Terry Gilliam Finally Filming ‘The Man Who Killed Don Quixote’ This Year

Published 1 year ago by

DQ Terry Gilliam Finally Filming The Man Who Killed Don Quixote This Year

Could it be? After multiple false starts, actor hirings and firings, and script revisions, maverick filmmaker Terry Gilliam may finally be ready to conquer the demon that has plagued him for most of his career.

That’s right, the director behind such triumphs as Brazil and Twelve Monkeys says he’s finally preparing to film The Man Who Killed Don Quixote. For real this time.

During a recent interview with Empire Online, Gilliam said that Don Quixote will be his next project after the release of The Zero Theorem, which is scheduled to begin a theatrical run  in the UK on March 14th. Filming on Don Quixote will take place on the Canary Islands, and will begin in late September.

Gilliam’s first serious attempt to make Don Quixote began way back in 1998. He teamed up with frequent collaborator Tony Grisoni and created a script that made major changes to the legendary Miguel de Cervantes book from which Gilliam’s film draws its inspiration.

Wary of his constant creative battles with Hollywood, Gilliam managed to procure a $32 million budget independently. Jean Rochefort and Johnny Depp were cast in the two lead roles, and principal photography began in 2000.

The production process was an epic disaster, one ridiculously plagued by misfortune at every turn. Unpredictable weather, financing issues, and health problems involving Rochefort led production to be suspended after only a few days.

Untitled13 Terry Gilliam Finally Filming The Man Who Killed Don Quixote This Year

The entire aborted production was chronicled in the terrific documentary film Lost in La Mancha, which even offered viewers a tantalizing glimpse at already shot scenes involving Depp. Gilliam has tried to relaunch the film several times since, but has never gotten past the pre-production stage.

So why doesn’t he just give up on something that seemingly isn’t meant to be? For Gilliam, making Don Quixote isn’t just a want, it’s a need. Said Gilliam:

“It’s obsessive… desperate… pathetic… foolish. It’s this growth, this tumor that’s become part of my system that has to get out if I’m to survive.”

Gilliam is now working with Spanish producer Adrian Guerra and is hopeful that his new partner will be able to finally help him realize his dream.

“He’s really smart, loves movies. He’s young enough to still love movies. But we’ve still got to cast it and get the money but other than that, that’s the deal.”

Gilliam clearly doesn’t want his directorial career to end before making The Man Who Killed Don Quixote a reality. The man is now 73 years old and likely realizes that if this film is going to happen, it needs to happen soon. He’s not getting any younger, and getting financing only gets harder the longer he goes without a hit film.

Fortunately, Adrian Guerra has already produced ten films in his short career, and it would appear that he has the skills to finally get Quixote off the ground.

That said, Gilliam’s quest to make this film occasionally borders on the definition of insanity – which is to say, he constantly attempts to make the same seemingly doomed film expecting different results.

Sure, The Man Who Killed Don Quixote could very well end up being the magnum opus of Terry Gilliam’s career, but can he ever truly hope to make a film that lives up to his astronomical expectations? For his sake, let’s all hope the answer is yes.

_________________________________________________

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote is scheduled to begin production in September 2014.

Source: Empire Online

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:

12 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Casting Johnny Depp as Sancho Panza at the time was a good idea…. But I think using him now would be a bad idea. Depp is overexposed and his portrayal as the (disastrous) Lone Ranger’s sidekick Tonto is too close for comfort, when compared to acting as Don Quixote’s quirky sidekick Sancho Panza. Comedic foil to a hero on horseback…… Again?

    How many quirky sidekick characters can Depp do?

  2. Woooo Hoooo!!! At last.

  3. Finally!

    I’ll bet even Gilliam’s doing somersaults at this finally getting off the ground. I assume that means the Monty Python reunion shows in London (which I’ll be attending along with some other SR readers, looking forward to it as well fellas?) will be the only Python related work he does so other fans won’t get the global tour they hoped for.

  4. His movies are quirky and weird . Not bad just weird. Definitely not for the average movie goers. But he does have a loyal hardcore fan base.

    I liked his now-classic films like Brazil and Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas.

    • Yeah, it’s an acquired taste for most.

      I grew up with stuff like The Goon Show, Spike Milligan, Monty Python’s Flying Circus, Eddie Izzard, The Harry Hill Show, Reeves & Mortimer and other weird, surrealist comedy shows/comedians/movies and also like to get philosophical so I’m already pretty quirky and unique as others have labeled me over the years but showing that stuff enthusiastically to friends and seeing their reactions ranging from apathy to abject horror kind of proves that theory.

      Saying that though, I think everyone should have at least one Gilliam movie in their collection purely because he’s a true visionary and you won’t see many other films that look like his visually.

    • Terry Gilliam exasperates me both positively and negatively. His films are so frustrating and at times it can be awesome and at other times it can be quite horrible. I loved Time Bandits, Brazil, Baron Manchausen, 12 Monkeys, but I hated Tideland, Brothers Grimm. And I still need to give Fear and Loathing another shot because I stopped watching it half way through, but since then I’ve become a smarter film goer so I definitely understand Gilliam’s perplexing style.

