New ‘Thor: The Dark World’ Images, Magazine Covers and Plot Details

Published 2 years ago by

thor dark world movie poster New Thor: The Dark World Images, Magazine Covers and Plot Details

Marvel’s “Phase 2″ continues this November with Thor: The Dark World, which pits the God of Thunder (Chris Hemsworth) against a new dangerous opponent – or, rather, an ancient foe in Malekith the Accursed (Christopher Eccelston). While the Thor sequel won’t stray too far into dark storytelling territory – this is still a Marvel Studio production after all – it’s clear from the trailers and images released so far that director Alan Taylor (Game of Thrones) is taking a grittier and more tangible approach to the Nine Realms than his predecessor, director Kenneth Branagh, did on the first Thor installment.

Taylor has described The Dark World as a fantastical blockbuster that’s “really a domestic drama,” with its emphasis on the complicated relationships between Thor and his father Odin (Anthony Hopkins), step-brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston) and his human love interest Jane Foster (Natalie Portman), among other Earthlings and Asgardians who populate the Thor universe. Obviously, it’s the damaged link between Thor and Loki that’s been the focus of the marketing so far – in part, thanks to the Loki character’s runaway popularity.

Empire has premiered a couple new magazine covers, featuring Hemsworth and Hiddleston in costume as their Marvel-verse alter egos. In addition, the site has unveiled several new images from The Dark World, which features new glances at Malekith and his Dark Elves, in addition to your favorite humans and “gods” from the previous Thor installment. Feel free to peruse through all that material at your leisure (in the gallery below):

[Click for Full-Sized Version]

The Dark World is undergoing reshoots so as to beef-up Loki’s screen time in the sequel. However, according to director Alan Taylor and executive producer Craig Kyle, there are much larger problems at hand for Thor and his companions than the trickster God – with Taylor in particular having told Empire that not all of the Asgardians will make it out of this movie alive, saying “It turns out immortality isn’t all that it was cracked up to be.”

Kyle went on to clarify the situation, as far as what’s been going on in the Nine Realms since the events of the first Thor installment took place (including, around the same time as Loki’s attack on Manhattan/Earth in The Avengers):

“When the Bifrost was broken at the end of the first film, Odin had to conjure a lot of dark energy and go through a lot of personal sacrifice to try and get his son back to Earth. And it was a one-shot deal. If Thor didn’t succeed, without the Tesseract he couldn’t have got back again. And in our film, finally the Bifrost has been rebuilt, but during that time, when the cops were largely cut off from the rest of the universe, you had miscreants that came in from outside the Nine Realms, pillaging and destroying and causing havoc. So that’s what our guys have been doing now – trying to put all these fires out across the Nine Realms.”

Do you like the look (read: costumes, sets, etc.) for Thor: The Dark World? Are you excited to see more of the cosmic realms located in the Marvel Cinematic Universe?


Thor: The Dark World opens in select IMAX 3D theaters on October 30th, 2013, before it begins a general release a week later on November 8th.

Source: Empire

Follow Sandy Schaefer on Twitter @feynmanguy
TAGS: Thor, Thor 2
Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. That sounds meh.

    • hahaha

    • Sounds awesome, I can’t wait.

      • I was actually thinking the exact opposite AAA, but to each their own.

  2. This looks and sounds fantastic, I can’t wait!

    • I agree, it looks awesome! I can’t wait for Nov.

  3. This movie will be one of the highlights of Phase 2. For sure. Plus Thor is badass so winning.

  4. Yes this movie will be a good one! I think the first Thor was lacking in the Real World Feel that this one looks to have! I can’t wait!

  5. So shield has the mind gem possibly from the events of avengers. Maybe we see another gem pop up?

  6. I dont like when directors try to make their movies sound like one thing when they really are just fun action films. Shane black and crew said ironman 3 would be dark gritty, when really it was a fun buddy cop film. Thor 2 a domestic drama? Could be possible. But cap 2 as a political thriller sounda way off base

    • Yeah but Iron Man 3 was just Shane Black doing his Shane Black thing. With Thor and Cap, the directors behind that are tv directors that will be looking to win over the fans and audiences to launch their career so those movies might end up being the better of the Phase 2 films.

      • That is a great point.

  7. The Natalie Portman part of the “domestic drama” is too much drama for me.
    I cannot say I like the look of this. The Dark Elves look practically animated.

