‘Under the Skin’ Review

Published 12 months ago by , Updated October 7th, 2014 at 1:34 am,

Scarlett Johansson Under the Skin Poster Under the Skin Review

For cinephiles that enjoy artistic debate more than concrete answers, the film allows an intriguing platform for discussion and reflection.

In Under the Skin, Scarlett Johansson (Captain America: The Winter Soldier) plays a mysterious extraterrestrial stalking prey (read: men) along the West Coast of Scotland. After assuming the appearance of one particularly unfortunate Scottish dame, Johansson’s unnamed alien prowls the streets in a nondescript cargo van, pretending to need directions in an effort to seek out unsuspecting (and lustful) loners willing to throw caution to the wind and accept a ride from the black-haired beauty.

Overseen by a male attendant (played by former Irish motorcycle racer Jeremy McWilliams), Johansson’s character is completely oblivious to the dangers and horrors of the world, a singularly focused siren, pursuing one male victim after the next, leading each to a horrifying end inside her slaughterhouse. Until an unusual encounter causes the uncaring predator to empathize with a quarry and question her own place in humanity.

Scarlett Johansson Alien Under the Skin Under the Skin Review

Scarlett Johansson in ‘Under the Skin’

Jonathan Glazer (Sexy Beast) directs Under the Skin - which was inspired by Michel Faber’s 2001 novel of the same name. However, while the movie borrows the core premise of the book, Glazer trades out a number of key details in the interest of a significantly more subtle narrative. In the novel, Johansson’s alien creature has a name and the plot provides a steady stream of exposition to help flesh out select sci-fi elements. Yet, the film does not labor over specifics and, instead, leaves a lot of interpretation to the viewer – both in terms of the central protagonist and larger world building. The result is a beautiful and haunting movie that prioritizes nuance at nearly every turn, sacrificing traditional moviemaking elements (like clear-cut exposition) to provide an opportunity for thoughtful insight into the human condition.

That said, despite its “Scarlett Johansson is a seductive alien” marketing hook, fans of the actress (or the sci-fi genre) will probably find Under the Skin is too art house for mainstream appeal. While Glazer’s film succeeds as contemplative artistic expression, moviegoers who were expecting a detailed story about aliens hiding in plain sight will be left wanting. Still, for viewers who are not put-off by a philosophical glimpse at humanity through the unique, and callous, perspective of an extraterrestrial creature living (and hunting) among us, there are plenty of interesting ideas and gorgeous visuals to appreciate in Under the Skin.

Scarlett Johansson Scotland Under the Skin Under the Skin Review

The prey and his predator in ‘Under the Skin’

Glazer, along with cinematographer Daniel Landin, not to mention a brave performance from Johansson, ensure that even the most bizarre sci-fi ideas translate into beautiful imagery onscreen. The actress is captivating in the role – a true feat considering nearly all of her stalking scenes were completely improvised. Johansson, disguised in a black wig and red lipstick, driving a van rigged with six hidden cameras, actually approached random men on the streets of Scotland, striking up flirtatious conversations in character – so that her Under the Skin director could capture authentic reactions from male targets. Beyond the improvisation work, Johansson is charged with a number of tough scripted scenes, selling a vicious as well as manipulative predator one minute, only to see the apathetic visage unravel to make room for curiosity and sheer terror.

Under the Skin is nuanced and will not appeal to everyone, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t room for legitimate criticism either. Regardless of an evocative tone and stirring leading lady, Glazer retreads story material and thematic ideas that audiences will have seen before. Scenes inside the alien kill room provide an interesting variation on similar seductive siren tales but the larger journey of Johansson’s character isn’t as original as other aspects of the production.

Scarlett Johansson Under the Skin Character Under the Skin Review

Jonathan Glazer’s depiction of malevolent extraterrestrial life.

Additionally, Glazer fails to find the right balance between the character’s journey and heavy-handed commentary – resulting in setups that beat audiences over the head with thematic messaging while key plot beats are rushed and underdeveloped. This isn’t to say the film should have provided answers to its sci-fi mythology; but, once the creature steps outside of its comfort zone and into the world of genuine human relationships, the interactions needed to be as impactful as any thematic parallels that Glazer is attempting to highlight. Unfortunately, they are not.

Nevertheless, Under the Skin is a provocative movie experience – one that can truly be defined as an auteur effort. Given drastic subduing of the source text in the interest of a more interpretative film, Glazer manages to take a sharp sci-fi idea and wrap it with smart rumination on what makes us (and only us) human – both the good and the bad. Through Glazer’s alien microscope we are not just one thing: we are brave, we are scared, we are monsters, and we are food. For cinephiles that enjoy artistic debate more than concrete answers, the film allows an intriguing platform for discussion and reflection – albeit one where the moment to moment seduction proves to be significantly more enticing than what is literally “under the skin.”

If you’re still on the fence about Under the Skin, check out the trailer below:


[poll id="790"]


Under the Skin runs 108 minutes and is Rated R for graphic nudity, sexual content, some violence and language. Now playing in theaters.

Let us know what you thought of the film in the comment section below.

Follow me on Twitter @benkendrick for future reviews, as well as movie, TV, and gaming news.

Our Rating:

3.5 out of 5
(Very Good)

Follow Ben Kendrick on Twitter @benkendrick
Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. This isn’t no story about Aliens!!! It’s simply a story about love and retribution.

  2. This film was like when you go to an art gallery and you are shown the wonderful painting that’s so “in style” and you find yourself looking at a canvas with random splashes of paint. So he threw paint at the canvas probably with special machines and wants $30000 and a pat on the back. I loved Sexy Beast but this was experimental crap that should only be made in a cinema college course. I love scarlet but I don’t think accent was at all convincing. Why are we messing around with hidden cameras?! When are we going to get past this reality TV craze!! The sound track isn’t spooky, or meaningful. Just annoying. I love art but not pretentious garbage. What does it all mean? Well that’s the beauty, it means what ever you like it to! Oh goody- goody I wanna play! Does that mean we put too much emphasis on our sexual identies? Yeah, sorry kids I’m out of time. By-by

    • She’s an alien! Why would she have a perfect accent? In the beginning of the film you can hear her practicing how to speak english.

  3. This movie was pretentious garbage with pretty scenery and Scarlett can’t do a British accent so they should have filmed in the US. Don’t expect a meaningful ending for your time sacrificed.

  4. Art doesn’t have to be so murky that you can’t see what is going on, as this film is. Overrated. If I hadn’t known from reading the reviews that she was an alien predator, I would have been mystified. As it was, I was just bored

  5. The movie tried too hard to be mysterious and artsy. It was mostly about seeing Scarlett Johansson naked.

  6. I watched this moving knowing NOTHING about it except that it was a sci-fi. I enjoyed it the first time and decided to watch it a second time. Even better the second time around! The first time I saw the metaphors pertaining to human life and how the cat and mouse game works between man and woman. I though the way it was interpreted was awesome! Watching it the second time around, everything makes sense for the most part. This is one of those movies that you can watch over and over always noticing something different. I like movies that make you think and I especially like movies that I can watch over and over finding new depth! I though it was beautiful!