<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise vs. Galactica: Who Would Win?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: fsdfdfdsfdsdfs</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-4/#comment-458986</link>
		<dc:creator>fsdfdfdsfdsdfs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-458986</guid>
		<description>I think Bruce Simmons flunked jr high math not knowing megatons are greater than kilotons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bruce Simmons flunked jr high math not knowing megatons are greater than kilotons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mytai01</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-454881</link>
		<dc:creator>mytai01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-454881</guid>
		<description>The yield of the photon has never been stated on the show. Therefore, it is unknown. The only thing that has been stated is that the Enterprise can destroy an entire planet. That is a statement made by both Mr. Scott and Capt. Kirk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The yield of the photon has never been stated on the show. Therefore, it is unknown. The only thing that has been stated is that the Enterprise can destroy an entire planet. That is a statement made by both Mr. Scott and Capt. Kirk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mytai01</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-454880</link>
		<dc:creator>mytai01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-454880</guid>
		<description>First of all, one can not ignore the statements made on the respective shows about the capabilities of their ships. Second, one also has to take into account what things the two ships have gone through on the two shows. Opinions don&#039;t mean a thing in a debate about fantasy ships. The only facts are those found on the TV shows themselves. 

In the case of the Enterprise, Capt Kirk has stated on the show that the Enterprise is capable of destroying an entire planet (ref &quot;A Taste of Armagedon&quot;?). We don&#039;t know if that means in the Death Star way, or in the cinder ball way, but either way it means a dead planet. The Enterprise uses energy weapons with a virtually unlimited number of phaser shots. The photon torpedoes were assumed to be energy bolts until the The Wrath Of Khan depicted them as actual devices of limited quantity aboard ship. Galactica does have a nuclear missile arsenal of it&#039;s own of unknown yield and unknown numbers of warheads. That means the Galactica has a limit to it&#039;s nuclear attack capability. The Enterprise has taken a nuclear blast of unspecified yield at less than 100 meters with only circuit overloads and a few radiation burned crewmen in the episode &quot;Balance of Terror.&quot; In that episode, the Romulan ship also fired a torpedo that could destroy a Federation base located one mile deep on an asteroid made of &quot;almost solid iron.&quot; The Enterprise took a hit from that torpedo, although after the torpedo lost much of its power chasing the Enterprise. The Enterprise suffered no damage at all. The Galactica did take a nuclear missile hit of probable 50 kiloton yield (based on another scene where a Cylon Raider launched a 50Kt warhead at Colonial One) at what appeared to impact directly on the hull  in the first episode, causing serious and extensive structural damage to Galactica. So far the shows are supporting the far superiority of Enterprise. Not to mention Warp speed beats hyper jump by far. Please bring up specifics from the shows that support your position. feelings and desires don&#039;t count only &quot;facts&quot; from the shows matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, one can not ignore the statements made on the respective shows about the capabilities of their ships. Second, one also has to take into account what things the two ships have gone through on the two shows. Opinions don&#8217;t mean a thing in a debate about fantasy ships. The only facts are those found on the TV shows themselves. </p>
<p>In the case of the Enterprise, Capt Kirk has stated on the show that the Enterprise is capable of destroying an entire planet (ref &#8220;A Taste of Armagedon&#8221;?). We don&#8217;t know if that means in the Death Star way, or in the cinder ball way, but either way it means a dead planet. The Enterprise uses energy weapons with a virtually unlimited number of phaser shots. The photon torpedoes were assumed to be energy bolts until the The Wrath Of Khan depicted them as actual devices of limited quantity aboard ship. Galactica does have a nuclear missile arsenal of it&#8217;s own of unknown yield and unknown numbers of warheads. That means the Galactica has a limit to it&#8217;s nuclear attack capability. The Enterprise has taken a nuclear blast of unspecified yield at less than 100 meters with only circuit overloads and a few radiation burned crewmen in the episode &#8220;Balance of Terror.&#8221; In that episode, the Romulan ship also fired a torpedo that could destroy a Federation base located one mile deep on an asteroid made of &#8220;almost solid iron.&#8221; The Enterprise took a hit from that torpedo, although after the torpedo lost much of its power chasing the Enterprise. The Enterprise suffered no damage at all. The Galactica did take a nuclear missile hit of probable 50 kiloton yield (based on another scene where a Cylon Raider launched a 50Kt warhead at Colonial One) at what appeared to impact directly on the hull  in the first episode, causing serious and extensive structural damage to Galactica. So far the shows are supporting the far superiority of Enterprise. Not to mention Warp speed beats hyper jump by far. Please bring up specifics from the shows that support your position. feelings and desires don&#8217;t count only &#8220;facts&#8221; from the shows matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodrigo pereira</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-441722</link>
