Comments on: Two Harry Potter Films For the Price of…Two? http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/ TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:57:22 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Jamie Williams http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/comment-page-1/#comment-12521 Jamie Williams Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:09:24 +0000 http://dev2.screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-1419/#comment-12521 Before WB made this decision, I didn't have a doubt in my mind that DEATHLY HALLOWS would do $1 billion+ box-office. Now...I don't know. It's going to make HUGE $$$ regardless. But I can't help but wonder if this will annoy audiences. Of all times split the books into two films, they wait 'till the final one(!?!) Jamie Before WB made this decision, I didn’t have a doubt in my mind that DEATHLY HALLOWS would do $1 billion+ box-office. Now…I don’t know.

It’s going to make HUGE $$$ regardless. But I can’t help but wonder if this will annoy audiences. Of all times split the books into two films, they wait ’till the final one(!?!)

Jamie

]]> By: Gary http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/comment-page-1/#comment-12520 Gary Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:27:22 +0000 http://dev2.screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-1419/#comment-12520 I dont think its a good idea. Movie audiences might reject this. I dont think its a good idea.
Movie audiences might reject this.

]]> By: Screen Rant http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/comment-page-1/#comment-12519 Screen Rant Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:44:03 +0000 http://dev2.screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-1419/#comment-12519 Jimmy, watch the language. This is a PG-13 site, not R. Vic Jimmy, watch the language. This is a PG-13 site, not R.

Vic

]]> By: Jimmy http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/comment-page-1/#comment-12518 Jimmy Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:42:05 +0000 http://dev2.screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-1419/#comment-12518 Maybe if the people who pay to see EACH and EVERY one of these would stop sucking Warner Brothers' cocks, they wouldn't be able to get away with this nonsense. But no, the tards still give their $80 away for these kids movies. LOTR should of been 6 movies because that warranted that much story telling. However they did a fantastic job of making it 3 solid movies telling the main story a bit better than the books did, despite the rediculous multiple endings of ROTK Maybe if the people who pay to see EACH and EVERY one of these would stop sucking Warner Brothers’ cocks, they wouldn’t be able to get away with this nonsense.

But no, the tards still give their $80 away for these kids movies.

LOTR should of been 6 movies because that warranted that much story telling. However they did a fantastic job of making it 3 solid movies telling the main story a bit better than the books did, despite the rediculous multiple endings of ROTK

]]> By: Jamie Williams http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/comment-page-1/#comment-12517 Jamie Williams Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:04:41 +0000 http://dev2.screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-1419/#comment-12517 Thank you, Andy! You, good Sir, get a cookie for that good observation. :-) Jamie Thank you, Andy! You, good Sir, get a cookie for that good observation. :-)

Jamie

]]> By: Andy http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/comment-page-1/#comment-12516 Andy Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:48:53 +0000 http://dev2.screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-1419/#comment-12516 If that is the case, then the LOTR trilogy should have been 6 movies!!! If that is the case, then the LOTR trilogy should have been 6 movies!!!

]]> By: Oscar! http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/comment-page-1/#comment-12515 Oscar! Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:49:04 +0000 http://dev2.screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-1419/#comment-12515 Some of it might have to do with the money, but I agree with them, the book has way too many details and parts that cant be taken off. Some of it might have to do with the money, but I agree with them, the book has way too many details and parts that cant be taken off.

]]> By: Andy http://screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-filmnerdjamie-1419/comment-page-1/#comment-12514 Andy Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:25:30 +0000 http://dev2.screenrant.com/two-harry-potter-films-for-the-price-oftwo-1419/#comment-12514 Yup, it's all about getting $20 out of every Potter fan instead of $10 for the box office. Plus now they get to see 2 dvd's as well. It's all about the moolah. Yup, it’s all about getting $20 out of every Potter fan instead of $10 for the box office. Plus now they get to see 2 dvd’s as well. It’s all about the moolah.

]]>