<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Watchmen Killed &#8216;Comic Book Movies?&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:49:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lewis</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-113862</link>
		<dc:creator>lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-113862</guid>
		<description>i actually thought watchmen was a good movie. i dont know what people are on about saying that its a crap movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i actually thought watchmen was a good movie. i dont know what people are on about saying that its a crap movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Matrix&#8217; Producer Says His &#8216;Watchmen&#8217; Would&#8217;ve Been Better - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-111702</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Matrix&#8217; Producer Says His &#8216;Watchmen&#8217; Would&#8217;ve Been Better - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-111702</guid>
		<description>[...] the end, I think it all comes back to the too-soon-to-call debate about what Watchmen is vs. the wishful-thinking notion of what it could&#8217;ve been. Only time (or the inevitable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] the end, I think it all comes back to the too-soon-to-call debate about what Watchmen is vs. the wishful-thinking notion of what it could&#8217;ve been. Only time (or the inevitable [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Half-Blood Prince&#8217; Advance Tickets Outselling &#8216;Twilight&#8217; - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-109603</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Half-Blood Prince&#8217; Advance Tickets Outselling &#8216;Twilight&#8217; - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-109603</guid>
		<description>[...] Warner Bros. has had a somewhat di$$$apointing blockbuster season so far, with big tentpoles like Watchmen and Terminator Salvation not doing as strongly as hoped at the box office. If the trends Fandango [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] Warner Bros. has had a somewhat di$$$apointing blockbuster season so far, with big tentpoles like Watchmen and Terminator Salvation not doing as strongly as hoped at the box office. If the trends Fandango [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Details On Matthew Vaughn&#8217;s &#8216;Kick-Ass&#8217; - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-109563</link>
		<dc:creator>New Details On Matthew Vaughn&#8217;s &#8216;Kick-Ass&#8217; - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-109563</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;comic book geek&#8221; world, and like Watchmen it&#8217;s very violent. By now we know how (not) great Watchmen did at the box office; however Wanted (another little-known comic book adapted into a violent movie) was a surprise hit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] &#8220;comic book geek&#8221; world, and like Watchmen it&#8217;s very violent. By now we know how (not) great Watchmen did at the box office; however Wanted (another little-known comic book adapted into a violent movie) was a surprise hit [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watchmen Director&#8217;s Cut Will Have Limited Theatrical Release - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-103490</link>
		<dc:creator>Watchmen Director&#8217;s Cut Will Have Limited Theatrical Release - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-103490</guid>
		<description>[...] Watchmen: The Director&#8217;s Cut will be getting a limited theatrical release this July! After all the debate about whether Snyder&#8217;s film was a fantastic achievement or a flaming disaster, Watchmen fans [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] Watchmen: The Director&#8217;s Cut will be getting a limited theatrical release this July! After all the debate about whether Snyder&#8217;s film was a fantastic achievement or a flaming disaster, Watchmen fans [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadpool Creator Talks Deadpool Solo Project - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-80019</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadpool Creator Talks Deadpool Solo Project - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-80019</guid>
		<description>[...] love to see a comic book character that knows he&#8217;s now in a movie, but if Watchmen is a sign, niche comic books don&#8217;t make &#8220;successful&#8221; films (that is, in box office [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] love to see a comic book character that knows he&#8217;s now in a movie, but if Watchmen is a sign, niche comic books don&#8217;t make &#8220;successful&#8221; films (that is, in box office [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIN187UM</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-79407</link>
		<dc:creator>SIN187UM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-79407</guid>