		<dc:creator>rodrigo pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-441722</guid>
		<description>hello,nice comparison between the new bsgand the old star trek fed. cruiser;
i also thought about a cross-over involving the most famous battlestar,galactica; what would happens if the galactica met the expeditionary fleet of the ref,in robotech,rhe next generation?
somethig awsome-transforming vipers, ships with reflex synchro cannons....
with that type of technology, the colonials would kick some cylons butt!!
would u think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello,nice comparison between the new bsgand the old star trek fed. cruiser;<br />
i also thought about a cross-over involving the most famous battlestar,galactica; what would happens if the galactica met the expeditionary fleet of the ref,in robotech,rhe next generation?<br />
somethig awsome-transforming vipers, ships with reflex synchro cannons&#8230;.<br />
with that type of technology, the colonials would kick some cylons butt!!<br />
would u think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poopmcpoopins</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-434772</link>
		<dc:creator>poopmcpoopins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-434772</guid>
		<description>your math is wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your math is wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talon</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-427615</link>
		<dc:creator>Talon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-427615</guid>
		<description>I loved the revision of Galactica but come on! Pegasus, a more advanced battlestar, was destroyed by missles and cannons firing chemical based projectiles. The Enterprise would slice Galactica to ribbons, probably before it was picked up on the Dradis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the revision of Galactica but come on! Pegasus, a more advanced battlestar, was destroyed by missles and cannons firing chemical based projectiles. The Enterprise would slice Galactica to ribbons, probably before it was picked up on the Dradis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealAmazingAnon</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-417355</link>
		<dc:creator>RealAmazingAnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-417355</guid>
		<description>i would like to see a battle with Galactica and Enterprise. i mean Galactica would win hands down due to fighters and firepower. but it would be cool to see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to see a battle with Galactica and Enterprise. i mean Galactica would win hands down due to fighters and firepower. but it would be cool to see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackosaur</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-405274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackosaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-405274</guid>
		<description>But who would win between Space BattleShip Yamato and Enterprise.  Can Enterprise withstand wave motion gun hit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But who would win between Space BattleShip Yamato and Enterprise.  Can Enterprise withstand wave motion gun hit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mock</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-344912</link>
		<dc:creator>Mock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-344912</guid>
		<description>In space 2-4 kilometers might as well be a miss, torpedoes would have to make contact with the structure in order for the material of the structure itself to transmit energy of the explosion.  I does not matter how big the yield of the nuke is if there is no media for the shockwave to travel through.   One low yield nuke breaches the shields of the Enterprise given the structural size and design of the ship in a real world scenario would be all it would take, the shape and design of Enterprise looks more like 1960s contemporary art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In space 2-4 kilometers might as well be a miss, torpedoes would have to make contact with the structure in order for the material of the structure itself to transmit energy of the explosion.  I does not matter how big the yield of the nuke is if there is no media for the shockwave to travel through.   One low yield nuke breaches the shields of the Enterprise given the structural size and design of the ship in a real world scenario would be all it would take, the shape and design of Enterprise looks more like 1960s contemporary art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mock</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-344483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-344483</guid>
		<description>In a vacuum how exactly does a shock wave travel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a vacuum how exactly does a shock wave travel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laclone</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-338466</link>
		<dc:creator>laclone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-338466</guid>
		<description>How is a 150 kiloton nuke superoir to a 62 megaton Photon Torpedo?

To level the scale, that a .15 megaton nuke compaired to a 62.0 megaton Photon torpedo, or the reverse..., a 150 kiloton nuke vs. a 62,000 kiloton Photon Torp.  

1 megaton is 1,000 kilotons!  Photon Torpedos are waaay more powerful than BSG nukes!  And, btw, the max yield of a Photon Torp. is 90 megatons, not 62 (1.5 kilograms of both matter &amp; antimater.  Basic physics/real-world math).

Here&#039;s a link to a wiki about the largest nuke EVER detonated.  It was a massive 50 megaton (a standard Photon Torpedo, dialed down to a 60% yield).  The fireball itself was 33 kilometers in diameter!!!!
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba

The Enterprise vs. Galactica combat report would be a short one.

