Recent Related Items:

25 Comments


Matt K says:

Never read the book, but from what I have seen it does look pretty good…lol I’m always a sucker for post-apocalyptic films.

CW says:

Do we know if the actual film is more like the book, or like this trailer?
I could totally see how the studio would fudge the film towards mainstream fare. Shoot, I was shocked when I heard this was being adapted. Way, way too despairing.

I’ve read elsewhere that the movie is more like the book.

I hate when they misrepresent a movie just to get butts in movie theater seats – in the end it just ends up pissing people off who went in expecting a certain type of film and got something completely different.

Vic

BG says:

Of course the trailer will emphasize the action sequences, because how can you convey complex paternal emotions in a 2 minute trailer? I am sure there will be more to come that will show us something more promising.

Pete says:

The trailer targets the wrong audience and is just a complete miss in every respect.

I was surprised that they didn’t show Robert Duvall or Guy Pearce but went with Garret Dillahunt instead. That was just about the only thing that I liked about the trailer.

cat says:

it’s only a trailer. trailers are designed to bring people to the seats who aren’t familiar with the book. we, who are familiar with it already, will be going so they don’t need to lure us in. the trailer does it’s job.

greenknight333 says:

Well I think from watching this trailer that misrepresentation is only a joke here. The trailer DOES CAPTURE the tension I felt while reading the book but it severely over emphasizes the importance of the cannibals. There were a few confrontations but they were brutal and quite barbaric. Also of Charlize Theron’s character, who I thought was nothing more than a footnote in the story,it is only implied what happens to her and then you have to infer a lot to reach any conclusion about her fate. Does she deserve her fate because she loses hope? The story is about survival but more from a baby boomer point of view whereby a man from that generation felt that taking care of the family (from a provider/protection) was the males responsibility and one they took very seriously.It is also about the subtle and definitely not so subtle relationship between father and son. The son trying to understand the father and choices his father makes and the father trying to temper the brutality and violence in a world where compassion and hope are lost, trying to show his son that he has not lost his humanity.

Great book!!!! I hope Vic is right and that the movie is like the book…

Great article Kofi. I was wondering why there had been no news on this movie for a while now.

Taylor says:

ok

1. completely miscast.

2. he fires a TRACER round out of a six shooter? ummm…

3. mad mad much?

4. ill wait for DVD

greenknight333 says:

@ Taylor

Have you read the book?..

I think the casting except for maybe Theron was pretty much on the mark..I think the man and the boy are perfect casting IMO…

?? mad mad much ??

woolycaveman says:

I love the look and all, but I am a little displeased with the “action slant” they’re putting on it. I loved this book, we read it in school and it is the only one I have actually read/enjoyed this entire year. Also I loved “No Country For Old Men” I haven’t read the book yet, but I want to. I just hope this is a little truer to the book than the trailer. Although, this isn’t the worst thing they could have done, I mean there are some pretty actiony moments in the book. This is like the best worst thing they could have done.

Paul Young says:

Kofi is right. They are waiting for Oscar time to roll around. But to release a full trailer this early is weird to me. I understand the movie has been done since last year so all the footage is there but wouldn’t they have been better served to release a teaser instead?

They are trying to reach the action crowd with this 1st trailer. I’ll bet you a dollar to donuts the next trailer will go a different direction, sort of what they did with 7 Pounds.

Richard says:

I’ve wanted to read the book for awhile and so I know a bit about it but when I heard they were making a movie I decided to wait, I like to read the book after the movie because otherwise the movie lets me down, this way I’m sure I’ll be entertained twice.

From what I understood I also thought the trailer seemed a little more action then I thought. However, I don’t think it over did it really, trailers are supposed to make people interested and if I never knew about the road I would look into it now and then decide if I wanted to see the the movie, which would still be yes.

Michael says:

I am looking forward to seeing this movie. I read the book and became excited when I heard that a movie was being made of it and that Viggo Mortensen was to star in it. The trailer looks very intense and although seems a like it put more prequel scenes than expected. However, any scene with Charlize Theron is a nice bonus.

This looks like it will be most compelling.

Richard says:

I think I’ll like the book and the movie

JessSayin says:

Having read the book I can tell you the trailer is just like it save for the expanded roll of Charlize as Viggo’s wife. In the book she had a couple lines in a flashback and that was it.

The book was amazingly bleak and depressing but written like poetry, beautiful and raw.

It won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction. Personally, I didn’t care for it. Too bleak for my taste. What can I say? I’m a romantic.

I’m really looking forward to seeing Robert Duvall in the role I just know he’s gonna be playing.

JessSayin says:

@Vic
I’m agree with you about misrepresenting just to get butts in the seats.
The best book I’ve read in ages was ‘Cold Mountain’ and we know what Hollywood did with that one,
They rant and raved about how it was gonna sweep the Oscars and…..nothing. not a peep. Forgotten.
(And they made Nicole Kidman’s character a blonde.. And I was REALLY looking forward to that jet black hair)

Franni says:

The trailer is a complete misread of the book. Some reviews keep saying this is the first trailer. We can only hope the 2nd is truer to form and to the book.
A word to Taylor. No it is not 17 again but I would suggest that you grow into an adult mental image, and then wait for trailer # 2.
Mr. Mortensen is the perfect choice for this role as no one can telescope feelings with his eyes like this man. He is brilliant in most all that he does. This is like icing on the cake for him.
Sure wish the Weinstein group would give Charlize her own movie. She is so not in this movie except as a thought of remembrance in a flashback. Also they could have dirtied her face a bit, to suit the role.

thumbmonster says:

UMMM read the book i dont recall enviromental breakdown, it was all a nuclear war. So why are they showing global warming and weather havoc?

@thumbmonster

Because that’s in vogue at the moment (unfortunately).

Vic

Thumbmonster says:

boy then i am worried about it not being true to the book then if they start adding things that dont belong, as well as the wife, as i recall she had a few lines in the book and thats it in the end. a few lines. so i dont understand why they are adding her to the movie and giving her an extended role.

Stephen Tilson says:

Ultimately, making a movie out of a Cormac McCarthy book is like making a stage play out of Bach’s Concerto and Fugue in D Minor. So much of McCarthy’s appeal comes from his authorial voice, his diction and even his syntax, that any movie can only hint at the richness of the novel.

If you’ve only read The Road, do yourself a favor and read Blood Meridian. The Road is good, but Blood Meridian is McCarthy’s masterpiece, the work that should assure him immortality.

mildred alvarez says:

This looks nothing like the McCarthy I read. The trailer is grossly misleading and will have anyone who has read the book outraged. Those who have not read the book will go in looking for Road Warrior and will come out disappointed, that is, if they stay to the end of the film. It will lead to bad word of mouth.

Firewalker says:

I agree totally with the Trailers misrepresentation of the guts of the story, but what’s got me also beevied is that the destruction was caused by a natural caustrophe. I know the book left it up for interpetation. My interpetation was that mankind destroys mankind (War) and that the surviours felt that god had abandoned them but through the journey and discovery of bond between Father and Son and the grey area of right and wrong humanity is saved and the bond between god and people and can never be destroyed no matter how hard we try! To quote the book “goodness will find a way” —will be loss if the destuction is interpetated for us especially something as silly and simple as the weather.

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.