Recent Related Items:

26 Comments


M-Cat says:

2.5 ouch
I’ll still check it out since it’s sci-fi. I’m sure I’ll get some enjoyment out of it. I like futuristic techy type flicks.

Longshanks says:

The more I saw of the previews,the more I thought that it just looked like a rental.Looks like I might be right.

Well one really bad thing they did in the trailer was completely give away the ending.

Duh.

Vic

I’ve become tired of people scathing me for not watching each and every trailer – and Vic has just showcased WHY. I’ve got a feature story in the beginning stages for essentially that.

So many trailers/previews/whatever give away not only the details and (in this case) the END of the movie, it would have behooved me to note bother to watch the trailers.

When you consider that every single ounce of money-laden effects shots are given away in most of the gigantor trailers because the “powers that be require it” – oy – its such a sordid little-big market.

Aaron says:

Avatar wont give anything away in the trailer. And thats half the reason most didnt like it. It was only scenes from the first half of the movie. I think ill give surrogates a shot just cause my girlfriend wants to see it.

the old man says:

Well you do take a chance watching previews. Been that way for along time now. I had to avoid the “Watch Man” trailers beyond the first one, because ones after it weren’t trailers they were spoilers. Of course in a way you could look at it as the companies doing you a favor…

Ken J says:

I just saw it, I’d say Vic’s rating is pretty fair. First of all, supposedly the technology is developed, then a few years later 90% of people are surrogates… WTF?? There’s no way it would move that fast.\

***SPOILER***
And then this whole idea of an “anti-surrogates resistance” is stupid because it’s not like they forced people to use surrogates. And it’s not like the government didn’t allow humans who don’t use surrogates to live in the regular cities, there was no reason for them to form these so called surrogate free colonies… And the ending was just dumb, it almost seems like they were supporting the resistance’s message. What happened to free will? Shouldn’t it be the choice of the individual if they want to use surrogates or not???

But I liked how the cops like Bruce Willis’ character had super human strength, that was pretty cool.
***END SPOILER***

But hey, it’s better than Terminator 3, so good job Jonathan Mastow, lol. But I had to see it because Bruce Wilis was in it, haha.

Huggybear says:

I’ll still watch it. I have this tendency to watch movies i look forward to, even if they get horrible reviews. But i’ll wait for DVD :)

allen says:

I took my best friend to see it ’cause we are both Bruce Willis fans. And don’t get me wrong it was an alright movie. I will probably watch it again in another ten years. What I thought they did right was the beginning documentary on the surrogate tech evolution. Also I liked the Barbie doll look of the surrogates.

What they got wrong was the movie was too small, too few characters. I mean it was supposed to be a suspense thriller and with the limited amount of characters you already could guess who was the bad guy before the second half of the movie. I like it when a movie tries to give me a challenge and lets me work it out for myself. This movie did not do that even a little. Everything was cookie cutter plotted, and explained so my brain wasnt engaged at all.

This movie, had it been produced and directed like Minority Report, could have been a good scifi/commentary on the human condition, but instead was just another vehicle for Bruce that didnt fire on all engines, and ended up being another stale effort for everyone involved.

Btw my friend pointed out this movie would have been better if this had starred John McClane. Dont you agree?

SK-47 says:

Saw the movie, it was pretty good for me. What I really enjoyed in the film was it’s subtle message about our obsession with vanity.
Staying young and looking pretty as opposed to accepting age.

huntthejest says:

Just my two cents: So far, everything I’ve seen in the theater starring Bruce Willis has been worth the ticket price for me. He seems to be one of few actors that still actually reads the scripts for the projects he is doing. I’ll probably catch this one this coming weekend.

jordi says:

@huntthejest

What, even Planet Terror!? :P

John "Kahless" Taylor says:

Saw 2 movies this weekend: Surrogates and Pandorum (which I thought was crap). While I agree with Vic, I would probably give it an extra .5, making it 3 out of 5.

Ken J says:

@John

I enjoyed the movie, but I know it’s just because of Bruce Willis kicking ass, but thinking about the actual movie now, I can see that it wasn’t really a great movie. But I think 2.5-3 is around what I would give it too. I think it would depend on my mood which one I would give, 2.5 seems fair, 3 to add on the fact that Bruce Willis is in it, lol

Joe Zoch says:

I guess I’m in the minority and liked it much more than anyone else. In fact, I think it was the best movie (that I’ve seen) all summer. I’d give it at least 3 out of 5.

Ken J says:

Surely not better than Star Trek????? *raises eyebrow*

Andy S says:

I still might catch this, for the reason most everyone else stated: Bruce Willis is in it. Maybe a matinee on my day off in the middle of the week. My GF didn’t seem too interested in it, so midweek matinee it is!!

JessSayin says:

I think it’s funny that actor James Cromwell was cast as the one who came up with the ‘first generation’ technology in this film when he was the actor who played Dr. Alfred Lanning who perfected the robot technology everyone was using in ‘I Robot’.

..and the actor who played Zephram Cochrane, who first used and perfected warp travel in Star Trek: First Contact.

So Joe, the only other movie you saw this summer was Transformers 2? (ZING!) :-P

Vic

huntthejest says:

@Jordi: Gasp!! Don’t say those words around me! I’m at least 87% sure I didn’t know Bruce Willis was in that. I’ve avoided that film like the plague since my brother(an avid Tarantino fan) told me it stunk on ice. That being said, I am naming my first son Hudson Hawk. That’s right.

Sidenote: I was sorely dissappointed when Butterfinger was snubbed the Oscar nom that year. “Hey Coach, looks bad.”

M-Cat says:

JessSaying
yeah I thought that was funny too. I liked him in those roles as well. He’s a good scientist I guess.

Vic

bad joke.

@M-Cat

Oh, I don’t know – I thought it was quite funny. 8)

Vic

shart_bite says:

I would’ve given it a 3.5. OK, but nothing to crap a brick about.

DanLister says:

And will they somehow work in that song from The Guild with lead vocals by Felicia Day, “Do You Wanna Date My Avatar?”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urNyg1ftMIU

JessSayin says:

Saw it last night. Wish I had paid matinee pricing, or better yet rented it. (Buddy of mine just HAD to see it)

You hit the nail on the head Vic, 2.5 stars

They just haven’t perfected the face cg thing yet. Didn’t work at the end of X-Men Origins: Wolverine with Patrick Stewart and it didn’t work in this one. All the faces looked like any of Britney Spears album art or posters. (Thank you, Adobe!) Someday though..

And I didn’t like having everything explained to me at the start either, I HATE that. Bad lighting (too much, all the time) and poor editing didn’t help either.

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.