Recent Related Items:

15 Comments


Rob says:

It will definately have some footage.

We still haven’t seen a complete shot of the ship, NOTHING from the characters, or anything at all!! I’m going CrAzYY!

Props to JJ for being the ultimate lid, keeping closed any revelations for any of his projects. That guy IS marketing.

790 says:

I’d say your right on Vic. Glad your gonna cover that for us that can’t go!

Gary says:

You are probably right Vic but i wish they would just say so.

Mat D says:

as a Con attendee…I find it hard to care…I think GI JOE will probably be the star of this years convention…or the red headed stepchild

Gary says:

Why doesnt Paramounts success with Iron Man at the con last year emboldem them to try the same thing with Trek this year ?

jc in chicago says:

The sound you hear from me is a massive yawn.

I want to go on the record as not giving what Hancock might call a flying duck. (Or is that Wall-E?)

I am only saying this because the movies I’m most skeptical about turn out to rock my socks off. So, duly noted? OK Abrams, dazzle me good.

Kahless says:

Does anyone remember the name of the site that suppose to replace startrek.com? I don’t think it was trekmovie.com.

What do you guys mean by “replace” startrek.com?

Trekweb isn’t replacing that site in any official or even unofficial capacity. They don’t even do any of their own news, all they do is pull it off of other sites.

Vic

Gary says:

i thought the successor to Star trek.com was still under devlopment.

If someone could provide a link to some sort of story mentioning a “successor” to StarTrek.com I’d love to see it.

Vic

Gary says:

Vic, I used the word “successor”
because the word replacement didnt apply to trekweb i was trying to find a better word.
i had read a long time ago That paramount still had plans to launch another Star trek related website which
which wouldnt be limited just to the upcoming film.
I didnt mean to imply there was soon going to be another website up and running .
It was a poor choice of words.
My apologies.

Gary, no prob, but my point is why would Paramount discard StarTrek.com to “succeed” or “replace” it with something else? That site already covers much more than the upcoming film – it’s basically the portal to all things Trek.

It just wouldn’t make much since to discard that site for something new IMHO.

Vic

Kahless says:

Ok, I just now sent the editor of startrek.com an e-mail to confirm this.

Vic, I didn’t mean to make your blood pressure go into Vulcan territory. As counselor Troi instructs us, use the 2 fore-fingers for plexing under the corrauted (sp) artery. :-)

790 and green, thanks for the info.

Kahless says:

I meant Gary, not green.

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.