‘The Last Exorcism’ Ending Explained

Published 5 years ago by , Updated September 3rd, 2010 at 9:09 am,

last exorcism nell possessed The Last Exorcism Ending Explained

In the last 10 minutes, the ending seems to completely unravel what was established in the prior hour and a half, implying that the supernatural was indeed at work, and makes the ludicrous assumption not only that the town preacher is actually a satan worshipper, but that the entire church body is as well – and in on the conception and birth of some demon creature.

Of course the question the audience is left with is: Was Nell really possessed or was it all an elaborate psychological issue? Well here’s the problem… there were different points of view about what was really happening between those involved in the film, so it’s going to be (mostly) open to interpretation by the audience. The idea behind the film (up until the final scenes) was to present everything that happened in as neutral a way as possible, so that two people could look at the same movie and one would say it was possession while the other would say it’s psychological.

However the ending, while apparently meant to also be ambiguous or open-ended, obviously leans toward the demonic possession side of the equation. The birth of a child/creature that is clearly alive although Nell is so early in her pregnancy that it’s not even remotely apparent that she’s pregnant points to it being non-human. There have also been descriptions from those involved in the film that the “baby” had “spikes” protruding from it – obviously not a super-early term embryo/fetus/baby. Finally the massive expansion of the fire when the creature is thrown into it – all these things point to a supernatural occurrence – which was NOT the intention of the filmmakers.

Actually what the real question is that we were supposed to walk away with from the film was this: When Cotton raises his crucifix and walks toward the cultists and the raging ball of fire, will God help him because he has found his recently lost faith? Or will God turn his back on Cotton for falling away in the first place.

Still have doubts? If you want an answer directly from the director, producer and cast of the film read our interview with them here:

Give The Last Exorcism your own rating right here: The Last Exorcism: Was It Possession… Or Psychology?


[poll id="67"]

Discuss away!

« 1 2

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Thas so old thas from the 70s movies. Nothin new

  2. Thank you for that last comment, brilliant. Just saw the 2nd one, pretty entertaining but a lot more questions. So the scene with her dad, did that really happen? Why was the room empty, why no body? And what was the deal with licking the blonde chick at the end? The demon was into her? haha, as someone else said, love her choosing life over death. would have pissed me off otherwise. Well I’ll read everyones new comments in a few years when the final chapter of this s*** show comes out.

  3. I think she was definitely possessed, the drawing she did on the wall explained the deaths of cotton (going into the fire in the first image, then dying in the flames the next) and the woman (cut up into pieces), and finally the camera man who gets his head cut off by caleb at the end. That’s why I thought the ending was more resolved than most think, Nell explained all the deaths in her drawings.

  4. I think she was definitely possessed. one point that my friend pointed out,the drawing she did on the wall explained the deaths of cotton (going into the fire in the first image, then dying in the flames the next) and the woman (cut up into pieces), and finally the camera man (who gets his head cut off by caleb) at the end. That’s why I thought the ending was more resolved than most think, Nell explained all the deaths in her drawings.

  5. Yes, the drawings kinda prove that nell has actually been possesed. But I am still confused in part when they do the second exorcism that cotton is sure she is not possesed but mentally traumatized. And who actually makes her pregnant?

  6. Okay. She was posssed by Abalam, not Satan, or the devil. It states that clearly in the film. SHE IS POSSESSED, and continues to be. The preacher hosted parties for his sunday school students at his own home that Nell used to attend – she was impreganted there by either the Rev Manely, or another of his cult congregation. The reason she doesn’t look preggo throughout is because of the possesion – and the doctors did realize she wa pregantant when the rests of her tests came back in – her father yanked her out of the hospital before actually hearing anything from a doctor. The brother is part of the cult – that was CLEAR from the first time you meet him – when he tells them to turn around and go back to where they came from – then pointed out even clearer when Caleb gets slashed by his sister, and he writes the note “Don’t leave her alone with him” because..Caleb needs her ALIVE to continue the Cults work of getting a host body to Abalam (So becomming absloutely ONE with NELL)- though its stated she HE CAN NOT DO THIS unless she ‘willingly accepts him’ because of the prophecy (You can get this all from the first viewing of the first film, and it also just pounds all the same facts back at you in the sequel when she does join with Abalam at the end, willingly and she drives off listening to some weak rock music, and everything starts lighting on fire was she goes – Very anti climatic like the first (and a total Carrie rip off)

    So yes, She was possesed it was not ‘in her head or imagined’

    So stop arguing over it.

  7. I genuinely thought it was just teenage psychological issues over her mother dying, her father being a drunk and over protective and the rape that she suppressed. Infact I thought it would have made a better movie without forcing the demonic possession ritual at the end. Personally I am a Christian and I do believe in that kind of stuff with demons but I think they have been over dramatised in this movie in particular to the point where it’s not realistic. I didn’t really understand the ending, but that might be because of my age(15). I thought her dad rapped her at first then I suspected the brother, in fact I think that is the most likely explanation. I think that the guy Logan was in on the cult, gay or not. Also yes, Nells pictures explained the deaths of the camera crew and Cotton but that doesn’t mean she was possessed, has no one ever had that sense of déjà vu before where you feel like you’ve been their before like maybe in a dream?
    I don’t know, maybe this is just a film where everyone’s just going to have to agree to disagree…

  8. The preacher made up that Nell was possessed by abalam to the dad so that he could go on with an exorcism to get paid. Clearly. If you actually payed attention the preacher was trying to explain to the dad what the Latin writings meant because the father couldn’t read Latin. And the preacher barely understood it either so he made up a b******* explanation of who and how she is “possessed”. It rigged the exorcism and only had the dad convinced. obviously you should know this if you watched the movie. And had nell believing it too. All in all the point i want to make is that it was phsycological issues. She was messed up in the head from being raped and her mom dying and her dad being an abusive drunk. They put s*** in her head to think she was possessed and that’s how we get the movie.