		<description>Firstly I don&#039;t think Watchmen has killed the Comic Book Movie wave or even the R-Rated comic book movie for that matter.  I can honestly say that if they make Terminator Salvation PG-13 it will be a let down on some level.  I&#039;ve never read the graphic novel of Watchmen so I went as a &quot;newbie&quot; if you will when I watched it, but I did read a quick overview on Wikipedia (yes I know this is not the same as reading the whole graphic novel), so I wasn&#039;t completely blind by events of the film, but I must admit when I first saw the trailer I was interested because it appeared to be an R-rated super hero movie, and because it looked cool.  I thought the plot was good, and direction, but it was still lacking.  I don&#039;t really agree that films should be made specifically for fanboys that are going to be released to the general public, and Im glad for the most part they are not, because lets face it most of the revenue is coming from the the general movie watcher public as far as films are concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly I don&#8217;t think Watchmen has killed the Comic Book Movie wave or even the R-Rated comic book movie for that matter.  I can honestly say that if they make Terminator Salvation PG-13 it will be a let down on some level.  I&#8217;ve never read the graphic novel of Watchmen so I went as a &#8220;newbie&#8221; if you will when I watched it, but I did read a quick overview on Wikipedia (yes I know this is not the same as reading the whole graphic novel), so I wasn&#8217;t completely blind by events of the film, but I must admit when I first saw the trailer I was interested because it appeared to be an R-rated super hero movie, and because it looked cool.  I thought the plot was good, and direction, but it was still lacking.  I don&#8217;t really agree that films should be made specifically for fanboys that are going to be released to the general public, and Im glad for the most part they are not, because lets face it most of the revenue is coming from the the general movie watcher public as far as films are concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Details On the &#8216;Venom&#8217; Script - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-78278</link>
		<dc:creator>New Details On the &#8216;Venom&#8217; Script - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-78278</guid>
		<description>[...] the last few years, and the success of Watchmen, a film that was all about comic book anti-heroes, is certainly debatable. This could be a steep uphill battle for old Venom (his co-creator Todd McFarlane certainly thinks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] the last few years, and the success of Watchmen, a film that was all about comic book anti-heroes, is certainly debatable. This could be a steep uphill battle for old Venom (his co-creator Todd McFarlane certainly thinks [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1-7</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-76061</link>
		<dc:creator>1-7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-76061</guid>
		<description>Watchmen has moments of brilliance, but succumbs to mediocrity too often and this becomes frustrating for the audience.  It entangles the viewers with strong characters but fails to deliver a strong conclusion.  The movie is nearly 3 hours long but it did not have 3 hours worth of material.  It could have, but Snyder decided it was more important to spend nearly a minute zooming out from a tombstone.  In the end, I think Alan Moore was right.  A graphic novel by its very nature is able to do things which can not be translated onto the big screen, or they can if you want unintended comedic or implausible moments.  On paper, Watchmen is brilliant, on film, it’s just another comic book movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watchmen has moments of brilliance, but succumbs to mediocrity too often and this becomes frustrating for the audience.  It entangles the viewers with strong characters but fails to deliver a strong conclusion.  The movie is nearly 3 hours long but it did not have 3 hours worth of material.  It could have, but Snyder decided it was more important to spend nearly a minute zooming out from a tombstone.  In the end, I think Alan Moore was right.  A graphic novel by its very nature is able to do things which can not be translated onto the big screen, or they can if you want unintended comedic or implausible moments.  On paper, Watchmen is brilliant, on film, it’s just another comic book movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-75245</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-75245</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t speak for sin city, but to me the difference between 300 and watchmen is obvious.  Watchmen is nearly 400 pages long, while 300 is less than 100. 
 That means when adapting 300, there was room to include everything from the comic plus padding to make it work better as a movie.
A true watchmen &#039;comic book film&#039; would be like 8 hours long.  The version we were given was almost 3 hours long and still left out half the source material.  So ironically, by trying to be so faithful he has stripped the comic down to a hollow shell of what it was.  It looked like watchmen, but it didn&#039;t feel like watchmen.  It was missing the spirit of the comic, because we didn&#039;t have enough information and time to absorb all the characters and events that shaped the watchmen world.  Most importantly, we didn&#039;t get to absorb the politically charged climate.  It didn&#039;t have that sense of impending doom that was so important to the source.  Basically what I&#039;m saying is, watchmen can&#039;t me made into a shot for shot adaptation because it&#039;s way too long.  Snyder tried anyway, and what we got was half a film.
To adapt watchmen successfully, it would have to be rewritten, ala V for Vendetta.  That movie worked because it took the basic plot, characters, and ideas of the comic and wrote a movie around them.  So as different as the film was, it still had the spirit of the comic.  I had all the same reactions and emotions while watching as I did while reading.  And the ending was just as satisfying, if not more.

