‘The Adventures of Tintin’ Early Reviews

Published 3 years ago by , Updated March 9th, 2013 at 1:54 pm,

adventures tintin trailer1 The Adventures of Tintin Early Reviews

There’s been a lot anticipation for Steven Spielberg’s and Peter Jackson’s The Adventures of Tintin, which will attempt to translate the comic books of Belgian writer/artist Georges Remi (a.k.a. Hergé) into a big-screen blockbuster adventure.

Tintin was released in UK theaters last month, but won’t debut in the U.S. until Christmas time. However, the film was recently screened at the AFI Festival, and a handful of online press were in attendance and are making their thoughts on the film known. Now that there are Tintin reviews from both sides of the pond out there to be found, we thought we’d round up a few for your easy-reading pleasure.

For those not in the know, here’s a synopsis for The Adventures of Tintin:

Tintin (Jamie Bell) and Captain Haddock (Andy Serkis) set off on a treasure hunt for a sunken ship commanded by Haddock’s ancestor. But someone else is in search of the ship. Based on three of the earliest Tintin comic books: “The Secret of the Unicorn,” “Red Rackham’s Treasure,” and “The Crab with the Golden Claws.”

The film is a joint effort between Spielberg and Jackson, with the former taking lead as director and the latter producing (roles which will supposedly be reversed for the sequel, should it come to pass). Jackson’s WETA workshop is also handling the visual effects, which involve live actors transformed into CGI cartoons via motion-capture performance, a la The Polar Express or Avatar. If you haven’t seen the Tintin trailer, clips or UK trailer, the film (which was shot in 3D) looks like a classic Spielbergian action/adventure flick, in the vein of Indiana Jones.

The biggest question, however, is wether or not WETA can achieve the hard task of making humanoid CGI creations (even purposefully cartoonish ones) feel lively and real, instead of having the characters be stranded in that “valley of the uncanny,” in which the eye and mind struggle to accept that the CGI characters are actually believable humanoids. (It’s easier when mo-cap is used on more fantastical creatures, such as those in Avatar or Rise of the Planet of the Apes.)

Check out what some critics have had to say about the plot, effects, and overall experience of The Adventures of Tintin:

Variety - Working hand-in-hand with Jackson, however, [Spielberg] and his team have deployed both technologies with subtle finesse throughout, exploiting 3D’s potential just enough to make the action scenes that much more effective without overdoing it; likewise, the motion-capture performances have been achieved with such exactitude they look effortless, to the point where the characters, with their exaggerated features, almost resemble flesh-and-blood thesps wearing prosthetic makeup.

Indeed, in the early going auds might wonder why the filmmakers bothered with motion-capture at all. But the choice starts to make sense once Snowy, Tintin’s faithful white terrier, performs antics not even the best-trained pooch could perform and the sets, stunts and action sequences become ever more lavish.

Extreme Tintin purists might quibble that the screenplay, by all-Brit team Steven Moffat (“Doctor Who”), Edgar Wright (“Shaun of the Dead”) and Joe Cornish (“Attack the Block”), doesn’t stick to the letter of Herge’s original strips. But others will appreciate how skillfully it shuffles and restacks elements from three of the adventures: slices from “The Crab With the Golden Claws” (published in 1943), the lion’s share from “The Secret of the Unicorn” and a wee bit from “Red Rackham’s Treasure” (both published in 1945). The remainder of the latter book will presumably bedrock the inevitable sequel.

-

Hollywood Reporter - Tintin himself is far from your typical, butt-kicking crime fighter…If anything, his erudite approach to solving mysteries, along with a taste for escapades in the Middle East, Asia and Africa throughout the mid-20th century, make him a less brawny, more European counterpart to Indiana Jones, which is purportedly what first sparked Spielberg’s interest in bringing Tintin to the screen back in the early 1980s.

