Recent Related Items:

53 Comments


steven the git says:

Sauron and Saruman and those nasty Orcs weren’t helping matters either.

The Internet says:

“Broad generalization. Nazism started as an “idea” and it certainly didn’t “enlighten” anyone. Planning the murder of a spouse can be an “idea” as well.”

Ideas do not kill. Actions do. Ideas do not commit genocide. People do. Plenty of people might wish somebody was dead, or have an idea pop into their head once or twice. Those ideas can be right or wrong, but the people themselves have to act. The ideas will not do any harm as long as the parent explains why the actions themselves are wrong. No idea has ever harmed a person on its own.

“How do you see DWDM technology effecting the way streaming will be done in the future.”

I’ll pretend for the moment that there was a question mark at the end of that statement and answer it if it were a question. While DWDM and other fiber optics technologies, such as automatic transimpedance control amplifiers, which allow the fiber optic signals to be amplified and clarified at the receiver boxes (search http://google.com/patents for Timothy M. Laverick for more information on those), may very well revolutionize streaming… but only the speed of streaming, not necessarily the method.

“I sometimes have problems sending pictures with my Blackberry. W t Da f man…?”

I thought it was fairly obvious how temperamental I am.

“Aslo can yoy speed things up a bit. I have to sometimes wait 8 minutes to upload?? Wtf’s up with that????”

You obviously haven’t payed the right ISP enough money for the speed you want.

The Internet

790 says:

Everything starts with an idea. Thought motivates action?

Screen Rant says:

Gotta agree with 790. There is usually no action without an idea first. Sure, lots of ideas are GOOD, but the concept of ideas being good in and of themselves is wrong.

Ideas can be good OR bad, and movies, books, TV, etc. put ideas in peoples’ heads that can also be good or bad, which they may or may not act one. Heck YouTube is full of idiots who’ve seen stunts on the TV show Jackass…

Vic

The Internet says:

“Ideas can be good OR bad.”

Absolutely. In fact, I’ve stated so above:

“Those ideas can be right or wrong, but the people themselves have to act. The ideas will not do any harm as long as the parent explains why the actions themselves are wrong. No idea has ever harmed a person on its own.”

There are plenty of idiots in the world (trust me, I’m chock full of idiots), though. No argument there.

The Internet

I Hate "The Internet" says:

“I’ll pretend for the moment that there was a question mark at the end of that statement and answer it if it were a question. While DWDM and other fiber optics technologies, such as automatic transimpedance control amplifiers, which allow the fiber optic signals to be amplified and clarified at the receiver boxes (search http://google.com/patents for Timothy M. Laverick for more information on those), may very well revolutionize streaming… but only the speed of streaming, not necessarily the method.”

Wow did you just like Google that and then copy and paste all that mumbo jumbo from Wikipedia, or what?(Oh and here’s an extra question mark for you, ?)

790 says:

Yeah “I Hate The Internet” it was pretty obvious.
I was going to ask “the interent” what DWDM stood for (since I didn’t see that in his pasted info) but I figured he would just look that up as well.

That’s cool, I guess “its” playing with itself, against us???????????????????????????!

The Internet says:

DWDM I googled. The transimpedance control amplifiers I’ve taken an active interest in previously. And yes, 790, I’m (see that apostrophe there?) allowed to use any resources that I contain in my favor.

The Internet

790 says:

Hey internet. Easy question you shouldnt need to google if your into Transimpediance Control amps.

How are fiber optic signals boosted along the optical pathway?

Fairly simple question and it will be educational to the Screen Rant readers.

I’m not looking specs just the 3 word explanation.

Panda says:

WTF happened to this thread?

New screenplay I’m pitching… “790 vs. The Internet”. Catchy, idnit?

790 says:

Yeah your right Panda.
The internet has clearly exposed himself to be a “human lifeform”.
And this was supposed to be about Hancock. So I’m sorry.

The 3 word answer I was looking for was (an inert gas)

That’s all no more off-topic BS…

Screen Rant says:

Yes, thanks. I think we can disagree and still play nice. :-)
And I *still* wish they had just done what they wanted with this movie, rated it R and cut it loose to stand (or fall) on its merits.

Vic

Trystan1267 says:

THAT’S SO NOT TRUE! I SAW HANCOCK AND IT WASN’T SEXUAL OR THAT VIOLENT! IT WAS AWESOME!

Page 3 of 3«123
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.