Comments on: Venom Updates: How Will It Tie Into Spider-Man Franchise?

By: Story For Spider-Man Reboot Already Exists - Screen Rant

Story For Spider-Man Reboot Already Exists - Screen Rant — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:02:58 +0000

[...] they will use the characters we’ve already seen in Raimi’s trilogy with one exception: Venom. You can argue all you want, but Venom isn’t nearly as bankable character compared to [...]

By: Spider-Man 4 Cancelled! - Screen Rant

Spider-Man 4 Cancelled! - Screen Rant — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:52:44 +0000

[...] Venom Updates: How Will It Tie Into Spider-Man Franchise? [...]

By: Confirmed: Spider-Man 4 Delayed - Screen Rant

Confirmed: Spider-Man 4 Delayed - Screen Rant — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:56:58 +0000

[...] that would focus on just him. This would of worked well for the franchise and could easily have tied into the Venom spin-off they’ve been talking about for a long [...]

By: chrisj

chrisj — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:04:27 +0000

@ Peter
It’s obvious that Superman/Lois had a kid after what viewers seen in Superman 2 when Superman became human for a short while and he/Lois slept together in bed in the Fortress Of Solitude. And at the end of the film Superman gave her the Amnesia kiss and she forgot about Clark/Superman being the same guy. As for Lois having reading glasses, what’s the big deal about Singer putting that in there? Lois is a journalist and its obvious she wants to check her spelling before any article of hers is finalized. She also was askin how many letters for a certain word in the film just as she did in the original.

By: peter

peter — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:55:29 +0000

I’m not complaining of Superman having a kid. But what confuse me is that how did Lois has his child without knowing who the kid’s father (as describe in the SR prequel comics – thinking it shld be from Richard Perry’s son)
Thing gets even more complicating after declaring that the kid is obviously Superman’s son but yet Lois still didnt know who is Superman/ClarkKent.
That just make her stupid to potray as a smart journalist, Plus why does she ever wearing glasses? Who’s dumb idea is that?? Do you get what I mean.
Bryan Singer may have made some decent X-men movies but he sure did screw up Superman franchise. Thanks to him that WB have to hold on wth all the other DC properties & deal with it cautiously starting with the lesser known characters such as Jonah Hex, The Losers, Lobo & etc.

By: Will Sam Raimi Direct Spider-Man 5 & 6? - Screen Rant

Will Sam Raimi Direct Spider-Man 5 & 6? - Screen Rant — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:39:13 +0000

[...] Venom Updates: How Will It Tie Into Spider-Man Franchise? [...]

By: John K.

John K. — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:48:41 +0000

Sorry, i went bak to thinking Green Goblin was used too early. Spiderman couldn`t have already been ready to fight him.

By: Rogers

Rogers — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:58:48 +0000

Oh and PLEASE JUST PUT A LITTLE HORROR VIOLENCE OTHER THAN ACTION FIGHTING VIOLENCE IN THIS MOVIE OR ELSE IT WILL BE TOO KID-FRIENDLY JUST PLEASE PUT A LITTLE VIOLENCE IN THIS MOVIE DON`T MAKE SPIDERMAN TOO CHARMING KID OR FAMILYISH IT WON`T BE A BAD MOVIE IF THE CHARACTERS GOT THE LIFE THEY WANTED PLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Rogers

Rogers — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:04:27 +0000

Well i`m not saying it was wrong for him to get money for his daughter`s medical attention, but i`m just saying there were different plots in there interfering with another, they were all mixed and not very well organized.

By: chrisj

chrisj — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:47:07 +0000

@ Rogers
Whocares if Sandman had a kid, commiting crimes to get money to help his dying girl is no different from Mr. Freeze commiting crimes to get money to cure his wife etc. The purpose was to give Sandman a motive otherwise he’d be like any other villain like Rhino. Nothin to drag the movie down on. As for Superman having a kid in the comics was pretty much because they were running outta ideas for comics. Especially after they had Lois & Clark tie the knot etc. Unrelated example is what Bruce Timm said about toning down Superman’s powers for the animated series. If Superman had his full strength as he did in the earlier comics, the show would be over within 5 mins or under. Back to the comic, basically Superman having kid was intended to make a great comic for every comic collector.

By: Rogers

Rogers — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:33:39 +0000

Sandman did not need to have a kid in Sm3, it was all plumped in there. It was an understandable story but things didn`t make sense. Anyway if Superman had a kid in the comics then i think they kind of ruined the Superman comic book, it`s a little too deep for the character, just so as Spiderman, if they make Spiderman have a kid in Spiderman 4 it will ruin Spiderman for me, please don`t go too steep down the hill with(one)of my favorite superheros please!!!!!

