<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watchmen Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Behind-the-Scenes of &#8216;Legend of the Guardians&#8217; - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-206864</link>
		<dc:creator>Behind-the-Scenes of &#8216;Legend of the Guardians&#8217; - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-206864</guid>
		<description>[...] The Owls of Ga&#8217;Hoole, the upcoming fantasy-adventure film from director Zack Snyder (300, Watchmen). The first trailer for the film was extremely beautiful to look at, but something about it seemed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Owls of Ga&#8217;Hoole, the upcoming fantasy-adventure film from director Zack Snyder (300, Watchmen). The first trailer for the film was extremely beautiful to look at, but something about it seemed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ‘Swamp Thing’ Movie On Hold?</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-194819</link>
		<dc:creator>‘Swamp Thing’ Movie On Hold?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 20:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-194819</guid>
		<description>[...] have already made the transition to the big screen, with results that range from pretty good (Watchmen) to mediocre (From Hell) to downright awful (see below).  Moore has long been a vocal opponent of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have already made the transition to the big screen, with results that range from pretty good (Watchmen) to mediocre (From Hell) to downright awful (see below).  Moore has long been a vocal opponent of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Swamp Thing&#8217; Movie On Hold? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-194600</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Swamp Thing&#8217; Movie On Hold? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 20:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-194600</guid>
		<description>[...] have already made the transition to the big screen, with results that range from pretty good (Watchmen) to mediocre (From Hell) to downright awful (see below).  Moore has long been a vocal opponent of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have already made the transition to the big screen, with results that range from pretty good (Watchmen) to mediocre (From Hell) to downright awful (see below).  Moore has long been a vocal opponent of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New &#8216;Elm Street&#8217; Clip, Image, And Interview - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-191266</link>
		<dc:creator>New &#8216;Elm Street&#8217; Clip, Image, And Interview - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-191266</guid>
		<description>[...] by checking out a new clip from the film, as well as an excellent look at how Jackie Earle Haley (Watchmen) looks as the new Freddy, and even some words from the actor himself.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by checking out a new clip from the film, as well as an excellent look at how Jackie Earle Haley (Watchmen) looks as the new Freddy, and even some words from the actor himself.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hamill Directing His Own Comic Book Movie? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-189335</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hamill Directing His Own Comic Book Movie? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-189335</guid>
		<description>[...] sounds like a story that has neither the rampant violence of Kick-Ass nor the thematic heaviness of Watchmen but instead (conceptually) falls somewhere between those two works &#8212; not to mention much more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sounds like a story that has neither the rampant violence of Kick-Ass nor the thematic heaviness of Watchmen but instead (conceptually) falls somewhere between those two works &#8212; not to mention much more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-120733</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-120733</guid>
		<description>This is by far the worse action/villain comical in the entire history of film making.  One cant help but to think of other things one could be doing instead of watching this. Which is not good for having a movie night because this does not come up on the radar of a 1 - 10 star rating.  A complete waiste of time.  No hero rating, and the blue guy? named John, now theres a super heroic name {not} he should of had his own film called the &quot;blue guy&quot;, in a &quot;blue movie&quot;
Not worth its time nor its worth, a definate disappointing film, I&#039;ll make sure I dont recommend it to my friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is by far the worse action/villain comical in the entire history of film making.  One cant help but to think of other things one could be doing instead of watching this. Which is not good for having a movie night because this does not come up on the radar of a 1 &#8211; 10 star rating.  A complete waiste of time.  No hero rating, and the blue guy? named John, now theres a super heroic name {not} he should of had his own film called the &#8220;blue guy&#8221;, in a &#8220;blue movie&#8221;<br />
Not worth its time nor its worth, a definate disappointing film, I&#8217;ll make sure I dont recommend it to my friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keith</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-116165</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-116165</guid>
		<description>Well there were added scenes of Dr. Manhattan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there were added scenes of Dr. Manhattan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylar's Hunger Continues</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-116160</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylar's Hunger Continues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-116160</guid>
		<description>I was joking...all that Dr. Manhattan weenage was in the screen version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was joking&#8230;all that Dr. Manhattan weenage was in the screen version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-116153</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-116153</guid>
		<description>Just saw Watchmen last weekend after renting the DVD
It is awesome... penis and all!!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw Watchmen last weekend after renting the DVD<br />
It is awesome&#8230; penis and all!!! <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keith</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-116143</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-116143</guid>
		<description>Yeah it does...click on my name and check out my review for the Blu-Ray disc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it does&#8230;click on my name and check out my review for the Blu-Ray disc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylar's Hunger Continues</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-116138</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylar's Hunger Continues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-116138</guid>
		<description>Matt,
I hear that on the director&#039;s cut, there is even some full frontal nudity. Is it true?