&quot;3000 kilometers away, out of range of their weapons, the Enterprise fired a Photon Torpedo at the Galactica.  The Galactica&#039;s point-defense weapons sucessfully detonated the torpedo 2-4 kilometers away from the ship. The massive size of the Galactica shielded about 1/4 of the structure from being completely destroyed in the explosion, but the shock wave sent the crushed remains of the vessel spinning off into space. No remaining life signs.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is a 150 kiloton nuke superoir to a 62 megaton Photon Torpedo?</p>
<p>To level the scale, that a .15 megaton nuke compaired to a 62.0 megaton Photon torpedo, or the reverse&#8230;, a 150 kiloton nuke vs. a 62,000 kiloton Photon Torp.  </p>
<p>1 megaton is 1,000 kilotons!  Photon Torpedos are waaay more powerful than BSG nukes!  And, btw, the max yield of a Photon Torp. is 90 megatons, not 62 (1.5 kilograms of both matter &amp; antimater.  Basic physics/real-world math).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to a wiki about the largest nuke EVER detonated.  It was a massive 50 megaton (a standard Photon Torpedo, dialed down to a 60% yield).  The fireball itself was 33 kilometers in diameter!!!!<br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba</a></p>
<p>The Enterprise vs. Galactica combat report would be a short one.</p>
<p>&#8220;3000 kilometers away, out of range of their weapons, the Enterprise fired a Photon Torpedo at the Galactica.  The Galactica&#8217;s point-defense weapons sucessfully detonated the torpedo 2-4 kilometers away from the ship. The massive size of the Galactica shielded about 1/4 of the structure from being completely destroyed in the explosion, but the shock wave sent the crushed remains of the vessel spinning off into space. No remaining life signs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Steiner</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-257194</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Steiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-257194</guid>
		<description>are yu guys nuts? the &quot;israelis working on a shield system&quot;...first they are not working on anything. they dont have tech or money. all teh weapons come from the US, so the thought that Israeli&#039;s work on anything more than an iPhone App to audio recording or real estate bidding software is a joke. They don&#039;t have the level of education, and anything they might develop needs permission of the EU and US. If they get word that they do something weird, they get slapped on the wrist - to keep things balanced in that region. US, and EU are really not happy about Israel not obeying their rules, so the times where they had a merciful eye on the, is mostly gone.
There are some jewish in the US in show business and stock market who lobby for israel, but when it comes to arms production, hi - tech and the new administration, they have to keep a low profile, so that the american general public doesnt get pissed, and associate them with middle easterners (which they already do anyways).

final word:
ST vs BSG? this is no contest. YOu are pitching 24th century technology vs 1990ies nukes and guns? just because you attach a jump drive to an oil tanker , doesnt make it a fighter jet.
enterprise would not be hit by any weapons of BSG, it simply could not lock on. ST has teh best weapons lock sensors, and BSG could not escape.  Phasers would tear the ship apart, slowly but surely.
raptors would do damage to enterprise, but be quickly disabled, since they are too slow to evade sensors.
finally, a boarding party with phasers beamed on the galactica would render this ship uncontrollable within 20 minutes.
the reason behind this, is that we might have a galactica spaceship in a couple of hundred years, the enterprise is about 500 years into the future (time and space manipulation requires such massive energy reserves and potential) - and the question is if that were ever possible.
so there is a 500 year technological span between ST, BORG, DS9 and the GALACTICA universe. That&#039;s actually the charm of galactica, it is retro!...in essence today&#039;s tech , played out in space.
remember also that enterprise has traveled the galaxy, encountered many many species for generations, and knows about space. galactica knows nothing. they travel lost, looking for earth. enterprise can go at will...
DATA beamed on board galactica with WORF , would take out the entire crew, most likely.
ANY civilization that can fabricate WARP drives, and control them, cotrols energy , mass and time, and can therefore build weapons that can desintegrate anything.

