<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Better Look At The USS Kelvin From &#8216;Star Trek&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:14:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fury2701</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-105801</link>
		<dc:creator>Fury2701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-105801</guid>
		<description>@Vic

You can&#039;t mess with a Star Trek fan.

P.S. Let me know if I&#039;m becoming too much of a thread hawk.

It&#039;s your site; I don&#039;t want to step on anyone&#039;s toes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vic</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t mess with a Star Trek fan.</p>
<p>P.S. Let me know if I&#8217;m becoming too much of a thread hawk.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s your site; I don&#8217;t want to step on anyone&#8217;s toes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-105799</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-105799</guid>
		<description>@Fury

No worries, I deleted his comment. Thanks for pointing it out.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fury</p>
<p>No worries, I deleted his comment. Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fury2701</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-105796</link>
		<dc:creator>Fury2701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-105796</guid>
		<description>No bashing friend.  Read your comment box - there should be no personal attacks.

Calling people dorks and nerds is just plain mean.

Galaxy Quest was a good movie BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No bashing friend.  Read your comment box &#8211; there should be no personal attacks.</p>
<p>Calling people dorks and nerds is just plain mean.</p>
<p>Galaxy Quest was a good movie BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliven</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-101472</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-101472</guid>
		<description>@ Jim . . 

The Hermes scout class&#039; design was also used for a &quot;destroyer, escort or frigate&quot; (quote from Memory Alpha wiki) class, called the Saladin class.

There was also one more federation warp-capable ship, with a different design, from the old ST Tech Manual:  a &quot;tugboat&quot; type ship, called he Ptolemy class.  It had a design (very) superficially resembling the later &quot;Reliant&quot; style frigate, with 2 nacelles below the primary hull on very long pylons, a nav deflector dish (like the one on the Hermes/Saladin classes) projecting out of the bottom of the &quot;saucer section&quot;.   The tug had no secondary hull (only the saucer), but it did still have the ventral &quot;connector neck&quot;, which was used to connect to detachable cargo units (which were long cylinders, so resembled a secondary hull); one cargo unit coupled to the neck, and further cargo units were strung off the back of that unit, in a chain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jim . . </p>
<p>The Hermes scout class&#8217; design was also used for a &#8220;destroyer, escort or frigate&#8221; (quote from Memory Alpha wiki) class, called the Saladin class.</p>
<p>There was also one more federation warp-capable ship, with a different design, from the old ST Tech Manual:  a &#8220;tugboat&#8221; type ship, called he Ptolemy class.  It had a design (very) superficially resembling the later &#8220;Reliant&#8221; style frigate, with 2 nacelles below the primary hull on very long pylons, a nav deflector dish (like the one on the Hermes/Saladin classes) projecting out of the bottom of the &#8220;saucer section&#8221;.   The tug had no secondary hull (only the saucer), but it did still have the ventral &#8220;connector neck&#8221;, which was used to connect to detachable cargo units (which were long cylinders, so resembled a secondary hull); one cargo unit coupled to the neck, and further cargo units were strung off the back of that unit, in a chain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Bechtel</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-89765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bechtel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 01:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-89765</guid>
		<description>The design is similiar to a Starfleet scout ship from the original series. Franz Joseph Designs put out blue prints of three ship classes; Constitution Class, Scout Class and Dreadnaught Class. Also if anyone has ever heard of or played Star Fleet Battles or the FASA, Star Trek Starship Tactical Combat Simulator(strategy board games), you will find many interesting designs in the ship recognition manuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The design is similiar to a Starfleet scout ship from the original series. Franz Joseph Designs put out blue prints of three ship classes; Constitution Class, Scout Class and Dreadnaught Class. Also if anyone has ever heard of or played Star Fleet Battles or the FASA, Star Trek Starship Tactical Combat Simulator(strategy board games), you will find many interesting designs in the ship recognition manuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-87968</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-87968</guid>
		<description>the secondaet hull also contains the shuttle bay on seeing the new film twice it wierd thing is that it looks worse off interior wise than the nx-01</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the secondaet hull also contains the shuttle bay on seeing the new film twice it wierd thing is that it looks worse off interior wise than the nx-01</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Star Trek XI (gesehen) [SPOILER] - Seite 23 - SciFi-Forum</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-86931</link>
		<dc:creator>Star Trek XI (gesehen) [SPOILER] - Seite 23 - SciFi-Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-86931</guid>
		<description>[...] h</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] h</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-78528</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-78528</guid>
		<description>@Jake