Also it should be noted that neither watchmen nor v for vendetta had narration like 300, which greatly eases the transfer from novel to film.  Another thing to consider is pacing.  Scenes that play perfectly in panels can often seem long and drawn out on film.  That&#039;s why its so important to rewrite an adaptation like watchmen.  You have to play to the strengths of your medium, so when that medium changes, so must the story.

For what its worth, I think watchmen would have worked great as a 12 part HBO miniseries, provided it had the budget.  Then they could make a true shot for shot adaptation with no changes or omissions, and retain the feel of a serial stroy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak for sin city, but to me the difference between 300 and watchmen is obvious.  Watchmen is nearly 400 pages long, while 300 is less than 100.<br />
 That means when adapting 300, there was room to include everything from the comic plus padding to make it work better as a movie.<br />
A true watchmen &#8216;comic book film&#8217; would be like 8 hours long.  The version we were given was almost 3 hours long and still left out half the source material.  So ironically, by trying to be so faithful he has stripped the comic down to a hollow shell of what it was.  It looked like watchmen, but it didn&#8217;t feel like watchmen.  It was missing the spirit of the comic, because we didn&#8217;t have enough information and time to absorb all the characters and events that shaped the watchmen world.  Most importantly, we didn&#8217;t get to absorb the politically charged climate.  It didn&#8217;t have that sense of impending doom that was so important to the source.  Basically what I&#8217;m saying is, watchmen can&#8217;t me made into a shot for shot adaptation because it&#8217;s way too long.  Snyder tried anyway, and what we got was half a film.<br />
To adapt watchmen successfully, it would have to be rewritten, ala V for Vendetta.  That movie worked because it took the basic plot, characters, and ideas of the comic and wrote a movie around them.  So as different as the film was, it still had the spirit of the comic.  I had all the same reactions and emotions while watching as I did while reading.  And the ending was just as satisfying, if not more.</p>
<p>Also it should be noted that neither watchmen nor v for vendetta had narration like 300, which greatly eases the transfer from novel to film.  Another thing to consider is pacing.  Scenes that play perfectly in panels can often seem long and drawn out on film.  That&#8217;s why its so important to rewrite an adaptation like watchmen.  You have to play to the strengths of your medium, so when that medium changes, so must the story.</p>
<p>For what its worth, I think watchmen would have worked great as a 12 part HBO miniseries, provided it had the budget.  Then they could make a true shot for shot adaptation with no changes or omissions, and retain the feel of a serial stroy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the biz</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-75007</link>
		<dc:creator>the biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-75007</guid>
		<description>You obviously have never read The Spirit if you think that film followed the source material closely or faithfully.

Watchmen was the unfilmable graphic novel and this was proven in the awful photocopy job they attempted in the film.

Honestly, Hollywood can stay out of the comic book film business forever. The saying is always, &quot;the book is always better&quot;. It is true of novels and short stories and it is true with the comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You obviously have never read The Spirit if you think that film followed the source material closely or faithfully.</p>
<p>Watchmen was the unfilmable graphic novel and this was proven in the awful photocopy job they attempted in the film.</p>
<p>Honestly, Hollywood can stay out of the comic book film business forever. The saying is always, &#8220;the book is always better&#8221;. It is true of novels and short stories and it is true with the comics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GBB</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-74817</link>
		<dc:creator>GBB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-74817</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the premise that fanboys of the book tend to love the movie. As such a fanboy, knowing what could have been just made me more disgusted with the stiff acting, the poor pacing, and the lousy billboard dialogue of this expensive, glowing blue lump. Regardless of the R-rating, the familiarity or unfamiliarity with the graphic novel, or for chrissakes the blue willy (really?), the box office dived because Watchmen is a bad movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the premise that fanboys of the book tend to love the movie. As such a fanboy, knowing what could have been just made me more disgusted with the stiff acting, the poor pacing, and the lousy billboard dialogue of this expensive, glowing blue lump. Regardless of the R-rating, the familiarity or unfamiliarity with the graphic novel, or for chrissakes the blue willy (really?), the box office dived because Watchmen is a bad movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordThanos X</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-74732</link>
		<dc:creator>LordThanos X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-74732</guid>
		<description>ok</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prototype</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-74728</link>
		<dc:creator>Prototype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-74728</guid>
		<description>Then we agree to disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then we agree to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordThanos X</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-74507</link>
		<dc:creator>LordThanos X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-74507</guid>
		<description>@ prototype 

