sponsored links
Ads by Google
  • Charles O
    @Johnny

    I laughed out loud after you said this movie would've been better if Vin had been cast as Marcus. Lol I'm sorry. But Vin? Really?

    And what director's cut of Star Trek (2009) are you referring to?

    And how didn't Salvation do anything new? It completely abandoned the setup of the original three.

    Sigh.
  • johnny
    I thought bale wasnt so miscast as the lead for kyle reese who didnt look his age (looking older) and especialy Sam Worthington as the lead. Bale is not my favorite actor and in my opinion makes a great snide rich pompous badguy and thats about it, I have been less impressed with bale in any other role except American Psycho and Thinner (if i got that correctly).

    My biggest peeve with Star Trek and Terminator and Bond and Superman and mildly Batman (although not minding the new Batman music I prefer Burtons) is producers chucking the terrific musical score (wich in my opinion is why Terminator 3 onward started sucking). Music
    is 85% of a movie and just as important as a character in it, at least Lucas and Spielberge recognize the importance of music continuity with Indy/Star Wars.

    The first two terminators were absoultely terrific also because they were nonstop chase movies in addition to being action scifi films. something from T3 on they dropped. They really needed sarah connors voice over and maybe more of an appearance from Linda Hamilton as also part of the charm of Terminator 1 and 2 was it had an original idea of a strong female heroine, Terminator Salvation really doesnt innovate or elevate the genre or do anything new, her appearance also
    missed in T3.

    I was excited for this until I heard they dropped the music and dropped Vin Diesle as Sam Worthingtons character, that would have been epic, nobody can play an underdog dark con villianhero like Diesle. Like Star Trek 2009 Im not impressed with the Directors Cut, Plenty to like and Dislike, 3 minutes of extra footage isnt worth buying an
    extra dvd for. Nobody really cares about a medoicre directors input on the movie, those extras should be for guys like Cameron who can
    actualy teach something valid rather than a music video directors first film.

    Dont bother if youve already bought Terminator Salvation, much adu about nothing.
  • CplHicks
    @ Vic

    I definitely agree the movie is better the second time through. I would classify it as "solid" now, whereas upon first screening in theaters I called it "OK", but nothing to write home about.
  • 790
    Well Vic, I felt the cleavage scene was meant to be a first sign of attraction between Moon's character and Marcus, but I disagree that should be the reason it got an R rating...
    That's just stupid!
  • @Balboa

    I agree with your thoughts on Bale/John ... to add to that, he's living in a future he's been prepared for all of his life. How would anyone handle that, realistically speaking? I think his performance was more somber because he had sacrificed so very much and saw so many unspeakable things in his life. If he were full of life & laughing, he'd be a character not worth saving.

    He (Bale) was more reserved in T:S than his performance in Reign of Fire - which is similar in circumstance only dragons as opposed to machines. I think his (much criticized) on-set blunder during production hurt the public opinion of his performance. (Being vague) I don't think many audiences want their heroes/celebs to be human or flawed. That said, I don't blame Bale for the quality of the film or his role.
  • Yeah, there wasn't much to it - I can see why McG wanted it left in, it did emphasize the humanity of those left alive beyond being refugees or soldiers.

    Vic
  • 790
    I had a chance to watch the topless scene today, and its total hype!

    Its a side view in the rain, for about 2 seconds the rest of the time she's covering up,,, lol

    The rating system is so ass backwards.

    Also noticed on the repeat viewing that Sam Worthington's Australian accent comes through on more than one line,,, the film has some fun action scenes but its such a mess,,,
  • John "Kahless" Taylor
    Why on earth would Target (pronounced tar-jay for you homies :-) ) be selling the only DVD SE version? This doesn't make since to me.
  • Andy S
    Don't speak bad about Target, Vic. While it is a ghastly company to work for, they DID have the cool Iron Man special edition DVD in a plastic Iron Man helmet. :)
  • greenknight333
    @ Vic

    "Billy Joe-Bob’s DVD and Beef Jerky Emporium"

    I'm insulted!! We eat there all the time while we are shopping for those hard to find DVD's!! Thanks!!
  • @Charles O

    Due to your investigative skills and prodding I've updated the review to indicate that you can find the SE version of the film on DVD at Target. Never let it be said that I don't pay attention to my readers. :)

    Oh, and for someone else who asked - I guess I cut out of the theatrical version with MMM too soon... it DOES go into the alternate ending McG wanted for the film. Shows it in storyboard mode.