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
I hear that on the director&#8217;s cut, there is even some full frontal nudity. Is it true?</p>
<p> <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keith</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-115906</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-115906</guid>
		<description>I waited for the film to be released on dvd before I saw and man I&#039;m glad I got to see the director&#039;s cut...I give it a 4.5 out of 5, with running time of 186 minutes I just had to drop it half a point, but other than that the movie was AMAZING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I waited for the film to be released on dvd before I saw and man I&#8217;m glad I got to see the director&#8217;s cut&#8230;I give it a 4.5 out of 5, with running time of 186 minutes I just had to drop it half a point, but other than that the movie was AMAZING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenix</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-7/#comment-97822</link>
		<dc:creator>Fenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-97822</guid>
		<description>this movie was sweet you people are dumb its not at all hard to understand. Follows graphic novel to a T like vic said so its truly for the fans. If your not into graphic novels then you prolly won&#039;t enjoy this period</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this movie was sweet you people are dumb its not at all hard to understand. Follows graphic novel to a T like vic said so its truly for the fans. If your not into graphic novels then you prolly won&#8217;t enjoy this period</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael freaky jackson</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-6/#comment-92568</link>
		<dc:creator>michael freaky jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 02:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-92568</guid>
		<description>It is a horrible movie and i am never goint to see it cause i do not sniff stuff like that, but i like the name of it cause i also like to watchmen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a horrible movie and i am never goint to see it cause i do not sniff stuff like that, but i like the name of it cause i also like to watchmen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Jackie Earle Haley The Next Freddy Krueger? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-6/#comment-76379</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Jackie Earle Haley The Next Freddy Krueger? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-76379</guid>
		<description>[...] let&#8217;s not forget his performance as the mysterious Rorschach in the recent Watchmen adaptation. He had that gruff, tough and intimidating (despite his relatively small stature) thing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] let&#8217;s not forget his performance as the mysterious Rorschach in the recent Watchmen adaptation. He had that gruff, tough and intimidating (despite his relatively small stature) thing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-6/#comment-75260</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-75260</guid>
		<description>You people are way too uptight/immature about nudity.  Especially male nudity.  I see my own dangling junk everyday, and I suspect most of you do too.  Why is it suddenly such a big deal when its in a movie instead of a mirror?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people are way too uptight/immature about nudity.  Especially male nudity.  I see my own dangling junk everyday, and I suspect most of you do too.  Why is it suddenly such a big deal when its in a movie instead of a mirror?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satyr</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-6/#comment-74935</link>
		<dc:creator>Satyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-74935</guid>
		<description>Well, I went to see this without knowing what to expect. Didn&#039;t read any reviews, and the only thing I knew was that it involved some superheroes. Imagine my surprise as I actually watched the movie. Expecting a dull and cliche superheromovie, it was waaaay better than I expected! I&#039;m going to read the novel too, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I went to see this without knowing what to expect. Didn&#8217;t read any reviews, and the only thing I knew was that it involved some superheroes. Imagine my surprise as I actually watched the movie. Expecting a dull and cliche superheromovie, it was waaaay better than I expected! I&#8217;m going to read the novel too, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Bales</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-6/#comment-74780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Bales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-74780</guid>
		<description>There has been a lot of comments on this film. Most of them have been praises. The big question is : is this movie worth all these posted comments? The reason why I asked is because I have not seen this Film. So are we talking good like Tarintino good or Guy Ritchie good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of comments on this film. Most of them have been praises. The big question is : is this movie worth all these posted comments? The reason why I asked is because I have not seen this Film. So are we talking good like Tarintino good or Guy Ritchie good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-6/#comment-74378</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-74378</guid>
		<description>Yeah I completely agree with the review, there were only three worthwhile characters.  Even in the comic book I wasn&#039;t attached to any of the characters, the only ones that seemed to have any depth were Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, and the Comedian.  In the movie that connection with those characters seemed to be even more evident.  Everyone else seemed somewhat detached and hollow.  And being a girl I did like veidt only because of his cool as a cucumber personality and the fact that he was cute, but physically that punk was definitely not strong enough to take on the comedian, far less throw him through a window.  If perhaps they showed a muscular figure or even his gymnastics routine to at least show he was athletic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I completely agree with the review, there were only three worthwhile characters.  Even in the comic book I wasn&#8217;t attached to any of the characters, the only ones that seemed to have any depth were Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, and the Comedian.  In the movie that connection with those characters seemed to be even more evident.  Everyone else seemed somewhat detached and hollow.  And being a girl I did like veidt only because of his cool as a cucumber personality and the fact that he was cute, but physically that punk was definitely not strong enough to take on the comedian, far less throw him through a window.  If perhaps they showed a muscular figure or even his gymnastics routine to at least show he was athletic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/comment-page-6/#comment-74250</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/watchmen-reviews-vic-5888/#comment-74250</guid>
		<description>I saw this movie 2 weeks ago; never read the comic, nor had I even heard of Watchmen before the movie...Ended up walking out about 1 hr into the flick. I&#039;m definitely not a comic buff/fan, therefore I didn&#039;t really know what to expect.  The beginning kept me intrigued, yet the vivid images (to include the gore, sex, and &quot;frontal&quot;) were a bit too much for my taste.  My wife thoroughly hated it btw..Anyhow, as if it hasn&#039;t been said before, this isn&#039;t a family movie...doesn&#039;t come near TDK nor Ironman imho (Although I didn&#039;t read the latter, the graphics and acting were MUCH better than Watchmen). Interesting plot (of what I saw at least), but waaay to much fluff to keep me watching. I shoulda read Vic&#039;s review prior to paying $20 for tickets...Will check back here next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this movie 2 weeks ago; never read the comic, nor had I even heard of Watchmen before the movie&#8230;Ended up walking out about 1 hr into the flick. I&#8217;m definitely not a comic buff/fan, therefore I didn&#8217;t really know what to expect.  The beginning kept me intrigued, yet the vivid images (to include the gore, sex, and &#8220;frontal&#8221;) were a bit too much for my taste.  My wife thoroughly hated it btw..Anyhow, as if it hasn&#8217;t been said before, this isn&#8217;t a family movie&#8230;doesn&#8217;t come near TDK nor Ironman imho (Although I didn&#8217;t read the latter, the graphics and acting were MUCH better than Watchmen). Interesting plot (of what I saw at least), but waaay to much fluff to keep me watching. I shoulda read Vic&#8217;s review prior to paying $20 for tickets&#8230;Will check back here next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

