<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek Movie: The Enterprise Is NOT Built In &#8216;Area 51&#8242;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VulcanNonibird</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/comment-page-1/#comment-89757</link>
		<dc:creator>VulcanNonibird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 01:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-1247/#comment-89757</guid>
		<description>Fascinating but not new. The USS Tsiolkovsky - The Next Generation: The Naked Time - was according to its dedication plaque built and launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in 2363.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating but not new. The USS Tsiolkovsky &#8211; The Next Generation: The Naked Time &#8211; was according to its dedication plaque built and launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in 2363.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/comment-page-1/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-1247/#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>Jae,

What a great &quot;vision&quot; for the Enterprise! From Orci&#039;s comments it seems like that&#039;s the direction they&#039;re leaning towards.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jae,</p>
<p>What a great &#8220;vision&#8221; for the Enterprise! From Orci&#8217;s comments it seems like that&#8217;s the direction they&#8217;re leaning towards.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jae Senn</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/comment-page-1/#comment-9593</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Senn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-1247/#comment-9593</guid>
		<description>Wow, this Enterprise would be tough??

That would be great!!!! Don&#039;t you think it&#039;s embarrassing usually when the enemy vessels have just fired their first volley of shots, and the Enterprise&#039;s security head (whether Chekov or Worf) report that the shields are falling, the photon torpedoes are offline, and other such nonsense?

Hopefully this ship can take a beating.. hopefully it is tough, brutish and robust like a hot-rodded American Muscle with a big-block engine shoehorned under its bonnet.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this Enterprise would be tough??</p>
<p>That would be great!!!! Don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s embarrassing usually when the enemy vessels have just fired their first volley of shots, and the Enterprise&#8217;s security head (whether Chekov or Worf) report that the shields are falling, the photon torpedoes are offline, and other such nonsense?</p>
<p>Hopefully this ship can take a beating.. hopefully it is tough, brutish and robust like a hot-rodded American Muscle with a big-block engine shoehorned under its bonnet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve adams</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/comment-page-1/#comment-9592</link>
		<dc:creator>steve adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-1247/#comment-9592</guid>
		<description>MBL you crack me up
dude. I look forward to more of your comments on films etc.
^
This is welcome news indeed. I&#039;m really hoping there going to faithfully kick Star Trek ars in this new film.
Area 51 has no part in that film.
^
The picture of the Enterprise looks fricken perfect I have no probs at all. Great job JJ!
They even have the old school bussard collectors, I didn&#039;t think they would follow that close to cannon but they did... Great work!
^
I&#039;m really looking forward to this years films including Trek.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MBL you crack me up<br />
dude. I look forward to more of your comments on films etc.<br />
^<br />
This is welcome news indeed. I&#8217;m really hoping there going to faithfully kick Star Trek ars in this new film.<br />
Area 51 has no part in that film.<br />
^<br />
The picture of the Enterprise looks fricken perfect I have no probs at all. Great job JJ!<br />
They even have the old school bussard collectors, I didn&#8217;t think they would follow that close to cannon but they did&#8230; Great work!<br />
^<br />
I&#8217;m really looking forward to this years films including Trek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KEL</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/comment-page-1/#comment-9591</link>
		<dc:creator>KEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-1247/#comment-9591</guid>
		<description>Good news. :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news. <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/comment-page-1/#comment-9590</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-1247/#comment-9590</guid>
		<description>Heh... I&#039;ll need a picture of that when you&#039;re done. :-)

BTW, I *did* get your email but I&#039;m swamped. I promise to reply!

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230; I&#8217;ll need a picture of that when you&#8217;re done. <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW, I *did* get your email but I&#8217;m swamped. I promise to reply!</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBL</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-vic-1247/comment-page-1/#comment-9589</link>
		<dc:creator>MBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-the-enterprise-is-not-built-in-area-51-1247/#comment-9589</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s actually being built in an area of my living room.  SO THERE!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s actually being built in an area of my living room.  SO THERE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 94/110 queries in 0.023 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via srwp.screenrant.netdna-cdn.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: screenrant.com @ 2010-03-21 15:20:06 -->