‘The Upper Footage’ Review

Published 9 months ago by , Updated August 22nd, 2014 at 1:04 am,

The Upper Footage UPPER movie reveiws 2013 The Upper Footage Review

Another entry in the found-footage sub-genre, The Upper Footage recounts an infamous night in 2009 when New York socialites Blake Pennington, Will Erixon, Taylor Green and Devon Petrovsky went out for a wild night on the town that went horribly wrong. After picking up a young girl named “Jackie” in a bar, the four friends head to Blake’s upscale NYC apartment for some cocaine and liquor-fueled fun. The only problem is Jackie has too much fun, and winds up dead as a result.

What happens next is a real-time look at four people’s attempt to cover up a wrongful death – leading to questions that extended beyond the movie screen and into real life.

Like so many found-footage movies, The Upper Footage relies on the gimmick of selling the viewer on the idea of getting first-hand record of actual events – the more implausible and fantastical, the better. Films like Paranormal Activity or The Blair Witch Project go for more subtle and realistic conventions to suggest authenticity – while films like Chronicle and Cloverfield use the format to try and bring the impossible into the frame of reality. It’s only gotten more disturbing as newer found-footage films try to outright blur the line between reality and fantasy through viral campaigns and social media promotion – and The Upper Footage is probably one of the more bold and risky attempts yet. 

The Upper Footage Movie Jackie The Upper Footage Review

The bizarre story at the center of the film (which you can READ in full HERE) has many strands tied to real-world happenings – but that’s all they are: strands. Not solid lines of evidence. A message at the beginning of the film informs us that “director” Justin Cole simply edited the found-footage of the crime into what we’re seeing, but it’s still evident from the very first frame that this film is a piece of crafted cinema, with obvious production values. Despite the description of Will Erixon being an amateur “vlogger” (video blogger), the movie hits the sort of hard logic-gaps that found-footage often does – namely, why the hell is someone going through the work of filming all this? And, when Cole tries to artfully circumvent these gaps, the film – in its own artfulness – exposes the very facade the director is trying to construct.

Then there are the performers, who indeed come off as “performers.” The difference between found-footage films that succeed in their real-world intentions and those that don’t is in the performances of the actors involved. You won’t find suitably convincing performances in The Upper Footage. The whole 90-minute event plays out like a dramatic re-enactment you might’ve seen on Unsolved Mysteries, which is a fatal blow to the entire found-footage approach, in this case.

Because it doesn’t feel authentic (whether it is or not), choices like a camera left facing a blank wall (with only audio left to hold our attention) become nuisances rather markers of authenticity. The feeling of watching something crafted makes you cognizant (and critical) of the director’s level of craftsmanship; The Upper Footage places its bet on the wrong marker (reality) and is ultimately unraveled by that choice. 

Real or Fake The Upper Footage Movie 2013 The Upper Footage Review

Where the film redeems itself, however, is in the arena of doubt. While coming off as artificial, there is still enough detail and earned authenticity to leave one wondering – even though we may not be seeing the actual footage of actual events – if we still might be watching the re-enactment of something very real. There are just enough breadcrumbs sprinkled around the Internet (in both old news articles and old footage) to provide any querying mind (and there will be some querying minds after watching this film) with food for thought. The great irony here is that the movie will likely generate actual discourse about larger ideas of wealth and privilege in face of the law, or the questionable authenticity of media these days, even though the film itself in no way broaches those discussions.

If it’s all fake, The Upper Footage is nonetheless an intriguing (and gimmicky) experiment in modern media marketing; if there is any truth at the core of the film, then The Upper Footage is also a bold attempt at using media and marketing as a tool for pursuing justice where the legal system has failed. In either case, the debate surrounding the film far outclasses the experience of actually watching it. But therein lies the hook:

If the discussion interests you, can you resist the urge to see for yourself what it’s all about?

_______________________________________________________

READ: Is The Upper Footage Real or Fake? (SPOILERS)

________________________________________________________

The Upper Footage is now available online. You can purchase “Tickets” HERE. The film is 90 minutes long and is Not Rated, though it contains drugs, language, adult situations and brief nudity.

Our Rating:

2 out of 5
(Okay)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: the upper footage

17 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. Fake as fuark.

    • Hey! I happen to believe Fuark is real. Please don’t mock others’ beliefs.

  2. I dig bizarre cinema so I’ll be giving this one a viewing.

    • I’d never heard of this movie before reading this article. It’s piqued my interest, but it’ll probably be one of those “oh, this movie’s out on Netflix already?” kind of viewings.

  3. Who gives a f**k? Some s*ut dies… why do I wanna see that?

    • Well when you phrase it like a sociopath… I guess the answer is, “you don’t.”

      Hope nothing like that ever happens to a lady you love. You might find your exact sort of reasoning to be… distasteful if that were to occur.

      • Or it could be possible that everybody that actually wants to see a girl die on camera, could be easily considered more of a sociopath, so the road goes both ways.

        • Lets not go see any movie ever then because people die in them, despite them being entirely fictional. That’s what you’re saying, right?

          • Exactly. It’s not your experiences that define you as a sociopath, it’s how you process those experiences.

    • So eloquent. You may want to consider submitting some guest editorials to this site.

  4. A 2/5 huh. Ouch. Guess I’ll be skipping this one, LOL

  5. Yeah I’ve never heard of this film until I saw the articles title, there’s no trailer for the film, and there’s virtually nothing on the film on the internet besides this review, and a couple other reviews as well. On the IMDB page it says it came out “January 2013″ in the US, but there’s virtually nothing supporting that.

  6. Seems like a bit of an odd review. Not sure how it can potentially be real and that the actors were not convincing enough all at the same time. Well everything about this seems quite odd, I think I am going to have to check this out for myself.

  7. So, the big question is….can anyone figure out the identity of whoever plays “Jackie” or is that part of the story just BS to help sell the movie?

    • Apparently the “rumour” is it may be Andie McDowell’s daughter Rainey Qualley. Justin Cole wrote a long, whining piece back in March that several people linked to on the trailer thread, in which he claimed to have been royally done over by everyone from studio execs to individual theatres and McDowell herself (without naming her directly). However, using his own logic of blurring the line between script and reality, there’s no reason to believe a word of this “poor little underdog standing up to The Man” story is true either.

  8. I didn’t watch the trailer, but the initial plot sounds like the movie “Very Bad Things” with Christian Slater and Jeremy Piven.

  9. Wasn’t expecting much after reading the review but I just finished watching it and thought it was something that was really thought-provoking and well done. Surely leaves you angry but I think that’s the point.

Be Social, Follow Us!!