That&#039;s the secondary or engineering hull. It&#039;s usually below the primary hull (disc) but in this case they put it on top.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jake</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the secondary or engineering hull. It&#8217;s usually below the primary hull (disc) but in this case they put it on top.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-78439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-78439</guid>
		<description>what is that thing at the top? The Star Trek website says the Kelvin only has one warp Nacelle, logic dictates that the thing on the bottom is the warp nacelle, so what is the thing on top?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is that thing at the top? The Star Trek website says the Kelvin only has one warp Nacelle, logic dictates that the thing on the bottom is the warp nacelle, so what is the thing on top?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johhny-O</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-76054</link>
		<dc:creator>Johhny-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-76054</guid>
		<description>The Kelvin is interesting, not so much for the hull layout &amp; design but for it&#039;s detail, what you modelers might call &#039;weathering&#039; - it looks like a ship that has been serving a long time, and has many scars - plus, I like the abscence of any streamlining - like the squared-off tail of the lower warp nacelle, minus the usual &#039;scarfing&#039; of the Enterprise. I also like the over-&amp;-under arrangement of the top-mounted secondary hull, I didn&#039;t think I would like that at all, but now that I see it in situ, so to speak, against a background of stars, it&#039;s cool.

Many may not know this, but when John Jefferies originally designed the TOS Enterprise in 1964, the layout was all over the map; for example, the saucer was at first a smaller-diameter sphere, the power units were connected to the primary hull, the name was Constitution, Independence, and the nsme Enterprise was settled on only later (suggested by an old friend of Roddenberry&#039;s who served on the old Enterprise of the Yorktown class, also, the world&#039;s first nuclear-powered supercarrier, CVN Enterprise, had just come on line), the registry # NCC-1701 was the tail number of a friend&#039;s private airplane (and became the &#039;Naval Construction Contract&#039; number), and most striking of all, once the layout was finally settled (saucer, engineering hull, &amp; 2 nacelles)...it was upside down!

Jefferies called Roddenberry to come down &amp; look at his final brilliant design, and when old Gene saw it, he smiled and said, That&#039;s it! With one change, though...and then proceeded to flip it inverted, with the saucer at the top &amp; the secondary hull at bottom. That&#039;s the way the public saw it in it&#039;s final form, as we all know it today.

Roddenberry also did this with the Reliant (&#039;Miranda&#039; class), for the movie STII, &#039;Wrath of Khan&#039; - it was originally designed with the weapons pod &amp; megaphasers &amp; the angle walls on the bottom, &amp; nacelles up top.

I do like the Kelvin, it is a shorter-dorsal version of the Hermes &amp; Saladin class (scout &amp; destoyer) classes found in the original Starfleet Tech Manual, released in the early 80s, with the addition of a superior secondary hull. The Hermes &amp; Saladin ships located the main sensor dish on a strut protruding vertically right out of the lower sensor dome, almost directly in front of the Bussard hydrogen ram collector (that big, glowing red dome). This is better; it has balls. Also, it increases the internal habitable volume by half-again.