    • Natalie Portman, yeah they should get rid of her. But we gotta wait to see more of the Dark Elves on screen before dissing on their look.

      • Images can be misleading. CGI seems to be calling attention to itself here.
        Natalie Portman, she’s become a distraction. And the romance seems forced.

        • +1
          Natalie Portman was great in V For Vendetta and obviously, Black Swan, but she’s one of those rare actresses that either nails a role (like in the two previously mentioned films), or comes off as fake and forced (ala a large part of the Star Wars prequels and THOR).
          After her (kind of) public fallout with Marvel concerning Patty Jenkins being dropped from the movie, I can’t help but think she doesn’t want to do the movie anymore. I’m quite possibly wrong, but if she’s going to be as stale and boring as she was the first THOR, and on top of that, the constant reminder that maybe she’s only doing this movie because she’s contractually obligated to, then it’ll definitely affect the overall experience of the movie for me.

          …So basically, if she doesn’t get more interesting (i.e. if the character isn’t acted, written and directed with more “moxie” and determination), they might as well kill her off 😛

          • Killing her off would be best for Thor movies going forward.
            Being shackled to her for a film after this is migraine educing 😀

          • I get the feeling that Natalie Portman did Thor for the money and is doing The Dark World for the same reason. Some actors/actresses do the big budget films so they can do the smaller, less-well-funded movies that they really want to do.

      • I have said 4 quite some time that the dark elves and Maliketh look generic. There is nothing solid to really go on here. After watching Pacific Rim, this looks and sounds somewhat mediocre.

        • Right. This does not look up to Pacific Rim standards.
          The shots of Thor and Thor and Heimdall look on the
          level of Game Of Thrones and almost from that show.

  8. Natalie Portman is hot, I say she stays!

  9. I’ve been waiting for this movie since it was announced. I’m so excited! Loki is an awesome character. I think my new favourite will be Malekith. Also, the dark elves look amazing! *_* Mmm, villains! ♥

    • I bet Portman gets it, which is why being immortal sucks, watching everyone mortal around you eventually die (Wolverine much?). That’ll make Thor mad, question everything, and leave him brooding and bruised (but victorious?) by the end. He’ll take convincing to get back with the Avengers in Ultron. But he will ultimately come around. Sound about right?

  10. I know some people consider Thor to be the weakest out of Phase 1(Iron Man 2 and Captain Merica weren’t really good, at all) but Thor was my favorite. I am not a Thor fan at all and probably don’t consider him one of my favorite superheroes(not even Top 25). It was the characters and the Shakespeare-like story about a brother rivalry to please their father that just…did it for me. And, believe it or not, this is the most anticipated Marvel movie for me out of Phase 2(excluding Avengers 2…ULTRON!!!!!!!). I hope that this becomes a larger Thor universe that is expanded to the limits. I really hope they make another sequel that has Thor defend Asgard directly and not Earth. The Avengers is really overrated and it is not the best superhero movie ever. I just wanted to clarify.

    • I agree.

      Personally, I don’t like the Thor comic books but loved the movie. In my opinion, the weakest Phase 1 movie was The Avengers with IM2 coming real close.

      • I saw Thor to do a project on it for my Physics class and I just fell in love with it and I don’t get bored. And then I see all this hate going toward Man of Steel this year and I think to myself “How did this not happen when Avengers came out!?” I still do. Avengers was a huge disappointment other than the last 40 minute battle scene in New York(and people criticize Man of Steel for being too long in its third act spectacle…mmmmmmmmhhhhhhh).

        • Well, a lot of people loved the movie anyway.

          • Thor is my 2nd favorite phase 1 movie behind IM. My least favorite was cap and the avengers

        • Really? I personally enjoyed the Avengerz and thought it was set-up rather well. For a movie that ran over two hourz long, I found myself entertained throughout.

          • Nothing against its entertainment value, just found the story weak, the character interactioms tedious and was ment to do nothing but be entertaining. I prefer films to strive for more than that.

            • Normally I prefer more meaty filmz as well, but I don’t ever expect much substance from a comic book film. I see your point.

