<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek: Trailer News And Why Shatner&#8217;s Gonna Get Madder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:46:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: logan</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-47438</link>
		<dc:creator>logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-47438</guid>
		<description>Shatner is always mad. Read about him on this star trek love site. http://www.startrektrailer.com/shatner.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shatner is always mad. Read about him on this star trek love site. <a href="http://www.startrektrailer.com/shatner.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.startrektrailer.com/shatner.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristian</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-29592</link>
		<dc:creator>kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-29592</guid>
		<description>almost forgot... they would have to be stand alone movies but function as part of a larger story. alternately you could always start each movie with memories from the academy. show each captain as the cadet. maybe boothby wasnt just a grounds keeper. maybe he had a secret mission lol. maybe not but people should start putin their ideas on these sights, maybe the producers will look in once in a while</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>almost forgot&#8230; they would have to be stand alone movies but function as part of a larger story. alternately you could always start each movie with memories from the academy. show each captain as the cadet. maybe boothby wasnt just a grounds keeper. maybe he had a secret mission lol. maybe not but people should start putin their ideas on these sights, maybe the producers will look in once in a while</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristian</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-29590</link>
		<dc:creator>kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-29590</guid>
		<description>Vic :)

well it may not happen in this movie but then again this is the start of jim kirks career. Spock comes back to save the future, would it not be logical for spock to save kirk. after all. jim saved Spock. and while we are at it, this film could be a stepping stone to bring Kirk back. Just have to wait till the 24th century again lol. you could actually have a crossover movie with each crew, ship and station involved. heres and idea. each of the next movies start off with a new crew.. this one is TOS era, next movie will be TNG era, then Voyager and DS9. Finally you start off with events before the first movie.. so you start the last movie with enterprise crew finding or discovering something cut to the future and you involve all the crews from the 24th century. It could be laid out so that all the movies lead back to that one moment in time, a decision or event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vic <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>well it may not happen in this movie but then again this is the start of jim kirks career. Spock comes back to save the future, would it not be logical for spock to save kirk. after all. jim saved Spock. and while we are at it, this film could be a stepping stone to bring Kirk back. Just have to wait till the 24th century again lol. you could actually have a crossover movie with each crew, ship and station involved. heres and idea. each of the next movies start off with a new crew.. this one is TOS era, next movie will be TNG era, then Voyager and DS9. Finally you start off with events before the first movie.. so you start the last movie with enterprise crew finding or discovering something cut to the future and you involve all the crews from the 24th century. It could be laid out so that all the movies lead back to that one moment in time, a decision or event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-29316</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-29316</guid>
		<description>@kristian

Good thought, but that&#039;s not going to happen. They&#039;ve made it abundantly clear that Shatner will not be in the film repeatedly.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kristian</p>
<p>Good thought, but that&#8217;s not going to happen. They&#8217;ve made it abundantly clear that Shatner will not be in the film repeatedly.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristian</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-29296</link>
		<dc:creator>kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-29296</guid>
		<description>has anyone thought.. that by going back and changing the past, the result being this reboot or alternate universe of star trek. you know the same but not the same... well technically Jim Kirk hasn&#039;t died yet, who knows he may not have retired when he did. he said he shouldn&#039;t have in generation&#039;s. so this leaves the door wide open to write the Shat back into the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has anyone thought.. that by going back and changing the past, the result being this reboot or alternate universe of star trek. you know the same but not the same&#8230; well technically Jim Kirk hasn&#8217;t died yet, who knows he may not have retired when he did. he said he shouldn&#8217;t have in generation&#8217;s. so this leaves the door wide open to write the Shat back into the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-18767</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-18767</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care if Shatner, Nimoy, Takei, Nichols or one of the legendary Late Greats of Star Trek, or a freakin Fahrengi sits in the Captain&#039;s Chair of (Zero?), as long as it CONTINUES.., to boldly go., my 40+yr inspiration will go happily, (for better or S.T.5 worse), with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care if Shatner, Nimoy, Takei, Nichols or one of the legendary Late Greats of Star Trek, or a freakin Fahrengi sits in the Captain&#8217;s Chair of (Zero?), as long as it CONTINUES.., to boldly go., my 40+yr inspiration will go happily, (for better or S.T.5 worse), with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike-J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7702</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike-J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7702</guid>
		<description>Latest news on &quot;Star Trek 11&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paramount.com/startrek/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.paramount.com/startrek/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latest news on &#8220;Star Trek 11&#8243;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.paramount.com/startrek/" rel="nofollow">http://www.paramount.com/startrek/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7701</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7701</guid>
		<description>Joe,

EXACTLY my point! :-)

