Terminator 4, Terminated?

Published 7 years ago by , Updated February 9th, 2012 at 9:50 pm,

terminatorskull Terminator 4, Terminated?I love the first two Terminator films. The Terminator was the first film that I ever owned on VHS and Terminator 2 was the first film that I ever snuck into the cinema to watch. Terminator 3, I can enjoy, but it’s very much like the Star Wars prequels; I see them as second helpings of a great dish. Nice enough, but just not as good as your first helping.

In contrast, I hate the Charlies Angels films. Hate them. I saw the first film because it had Bill Murray, and I only saw the second because a friend of mine was called Charlie and, well he wanted to watch it.

I see McG as a cinematic Anti-Christ.

So when the news hit, that he was going to be helming the next Terminator film, it was a dark day in the Browne household. The skies went black and the sun went red. McG is a terrible film director and the less that I say about The O.C. the better.

How can we go from James Cameron to Jonathan Mostow (a fine director in his own right) to the talent void that is McG. It’s like getting Rob Schenider to write and direct a follow-up to Citizen Kane.

This is the McG who over uses “wire-fu” in every action scene. This is the McG who was attached to direct Superman but quit because he was afraid to fly!!

To be fair to the man, he has stated that he wants to be take seriously as a filmmaker, and he made the first steps towards this with We Are Marshall. I haven’t seen it, but I am a fan of Matthew McConaughey, so I’ll probably catch it at some point. God forbid.

Maybe he has a vision. Maybe he has talent. However, does he really have to destroy the memory of two fantastic films?

I don’t hold McG to blame for all of this though. Whoever owns the rights to the Terminator franchise have been whoring it out left, right and center recently and they seem to be willing to ruin any crediblility that the series once had.

This new film titled Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins (which sounds to me like a straight to DVD affair) will be the start of a new trilogy and focus on the events following Judgement Day.

I could probabaly bet a large portion of my wage packet that Arnold Schwarzenegger won’t go near this, as ; a) they couldn’t afford him b) he’s too busy with his other job c) he must have some sort of quality control.

We’ll have to wait a while before we see this, but I can promise you one thing.

I won’t be back…

In the cinema at least.

Source: moviehole

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. I hate to admit it, be “We Are Marshall” was quite good in my opinion. When I saw it I didn’t realize it was directed by McG and when I saw his name come up as director I was shocked.


  2. Who’s McG?
    I could go for a story set after Judgement day…
    But if the director sucks then I that would be bas.
    “We are Marshall” fits into the kind of film that I avoid so I don’t have any sense of this guy Mcg’s directorial abillites.

  3. It could be worse! It could be Uwe Boll. :O


  4. LOL, Zar you’re right! :-)

    Steve, McG is the guy who did “Charlie’s Angels.” And “We Are Marshall” was one of those great movies about overcoming adversity.


  5. I have seen the name MCG when I whatch supernatural. I think he is an exacutive producer.

  6. McG’s only failure so far is the second Charlie’s Angels; the first one was a fun movie and We Are Marshall was quite decent. Also, McG is the producer behind the TV-series Chuck, which is also pretty good. So he’s definitely not a bad director. However, I wouldn’t put him in charge of T4 – it’s just not his type of movie. I don’t think he can do dark movies very well, so he will probably end up with something resembling T3 – which was garbage, BTW. Anyway, time will tell.

  7. I dont like McG but admittedly he does very MTV over the top films and it works for a certain generation… I wish it wasnt McG directing but it could be worse as pointed out. :)