      • I agree as well. Thor was my favorite phase one film and Iron Man two the most disappointing. Next to the Guardianz film the Thor sequel is the flick I’m most excited about, followed by Avengerz.
        I’ve been reading comicz weekly since 1993 and only began reading and enjoying Thor for the past Six or Seven yearz. It was the Infinity Gauntlet that got me into collecting comicz, before that I read X-men and Spider Man occasionally. I lean towardz the cosmic side of Marvel more-so than the street level heroez and alwayz preferred Villainz.
        Overall, as an avid collector, I think Marvel has and is doing a good job with their movie Universe and aside from the stupid Mandarin twist, I’ve been okay with the character and story changez, however, I’m leery about the change to Drax and Ronan, and Ultronz origin.
        I understand the need to keep the non-comic fanboy entertained but it should be possible to do that and stay true to the characterz to please us more hardcore fanz.
        I withhold judgement until I see full trailerz but the conceptualization of Thor two is enough to get me into the theater.

  11. I am very excited for this film. I believe it can be the best superhero movie of the year. Iron Man 3 was just average. Man of Steel just good and The Wolverine was just good. None of those movies compared to the quality of last year 3 superhero films. I think Thor will suprise people, very intrested to see how people react to superhero films coming out in the fall season.

    • +1

  12. I hope I’m proven wrong, but I think we’ll be dealing with a very lackluster and uninspired villain here (Malaketh).
    I guess they’re building up to Surtur for the third film (which will undoubtedly be awesome), but I just can’t shake this feeling that Thor: TDW’s shortcoming will be it’s threat/villain(s).

    • Malekith isn’t at all lackluster or uninspired. In the comics, he is quite the threat. If they allow him to have possession of the Casket of Ancient Winters in this movie, it will be even moreso.

      I was very excited when he was announced as the villain, and Eccelston looks to be a good choice to play him.

      This is of course just my opinion :-)

      • In the comics, yeah, he’s an awesome villain (the animated Avengers series as well). But I’m talking about the movie: I have a feeling his motivations and reasons for doing what he’s doing will be almost non-existent or cliched.
        Of course, haven’t seen the movie, and I know it’s impossible to make a fair judgement without actually having seen said movie, but I’m just saying I have a suspicion they’ll go all Aldrich Killian on us with this one.

        Like I said, I hope I’m wrong.

        • For some reason i see malakeith turning out exactly like the frost giant leader whatever his name his. I think malakeith will play back seat to loki

          • I have that feeling too. And the Frost Giant’s name is Laufey, Loki’s father since his full name is Loki Laufeyson.

  13. I am really looking forward to this. I love the look Alan Taylor has given this world.

  14. Best movie of phase 2. Mark my words.

  15. Someone dies…I would say either Sif, Tyr, or at least one of the Warriors Three (or Baldar, as in the myths?). Oh-oh, call the Valkyries…

    • Speaking of Balder, I hope they introduce him in this film or Thor 3.

  16. I want Beta Ray Bill on screen, LIKE YESTERDAY!!! DAMN THESE MOVIE MAKERS!!

    • Totally agree. If Marvel can’t use the Silver Surfer, replace him with Beta Ray Bill!!!

    • Uh, he looks like Mr. Ed dressed up as Thor for Halloween.

  17. Is it me or is Loki even more popular than Thor right now? Loki spinoff anyone?

    • Yep. There’s even a petition for a Loki movie. Last time I checked it had over 1,000 signatures but still increasing.

      • Whop would he fight? Thor? We have Thor movies for that.

    • Never mind. The count is over 8,300 now. @_@

      • Loki is leagues more popular than most everyone in the MCU. Id say he falls right behind ironman and possibly cap

  18. So cannot wait for this!

  19. Did you see the backlash they got for making Idris Elba Heimdall? And he didn’t play a slave. Bringing up racial profiling and stereotypes for no reason is as bad as comparisons to Nazi Germany in internet arguments.

    Heimdall’s job was controlling the Bifrost because only he and Odin were powerful enough. Yes, Heimdall is one of the two most powerful characters in Thor. Anyone else that gets frozen is effectively dead and forgotten about, but Heimdall gets past it by being a badass. Hemsworth nailed it as Thor. Elba nailed it as Heimdall. I’m not sure if it was what you were going for, but you nailed it as a tool.

    • I think hemsworth is a good thor, but i am not sold on his acting chops outside the thor films. I am a huge fan of idris elba, its a shame to me that he hasnt been getting lead roles in movies cause he deserves it. I really hope he is the next james bond so the general public can recognize his talent.