Did you post saying anything about liking it. and I don&#039;t think the marketing was the issue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ prototype </p>
<p>Did you post saying anything about liking it. and I don&#8217;t think the marketing was the issue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tube Notes: &#8216;Motherhood,&#8217; &#8216;Samantha Who&#8217; return (Honolulu Advertiser) &#124; Hotustrends.com</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-74377</link>
		<dc:creator>Tube Notes: &#8216;Motherhood,&#8217; &#8216;Samantha Who&#8217; return (Honolulu Advertiser) &#124; Hotustrends.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-74377</guid>
		<description>[...] Has Watchmen Killed ‘Comic Book Movies?’ (Screen Rant) Will the box office disappointment of Watchmen affect future superhero movies?   SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Tube Notes: &#8216;Motherhood,&#8217; &#8216;Samantha Who&#8217; return (Honolulu Advertiser)&quot;, url: &quot;http://hotustrends.com/tube-notes-motherhood-samantha-who-return-honolulu-advertiser/&quot; }); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] Has Watchmen Killed ‘Comic Book Movies?’ (Screen Rant) Will the box office disappointment of Watchmen affect future superhero movies?   SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Tube Notes: &#8216;Motherhood,&#8217; &#8216;Samantha Who&#8217; return (Honolulu Advertiser)&#8221;, url: &#8220;http://hotustrends.com/tube-notes-motherhood-samantha-who-return-honolulu-advertiser/&#8221; }); [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prototype - Revised</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-74225</link>
		<dc:creator>Prototype - Revised</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-74225</guid>
		<description>@ LordThanos X

Where on earth in my post did I state that Watchmen was SUCKED because it was not Spider Man or Batman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ LordThanos X</p>
<p>Where on earth in my post did I state that Watchmen was SUCKED because it was not Spider Man or Batman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prototype</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-73274</link>
		<dc:creator>Prototype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-73274</guid>
		<description>@ ppnkof

Yes, I see what you&#039;re saying, but Watchmen was hugely unlikely to be a success form the get-go.  Other films such as The Dark Knight and Iron Man don&#039;t even need to bother to explain their stories in the trailers because pretty much everyone knows the characters.  Watchmen on the other hand is not well-known at all and the trailers and the marketing needed to explain what the film was about a whole lot more which they failed to do.  Yes, more honesty probably wouldn&#039;t have helped it but then again it may have spared some of WB&#039;s massive marketing dollars which appears to have been wasted.

