remake)its starting to make h-wood wonder if he’s getting lazier or if he(known for his edge in filmmaking)had indeed lost that edge that had people packin theaters..
    Personally I think his best film is True Romance, a great script by Quentin Tarantino and with his direction was a combo that will probably never happen again but if he does direct,would he be able to team up with Quentin again??? If what is said is true about the supposed “Japan storyline”, this might be right up Quentin’s alley..Also Scott’s greatest time of day in most of his films are early mornings and late afternoons thus setting the mood for most of his films..could this play into the Wolverine in japan storyline??yes…i think so.

  11. Hugh Jackman is also a big reason there’s going to be a W2.

    Have you all forgot that he talked about taking the character to Japan in the next film….? There was also a scene post credits that hinted of that.

    • i remember that 790, ijust dindt like wolverine too much. i feel he was kiddied down, which didnt work for me. IF Scott takes this on, i do hope its edgier, grittier, and ultra violent, if not, im not wasting money on it lol.

  12. Maybe FOX will leak the workprint again and you can catch W2 online,,, :-)

  13. Tony Scott easily. The guy directed The Last Boy Scout, True Romance, Crimson Tide, Man on Fire, Pelham 123. He’s an action legend.

  14. Robert Rodrigez should do W2 has any one seen the red ban trailer for machete it’s freakin awesome

  15. It will be Matt Reeves because FOX executives like to really control their directors like they did with hood on the first Wolverine film..Scott is too experienced and too much of a veteran to allow FOX to take control of the film away from him hence it will be Reeves..younger with not a lot of movie experience especially big-budget and therefore easier to control

    • You hit the nail right on the head. Well said.

      It’s a pity. I for one would prefer the experienced film makers to take on MARVEL’s characters.

      They would certainly make an overall better film based simply on their technical experience and skills garnered over the years when executing drama and action with a far greater understanding of cinematic narrative.

  16. I mean, from the movies utter retarded attempt to capture a decent adaptation of the comic based mutant’s history, what can we really hope to even expect of this? A reboot? a fabricated plot that appeases whatever direction they try to push it in? I personally don’t care for who directs this next installment(if it even happens). Although, the movie may have done decent for the masses that really know nothing of Wolverine(other than he’s a member of the X-men and he has a mysterious past), for the good lot of us, we we’re pretty saddened and pissed at this attempt. Point is, what can any director really salvage from that train wreck?

  17. the problem with Wolverine: Origins wasn’t jackman, it wasn’t the script,it wasn’t the characters involved-all were done well..it was FOX plain and simple…everyone who i know who never knew who wolverine was til the first XMEN film came out were a bit miffed that it wasn’t bloodier-though they really liked the film-others who new the character prior to the films(me included),f****** hated it.Our arguements weren’t about the character of wolverine at all though situations like where he got the jacket,how he learned how to ride a motorcycle-stuff that really wasn’t necessary in telling the origin shouldn’t have been involved aand wasted screen time that could’ve been used elsewhere. The origin of Deadpool(which hadn’t been done by Marvel so FOX thought it was “creative license” i suppose)and other “new” characters to the franchise like Monaghan’s character or Stryker’s #2 man (who is supposed to be Maverick) and then adding the Blob as well(though preBlob was very cool)and then the utter nonsense of tieing in Emma Frost’s character with Silver Fox thus giving the reason to save the children was almost the worst part of the film- the way they handled explaining Logan’s memory wipe-Adamantium bullets to the head..WTF.

    When people asked me what I felt about the film I told them it was like watching your favorite football team do really well halfway thru 1st quarter only to be down a fieldgoal because they fumbled the ball like 3 times trying to get dowwn field. then to start second quarter really well and be up by 7 then fumble the ball again to end the second quarter being down 3pts.then after halftime their all fired up and they’re ahead by 14, but then fumble the ball really bad allowing the other team to take it for a touchdown then another interception and another touchdown and now their down points and its the 4th quarter and they try to make one last run stick but they get to the 5 yard line but for whatever reason they can’t make a touchdown nor a fieldgoal to tie..

    The film was just a never ending up and down situational story-they could’ve done so much more and so much better but FOX had to screw it up as usual..Gavin Hood is a good director not a great one-a seasoned director should’ve done the film like tony scott or even Quentin Tarantino..Its sad when you can tell in the theater when something was written by the director, or the guy that filled in or by the producers or FOX..Hopefully Hugh Jackman might have more say in what his character does in the next film-or get someone totally new to do it..”in this scene Hugh, act really angry” wtf..

    also y’know they are going to try and put a ton of other characters in there that have nothing to do with the story again..
    here’s some ssince they’re going to Japan…
    Sunfire(more than likely,though he was the reason the xmen went there back in the day),Jubillee,Psylocke(try again Fox),Omega Red,the real Maverick,etc..

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

Be Social, Follow Us!!