Titus Welliver Says ‘Transformers 4′ Is ‘Not a Kids Movie’ [Updated]

Published 8 months ago by , Updated March 5th, 2014 at 8:01 am,

Transformers 4 Grimlock Optimus Prime Titus Welliver Says Transformers 4 Is Not a Kids Movie [Updated]

Whether you’re eagerly anticipating or dreading the upcoming Transformers: Age of Extinction – the fourth flick in Michael Bay’s franchise – you no doubt were hit with a heavy wave of nostalgia when Grimlock the Dinobot made his debut in the film’s Super Bowl spot.

Of course, the Transformers series has always banked on longtime fans yearning to revisit their youth, but this time around, Transformers 4 appears to be making that its primary audience. Over a year ago, not long after it was confirmed Bay would return for the fourth film, the director promised it would completely redesign the franchise, and he wasn’t just talking about the robots. Transformers 4 also features an all-new cast, is set four years after the third film, and – according to actor Titus Welliver (the Man in Black on Lost) – it will have a darker, more mature tone.

Speaking with Nerdist, Welliver made it clear that he doesn’t consider Transformers 4 to be a children’s movie:

“It’s a bit more of a darker vision of the ‘Transformers’ world… It’s not a kids’ movie, I’ll tell you that much.”

In the four years since Transformers 3, humans have no doubts about the Transformers’ existence, and it’s likely we as a species have come to consider both the Autobots and Decepticons threats. This increased paranoia about the Transformers might play into why Age of Extinction would be a darker addition to the series. The battles won’t just be between giant robots, but also over people’s fears.

[Update: Titus Welliver clarified his statement in an official update as to not exclude younger audiences who the film will undoubtedly appeal to.]

“I misspoke in my last interview when I said that Transformers 4 was not a kids movie… what I meant was that this film, will in fact expand their target audience and bring in a bigger fan base. Following the huge success of Transformers and their toy line,  it is certainly a kids movie and with the addition of Mark Wahlberg, Transformers 4 will be the coolest in the franchise.”

[The point Welliver is making, we believe, is that there will be a little less over-the-top childish humor that didn't quite work for all audiences in the original trilogy, the first two films in particular.]

If this is the case, then Kelsey Grammer’s “counter intelligence” agent fits right in. Cybertronian technology would be a massive asset for any world power, making the Autobots not only targets of enemy attacks but possible abuse from their supposed allies. This kind of political edge could be the “darker vision” Welliver is alluding to. Plus, this new level of secrecy would make it necessary for the Autobots to really be robots in disguise and would explain the redesigns.

Transformers 4 Not a Kids Movie Titus Welliver Says Transformers 4 Is Not a Kids Movie [Updated]

Then again, turning Transformers 4 into less of a smash ‘n’ bash, popcorn flick and more of a dark political thriller doesn’t seem to add up with what we know of Age of Extinction‘s plot. (There’s nothing sophisticated or mature about the Dinobots, no matter how badass they look.) But Bay has continued to hammer home the point that “there won’t be any goofiness” in Transformers 4, so does that mean it’ll be a totally humorless entry catering to a more adult audience? Probably not.

What do you make of Welliver’s comments that Transformers 4 isn’t “a kids’ movie“? Would making the film more mature be the right direction for the franchise? Let us know your thoughts below!

_________________________________________________

Transformers: Age of Extinction rolls into theaters June 27th, 2014.

Source: /Film

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: transformers, transformers 4

88 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. Movie was full of awful profanity. You don’t have to trash the movie up to keep it from being goofy. This movie would have made a lot if money with out the f word plastered all through it.

  2. Most definitely NOT a kids movie. And not a good pick for anybody who lost anyone in 9/11. My friends and I went to see it together, and with the extremely graphic death of Mark Walberg’s best friend, one of my friends burst into tears and had to leave the theatre. Needless to say, as we continued watching the millions of civilians die left and right, along with the forced separation of Walberg and Nicola Peltz when she’s taken by the enemy, I had to step out of the theatre to make sure she didn’t come back in, then call her boyfriend to come pick her up and take her home. See, she lost her dad in the World Trade Center, more than likely one of the people who died when the second plane hit the South Tower. My friend was very close to him, so the loss hit her hard. It’s no wonder a movie like this would trigger flashes of what he must have gone through that day.

    Now, why weren’t we prepared for this possibility? Well, quite frankly, even thinking back on it now, none of us remember any of the other Transformers movies being that bad. They were mostly kid-friendly, so we didn’t think anything of it. The previews didn’t look any different than the other movies. Plus, none of us are really into this series, so we wouldn’t have gone nuts looking for information online about it. Otherwise, we wouldn’t have gone. So, yeah, chances are that, next time, we won’t be fooled by the advertising and we’ll look up what the movie is about first before we decide whether or not we’re going. None of us want to put her through that again.

    Sorry if some of the story was spoiled, that wasn’t my intention.