JOHN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kelvin is interesting, not so much for the hull layout &amp; design but for it&#8217;s detail, what you modelers might call &#8216;weathering&#8217; &#8211; it looks like a ship that has been serving a long time, and has many scars &#8211; plus, I like the abscence of any streamlining &#8211; like the squared-off tail of the lower warp nacelle, minus the usual &#8217;scarfing&#8217; of the Enterprise. I also like the over-&amp;-under arrangement of the top-mounted secondary hull, I didn&#8217;t think I would like that at all, but now that I see it in situ, so to speak, against a background of stars, it&#8217;s cool.</p>
<p>Many may not know this, but when John Jefferies originally designed the TOS Enterprise in 1964, the layout was all over the map; for example, the saucer was at first a smaller-diameter sphere, the power units were connected to the primary hull, the name was Constitution, Independence, and the nsme Enterprise was settled on only later (suggested by an old friend of Roddenberry&#8217;s who served on the old Enterprise of the Yorktown class, also, the world&#8217;s first nuclear-powered supercarrier, CVN Enterprise, had just come on line), the registry # NCC-1701 was the tail number of a friend&#8217;s private airplane (and became the &#8216;Naval Construction Contract&#8217; number), and most striking of all, once the layout was finally settled (saucer, engineering hull, &amp; 2 nacelles)&#8230;it was upside down!</p>
<p>Jefferies called Roddenberry to come down &amp; look at his final brilliant design, and when old Gene saw it, he smiled and said, That&#8217;s it! With one change, though&#8230;and then proceeded to flip it inverted, with the saucer at the top &amp; the secondary hull at bottom. That&#8217;s the way the public saw it in it&#8217;s final form, as we all know it today.</p>
<p>Roddenberry also did this with the Reliant (&#8217;Miranda&#8217; class), for the movie STII, &#8216;Wrath of Khan&#8217; &#8211; it was originally designed with the weapons pod &amp; megaphasers &amp; the angle walls on the bottom, &amp; nacelles up top.</p>
<p>I do like the Kelvin, it is a shorter-dorsal version of the Hermes &amp; Saladin class (scout &amp; destoyer) classes found in the original Starfleet Tech Manual, released in the early 80s, with the addition of a superior secondary hull. The Hermes &amp; Saladin ships located the main sensor dish on a strut protruding vertically right out of the lower sensor dome, almost directly in front of the Bussard hydrogen ram collector (that big, glowing red dome). This is better; it has balls. Also, it increases the internal habitable volume by half-again.</p>
<p>JOHN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Blades</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-51014</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Blades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-51014</guid>
		<description>I think these ships look incredible.  That thing looks viable, powerful and dangerous.  Seems that we just might see Star Trek go from being a bit cartoonish to something far more believable...&#039;might&#039; being the key word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these ships look incredible.  That thing looks viable, powerful and dangerous.  Seems that we just might see Star Trek go from being a bit cartoonish to something far more believable&#8230;&#8217;might&#8217; being the key word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John "Kahless" Taylor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-49456</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Kahless" Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-49456</guid>
		<description>To me, that ship looks horrible, almost like it had been in a firefight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, that ship looks horrible, almost like it had been in a firefight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-49291</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-49291</guid>
		<description>Lucy&#039;s actually the only reason Star Trek exists in the first place.  
 She (Desilu Productions) was the only one that took the chance on it in the late 60&#039;s.  Nobody else wanted a crazy space alien show...  

 This is all from Gene&#039;s words in a dvd interview I have...  
 I love Lucy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucy&#8217;s actually the only reason Star Trek exists in the first place.<br />
 She (Desilu Productions) was the only one that took the chance on it in the late 60&#8217;s.  Nobody else wanted a crazy space alien show&#8230;  </p>
<p> This is all from Gene&#8217;s words in a dvd interview I have&#8230;<br />
 I love Lucy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-49280</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-49280</guid>
		<description>@Steve

Oh my gosh! You&#039;re right... the Trek and I Love Lucy themes ARE incredibly similar, lol! :-P