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>EXACTLY my point! <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Poniatowski</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7700</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Poniatowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7700</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Vic.. Kirk is the legend, not Shatner.  And yes, I&#039;m an original fan of the original series.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Vic.. Kirk is the legend, not Shatner.  And yes, I&#8217;m an original fan of the original series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FilmNerdJamie</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7699</link>
		<dc:creator>FilmNerdJamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7699</guid>
		<description>Knowing Shatner...I&#039;m gonna guess and say its a lost opportunity for someone to give him a paycheck. Thats why he&#039;s so upset about all this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing Shatner&#8230;I&#8217;m gonna guess and say its a lost opportunity for someone to give him a paycheck. Thats why he&#8217;s so upset about all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve adams</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7698</link>
		<dc:creator>steve adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7698</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick maybe at the end Kirk will do a flyby in the Nexus wave, haha.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick maybe at the end Kirk will do a flyby in the Nexus wave, haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7697</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7697</guid>
		<description>Cameos take me out of the movie...Don&#039;t care for them in general. Maybe Shatner could blend into the movie. He can BE the Starship.
Sorry that was mean. Pass the donuts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameos take me out of the movie&#8230;Don&#8217;t care for them in general. Maybe Shatner could blend into the movie. He can BE the Starship.<br />
Sorry that was mean. Pass the donuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve adams</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7696</link>
		<dc:creator>steve adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7696</guid>
		<description>#3 Gordon, I totally agree with you on Shatner!!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3 Gordon, I totally agree with you on Shatner!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve adams</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7695</link>
		<dc:creator>steve adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7695</guid>
		<description>Sulu and even Kirk could still be in this film, they could be writting scenes &quot;strike or not&quot; off lot in private. (We might still get that special line JJ came up with)...?
^
They can hold sets and the cast all they want.
^
But man let&#039;s hope they don&#039;t.....!
I think its cool for Nemoy but...Sulu he deserves a show of his own not some reboot cameo nod.
^
I swear if shatners is in the last 2 min of this new film I&#039;m gonna puke.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sulu and even Kirk could still be in this film, they could be writting scenes &#8220;strike or not&#8221; off lot in private. (We might still get that special line JJ came up with)&#8230;?<br />
^<br />
They can hold sets and the cast all they want.<br />
^<br />
But man let&#8217;s hope they don&#8217;t&#8230;..!<br />
I think its cool for Nemoy but&#8230;Sulu he deserves a show of his own not some reboot cameo nod.<br />
^<br />
I swear if shatners is in the last 2 min of this new film I&#8217;m gonna puke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7694</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7694</guid>
		<description>This might not make sense but to me it&#039;s less about Shatner than it is about Captain James Tiberius Kirk.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might not make sense but to me it&#8217;s less about Shatner than it is about Captain James Tiberius Kirk.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7693</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7693</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, Shatner loved Trek, but aside from the gag on SNL years ago, he did have a love/hate relationship with it.  But think about it like this, a lot of people had their first Shatner exposure due to TJ Hooker or Rescue: 911, a show my Mom loved.  (And I despised.)

heath
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, Shatner loved Trek, but aside from the gag on SNL years ago, he did have a love/hate relationship with it.  But think about it like this, a lot of people had their first Shatner exposure due to TJ Hooker or Rescue: 911, a show my Mom loved.  (And I despised.)</p>
<p>heath</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7692</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7692</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Gordon. I&#039;ve updated the post. Wierd story, Starburst magazine has some answering to do, it seems.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gordon. I&#8217;ve updated the post. Wierd story, Starburst magazine has some answering to do, it seems.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7691</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7691</guid>
		<description>FYI, since I&#039;m on a Trek movie kick, I had Generations in my hands via Netflix, but sent it back.  For obvious reasons.  I haven&#039;t seen the movie since 1994 when it opened.

I remember having hurt my back really bad a week or two before it opened, and was on a pain killer.  When Shatner showed up, the p.k. kicked in and I was thinking, what a great ending to a lousy film.  No, I was just couldn&#039;t  tell how bad it sucked!

heath
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, since I&#8217;m on a Trek movie kick, I had Generations in my hands via Netflix, but sent it back.  For obvious reasons.  I haven&#8217;t seen the movie since 1994 when it opened.</p>
<p>I remember having hurt my back really bad a week or two before it opened, and was on a pain killer.  When Shatner showed up, the p.k. kicked in and I was thinking, what a great ending to a lousy film.  No, I was just couldn&#8217;t  tell how bad it sucked!</p>
<p>heath</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KEL</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7690</link>
		<dc:creator>KEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7690</guid>
		<description>Dammit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Sytsma</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-vic-1140/comment-page-1/#comment-7689</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Sytsma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-trailer-news-and-why-shatners-gonna-get-madder-1140/#comment-7689</guid>
		<description>TrekMovie has already debunked the Takei rumour.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TrekMovie has already debunked the Takei rumour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