back to the israelis!.. the only thing they should be working on is their water supply and how to make friends with their enemies... this is a big world between USA, EU, China, JAPAN, and there&#039;s just no time for the world to deal with a bunch of crazies in that region , who all combined are the size of LA and San Diego County combined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are yu guys nuts? the &#8220;israelis working on a shield system&#8221;&#8230;first they are not working on anything. they dont have tech or money. all teh weapons come from the US, so the thought that Israeli&#8217;s work on anything more than an iPhone App to audio recording or real estate bidding software is a joke. They don&#8217;t have the level of education, and anything they might develop needs permission of the EU and US. If they get word that they do something weird, they get slapped on the wrist &#8211; to keep things balanced in that region. US, and EU are really not happy about Israel not obeying their rules, so the times where they had a merciful eye on the, is mostly gone.<br />
There are some jewish in the US in show business and stock market who lobby for israel, but when it comes to arms production, hi &#8211; tech and the new administration, they have to keep a low profile, so that the american general public doesnt get pissed, and associate them with middle easterners (which they already do anyways).</p>
<p>final word:<br />
ST vs BSG? this is no contest. YOu are pitching 24th century technology vs 1990ies nukes and guns? just because you attach a jump drive to an oil tanker , doesnt make it a fighter jet.<br />
enterprise would not be hit by any weapons of BSG, it simply could not lock on. ST has teh best weapons lock sensors, and BSG could not escape.  Phasers would tear the ship apart, slowly but surely.<br />
raptors would do damage to enterprise, but be quickly disabled, since they are too slow to evade sensors.<br />
finally, a boarding party with phasers beamed on the galactica would render this ship uncontrollable within 20 minutes.<br />
the reason behind this, is that we might have a galactica spaceship in a couple of hundred years, the enterprise is about 500 years into the future (time and space manipulation requires such massive energy reserves and potential) &#8211; and the question is if that were ever possible.<br />
so there is a 500 year technological span between ST, BORG, DS9 and the GALACTICA universe. That&#8217;s actually the charm of galactica, it is retro!&#8230;in essence today&#8217;s tech , played out in space.<br />
remember also that enterprise has traveled the galaxy, encountered many many species for generations, and knows about space. galactica knows nothing. they travel lost, looking for earth. enterprise can go at will&#8230;<br />
DATA beamed on board galactica with WORF , would take out the entire crew, most likely.<br />
ANY civilization that can fabricate WARP drives, and control them, cotrols energy , mass and time, and can therefore build weapons that can desintegrate anything.</p>
<p>back to the israelis!.. the only thing they should be working on is their water supply and how to make friends with their enemies&#8230; this is a big world between USA, EU, China, JAPAN, and there&#8217;s just no time for the world to deal with a bunch of crazies in that region , who all combined are the size of LA and San Diego County combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-255925</link>
		<dc:creator>mk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-255925</guid>
		<description>Galactica is no match for Enterprise. Galactica has firepower barely compared to the Danube class.