It’s precisely the old-school exploits of the Jones films that the director and screenwriters Steven Moffat, Edgar Wright (Hot FuzzScott Pilgrim vs. The World) and Joe Cornish (Attack the Block) have channeled here, transforming two of the 23 Tintin comics into a saga filled with captivating CGI action and clever sight gags, while maintaining a compact narrative that never takes itself too seriously.

If the mocap technique falls somewhere between live-action and animated moviemaking, the same goes for the performances, which are altogether fluid yet sometimes (especially in certain dialogue-heavy sequences) give the impression of watching a very realistic video game with the sound turned up a few thousand notches. Serkis (King KongThe Lord of the Rings) nonetheless manages to turn Haddock into what will surely be the trilogy’s most memorable personage, while Bell (Billy Elliot) makes Tintin about as interesting as he can be, which is to say sometimes less so than his dog.

-

Coming Soon - It’s a fun adventure that takes Tintin and his pals all around the world, as Spielberg really gets the nature of Herge’s storytelling. The dialogue, provided by the genre supergroup of Stephen Moffatt (“Dr. Who), Edgar Wright (“Shaun of the Dead”) and Joe Cornish (“Attack the Block”), perfectly captures the whimsical interplay between characters Hergé did so well. This is especially true with Interpol agents Thompson and Thompson, performed by Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, who you’ll wish had more scenes since they perfectly embody the incompetent inspectors for some of the movie’s most lively scenes. For the second time this year, Andy Serkis is a movie’s undeniable MVP, as his portrayal of Captain Haddock adds so much to the story, both in terms of humor and fun as well as adding some much-needed emotion.

With such a strong script and fun characters, it’s a shame that what hurts the movie most is its animation choices. The performance capture just isn’t quite on par with “Avatar,” and as hard as the movie tries to be photorealistic and epic, it sometimes comes off looking more like an extended video game cut scene. An even bigger issue is that Tintin himself looks odd, his face looking flat and lifeless and lacking the cartoonish round noses of other characters. In a sense, trying to make him look more like a real person makes him stand out in a bad way, and Jamie Bell just doesn’t have the presence to get us past this. Fortunately, they also have Tintin’s adorable dog Snowy to single-handedly steal the movie from his master by bringing delight to every scene and helping you get through any of the slower exposition bits.

-

The Guardian (UK) - This Tintin is a spirited and amiably intentioned green-screen spectacular, but the motion-capture animation makes all the characters look like Ronseal marionettes. It’s a photoreal approximation of live action that is technically outstanding, but it has, for me, none of the charm, clarity and style of Hergé’s drawings and none of the immediacy and panache of actual, flesh-and-blood human beings. It is frustrating to watch this, and notice, moment by moment, how such a scene would be funny if it were drawn, or gasp – inducingly impressive if it were real. But this quasi-real mo-cap style is neither one thing nor the other.

There is plenty of spectacle and activity, albeit seen through this Perspex screen of computer animation…But for all the surface fizz, there is something flat and robotic and a little bit aimless about this Tintin. The opening credits, which playfully pastiche the original drawings with simplicity and wit, are actually more interesting and exciting than what follows. A disappointment.

-

View London - The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn is a thoroughly enjoyable, superbly animated adventure that captures the spirit of both Spielberg’s Indiana Jones movies and Hergé’s classic characters. Great John Williams score too. Highly recommended.

The script (by avowed Tintin devotees Stephen Moffat, Joe Cornish and Edgar Wright) is packed with witty gags and references and does a good job of both blending the various sources together and keeping things moving. Similarly, Spielberg directs with a terrific sense of pace and there are some wonderful, Indiana Jones-style action set pieces (the extended bike chase in Morocco is genuinely thrilling), though you do occasionally wish everyone would slow down a bit. The beautifully rendered motion-capture animation is the best seen so far on screen and if they haven’t quite nailed the dead-behind-the-eyes problem, they’ve at least got to the point where it’s not as jarring anymore.