  5. His next film after this will be ‘A Confederacy of Dunces’

    • I hope that happens,Gilliam is unique.I dont like all his films but at least his not doing remakes.

  6. Lost in La Mancha is one of my all time favourite documentaries. If anyone reading this hasn’t seen it yet, I really can’t recommend it enough.

  7. I’m hoping he can still get Bob Duvall for this. Damn good on him for sticking to it, and finally getting the film made.

  8. I think any and every film nerd needs to go through a Terry Gilliam phase.
    He has such a unique style that if you see just a minute of footage you can tell you’re watching on of his films.
    I’m still pretty partial to 12 Monkeys, mostly because of the performances of Bruce Willis and Brad Pitt. That was one of the first movies that proved Willis could be more than an action star and Pitt more than a pretty face and was a turning point for both actors careers.

    Also, Lost In LaMancha ranks with Hearts of Darkness as the greatest “making documentaries” I’ve ever seen.

  9. Well,
    I’m a big fan of Terry Gilliam myself,
    but, I read Don Quixote, and it’s more about a chevaleresque parody than anything else,
    I mean, in the book Sancho and Don Quixote vomit each other in the face.
    That’s what is about, funny things, grotesque, baroque and parodic about knights.
    But, has he said, maybe, Gilliam himself is trying to say things aren’t what they are but
    how he interprets them.
    Maybe it’s just his interpretation of Don Quixote (and if course it is, it’s a film).
    The book Don Quixote was made because they are so much Knight stories at that times, and they are boring and bad to death in general.
    Today, it very can be some parody about super heros for sure.
    I mean, Mel Brook could have done Don Quixote.
    Don Quixote is vote the best literaly piece of work of all times.
    So I think it’s dangerous to do a film about Don Quixote, because,
    if you fail, you fail for the eternity,
    it’s like hell, you make the history,
    you make the history to have done a bad movie about Don Quixote,
    but of course, maybe it will not be the case.
    But, to honest, when I was younger, it’s mean about 10 years ago when I was 16, I discover Gilliam and his wonderful films,
    it was just great.
    But ten years later, I’ve seen also his last films (Grimms, Tideland, Parnassus, Theorem, Nike, and short films),
    and I lied to myself about his last work over a decade.
    Now, I expulse all the movies, the books, the music, the medias, all the things who intoxicated me because we are to much expose to medias and their bloody shots, always
    Gilliam know that, and he’s of the boat in some strange way).
    And now, I’m honest to myself to say his last films aren’t good,
    and he is has been,
    sadly.
    So, when you’re has been,
    I think it’s dangerous to yourself to do a film about the masterpiece of masterpiece;
    if you didn’t a good thing, you just lose it forever,
    because you did, and there is no turning back after that, you make history.
    You make history to not did a good movie about the greatest masterpiece of all time.
    I can go to hell to have say that about my favorite movie director
    but at least it’s true and it’s fair enough.
    I think it is better for Gilliam to not do Don Quixote and stay frustrated with himself,
    then to do maybe a bad movie about Don Quixote.
    The strange thing, I read that Gilliam got a 20 millions budget for Don Quixote around 1992,
    after the fisher king, but he never read the book yet…
    For a long time, I believe he will be the perfect director of it, but today,
    I’m not very sure, for all these reasons.
    Gilliam is has been because he recycled himself into recycled kind of movies.
    Parnassus was obviously a compilation of all he did with the ideas he never get, and add computer images…
    Tideland was good but…
    Grimm… he didn’t like the screenplay, it’s lame to have accept it anyway.
    Zero Theorem is barely good.
    He did commercial for Nike ? what the f*** ?

    The new screenplay of Gilliam’s Don Quixote is about himself: the story of a publicity director or bad director who did already Don Quixote and watched the mest he did back then (who can be the public in general or fan like me…).
    In some pervert way, I like the idea, but I have also a great respect for the book and
    Don Quixote too.
    And in some ways, I think at least it’s not fair to do a film about Don Quixote,
    even if it’s Gilliam or anybody else.
    I think the last person in history who touch correctly Don Quixote is Gustav Doré.
    Gustav Doré was a great artist and a genius, and he did drawings and paintings. Drawings
    and paintings are far more sacred, and respectul and least vanishing than movies today for
    sure. Not because the people don’t do great movies, but because we are shooting in the head
    everyday by the medias, internet, the crappy things, the bad movies, the bad music, it’s
    like pollution, and it’s intoxicated us, me for sure.
    So Don Quixote represent the good part of art to stay clean and pure, and it’s about the
    exactly things I’m talking about : the crappy things.
    But maybe I’m wrong of course,
    maybe it will be good, after all, the title is not Don Quixote, but the man who killed
    Don Quixote, it can be Gilliam himself.