      • Is there talkz of him playing Bond?

        • Only on a fan level.

    • A tool indeed. I agree with you Reno, Hemsworth worked well as Thor, and I honestly can’t think of an actor better suited for the role, and Elba killed it as Heimdall even with limited screen time. I’d love to see Balder, the Enchantress, and Hela introduced. Also, Tyr, Lorelei or Brunnhilde the Valkyrie, Hercules, Pluto, Ulik, Mangog, Skurge the Executioner, Fenris, Karnilla, Korg,(Who I loved as one of Hulkz Warbound) and eventually Ymir and/or Surtur. Ego, could be used and would most likely be a visual masterpiece, I mean, a living planet, thatz damn cool. The Wrecking Crew would be good for Earthly Villainz, and the Character I’d most like to see introduced, Mephisto, though I imagine he may be better suited for either a Guardianz film or Doctor Strange.

      • I’m pretty positive that Tyr will be in Thor 2 TDW, I cannot remember who is playing the character but he will be in it!!

        I just looked and Tyr is being played by Clive Russel.

        “According to Russell, he performed a scene with Benicio del Toro, who was cast as The Collector”

  20. It’s interesting to see the diverse comments on the upcoming Thor movie. Considering myself possibly Thor’s #1 fan, I am quite excited about this movie and the fact that Alan Taylor, director of one of my favourite series, is at the helm of affairs. And I beg to differ, Chris Hemsworth has the role locked down.

    With Taylor in charge, I expect the movie to be deeper and more intriguing than the first…and with a more entertaining climax. That’s not to say the first wasn’t good. It could have been better.

  21. Sit down Claude. It is my duty to inform you that you are Thor’s #2 fan. I became a Thor fan in 1966 with the Marvel Super Heroes cartoon show. This lead me to read the books and Ive enjoyed his story line since then. I waited 45 years for that first Thor movie to happen and my patience paid off. Not only did we get a Thor movie, but we get Thor 3 years in a row? How great is that?

    The reason Im such a big Thor fan is because he is the only Charactor whos powers are his birth right. He didnt go into space and get them. No injections, spider bites, cosmic rays, change in sun colors. Yes Mutants are born and there power shows up sometime in their teens. But nothing like this. They have not even mentioned that Frigga is not Thors real mother yet. I think that will be discovered in Thor 3.

    They have not even begun to show you how powerful he actually is. He doesnt even know yet himself.

    And onthe Heimdall question. I thought the casting was brilliant and look forward to seeing what he will do in the next movie. And for those that dont know. Heimdalls sister is also in both films. Yep. Its Sif.

    • I had to Google that thing about Thor’s mother. I can see what they might be doing with that in terms of a child-of-two-worlds thing. A bit like Loki, I guess.

      I wouldn’t class a character as better because they are born with their powers. I think it’s far more important to consider what they do with them. In terms of power level, the first film doesn’t give us much. Thor has a hammer. He hits people with it. Hard. If he gets a bit overwhelmed, he calls down lightning. And he can take a punch from Hulk without dying. I guess it leaves room to manoeuvre in future films if they want him to be all-powerful or ‘just’ really strong.

      • Speaking of Thorz power level, I was extremely underwhelmed by how he was utilized in the Avengerz film. One of comicz greatest disputez is who would win between the Hulk and Thor, which obviously showz that Thorz strength is at the very least, on par with that of the Hulk, so the fight on the Helicarrier could and should have been far more epic rather than Thor seemingly struggle to stay in the fight. He is a God, and a powerful one at that, and should be shown as such. I recall reading the Infinity War and Thanos saying something to the effect of none of the heroez understanding his power, save for Thor. I also recall Thor going mad and beating Warlock, the Surfer, (Though it was a sneak attack) Beta Ray Bill, Drax with the Power Gem, Gamora, Moondragon, and finally falling to Thanos. My point is, Thor smash…

        • I pretty much can say I really enjoyed The Avengers overall. I especially got a kick out of the fight between Thor and Iron Man. That was classic contention right there!

    • I never knew that about Sif, COOL factoid!… but I don’t think that she is his Sister in the Mcu, it is possible for sure, and I hope it is so in the movie but I doubt it!!