-

All in all, not a bad roundup of reviews. It seems the UK critics are a bit more harsh than their US counterparts – which is understandable, given how much more beloved the character is in Europe. It seems that WETA has done the best they can with task handed to them – though clearly humanoid characters are still the weakest link of CGI mo-cap performance, which is clear from the amount of praise that Tintin’s dog, Snowy, is getting compared to the titular hero himself.

Will you be seeing The Adventures of Tintin when it hits U.S. theaters on December 21, 2011?

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: tintin

12 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. As someone who HATES Zemmekisis total Mo-Cap failures ( Beowulf , Polar Express , A Christmas Carroll ) I watched Tin Tin and was realy impressed , the technology is finaly were it needs to be to pull this stuff off

  2. I loved it. The 3D is gorgeous and the mo-cap doesn’t distract from the proceedings. Snowy is adorable. I think it deserves at least a 4/5. :)

  3. At last! Some yanks that like it. I was getting really fed up witha ll the Tintin hating that was going on.

    It’s great fun, very funny and perfect to take your kids to.

  4. Most of the complaints seem to be leveled at the CGI, which isn’t too surprising though it is nice that they seem to be making progress with it. The most negative review seemed to be The Guardian, though even with them the main issue was the CGI.

    Very much looking forward to seeing this in the U.S. come December.

  5. I’m definitely watching this.

  6. “Snowy”? really? is that what the dog is called in English editions of Tintin?

    Hehehe, I grew up on Tintin, but in French. I suspect I MAY have trouble watching this film in English. I hope the French dub is good.

  7. I understand the reasoning of doing the film totally in mocap however i think it would’ve been better to have done it half mocap and half live action,especially with its time refs and action. I’ve read all of the TinTin books and what i loved was the attention of detail that Herge drew in his scenes

  8. Blistering Barnacles! The adventure film of the year!The Secret of the Unicorn, is one of the greatest surprises of the year. Another great adventure in the archive of the most spectacular stories of humanity, told by a MASTER story-teller (Spielberg). A movie you will hardly forget.
    The film’s story is faithful to the comic book, and thus ends promising more. I hope there will be, because I was willing to follow Tintin and Haddock on new adventures straight away! I’d say it’s among the best, the most innovative comic-book films with Sin City and Scott Pilgrim vs. The World. The film is excellent escapism from the dreary day-to-day life and it made me smile for the rest of the day.

  9. This is practically the same mo cap as the Zemeckis stuff. I find it very disheartening how people can be led astray by just mentioning the names Peter Jackson and Andy Serkis. these eviews sound like this glorified video game has no story. WHY couldn’t this have been done in live action, or better yet- 2D animation like the originals????

    Because nobody has mentioned it yet, I’ll just go ahead and be the first one:
    DEAD EYES!!! UNCANNY VALLEY!!

  10. Just saw it in the theater last night, and thought it was fantastic. I had no preconceptions about the Mo-Cap and found the animation and visual style to be brilliant. Perhaps the most successful use of 3-D since Avatar. In terms of its thrilling action-adventure story-telling – with plenty of humor thrown in – comparisons to Raiders of the Lost Ark are appropriate.

    Was quite surprised to discover that it doesn’t open in the US until Dec 21(!), though I can say it will be worth the wait!

  11. As a 3D animated cartoon movie, with scenes stolen from Indiana Jones and Pirates of Caribbean, YES its a good entertaining flick. But being a Tintin addict who grew up memorizing each and every scene of the comics, I was totally disappointed and could hardly finish this movie till end.

    Its such a sad state of affairs that the original stories were adapted in only a few scenes, the characters like Capt. Haddock was as lifeless as Tintin himself and the detectives were too hopelessly adapted.

    People all over are giving thumbs up reviews, maybe as a good animated movie. But for Tintin lovers, its better not to watch the movie, as its a completely different movie; definitely lacking the basic sense of humor and entertainment of an Original Adventure of Tintin.

  12. I watched it here in London – it was brilliant!!