Comments on: Will There Be A Star Trek Preview At Comic-Con?

By: Kahless

Kahless — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:52:16 +0000

I meant Gary, not green.

By: Kahless

Kahless — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:34:44 +0000

Ok, I just now sent the editor of startrek.com an e-mail to confirm this.

Vic, I didn’t mean to make your blood pressure go into Vulcan territory. As counselor Troi instructs us, use the 2 fore-fingers for plexing under the corrauted (sp) artery.

790 and green, thanks for the info.

By: Vic Holtreman

Vic Holtreman — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:13:05 +0000

Gary, no prob, but my point is why would Paramount discard StarTrek.com to “succeed” or “replace” it with something else? That site already covers much more than the upcoming film – it’s basically the portal to all things Trek.

It just wouldn’t make much since to discard that site for something new IMHO.

Vic

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:51:23 +0000

Vic, I used the word “successor”
because the word replacement didnt apply to trekweb i was trying to find a better word.
i had read a long time ago That paramount still had plans to launch another Star trek related website which
which wouldnt be limited just to the upcoming film.
I didnt mean to imply there was soon going to be another website up and running .
It was a poor choice of words.
My apologies.

By: Vic Holtreman

Vic Holtreman — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:18:31 +0000

If someone could provide a link to some sort of story mentioning a “successor” to StarTrek.com I’d love to see it.

Vic

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:48:31 +0000

i thought the successor to Star trek.com was still under devlopment.

By: Vic Holtreman

Vic Holtreman — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:49:09 +0000

What do you guys mean by “replace” startrek.com?

Trekweb isn’t replacing that site in any official or even unofficial capacity. They don’t even do any of their own news, all they do is pull it off of other sites.

Vic

By: 790

790 — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:06:48 +0000

Kahless its

http://www.trekweb.com

By: Kahless

Kahless — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:38:21 +0000

Does anyone remember the name of the site that suppose to replace startrek.com? I don’t think it was trekmovie.com.

By: jc in chicago

jc in chicago — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:56:25 +0000

The sound you hear from me is a massive yawn.

I want to go on the record as not giving what Hancock might call a flying duck. (Or is that Wall-E?)

I am only saying this because the movies I’m most skeptical about turn out to rock my socks off. So, duly noted? OK Abrams, dazzle me good.

By: Gary

Gary — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:34:09 +0000

Why doesnt Paramounts success with Iron Man at the con last year emboldem them to try the same thing with Trek this year ?

By: Mat D

Mat D — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:04:00 +0000

as a Con attendee…I find it hard to care…I think GI JOE will probably be the star of this years convention…or the red headed stepchild

By: Gary

Gary — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:21:20 +0000

You are probably right Vic but i wish they would just say so.

By: 790

790 — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:19:31 +0000

I’d say your right on Vic. Glad your gonna cover that for us that can’t go!

By: Rob

Rob — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:12:14 +0000

It will definately have some footage.

We still haven’t seen a complete shot of the ship, NOTHING from the characters, or anything at all!! I’m going CrAzYY!

Props to JJ for being the ultimate lid, keeping closed any revelations for any of his projects. That guy IS marketing.