Recent Related Items:

11 Comments


Mycroft says:

The Office was brilliant, so I can more than understand his success. Extras was, even if not as good, still great. His podcasts and radio shows with Stephen Merchant and Karl Plinkinton are no less than hilarious for me, and I find his stand up acts quite good too. Now Ghost Town was just entertaining but he didn’t write/direct it, so I expect more of this one, even though i think he should stick to the small screen rather than Hollywood.

jordi says:

Didn’t care for the Office but I liked his stand-up, observation humour mainly but quite intelligent at times as well. I think a lot of his appeal is his everyman image, not many in Hollywood look like people you meet in real life so maybe that’s his edge?

As you say comedy is a personal thing, in the Python series there was as much dross as gold imo.

jordi says:

@chris

If you don’t agree with someone’s opinion that doesn’t automatically make them an idiot. After all, he can use capitals and punctuation… ;)

Aknot says:

John Foote,

Could you elaborate a little on this comment:
“he does little else right as a director here.”

Thanks

INK says:

That read more as a review of Ricky Gervais than it did a review of a movie. I thought a reviewer reviewed the movie and didn’t let his disdain, and yes it came across as disdain to me, of a person interfere with his take on a film?

Ben says:

Ricky Gervais is a very funny man and all his shows are great. If you don’t like him then that’s fine but do a review on the damn film next time instead of him.

conbot says:

If you don’t get Ricky Gervais, then you most likely won’t enjoy a film that he wrote, directed and starred in.

This was a bad review.

John H. Foote says:

On Gervais — comedy is easily the most personal of film genres, and something that is different to each of us — an examaple, if you are walking down the street and fall, I am going to laugh out loud, I cannot help it, but those around me may not think it is funny — I find “The Life of Brian” to be hysterically funny, but my wife looks at me like I am from Mars as she hates it — I do not find Gervais funny…at all — I do not deny his talents, there are obviously those who like him very much, I am just not one of them — as for the review, I admit I did tend to review Gervais more than the film, but on the other hand, Gervais puts so much of himself in the film (keep in mind he is also co-directing)that I grew tired of him, therefore the film, very quickly — for the record Rob Lowe is quite good, and Jennifer Garner is wonderful as always — the film, stinks, and I still don’t find Gervais funny. To attack me for having an opinion is beyomnd idiotic, after all, we are all film critics are we not?

John H. Foote says:

And Lowe is quite good despite having no character written for him — could Gervais have done that??

I don’t find this a valid review because you don’t like the star/writer to begin with, so this is more like you just venting. I think people would prefer a review from someone less biased against the subject matter.

Comedy is a very subjective thing, you’re right. And Monty Python is not everyone’s favorite cheese shop. (Happens to be one of mine.)

Aknot says:

JF,

I inquired about what was wrong with his directing. Im fine with your opinion and happy that at least you put across the point you are not to found of his comedy.

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.