Comments on: Two Harry Potter Films For the Price of…Two?

By: Twilight: ‘Breaking Dawn’ Split Confirmed & 7 New ‘Eclipse’ Clips - Screen Rant

Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:40:12 +0000

[...] this franchise for all it’s worth – I guess it’s no surprise that the studio is pulling a Harry Potter and splitting the movie in [...]

By: Could M. Night Shyamalan Direct ‘Breaking Dawn?’ - Screen Rant

Could M. Night Shyamalan Direct ‘Breaking Dawn?’ - Screen Rant — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:12:02 +0000

[...] Last Friday, we brought you the news that The Reader and Billy Elliot director, Stephen Daldry was on the shortlist of directors that will potentially helm the last installment in the Twilight Saga, Breaking Dawn (which is being broken into two parts, Harry Potter-style). [...]

By: 04savagec

04savagec — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:18:18 +0000

Dear Daniel R
went film come out 3D harry potter and the Deathly Hallows thank you Caleb Savage

By: 04savagec

04savagec — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:18:18 +0000

Dear Daniel R
went film come out 3D harry potter and the Deathly Hallows thank you Caleb Savage

By: Jamie Williams

Jamie Williams — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:09:24 +0000

Before WB made this decision, I didn’t have a doubt in my mind that DEATHLY HALLOWS would do $1 billion+ box-office. Now…I don’t know.

It’s going to make HUGE $$$ regardless. But I can’t help but wonder if this will annoy audiences. Of all times split the books into two films, they wait ’till the final one(!?!)

Jamie

By: Gary

Gary — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:27:22 +0000

I dont think its a good idea.
Movie audiences might reject this.

By: Screen Rant

Screen Rant — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:44:03 +0000

Jimmy, watch the language. This is a PG-13 site, not R.

Vic

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:42:05 +0000

Maybe if the people who pay to see EACH and EVERY one of these would stop sucking Warner Brothers’ cocks, they wouldn’t be able to get away with this nonsense.

But no, the tards still give their $80 away for these kids movies.

LOTR should of been 6 movies because that warranted that much story telling. However they did a fantastic job of making it 3 solid movies telling the main story a bit better than the books did, despite the rediculous multiple endings of ROTK

By: Jamie Williams

Jamie Williams — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:04:41 +0000

Thank you, Andy! You, good Sir, get a cookie for that good observation.

Jamie

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:48:53 +0000

If that is the case, then the LOTR trilogy should have been 6 movies!!!

By: Oscar!

Oscar! — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:49:04 +0000

Some of it might have to do with the money, but I agree with them, the book has way too many details and parts that cant be taken off.

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:25:30 +0000

Yup, it’s all about getting $20 out of every Potter fan instead of $10 for the box office. Plus now they get to see 2 dvd’s as well. It’s all about the moolah.