‘The Walking Dead’: Why Frank Darabont Was Fired & The Chaotic Aftermath

Aug 12, 2011 by  

Frank Darabont The Walking Dead

The news of Frank Darabont stepping down from AMC’s hit series The Walking Dead took everyone by surprise. This feeling grew even more when it was revealed that Darabont didn’t step down, but was actually fired.

With fans seeking to find out why the man who championed last year’s television phenomenon was unceremoniously fired days after appearing at Comic-Con 2011, The Hollywood Reporter is presenting the facts as they know them – including the chaotic mess in which The Walking Dead season 2 currently finds itself.

Shortly after his appearance at Comic-Con, Darabont returned to Los Angeles to work on editing an episode of the upcoming second season of The Walking Dead. With the cast in Atlanta to continue filming, Ben Davis, AMC vice-president of scripted programming, gathered the cast together for a lunch meeting. In this meeting, he broke the news that Darabont had been fired. With a simple explanation of “This isn’t working,” sources close to the series said that “It’s a crushing blow” and that “Even when you have a hit, they can still destroy you.”

Even though The Walking Dead proved to be a hit – and it is the only series that AMC owns completely – the network had already announced to the producers that they would not only be cutting the budget of the series from $3.4 million to $2.7 million, but that they would also want 13 episodes produced instead of 6 episodes that made up its first season. To make matters worse, AMC also told the producers that the 30% tax credit that the series receives from filming in Georgia would go directly to the network, and not make up for some of the money that was taken out of the production budget.

The Walking Dead - Comic-Con 2010The Walking Dead @ Comic-Con

AMC’s fiscal irresponsibility and their lack of appreciation for those who make The Walking Dead is largely what led to Darabont being fired. Originally taking the announcement of a second season budget cut in stride, the producers of the series decided to wait until the first season premiered. After The Walking Dead began breaking ratings records for the network, the producers assumed their budget wouldn’t be cut as much as originally thought.

Unfortunately, this is exactly what happened – and Darabont wasn’t too happy about it. Known as a man who fights for what he believes in, a confrontation between AMC and The Walking Dead producers occurred. With the head of original programming for AMC, Joel Stillerman, sticking to the cut budget, the network than began to overstep their bounds and attempt to tell Darabont how to produce the series.

Instead of long, sprawling outdoor scenes, the network wanted the second season of The Walking Dead to occur 50% outdoors and 50% indoors (indoors being cheaper to film). Another note asked whether or not the audience had to always see the zombies – couldn’t they simply hear them sometimes.

Jack Stillerman AMCHead of Original Production for AMC Jack Stillerman (on the right)

It’s been said that Darabont was involved in constant battles with the network to maintain the creative vision that drew so many fans to the series in the first place. On top of that, sources say that Darabont “doesn’t like to see the cast and crew overworked and underpaid.” Even with record ratings on their side, Darabont would repeatedly enter meetings with Stillerman where he would simply say, “Ratings have no bearing on this conversation.” Stillerman is somewhat known for not being the “best person” to deal with. With rumors persisting that he has poor relationships with most of AMC’s series creators, insiders have begun to say that “Joel [Stillerman] thinks he is responsible for the success of shows on AMC, and not the creators.”

With AMC making a leap into the forefront of scripted television, there’s always been a sense of the network going through growing pains. Not only is AMC doing it on their own (they have no parent company to support them), but they’re also trying to maintain a quality which rivals that of their pay-cable counterparts, HBO and Showtime.

Unfortunately, AMC only makes 60 cents for each cable subscriber, which isn’t enough to maintain the level of quality they were once able to do when they weren’t expected to pay the same amount as the other networks for programming. That being said, it’s hard to really stand up for a network that’s being championed by someone who’s a complete contrarian to the creative process.

walking dead comic cast season 2The cast of The Walking Dead

Even if AMC was trying to do what’s best for the network (without having to operate at a loss – something that HBO does, but is evened out by HBO being owned by Time Warner), there comes a point when taking a loss for the quality of the product is more important for the long term.

As the saying goes, “Good things come to those who wait.”

AMC has been waiting a long time to make it this far. Jumping from simply replaying old movies to creating original content – this all comes with a price. While not everything will make the financial return that you’re hoping for, it rarely does when you’re first starting out. And for AMC, they’re most certainly starting out.