      About Frigga, I have heard that she Dies in Thor 2, so if he does find out I think it would be more effective if he finds out in TDW!

      I STILL WANT BETA RAY BILL in the MCU, WTF Marvel? get your a$$es in gear and give us BRB! Not a watered down version either!!
      If they do, He will not be as awesome as he was in the comics (I HOPE THEY DONT CHANGE HIM if he does show up)

  22. HAHHHHAAAHAA. Looong time no hear, HG! We only seem to hook up when there’s a Thor movie around. I knew that would smoke you out. Lol! You summed Thor up well. I’ll just add my extra thrill being the power he holds literally in his hand. Without it, he is powerful but far less powerful and lethal than when mjolnir gets back in his hands. There is a significant difference in power. The whole idea of incredible power at your beck and call as well some vulnerability without it has a certain thrill to it IMO. Well-exemplified in his battle against Hulk in the Avengers movie- though Thor’s natural brawn seem diminished in that scene to me. My interest in mythology adds to the Thor thing too.

    Never thought Thor would happen. Not in a million years. Dreamt of it as boy and my elder bro laughed at the idea. Well you waited 45, so I concede. You waited much longer so #2 doesn’t sound so bad after all.

    Methinks this fall will be great!

  23. I think that’s one of the reasons why I like the Avengers: they all show a significant drop in strength when they are without their favourite ‘tools’. Cap without his shield, Hawkeye without his bow and arrows, Stark without his armor, Thor without his hammer, Banner without his anger. None of them is a ready-made package all the time like Superman. Caught unprepared they are considerably vulnerable.

    • Thor is still powerful without his hammer, it doesn’t add to his physical strength, it merely allowz him flight and a weapon to wield. And I’m not sure Bannerz anger countz as a tool, itz something readily available which can’t be taken from him, itz not as though he can forget his anger at Home like a hammer, shield, bow, or set of keyz.

    • What…? Cap without his shield… he took up a rifle! Hawkeye ran out of arrows… he picked one up from a baddie and changed the arrow head! Stark without his armour… defeated Loki’s magic heart-changer-stick! I thought that when the odds were against them, the Avengers were very resourceful. Take away their weapon of choice and they’ll probably kick ass anyway 😛

  24. You don’t get my point guys. These characters
    need something to complete them to be the total package. A weapon of choice, a suit or a transformation. ..Kal El is always Kal El. Clark Kent is just a cosmetic disguise. .he is just as strong with or without the garb. Banner can be taken out before he has the chance to change and take my word for it. .Thor is far more powerful with his uru hammer. And by power I’m not referring to brute force. His hammer is not just for flight. I recall an old East v West Coast Avengers comic were Thor took on Wonderman. Without the hammer Simon took his pound of flesh quite well until the hammer was back. One forceful throw and it was game over. The Avengers are resourceful but the beauty is the fact that they need to do or get something to be at their optimum.

    • Doesn’t Superman need the Sun to power up?

  25. I also remember an issue of Avengers where Wonderman is trying to show off to someone by lifting a set of weights saying. “See this? This is set for Thor” and the next panel you see him shaking and the weight starts to collapse on him. and he says ” And Uh….As you can see, Im not quite Thor” But this was back in the 80s when he still had his red jacket and looked cool.

    • @HG: *snicker*

      • I recall back when I was a teenager, my buddy’s brother was into lifting BIG barbells, weights, etc. I stopped by, and his brother had just gotten a new weight set. We put an prodigious elephant-load of weights on the bar, and he said, “Let’s see if you can lift that.” Never one to ignore a challenge, I hefted it up to my waist. He challenged me to lift it up to my chest, which I promptly did, and then he dared me to lift it over my head, so with a mighty thrust, I lifted that bar full of rhinoceros-nutz right over my head…and lost my balance, and dropped it backwards right through my buddy’s patio-door glass! Luckily, his dad (who looked like a mafia enforcer, and for all I know probably was) thought of me as an additional son, and was very cool about it (I of course offered to pay for it, but he had alot of $$$, and insurance, and told me not to worry about it, so I bought his family dinner at a nice restaurant instead). Lucky for me his dad, an old-world Italian named Guido (no, I am not kidding, that was really his name) liked me, or he probably would have been lifting my rhinoceros-nutz up and dropping them through a window as well!

