Recent Related Items:

29 Comments


Panda says:

A friend of mine once theorized that the future of ads in TV shows is product placement, and that (tech allowing) studios would digitally input products into older syndicated shows. For instance, a Cheerios box could be digitally replaced by Cap’n Crunch in Seinfeld’s kitchen cabinet. This would combat the Tivo or downloading issue. Could we live with that one?

Who knows what the next gen of ads is. They’re everywhere already.

Jim Carey says:

Bruce,
Online program commercials are much louder also! When I watched Daybreak and other online eps, it was very annoying…I didn’t want to wake the whole house!

Dataschmuck,
Thanks for caring! You receive a valuable “reward of omission”: People will not hate your guts.

790 says:

Prob is Panda I don’t buy most products they shove down our throats. So these product ads just annoy me.

Panda,
Product placement is already in full swing. A friend of mine was the one responsible for getting reeses pieces into ET when M&M’s bailed on the movie.. and she retired early from the money she made from selling product placements to studios..

Every single thing you see in a movie or tv show is there because the maker paid for it to be there.. . The Truman Show just mocked the process that’s been in place for years.

Sorry .. but we’ve already been besieged there!

790 says:

Another reason the volume is higher and compressed is because most tv ads have subliminal messages in them.

Its called Subterfuge. And there’s companies that design comercials exclusivly with these hidden messages in them.

Its pure evil…

Screen Rant says:

You guys…. there’s a cool thing here on the site called the “search function.” lol

Hate Product Placement? Here’s One Culprit

Vic

790 says:

Is tomarrow Solient Green day?

Anyone know?

Mark says:

“The reason we get “blasted” at commercial time is determined by how the audio levels are recorded when creating their ads.”

Not true. The audio levels are RECORDED at the same levels as tv shows, but they are later PROCESSED using a Maximizer or a Brickwall limiter during mixdown. The recording process is the same.

Page 2 of 2«12
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.