Twilight Review

Published 5 years ago by , Updated November 22nd, 2008 at 8:45 pm,

Short version: Twilight really is strictly for fans of the book – while not terrible, it’s far from great.

twilight reviews Twilight Review
Screen Rant reviews Twilight

So it’s finally here.

Twilight, at least for a select group of ladies, has been THE most anticipated movie of 2008 – and their wait is finally over. The question is: Was it worth it?

For them, yes.

For the rest of us? Eh, not so much.

Twilight opens with the introduction of our heroine, Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart). She is in sunny Arizona with her mom and new stepfather, and as they prepare for a long road trip she decides that she’d rather go up to Washington state to stay with her estranged father, Charlie (Billy Burke). He lives in the small town of Forks (population 3,000) and is the local sheriff.

She arrives in the middle of the school year so although it should be hard to make friends (and it’s implied), she manages to connect with a group of kids who are far more welcoming than she is ready to be welcomed. They give her the scoop on who’s who and they soon point out the Cullens, an odd assortment of very pale-skinned guys and gals. To make things weirder, they are apparently foster brothers/sisters yet they are “couples.” They’ve been taken in by the local Dr. Cullen and his wife.

One of the group is of course, Edward (Robert Pattinson). His story is that “no girl is good enough for him.” Of course Bella is immediately fixated on him, although the feeling is apparently very much not mutual. As a matter of fact when she is assigned to be his lab partner, he seems to be repulsed by her.

Edward leaves for a few days, and when he returns his mood towards Bella has changed considerably. He’s now polite and at least feigns interest. She (mostly) gets over being offended and tries to get to know him although he still doesn’t want to get close to her. Almost immediately he saves her from being killed in a car accident in a scene that’s been shown in the trailer. She’s no dummy and doesn’t miss the fact that he was across the parking lot, got over to her in a flash and was able to keep a van from smashing into her (to the point that he left a dent in the door with his hand). [Note slight sarcasm there, folks]

Anyway, we soon meet Dr. Cullen (Peter Facinelli) at the hospital, whose makeup job is so incredibly white that he looks like the Cesar Romero version of the Joker. He is none to pleased about Edward (I guess I can’t call him “Ed,” huh?) possibly exposing who he really is to save Bella’s life.

One thing leads to another and the burgeoning romance is on its way, with a side trip to a confrontation with the “bad” vampires who actually kill humans to feed (go figure). You see the Cullens only drink the blood of animals. The bad guys have been responsible for a number of gruesome murders in town recently. One of them decides to target Bella and thus we get the final confrontation which finally brings us some decent action.

So what’s good?

I thought that the stars and supporting cast actually did a really great job. Bella’s friends were engaging, funny and they played their roles very naturally. Billy Burke was low key and very good as Bella’s father, Kristen Stewart did a decent job, and I have to say that despite his severely sculpted eyebrows and uber-funky hair that I liked Rob Pattinson’s portrayal of Edward Cullen. I don’t know how closely the way he played the character matched the version in the book, but I thought that his uncertainty and awkwardness in light of how powerful he really was made him quite charming.

There were quite a few moments of unexpected humor in the film that I enjoyed. Nothing huge or slapsticky, but just little things that were enough to actually make me laugh out loud (which some comedies this year didn’t manage to make me do). Really the performances made this worthwhile for me.

So what wasn’t so good?

For a non-fan, it was really a pretty bland film. It seemed very slow-moving at times, and let’s face it – it’s a pretty “stock” teen romance movie. There wasn’t anything really special here outside of the fact that it had, you know… vampires.

Nothing really eye-catching as far as cinematography or interesting shots, and one think that really struck me as bad were the visual effects. When the film had its first “super-speed” effect, where the bad vampires corner one of the locals, it was so poorly done that I think I actually gasped out loud. I mean there was this incredibly cheesy blur that I can’t really describe except to say that anything you see on an average episode of Smallville is done far better.

Imagine my shock at the end of the film when in the credits I saw Industrial Light & Magic listed among the visual effects companies. I can only guess that they were responsible for some other effect and not the one I just mentioned (which was terrible throughout the film).

Towards the end the teen-romance-cheese-factor pegged the needle in the aftermath of the big battle in a scene between Edward and Bella. That was about the hardest scene in the movie to sit through, and pretty much from there until the end it was quite sappy and reminded me of a typical teen TV series on the CW.