Some links:
http://www.ditl.org/pagship.php?fedsovereign
http://www.ditl.org/pagship.php?feddanube</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galactica is no match for Enterprise. Galactica has firepower barely compared to the Danube class.</p>
<p>Some links:<br />
<a href="http://www.ditl.org/pagship.php?fedsovereign" rel="nofollow">http://www.ditl.org/pagship.php?fedsovereign</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ditl.org/pagship.php?feddanube" rel="nofollow">http://www.ditl.org/pagship.php?feddanube</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mock</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-202634</link>
		<dc:creator>Mock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-202634</guid>
		<description>Guys the best way to test this is to find a game that allows you to design ships and pit them up against each other.   I did this with Master of Orion 3 (crappy game in general but good tech).  I found the stats for each ship online and used a mod program to build two ships in game that mimicked the Enterprise and Galactica.  One thing I noticed was how few weapons Enterprise has (powerful yes but at most two forward phaser banks and 2 forward torpedo tubes) compared to the mind boggling number of point defense and heavy turrets, rocket, and missile tubes.  Ok I won’t get into the whole break down but here’s how 5 simulations ran, 1 and 2 Enterprise detected Galactica on entering the system and ran without engaging.  3, 4, and 5 I took control to force the fight.  In all fights Enterprise fired torpedoes at greater range  but coming in two at a time in 3 fights only one torpedo  ever made it through the flack barrier yes one torpedo did massive damage but it would have taken two to take Galactica  out.   
Now the Enterprise  takes the first volley of missiles out of phaser range followed buy the first wave of vipers and Raptors.  The Enterprise Phasers are reduced to defensively picking off missiles and fighters .  Enterprise’s shields are moderately depleted by the massive number of small rocket hits and the initial fighter assault .  The second volley hits as the Enterprise is still fending off the remaining Vipers sense the second volley strikes at closer range fewer counter measures are engaged and a larger number of ordinance detonate.    The second volley destroys the Enterprise in all three remaining engagements. 
Enterprise never makes it close enough to Galactica to even use phasers.    Enterprise may be able to out maneuver Galactica but with the amount of ordinance Galactica puts out it’s like attempting out maneuver a hail storm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys the best way to test this is to find a game that allows you to design ships and pit them up against each other.   I did this with Master of Orion 3 (crappy game in general but good tech).  I found the stats for each ship online and used a mod program to build two ships in game that mimicked the Enterprise and Galactica.  One thing I noticed was how few weapons Enterprise has (powerful yes but at most two forward phaser banks and 2 forward torpedo tubes) compared to the mind boggling number of point defense and heavy turrets, rocket, and missile tubes.  Ok I won’t get into the whole break down but here’s how 5 simulations ran, 1 and 2 Enterprise detected Galactica on entering the system and ran without engaging.  3, 4, and 5 I took control to force the fight.  In all fights Enterprise fired torpedoes at greater range  but coming in two at a time in 3 fights only one torpedo  ever made it through the flack barrier yes one torpedo did massive damage but it would have taken two to take Galactica  out.<br />
Now the Enterprise  takes the first volley of missiles out of phaser range followed buy the first wave of vipers and Raptors.  The Enterprise Phasers are reduced to defensively picking off missiles and fighters .  Enterprise’s shields are moderately depleted by the massive number of small rocket hits and the initial fighter assault .  The second volley hits as the Enterprise is still fending off the remaining Vipers sense the second volley strikes at closer range fewer counter measures are engaged and a larger number of ordinance detonate.    The second volley destroys the Enterprise in all three remaining engagements.<br />
Enterprise never makes it close enough to Galactica to even use phasers.    Enterprise may be able to out maneuver Galactica but with the amount of ordinance Galactica puts out it’s like attempting out maneuver a hail storm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McSweeney</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-182316</link>
		<dc:creator>McSweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-182316</guid>
		<description>Why are you people getting all tripped up on joules? A simple kiloton/megaton conversion should end this debate. The Enterprise&#039;s 64-megaton photon torpedos are the equivalent of a 64,000-kiloton nuke: i.e. Galactica would get its butt kicked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you people getting all tripped up on joules? A simple kiloton/megaton conversion should end this debate. The Enterprise&#39;s 64-megaton photon torpedos are the equivalent of a 64,000-kiloton nuke: i.e. Galactica would get its butt kicked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McSweeney</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-178433</link>
		<dc:creator>McSweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-178433</guid>
		<description>Why are you people getting all tripped up on joules? A simple kiloton/megaton conversion should end this debate. The Enterprise&#039;s 64-megaton photon torpedos are the equivalent of a 64,000-kiloton nuke: i.e. Galactica would get its butt kicked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you people getting all tripped up on joules? A simple kiloton/megaton conversion should end this debate. The Enterprise&#39;s 64-megaton photon torpedos are the equivalent of a 64,000-kiloton nuke: i.e. Galactica would get its butt kicked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpark</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-178434</link>
		<dc:creator>jpark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-178434</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand where these calculations came from for converting the explosive power to joules. Both numbers are off by MANY factors of ten. Besides, it is easy to know a photon torpedo of 64 MEGAtons is much more powerful than 150 KILOtons. One megaton is 1000x one kiloton. In translation, 64 megatons would be roughly 64000 kilotons... Enterprise&#039;s shields can take a couple photon torpedos, so a 150 kiloton nuke is literally a scratch. Galactica cannot safely take damage from a 1 megaton weapon, let alone 64...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t understand where these calculations came from for converting the explosive power to joules. Both numbers are off by MANY factors of ten. Besides, it is easy to know a photon torpedo of 64 MEGAtons is much more powerful than 150 KILOtons. One megaton is 1000x one kiloton. In translation, 64 megatons would be roughly 64000 kilotons&#8230; Enterprise&#39;s shields can take a couple photon torpedos, so a 150 kiloton nuke is literally a scratch. Galactica cannot safely take damage from a 1 megaton weapon, let alone 64&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ndv</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-159772</link>
		<dc:creator>ndv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-159772</guid>
		<description>&quot;150 kilotons = 625 Joules, and 64 Megatons = ~269 Joules.  So the hitting power does go to the Galactica.&quot;

This is just wrong.  150 kilotons = 625000000000000 Joules, and 64 megatons = 267800000000000000 Joules.  One megaton is 1000 bigger than one kiloton.  So the Enterprise&#039;s weapons are about 500 times better than BSG&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;150 kilotons = 625 Joules, and 64 Megatons = ~269 Joules.  So the hitting power does go to the Galactica.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is just wrong.  150 kilotons = 625000000000000 Joules, and 64 megatons = 267800000000000000 Joules.  One megaton is 1000 bigger than one kiloton.  So the Enterprise&#8217;s weapons are about 500 times better than BSG&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeconnally</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-156221</link>
		<dc:creator>jeconnally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-156221</guid>
		<description>I WOULD LOVE TO SEE The Millennium Falcon vs A GLATICA VIPER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WOULD LOVE TO SEE The Millennium Falcon vs A GLATICA VIPER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeconnally</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-enterprise-vs-battlestar-galactica-brusimm-5140/comment-page-3/#comment-156220</link>
		<dc:creator>jeconnally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=5140#comment-156220</guid>
		<description>keep in mind the federation will not hert people well glatica could care less</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep in mind the federation will not hert people well glatica could care less</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

