<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screen Rant &#187; the mummy 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/tag/the-mummy-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 16:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Classic Movie Monsters vs. Modern Movie Monsters</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/classic-movie-monsters-vs-modern-movie-monsters-pauly-29627/</link>
		<comments>http://screenrant.com/classic-movie-monsters-vs-modern-movie-monsters-pauly-29627/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dracula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frankenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the mummy 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the wolfman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=29627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It&#8217;s classic movie monster time! I was going to wait until Christmas to talk about this, but now seemed like a more appropriate time. We ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="ggnoads"><img class="attachment wp-att-29630 centered" src="http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/classic-monsters-header.jpg" alt="Classic Monsters Header" width="548" height="521" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s classic movie monster time! I was going to wait until Christmas to talk about this, but now seemed like a more appropriate time. We are going to compare the original black and white movie monsters (and the actors who brought them to life), against more modern versions and actors to see who comes out on top.</p>
<p>I know there are dozens of classic monsters, including the <em>Creature from the Black Lagoon</em>, <em>The Fly</em>, giant robots, aliens, and over-sized insects/animals, but I&#8217;m going to focus on the more famous literary monsters : Frankenstein&#8217;s monster, <em>The Wolf Man</em>, <em>Dracula</em> and <em>The Mummy</em>.<span id="more-29627"></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with my favorite character, Frankenstein&#8217;s monster. Most people incorrectly refer to the monster AS Frankenstein &#8211; but actually, author Mary Shelley never gave the creature a name. In the 1818 novel, Shelley writes about mad scientist Dr. ...<br /><br /><strong>Click to continue reading <a href="http://screenrant.com/classic-movie-monsters-vs-modern-movie-monsters-pauly-29627/">Classic Movie Monsters vs. Modern Movie Monsters</a></strong><br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://screenrant.com/classic-movie-monsters-vs-modern-movie-monsters-pauly-29627/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: July 20, 2008</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/weekend-movie-news-wrap-july-20-2008-niall-3019/</link>
		<comments>http://screenrant.com/weekend-movie-news-wrap-july-20-2008-niall-3019/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niall Browne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monster squad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminator salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the mummy 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-files 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=3019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So The Dark Knight has finally been released and it&#8217;s kicking all sort of Box Office butt. It&#8217;s great news, the bad news (for me ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So <em><strong>The Dark Knight</strong></em> has finally been released and it&#8217;s kicking all sort of Box Office butt. It&#8217;s great news, the bad news (for me at least) is that I don&#8217;t get to see it until Friday!!</p>
<p>However, don&#8217;t worry &#8211; we&#8217;ll always have the Weekend Movie News Wrap Up!</p>
<p>This week:</p>
<p>We have more news on the new <em><strong>RoboCop</strong></em> movie, we take our Tom Cruise news with a pinch of <em><strong>Salt</strong></em>, Christian Bale does some <em><strong>Terminating</strong></em>, we look at another <em><strong>X-Files</strong></em> poster, and Rob Cohen remakes <em><strong>The Monster Squad</strong></em>.</p>
<p><span id="more-3019"></span>1. Last week I brought you news that Darren Aronofsky was helming the <em><strong>RoboCop</strong></em> remake. Well it looks like the film isn&#8217;t a remake after all. The film appears to be more of a sequel to the original films. <em>Bloody Disgusting </em>report that the logline of the film (a logline is the plot &#8211; in a line or so) says:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Present day Los Angeles, ...<br /><br /><strong>Click to continue reading <a href="http://screenrant.com/weekend-movie-news-wrap-july-20-2008-niall-3019/">Weekend Movie News Wrap Up: July 20, 2008</a></strong><br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://screenrant.com/weekend-movie-news-wrap-july-20-2008-niall-3019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mummy 3 : All Wrapped Up For Christmas</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mummy-3-all-wrapped-up-for-christmas-niall-1171/</link>
		<comments>http://screenrant.com/mummy-3-all-wrapped-up-for-christmas-niall-1171/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niall Browne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the mummy 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/mummy-3-all-wrapped-up-for-christmas-1171/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.screenrant.com/images/mummy-3-logo.jpg" width="220" height="65" border="0" hspace="5" vspace="4" align="left" alt="mummy-3-logo.jpg" title="mummy-3-logo.jpg" />Rob Cohen has announced on the <a href="http://www.robcohenthemummy.com/" target="_blank" >official Mummy blog</a> that shooting has now ended on the third instalment of <em><strong>The Mummy</strong></em> series.</p>
<p>This film hasn&#8217;t got much coverage on screenrant, I&#8217;m not sure if Vic and Heath have a particular axe to grind with the franchise or if they&#8217;re just more interested in bigger movies coming up. Maybe <em><strong>Iron Man</strong></em>, but I could be wrong <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As Mr Cohen, says; &#8220;<em>After 91 days of shooting and 2,021 shots, <em><strong>The Mummy: Tomb of The Dragon Emperor</strong> </em>has wrapped</em>&#8220;.</p>
<p><em><strong>The Mummy: Tomb of The Dragon Emperor</strong></em> it just rolls off the tongue, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p><span id="more-1171"></span><br />
I really like the first <em><strong>Mummy</strong> </em>film, and I thought that the sequel, the imaginatively titled <em><strong>The Mummy Returns</strong></em> was pretty good. The first half was great fun, the second half was ...<br /><br /><strong>Click to continue reading <a href="http://screenrant.com/mummy-3-all-wrapped-up-for-christmas-niall-1171/">Mummy 3 : All Wrapped Up For Christmas</a></strong><br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://screenrant.com/mummy-3-all-wrapped-up-for-christmas-niall-1171/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