By: chrisj

chrisj — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:50:44 +0000

@BadMammaJamma
Superman Returns is intended to take place after Superman 2 &
ignoring events in Superman 3 & 4 cause Martha Kent is deceased in both those films. Superman was human for a short while while sleeping w/lois in the Fortress of Solitude etc. And it was mentioned that Lois was only engaged, not married yet cause Jimmy was telling Clark not to ask when she is cause everybody knows she hates that question. People shouldnt be surprised Superman had a kid cause he does in the comics etc. Even in Lois & Clark: new adventures of superman covered the issue but changed the facts up in the series finale.

@ Rogers
Sandman had a daughter who was sick for drama purposes.

By: Rogers

Rogers — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:57:28 +0000

And yeah they BETTER NOT MAKE SPIDERMAN HAVE A KID, PLEASE MAKE SPIDEY 4 HAVE SOMEWHAT A DARK DRAMATIC STORY(NOT AS DARK AS TDK) WITHOUT A KID GETTING MIXED IN, IN SM3 IT WAS A NICE STORY IN GENERAL BUT WHY DID SANDMAN HAVE TO HAVE A DAUGHTER IN SM3 WHY???

By: Rogers

Rogers — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:53:23 +0000

oh yeah there`s lots of news floating around other superhero franchises, anybody heard that they`re planning to do a superman reboot? And if they bring Joker back in Batman 3 i think it shouldn`t be such a cloft, also i`m kind of looking forward to Iron Man 2 with Iron fighting War Machine or whoever as well as Captain America and Avengers. I think Superman, Batman, X-Men, Spiderman, Hulk,(i think, not sure) and Iron are all tied as my favorite superheroes. There are different types of qualities I like about them as long as they don`t go toooo intense, and if the Disney/Marvel relationship affects what`s going on with Spidey 4, Iron Man 2, etc… then i can`t feel good about it. I really rather they wait to reboot Spidey and let Iron Man be for a little while, i just hope that they don`t do anything with their Disney hands and do anything more such as put any comedy or anything with the movies and make them all kid/family-friendly entertaining, cuz that`s what i thought they wanted to do with them when i first heard about it. If the Pg-13 ratings get lowered it will ruin most superheroes for me forever.

By: BadMammaJamma

BadMammaJamma — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:10:29 +0000

I didn’t love S3 nor did I hate it, but although I won’t let my 4 yo son see the movie, he is obsessed with Venom. (He made me find the scariest Venom mask for halloween.)

Spiderman could be pretty hokey in the comics as were all of the older comics, right? I mean at some point wasn’t there a lot of alternate universe stuff or am I mistaken?

@Rogers-I thought in Superman 4, the kid was Superman’s from before he left. She just happened to get married around the same time. Once again, am I mixed up

By: Rogers

Rogers — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:09:18 +0000

And as I said, if the Venom spinoff happens, I`ll also be pissed.

By: Rogers

Rogers — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:59:05 +0000

oh and as i said i thought the fightscenes in Spiderman 3 were still feelable but still sitty

By: Rogers

Rogers — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:54:13 +0000

Um, in Superman Returns Superman didn`t have a child, Lois was already married. Anyway i agree, Spiderman 3 was a piece of crap, i really don`t see what kind of story they`re gonna carry for Sm5, and has anyone heard about the disney/Marvel relationship going on? If disney bought both the company and the movies and if it doesn`t affect anything to do with Marvel and it`s just to make a bigger company and doesn`t affect any of the scenery or plans Marvel wants to put for their upcoming movies then maybe i don`t care except for upcoming movies like Sm4, Iron Man 2, Avengers, Captain America i really somehow those movies are the Marvel-type not the disney-type even if they don`t lower the pg-13 rating but if they only own the movies i really don`t feel good about it cuz i want to see Marvel make certain plans for the upcoming films it might ruin all the franchises if Spiderman 4, Iron Man 2, Avengers, and Captain America are even touched by Disney somehow i don`t feel good about it i think they should wait to reboot maybe X-Men and Fantastic 4 or Hulk I don`t care but i don`t know about rebooting Spiderman and i think Iron Man and Cap. America should wait for a little while then maybe disney could own the business bbut i`m not sure

By: John K.

John K. — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:34:32 +0000

And there were tons of stuff going on in SM3, all the problems and abusiveness between Peter, Mj, Harry, and Gwen Stacy was just crap

By: John K.

John K. — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:32:48 +0000

I`d hate to say it, but maybe setting Venom up for 4 with Carng in the last hour would`ve been the right thing to do. though i`m not sure