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve</p>
<p>Oh my gosh! You&#8217;re right&#8230; the Trek and I Love Lucy themes ARE incredibly similar, lol! <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-49259</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-49259</guid>
		<description>Oh...more ST trivia.  This comes from a somewhat dubious source, but I used to know a guy that worked for Desilu Productions (back in the day). He told me that the same guy that wrote the theme song for &quot;I Love Lucy&quot; wrote the theme song for &quot;Star Trek&quot;.  In fact, if you &#039;speed up&#039; the I Love Lucy theme song (or vice versa to the ST theme), you can actually hear that they are largely the same music.  Dont&#039; know if you can play Pink Floyd&#039;s Dark Side of the Moon to it like you can with The Wizard of Oz LOL...but I digress.  Hope someone found this interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;more ST trivia.  This comes from a somewhat dubious source, but I used to know a guy that worked for Desilu Productions (back in the day). He told me that the same guy that wrote the theme song for &#8220;I Love Lucy&#8221; wrote the theme song for &#8220;Star Trek&#8221;.  In fact, if you &#8217;speed up&#8217; the I Love Lucy theme song (or vice versa to the ST theme), you can actually hear that they are largely the same music.  Dont&#8217; know if you can play Pink Floyd&#8217;s Dark Side of the Moon to it like you can with The Wizard of Oz LOL&#8230;but I digress.  Hope someone found this interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-49257</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-49257</guid>
		<description>For those that never read any books, or educated themselves on ST Lore, Pike did indeed captain the Enterprise. But, unlike Kirk, it was not the only ship you ever saw him on.  Also, for those that are commenting on the ship design, I recall a bit of trivia about the original show and ship design.  The &#039;original&#039; Enterprise from the first series, is actually upside down. The nacels were actually located on the bottom, but someone thought the design looked better on top, so they went with that. I like the idea that they are toying with various design concepts and echo the happy thoughts of a few commenters here that enjoy the notion that they are building different evolutionary concepts into this.  Anything...absolutely anything...is better (in terms of &#039;prequel&#039;) than that horrible &quot;Star Trek Enterprise&quot; series. In that case...the &quot;...Enterprise&quot; was far more a vehicle for Scott Bakula&#039;s career than it was for the progression of this beloved science fiction genre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that never read any books, or educated themselves on ST Lore, Pike did indeed captain the Enterprise. But, unlike Kirk, it was not the only ship you ever saw him on.  Also, for those that are commenting on the ship design, I recall a bit of trivia about the original show and ship design.  The &#8216;original&#8217; Enterprise from the first series, is actually upside down. The nacels were actually located on the bottom, but someone thought the design looked better on top, so they went with that. I like the idea that they are toying with various design concepts and echo the happy thoughts of a few commenters here that enjoy the notion that they are building different evolutionary concepts into this.  Anything&#8230;absolutely anything&#8230;is better (in terms of &#8216;prequel&#8217;) than that horrible &#8220;Star Trek Enterprise&#8221; series. In that case&#8230;the &#8220;&#8230;Enterprise&#8221; was far more a vehicle for Scott Bakula&#8217;s career than it was for the progression of this beloved science fiction genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus_D</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-49038</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-49038</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bad design period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bad design period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-48523</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-48523</guid>
		<description>The Captain of The Kelvin Is Richard Robau, (Taran Fahir).
But dont worry vic,
You cant be expected to know EVERYTHING!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Captain of The Kelvin Is Richard Robau, (Taran Fahir).<br />
But dont worry vic,<br />
You cant be expected to know EVERYTHING!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-48498</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-48498</guid>
		<description>I may be mistaken in stating that Pike is the Captain of that ship.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be mistaken in stating that Pike is the Captain of that ship.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/uss-kelvin-images-new-star-trek-movie-vic-4417/comment-page-1/#comment-48489</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4417#comment-48489</guid>
		<description>It does look upside down.

hahahahahah... Star Trek dildo

Priceless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does look upside down.</p>
<p>hahahahahah&#8230; Star Trek dildo</p>
<p>Priceless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