@ LordThanos X

Not trying to be rude, indeed.  Where on earth in my post did I state that Watchmen was a failure because it was not Spider Man or Batman?  Where in my post did I speak of the complexities of the characters being a factor in Watchmen&#039;s dismal box office performance?I also fail to see how my opinion is invalid but you childish tirade is.  I too have read the graphic novel and consider it to be the most groundbreaking and important graphic novel ever published so I had no problem following the story which adhered well to the source.  Unlike your assumption, I liked the film and perhaps appreciated it far more than most people who quickly wrote it off.  My post was addressing why Watchmen failed at the box office and I believe that came down to marketing, not the story itself.  It&#039;s interesting how you quickly disregard the marketing for the film when it is crucial to any film&#039;s success.  Most people not familiar with the graphic novel went in expecting one thing and came out with another.  WB built the film up to be an action film of sorts and people went in expecting that but they quickly realized it was far from an action film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ppnkof</p>
<p>Yes, I see what you&#8217;re saying, but Watchmen was hugely unlikely to be a success form the get-go.  Other films such as The Dark Knight and Iron Man don&#8217;t even need to bother to explain their stories in the trailers because pretty much everyone knows the characters.  Watchmen on the other hand is not well-known at all and the trailers and the marketing needed to explain what the film was about a whole lot more which they failed to do.  Yes, more honesty probably wouldn&#8217;t have helped it but then again it may have spared some of WB&#8217;s massive marketing dollars which appears to have been wasted.</p>
<p>@ LordThanos X</p>
<p>Not trying to be rude, indeed.  Where on earth in my post did I state that Watchmen was a failure because it was not Spider Man or Batman?  Where in my post did I speak of the complexities of the characters being a factor in Watchmen&#8217;s dismal box office performance?I also fail to see how my opinion is invalid but you childish tirade is.  I too have read the graphic novel and consider it to be the most groundbreaking and important graphic novel ever published so I had no problem following the story which adhered well to the source.  Unlike your assumption, I liked the film and perhaps appreciated it far more than most people who quickly wrote it off.  My post was addressing why Watchmen failed at the box office and I believe that came down to marketing, not the story itself.  It&#8217;s interesting how you quickly disregard the marketing for the film when it is crucial to any film&#8217;s success.  Most people not familiar with the graphic novel went in expecting one thing and came out with another.  WB built the film up to be an action film of sorts and people went in expecting that but they quickly realized it was far from an action film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manowar</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-73157</link>
		<dc:creator>Manowar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-73157</guid>
		<description>To all the people who say that &quot;if there were blue breasts in the movie, nobody would be talking about it.&quot; Well, I bet if there were women with giant blue breasts that hung down to their waists, I bet alot of people would&#039;ve been talking about it. Regardless, you can&#039;t compare breasts to penis&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all the people who say that &#8220;if there were blue breasts in the movie, nobody would be talking about it.&#8221; Well, I bet if there were women with giant blue breasts that hung down to their waists, I bet alot of people would&#8217;ve been talking about it. Regardless, you can&#8217;t compare breasts to penis&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordThanos X</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/watchmen-killed-comic-book-movies-kofi-6133/comment-page-4/#comment-73106</link>
		<dc:creator>LordThanos X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6133#comment-73106</guid>
		<description>Not trying to be rude @ Prototype but the movie was a failure . How was it a failure explain to me please A valid reason. So  this is what I get from your message.  WELL UMMM WATCHMEN SUCKED TO ME BECAUSE IT WASN&#039;T LIKE SPIDER-MAN BATMAN OR IRON-MAN. Well 1st of all are  you a little slow.... I mean I read two issues of watchmen and saw the movie. But  I understood the movie. So clearly you don&#039;t know how to follow a Story. And also Honestly speaking if you can&#039;t pay attention u shouldn&#039;t  go to the movies. The character&#039;s in this movie were as real as it gets. I mean can you say that if you where a hero you would  save everyone ... even the baddest of the baddest of people. Example Rorschach let a lot of bad people go a lot, until that rapist guy killed the little girl chopped her up and feed her to the dogs. then Rorschach snapped. He lost it. If it was spiderman he would have just took him back to jail.. until he got loose again. I love spiderman dont get me wrong. but sometime you would think in certain situations  someone would be pushed to the edge. The Character&#039;s in this film where pushed beyond that point, especially  Dr. Manhattan, The Comedian , and the Rich guy. The Comedian  looked at people no differently than how some people look at each other now, that guy really didn&#039;t care. But you have your right to your opinion but have to come with something better than the marketing crap. you must have like feel on the steps of the theater and went unconscious and thought you saw the film</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not trying to be rude @ Prototype but the movie was a failure . How was it a failure explain to me please A valid reason. So  this is what I get from your message.  WELL UMMM WATCHMEN SUCKED TO ME BECAUSE IT WASN&#8217;T LIKE SPIDER-MAN BATMAN OR IRON-MAN. Well 1st of all are  you a little slow&#8230;. I mean I read two issues of watchmen and saw the movie. But  I understood the movie. So clearly you don&#8217;t know how to follow a Story. And also Honestly speaking if you can&#8217;t pay attention u shouldn&#8217;t  go to the movies. The character&#8217;s in this movie were as real as it gets. I mean can you say that if you where a hero you would  save everyone &#8230; even the baddest of the baddest of people. Example Rorschach let a lot of bad people go a lot, until that rapist guy killed the little girl chopped her up and feed her to the dogs. then Rorschach snapped. He lost it. If it was spiderman he would have just took him back to jail.. until he got loose again. I love spiderman dont get me wrong. but sometime you would think in certain situations  someone would be pushed to the edge. The Character&#8217;s in this film where pushed beyond that point, especially  Dr. Manhattan, The Comedian , and the Rich guy. The Comedian  looked at people no differently than how some people look at each other now, that guy really didn&#8217;t care. But you have your right to your opinion but have to come with something better than the marketing crap. you must have like feel on the steps of the theater and went unconscious and thought you saw the film</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
