The International Review

Published 5 years ago by

Short version: The International starts out with a strong espionage vibe but is weakened when it strays into “action movie” territory.

the international reviews The International Review
Screen Rant reviews The International

I really wanted to walk out of The International having loved it, but the best I can manage is that overall I liked it a lot.

It’s the story of Louis Salinger (Clive Owen), and INTERPOL agent working in France and his attempt to implicate a mega-banking firm in arms dealing. I loved how the film opens – the very first frame puts you right into the film with no preamble. Louis and his partner are trying to “turn” a bank executive and get him to provide evidence of the bank’s misdeeds. Things do not go well within a few short minutes.

It seems that everyone is against Louis and he can make no headway in his investigation. People are being killed and “disappeared” but there is no concrete evidence of the bank’s involvement. He is soon joined by American FBI operative Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts), who has been attempting to work the case state-side, and has also been running into roadblocks.

I don’t dislike Naomi, but I have to say that she stuck out like a sore thumb as soon as she appeared. The first part of the film was shot in Europe, and I felt like I was immersed in the world of espionage – until she came on screen. I bought the actors up until that point completely as the characters they were playing – be it police officers, bankers, lawyers, whatever. But when she appeared it was like “oh look, she’s playing an FBI agent.” She was just terribly miscast in this film.

When the film moved to New York City it lost me even further. Suddenly I didn’t buy any of the characters at all and it took me out of the film. Perhaps if the entire thing had begun in the U.S. and stayed there I would have felt differently, but the differences between the European and U.S. actors/scenes was quite jarring. It went from cool espionage film to typical cop action movie, and not in a good way.

There was one scene in particular that I found extremely over the top and out of place in the film: I dont’ want to spoil it but it takes place at the Guggenheim museum where a big gun battle goes down. The amount of firepower, number of men and the complete and utter disregard for stealth did not fit one iota with what came before or after in the film.

It was like the studio told director Tom Tykwer “hey man, you’re movie’s kind of slow – we need you to stick a huge action set piece right here so you don’t lose the audience.”

Now I don’t know if that’s the case, but it certainly had the reverse effect on me. Once the movie moved back overseas, it started to capture my attention and I started enjoying it once again.

Overall The International is a good film that could have been great. If you’re a Clive Owen fan, it’s certainly worth checking out.

Our Rating:

3.5 out of 5
(Very Good)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: 3 star movies, the international

10 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. You would think that being an Interpol agent he would at least know how to properly hold a weapon… Oh geez, here I go again on the guns, I have a disease…

    I might go see this if any of my friends are interested. I know they like Clive Owen, I’m not really a big Owen fan, have nothing against him, but don’t have any particularly positive opinion on him. Basically I’m neutral.

  2. I dig Owen, but your review actually surprised me. All my impressions of this movie were no good, looked bland.

    Well, I probably would’ve skipped it before, but maybe it deserves a rental.

    Thanks Vic!

    Rev

  3. @Ken J:

    It’s not how he holds the weapon, it’s also the eye blinking he does every time he shoots. *shoot* *blink* *shoot* *blink* Almost reminded me of Austin Powers. ;)

    But I’m also afraid only Sam Peckinpah got this right in his movies.

    ZAR.

  4. I’m an Owen fan myself so I’ll see this one. I’ll probably feel the same way you did when Naomi enters the movie. I’m not a big fan of hers. From what you said it sounds like a fun movie overall so it’s a must see for me.

  5. @Reverend

    Well there were parts that were slower and while other reviewers are complaining about those I rather enjoyed them.

    Vic

  6. Yea I had a feeling this movie wasn’t going to be that great..At first I thought it was going to be like Zeitgiest + Action..but then i figured they would make it hollywood..blah..it might get a borrowed from a friend who rented it..

  7. Great review. I was hoping this movie would turn out to be “great” instead of just “good”, but I’ll likely go and see it anyways.

  8. Yes, I couldn’t agree more. While I liked this film, I didn’t truly love it.

    And it really had so much potential to be great.

    Oh well, at least it is better then so many others that are out there. ;)

  9. This movie had a good concept, but I think that were it failed for me was the execution. I dont mind slow scenes but this movie was a whole bunch of big words that made my head hurt. i guess i expected a bit more action and an interesting climax that the movie just did not have. It wasnt horrible, it just REALLY didnt deliver tthe pizza for me lol

  10. Hi,
    Please explain me the climax scene. .. who killed the banker? for what?

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

Be Social, Follow Us!!