Comments on: See Toy Story 1 & 2 In 3D!

By: Toy Story | Wugez

Toy Story | Wugez — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:19:04 +0000

[...] toy story screenrant.com [...]

By: Trailer Toy Story 3: No Toy Gets Left Behind « Sector Gawed

Trailer Toy Story 3: No Toy Gets Left Behind « Sector Gawed — Tue, 18 May 2010 07:22:27 +0000

[...] See Toy Story 1 & 2 In 3D! (screenrant.com) [...]

By: SR Pick [Video]: Old ‘Tron’, New Trailer - Screen Rant

SR Pick [Video]: Old ‘Tron’, New Trailer - Screen Rant — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:35:09 +0000

[...] did that very thing with the first two Toy Story movies last fall to usher in the upcoming third film. And likewise, [...]

By: 300 Getting the 3D Treatment? - Screen Rant

300 Getting the 3D Treatment? - Screen Rant — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:41:09 +0000

[...] a page out of the Toy Story 3 playbook, the re-release of 300 would, more than likely, be used to promote the [...]

By: 300 Getting the 3D Treatment? - Screen Rant

300 Getting the 3D Treatment? - Screen Rant — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:41:09 +0000

[...] a page out of the Toy Story 3 playbook, the re-release of 300 would, more than likely, be used to promote the [...]

By: Ken J

Ken J — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 07:39:37 +0000

Might see this tomorrow… That or Zombieland, lol.

By: mrmcgoo

mrmcgoo — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:45:54 +0000

They wil have a 10 minute intermision. But thats also when they have the toy story characters sticking thier hands out at you, jumping out the screen…. etc.

By: twistedburton

twistedburton — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:38:49 +0000

I’m excited for this. The trailer gave me the chills. I forgot how much I loved all the characters from both Toy Story films! Question- Will there be intermission between the two films? I couldn’t sit in a theater that long! I would eventually need to use the restroom, but I wouldn’t want to leave the theater, but then I’d be holding it in and be really uncomfortable and wouldn’t enjoy the rest of the movie! So… hopefully an intermission will be included between the two films. Also, I think this is a very smart idea on Disney and Pixar’s part to make hype for the third installment.

By: Trailer For Toy Story 3D Double Feature! - Screen Rant

Trailer For Toy Story 3D Double Feature! - Screen Rant — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:55:49 +0000

[...] And then this happened: Toy Story 1&2 in 3D! [...]

By: vid

vid — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 09:28:32 +0000

I’d watch Toy Story 1&2 again in 3d. I don’t think it’s a gimmick and can enhance immersion. I really enjoyed Coraline in 3d and that horror movie who’s name I forget. I wouldn’t want to watch every movie in 3d though because some genres simply don’t need it like romcoms or dramas.

By: Joshi

Joshi — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 09:01:15 +0000

Ken

So was I. It’s annoying trying to convey tone on the internet.

And I said I work for a .org… not actually a .org website (though we do have one), but simply an organisation. Don’t know who hosts our website.

By: Ken J

Ken J — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:58:00 +0000

I was joking around Joshi, lol. But you know what’s funny? in a lot of forums I’ve been to, people tend to like to cite .org websites. At first I thought it was just a coincidence, but after a while, it seemed like people were avoiding citing anything with .com or anything else, and it was exclusively .org. So I started asking if they actually think it being a .org website makes it more trustworthy and they actually think it does!

Well, I have a .com website, even though I’m not a company, lol. I wanted a .us domain but the .com was cheaper at the time, and I just wanted to avoid .org lol.

Who do you have hosting for you? I have 1&1 and LOVE it, fast, ample features and storage, and cheapest around that I could find.

By: Joshi

Joshi — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:40:04 +0000

Kej

I work for a .org, trust me, we’re anything but truthful.

And we’re one of the nice ones.

By: Ken J

Ken J — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:59:16 +0000

Joshi, it was probably a .org website, if it says .org it means they are completely truthful. I tried buying a .org version of my domain and the internet police pulled me over because my website was too full of crap, which isn’t allowed on .org websites. So when doing research, make sure it’s .org, that information is 100% reliable, fully enforced. The internet police force’s virtual numbers are increasing virtually every day.

What I just typed right there would never be allowed on a .org website.

I do hate 3D gimmicks like Beowulf 3D or whatever, with the constant pointing things into the screen crap, but I did like Up in 3D, not that it wasn’t good in 2D, but it did immerse you a little bit more in my opinion. But it’s an option, if you don’t like it, don’t watch it in 3D, so I don’t see what all of the fuss is against it. Nobody’s forcing it on you.

By: Joshi

Joshi — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:51:38 +0000

Oh…yeah.

Okay, yeah, that’s cool.

By: 790

790 — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:33:30 +0000

I read that several years ago before Katzenberg made the announcment that he wanted to see all movies in 3D within 10 years. Back then I wasn’t paying as much attention to 3D. I remember it was kinda funny how the article claimed that the sublimnal properties were going to be used as an educational tool. Over the next few months the story and its future educational benefits seemed to fade away.

Keep in mind Joshi that when the theaters upgrade their movie theaters to full digital 3D/ compatible. All this subliminal technology comes right along with it. The film doesn’t have to be 3D to impliment this. So as you can see the 3D push that Hollywood is bent on developing has many applications…

By: Joshi

Joshi — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:26:27 +0000

I know there’s a big plan going on with 3D and it was pretty inevitable that a giant like Disney would be in on it (and we all knew about Cameron and Katzenberg). I still say it’s a fad, no matter how much backing it gets, at the end of the day it all comes down to the consumer and if we the public get tired of something that is little more than a gimmick (and it won’t be that hard), it doesn’t matter how much Disney’s backing it.

As for the subliminal images thing, any chance you could link me to said article or let me know which publication it was? I’d be interested to read it.

By: 790

790 — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:16:45 +0000

Well Joshi, its more than a fad they want to impliment 3-D in all movies cell phs and tv. There going to eliminate the glasses as well.

ONE study in making 3-D Tv technology accidentally revealed, Like frequencies in old CRT TVs, now, the audio thanks to high end digital sound can mix sound we cannot even pick up consciously. However, 3-D has a special layering system in how it sends the image feed. It can use flash images and text for the viewer to pick up subconsciously.

An article in one science journal I read mentioned this as a good way to ‘educate’ young people by making their subconscious
pick up words in connection to the images so they learn through that.

Oh there’s a plan going on with 3-D. Disney is a big part of it so are hollywood biggies such as Katzenberg and even Cameron…

By: Vic Holtreman

Vic Holtreman — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:21:30 +0000

I don’t believe for a second that Disney or Pixar would add/change scenes in order to have things flying off the screen.

Vic

By: Joshi (work)

Joshi (work) — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:56:24 +0000

@790

I’ve made no secret of my disdain for 3D, I feel it’s a fad that adds absolutely nothing to a movie (if the movie is better for the 3D it wasn’t much of a movie to begin with and will only be worse in a home environment, if it’s no better with 3D, then what was the point in the first place).

My comment about Lasseter was made simply to compare him to others who use 3D in an almost abusive fashion on screen (like in Monsters Vs Aliens) instead of simply to add a little depth (like in Bolt, and I only saw Bolt in 3D to see what all the fuss was about).

Frankly, I have less disdain for Disney than I have for 3D itself. At least as far as Pixar is concerned, we can get consistently decent movies out of them, but when studios like Dreamworks come up with a “Kung Fu Panda” once every 7-8 years and then saturate the market with cheap crap like Shrek 17: Shrek and the Beanstalk… well lets just say there are many more studios I can direct my hate towards than Disney.