    Vic
  • 790
    How dare you Vic insult Target like that. Me and my family have been going there every week for generations.. ;-D

    Christmas Eve tradition we all meet up at the Target cafeteria for hot pretzels... Doesn't everyone?
  • vid
    don't worry the extra 30mins will be tacked on in the ultimate director's final cut edition a few months from now at twice the price.
  • Charles O
    It is odd, yes. These days, all these separate retailers have stupid exclusives that should be available everywhere. It's to the point that everytime there is a new, relatively big movie released, I go and look at what every company is offering, just in case I missed something. It's kind of annoying, but hey, at least theres a copy available somewhere, lol.

    ~Charles
  • @Charles

    I don't want it to come across like I'm arguing, but it seems beyond odd to me that a Director's cut of the DVD is available at Target but not at Amazon or on Warner Bros.' own site. To me that's like the SE DVD not existing anywhere, but wait, you can find it at Billy Joe-Bob's DVD and Beef Jerky Emporium.

    Strange, is all. :-)

    Vic
  • INK
    Bales was horrible in Public Enemies. Although that movie was a big disapointment for me. (Could you please decide what this movie is about? The crooks? The FBI A love story? JUST CHOOSE) Anyway Bale's accent was so distracting I cringed whenever he was about to speak. Hey Hollywood actors and actresses – if you can't do an accent well, don't do it. 'Nuff said.
  • I agree. Bale is an amazing actor, but his performance in this movie was just PATHETIC.
  • Balboa
    Christian Bale has enormous range. Anyone who can't see that is blind and/or completely ignorant. He has more than proven himself over the years. American Psycho and The Machinist alone (excluding all his other work) is proof enough. I love how any time someone plays a soldier in either a post apocalyptic setting or an absolute warzone they are criticized for being "wooden" or not being emotional enough or whatever the case may be. Think about this particular case: John Connor survived some profound, life changing events including WWIII and when TS starts he has been fighting in a post apocalyptic world for what, 15 years or so, and people apparently expect him to be a delicate little man, wearing a silky white robe and skipping through a field of tulips. Nobody seems to understand the context in which a story exists.
  • I'm not sure the alternate ending was actually filmed. It was better though, might have at least made for a more interesting sequel with Bale as a Terminator, that fits his new acting range perfectly!
  • Charles O
    @Vic. Well, since you said you were unable to locate a copy of the Director's Cut on DVD, I assumed you searched extensively. And then when I found it on Target.com by simply searching for "Terminator Salvation," I was kind of surprised that you were unable to find it, especially after telling you it was there. Seeing as how it's a Target exclusive, of course it won't be listed at Amazon or WB.

    Either way, it's there. You know it's there, so you can get it, so don't worry about it.
  • @Charles O

    How I was able to miss it? Did you see how buried that thing was? On a site for Target? Amazon doesn't list it and neither does the WB site - how was I to assume a crappy ol' Target would have a version neither of those two places did?

    Vic
  • Charles O
    Lol here's a link for you, just in case somehow you were unable to locate it again:

    http://www.target.com/Terminator-Salvation-DVD-...

    What sucks about it, though, is that it is 24.99, which is nearly $10 more than the Blu-Ray. Unfortunately it looks like the only option for DVD owners in the States, besides importing. Enjoy!
  • Charles O
    Well the link has already been posted for the Weekly Ad, but IT IS at Target.com, so I'm not sure how you missed it. But yep, it's there for sure.
  • @Gary

    No alternate endings, sorry.

    Vic
  • Gary
    were there alternate endings on the Blu Ray Disc?
    Were they better?
  • Tim "Cloverfield"
    IDK.....Moongood is a bloody Goddess, maybe that's all I need. LMAO 790 ! You crack me up!
  • El Diablo
    Hey Vic,

    Check the weekly target add online;

    http://weeklyad.target.com/target/default.aspx?...

    Looks like a directors cut.

    Werd!
  • @Charles O

    Do you have a link? I just checked Target.com and it's not there. As a matter of fact I went to the official Warner Bros. site and THEY don't list a Director's Cut/SE version of the DVD.

    Vic
  • Charles O
    Idk if you guys looked around too hard, but Target has an exclusive edition of the DVD that has the Director's Cut. Soooo you should get that. Doesn't matter to me, Blu-Ray is the way to go.
  • Fenix
    This movie was so disappointing... Christian Bale was an emotionless Bruce Wayne if thats actually possible. I think Sam Worthington was the star of this one as does most other critics. I wouldn't waste my money on this. The action setpieces were sweet tho.
blog comments powered by Disqus