Hopefully AMC will make it through these growing pains intact. If not, you can sure bet that there are many other cable networks willing to take over in the place (and have the money to do it).

Now that Glen Mazzara is taking over for Frank Darabont, we’ll have to wait and see what happens when The Walking Dead season 2 premieres.

Fingers crossed.

-

The Walking Dead season 2 premieres October 19 on AMC

Follow Anthony on Twitter @anthonyocasio

Source: The Hollywood Reporter

"Follow us if you want to live."

83 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. HBO operates at a loss? I thought they made significant profits. I looked it up and they had a billion in profit from 45 billion in revenue in a recent year. Genuinely curious, am I missing something?

  2. This guy Stillerman is completely inept. He should be fired. We always want to see the zombies and lets face it these people are going to have to leave the farm eventually. Maybe anorher network could offer to buy the series?

  3. They completely ruined the show. It has gone from one about survival and th Apocalypse to some Days of Our zombie lives soap opera with stupid, insipid story lines and increasingly unlikable characters that all deserve to be eaten (with the lousy writers). The show lost its edge.

    • I agree with you completely.

  4. i was wondering why the show was ok the first season then turned into shiiit complete shiiiitt the second season the jew stillerman wants to make a profit and turn the show into what i beleive its equal in quality is jersey shore now what an jerk

  5. I can’t believe what I just read regarding the firing of one of the creative geniuses behind the Walking Dead and AMC’s penny-wise, pound-foolish decision to cut the budget of this excellent show.
    AMC has a huge ratings hit BECAUSE of the high quality of the show’s production values, scripts, characters, and the aforementioned creative geniuses behind the scenes. The firing seems like a classic case of cutting off their nose to spite their face. They can’t really, seriously, be that stupid…..or can they? (Apparently the answer to that is, unfortunately, yes).
    If the show’s quality suffers they’ll lose their audience, period, then just think of all the money they’ll save!

  6. Season 2 was a horrid disappoint, especially held against Season 1. AMC raped this show. Here’s hoping another network returns and can get Frank back on board.

    Season 2 would’ve been 100% more enjoyable for me if there was at LEAST ONE other narrative following characters out in the thick of things and not locked into the idle soap opera at the farm.

    What about Merle? Morgan and his son? The Morales family? This would’ve made the drudging purgatory the main cast’s been locked into at least tolerable and forced us to only get the good bits.

    Instead, we’re chained to increasingly unlikable characters with nothing to do but monologue and search for a character none of us even noticed before she went missing. Abysmal.

  7. I am not going to mention any names but someone should be banned from AMC for their seriously stupid mistake. Season 1 was very exciting to say the least. I have watched all of Season 2 and have seen a dramatic change in quality. If I wanted a soap opera I would turn to CBS. Needless to say with all of the crappy changes and the loss of the original concept I will not watch Season 3. Hire back Daramont and fire the idiot.

  8. I haven’t read the comic book, so I can’t comment on how closely the show sticks to it – and I’ve only just read about the firing of Darabont (Typical Network moronics) and the budget cut too – as I live in the UK. But I loved the second series – Comics are a niche market and to transfer them to screen directly sounds a bit risky to me – as TV needs to appeal to a broader audience than just comic book/graphic novel fans. A TV series needs to have good character development which series two did well for me – the shock of Dale and Shane dying was a big hit for me because of this.
    I think the creators did a great job of making over double the episodes on a smaller budget for S2, credit where it’s due. Having said that though Stillerman is obviously a kretin, he wants 2 cakes and he wants to eat them both. I say the TWD should stick them both in his face and move to the home of Dexter too.

  9. The first 5 episodes really had me disappointed. It did feel more like a Soap Opera. However, when episode 6 aired it shocked me and I’m sure it shocked a lot of viewers. I enjoyed the remaining episodes of Season 2 after that. With that said, YES WE WANT TO SEE THE ZOMBIES! I will watch Season 3. I didn’t realize AMC was having so many problems. I vote the show get picked up by another network before AMC runs it into the ground with budget cuts. Even if this show eventually goes under, I don’t think it will be the last time we will see a zombie series.

  10. Season 1 dragged a bit, but picked up at the end. Season 2 was much better in my opinion. Got me hooked. But each to their own.
    Frank getting fired is utter rubbish, though. 19 eps for the next season? Bring it.

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.