Recent Related Items:

35 Comments


790 says:

Na Jim , to quote Optimus Prime,
“My Bad”.

KEL says:

LOL, 790! Glad that I’m not completely alone in my view! :-) Good to see ya, bud.

I don’t see why the kid issue needs to be addressed at all. The best way to address it would be would to ignore that whole subplot completely and move on, it would be like saying “sorry, what were we thinking?” to the audience that actually came back for the “sequel”.

And as mentioned, the kid (wonderful actor), will be MUCH older by the time MOS comes out, and we don’t even know if Bosworth will return as Lois, so they may as well ignore the afformentioned incident if they’re going to have to recast anyway.

I say they should just do like Superman 3 did, bad as it was as a movie, it didn’t mention ANY of the events from Superman 2. It just went right into a new story, didn’t address the whole Lois/Superman affair or whether Lois remembered that Clark was Superman or not, and it didn’t have to. Same should be done with MOS, IMO.

Here’s why the bastard kid subplot is a dumb idea:

First of all, according to the comics, Superman, being kryptonian, is unable to reproduce with an earth person. They’re two different species. It would be like a horse and a donkey doing it.

Secondly, according to the Richard Lester cut of Superman 2, on which Superman Returns is “loosely based”, Superman was DEPOWERED, he was turned into an ordinary man, when he and Lois had their affair, therefore Jason should/would not have ANY superpowers.

Thirdly, the whole idea of Superman having an affair with Lois and then making her forget it ever happened is RIDICULOUS and COMPLETELY OUT OF CHARACTER. What, he has sex with her, makes her forget about it, leaves, comes back, finds out she had a kid that throws pianos and then doesn’t say anything about it?? WTF? How could he even approach her about that anyway? She’d be like “when did you and I…?” and how bad would Superman look? It’s almost like rape if you think about it. Can you see this winning a pulitzer prize: “Superman scews people and then brain washes them, it could happen to YOU by Lois Lane”? The whole idea is ridiculous, and whoever concieved it needs to be FIRED or have their head examined.

That’s why the best thing to do short of a reboot would be to just MOVE ON and ignore that BS. I honestly feel sorry for Routh, I think he deserves a second chance, it wasn’t his fault the script had that crap in it. He was the best thing about SR, IMHO. If they ignore those events and move on with more action and Routh then they’ll have one helluva movie.

Graham says:

None of the superhero movies have been bad lately, hyped up,too long,too many characters mabey, but not bad!
I still thought X-men 3 was very very good.
FF2 tried hard but was a bit too camp, still enjoyed it though.
Transformers was a great way to show how you can make a great movie out of a silly subject,that’s how to make superhero movies.

Jim Carey says:

Transformers’ hurry-blurry rendering left me thinking, “That’s two and a half hours of my life that I can never get back.”

CGI has become a crutch, and crass & camp are a lowest common denominator to attract the repeat-ticket junior high crowd.

Graham, I was impressed (and shaken) with the limited robotics of The Borg in “Q Who?” 20 years ago. But then, I cared about those characters.

Star wars 1977 says:

Spidey rules! I’d hell of rather see a movie with him than a movie with Super Man. Spidey’s tied with Iron Man for my favorite super hero.

Page 2 of 2«12
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.