The audience full of Twilight fans seemed to enjoy it a lot and gave it a thumbs up, so I guess it’s achieved its goal. I’m curious to see if it does well enough at the box office to generate a sequel (which I’m thinking would actually be better than this film).

So take all that for what it’s worth – I’ll leave the decision of whether to see it or not up to you.

Oh, and yes (for the fans), Edward does “sparkle” in the film and Bella is clumsy. icon smile Twilight Review

Our Rating:

3 out of 5
(Good)

TAGS: 3 star movies, twilight

194 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. HAHA i bought my tickets last week for tonights premiere im so damn excited i can barely wait!!!

  2. IMMA TWILIGHTERR AND I JUST LOVEEE TO READ TWILIGHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT EDWARDDD IS YUMM MY NAME IS CHANDLERR C

  3. I am so excited for the midnight twilight’s new moon premaire, but yet again, I am not as excited as I was for the twilight movie premaire. What is up with that?

  4. v loved d movie n we think who can’t, they suck.we love u edward cullen

  5. Twilight and new moon was the biggest waste of 2 hours ever!! i watched the 1st and thought the 2nd must be far better with all this hype. teenagers will love it and any realist that knows anything about films know that its not any good at all. p.s i feel asleep in the cinema how bad is that!!

  6. I think I liked the first movie better than the second. I watched Twilight several times and seemed to like it better the more I watched it. I do think the movies are following pretty close with the books, but there is something missing. Although, I can not name what is missing. I thought New Moon was okay, but maybe if I watch it again, I might like it better. Of course, books are always going to be so much better. I think that Jacob and Alice are the best characters in the movies. Alice has been a strong character in both movies, but I think the character of Jacob got better in New Moon. I still look forward to seeing the last two movies.

  7. Forwarning:This comment comes to you 11days after the new moom weekend release and I am sorry for that fact. Anywho, the new moon movie was so great and perfect that I had ended up watching the movie a total of three times during the new moon weekend release. That is saying something big, is it not?

  8. i read the book, and i do agree, the movie was cheesy.

  9. i read the book, and i do agree, the movie was cheesy.

  10. I’ve read fanfictions with better plot structure. Dr Cullens adopting the vampire kids, and they all couple up? It just has INEXPERIENCED WRITER – SHORT CUT – DOLLAR STORE PLOT DEVICE written all over it. I’ve read similar plot devices from really bad fanfictions, and I think that the film was a bore. Insufferable; but my boyfriend and I just had to check it out before bashing it. As an amateur story writer, I think the development of the story lacks tension; there is no ‘edge of your seat’ moment; you know she ends up with Edward. The wolf guy is (in my opinion) probably a subconscious desire for the author to express how she would like to still be desirable despite the fact that she may be in a relationship; we all want to be that desirable, and having two hot guys lusting over you; why not? Wooden acting skills for Kristen what’shername, I think my cat has a wider range of expression.

  11. I think twilight sucks. Edward and belle fell in love in like what? The third scene? I understand that they can’t possibly film the whole content of the book but really, the movie just isn’t informative enough. I would rate the movie 6/10

  12. I finally caught up w/this flick on cable. As a female far outside the target audience (considerably older!) and never having read the book(s) I have to confess I loved this film. But w/an asterisk. First off, I highly doubt most males (heterosexual anyway) would be interested in this subject matter, so I wouldn’t expect them to enjoy it.
    I was quite distracted by the greenish/grayish flat look to the movie. I understand the director wanted to set a gloomier scene more reflective of the Pacific NW, but it only made it rather depressing for me. Though I did love the baseball game.
    Second, the character of Bella was not fleshed out much and I would have liked to have seen more animation from her. I found it laughable how wide the intellectual gap was between her and her peers. They appeared to be a bunch of “rubes” who acted about 12, and why would they welcome this stranger right away? Wasn’t realistic.
    Would have liked to see the entire vampire element also expanded. What’s it like in their world other than they don’t eat or sleep and drink animal blood?
    What made the film soar for me was Edward. Pattinson’s depiction of him was quite wonderful and remarkable considering from what I’ve seen of him in interviews he is a whole different guy.
    What I suspect kept my attention and that of other females was the romance. Who wouldn’t want someone rare and strong to protect them, to fly away to the tops of trees, to love them unconditionally?
    I will now view the next films and see how they compare.
    As a film, it did lack in many areas. But Edward Cullen definitely carried it for me.

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

Be Social, Follow Us!!