  26. Shame on all you discriminating people who think all white parts should be played by black actors. You are the ones who raise the race card flag for everything to make a stink. I sure don’t see any of you that enjoy touting black actors for white parts giving equal time to demanding black parts be played by white actors. People who misplace “civil rights” and intentionally take them out of context are hypocrites, biased, self-centered and discriminatory.

    • We don’t think that, “all white parts should be played by black actors.” But if an actor is good enough then they should get the job based on ability over appearance. I’m sure I’ve told *you* specifically that early comics had few-to-no black people in prominent roles because of racist attitudes. Now superhero movies are a big thing, is it fair to exclude all non-white actors and actresses as a throwback to the openly racist days of the past?

      Have you not noticed that since the comic superhero movies really took off in the early 2000s, there has been only one major ‘black part’ (as you so indelicately put it) and that was Storm in X-Men? There may be more but I can’t think of any. We’re not playing ‘the race card’ – I can’t, because I’m ginger, soulless and have a very pasty-white complexion – but you’re clearly misunderstanding, as shown by your categorisation of ‘black parts’ and ‘white parts.’

      I would like to point out that I was not one of the people calling the casting of Benedict Cumberbatch in Star Trek Into Darkness or Johnny Depp in The Lone Ranger awful. Cumberbatch was pretty terrific in the former, I thought, and Depp did his usual thing in the latter. Potential troll bait, but since you’re discriminating against people based on their skin colour, aren’t you technically being racist?

      • Well, lets have a Blade movie where Blade is played by Russel Crowe, or a Luke Cage played by someone like Jason Statham. Maybe have Cyborg from Teen Titans be played by Liam Hemsworth or even T’challa be played by Daniel Craig. I can 100% guarantee there would be hell to pay, not only from the African American comic fans but from everyone.

        So, before people call others racists about people complaining that a black person is playing a white character, think about how you would feel if the roles (no pun intend) were reversed.

        • Well, I can pick a few flaws, there. After being Jor-El, I’m not sure Russell Crowe would want to do Blade out of loyalty, despite rumours of a Blade film in development alongside Ms Marvel, Black Panther etc.

          Luke Cage by Jason Statham? Isn’t Cage from NYC? Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy a good Statham movie, it’s just he’s a bit like Johnny Depp in that most of his characters have the same sort of… essence?

          I haven’t seen Hemsworth in much, but he hasn’t really impressed me in what I have seen him in. It’s early days and I’ve only seen (maybe) two movies with him in it and neither had him in the starring role.

          Black Panther needs to be black, really – Daniel Craig in no way, shape, form or capacity looks like he could be from an African tribe.

          It seems you’re picking mismatched actors just to be a ‘cazzo’ -it’s Italian, Assassin’s Creed taught me it – if I’m honest. And *again* – there is a lot less opportunity for black actors and actresses in comic books. Getting sick of repeating it. If a character’s skin colour isn’t absolutely integral to the role (Black Panther was the first black superhero, if I remember correctly) then why shouldn’t the role be open to everyone with the talent?

          • I had a long very good counter post, but my companies page coaching timer timed out and I lost it. I will be replying in a little bit on this lol. Sorry.

  27. Okay so anyway I know it’s just an old fanboy fancy with the Avengers. I agree with you HG on Wonderman’s original costume. Was more suited to his showbiz personality. Not sure he’s needed in MCU though. At least not yet. I’d go for Namor, Panther and a couple others before him.

  28. Class of strength is controversial in comics because some writers tend to forget and do their own thing. I remember an IM comic back then that stated that Thor, Hercules, Wonderman and Giant Man were in the same class while Namor, Thing and Doc Samson were a rung lower. Plus or minus they’ve maintained a consistency somewhat. I also remember a childish comic years ago when Thor took up Hulk’s challenge and threw away his mjolnir to engage in hand to hand combat. They levelled a large chunk of the city with Hulk having the upper hand but Thor refusing to go down. Hammer returns, Hulk refuses to continue, arrogant Thor throws away hammer and taunts him to continue. Hulk doesn’t and leaves. City in ruins. Childish and pointless battle. I think Marvel later said it was a what if tale. But the point of Thor with and without hammer was made.

    That’s just my point and one of my fascinations.

  29. I have a challange for soem of you. If you can find it. Check out the “What IF” issue titled. “What IF The Incredible Hulk Went Bezerk” There ya go