<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harlan Ellison Offers To Pen Star Trek 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 12:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: steveo</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-2/#comment-519335</link>
		<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 06:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-519335</guid>
		<description>Ellison would have a fine barbeque over &quot;still currently&quot;.  Things like that keep him alive and spitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellison would have a fine barbeque over &#8220;still currently&#8221;.  Things like that keep him alive and spitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiro Orika</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-2/#comment-334514</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiro Orika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 07:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-334514</guid>
		<description>The people who claim Star Trek XI is the best Star Trek motion picture yet made have obviously not seen Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan.

Star Trek XII will undoubtedly be another action movie, so I&#039;m still waiting for a science fiction with some humanity to it, like the real franchise has, like Babylon 5 has, and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who claim Star Trek XI is the best Star Trek motion picture yet made have obviously not seen Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan.</p>
<p>Star Trek XII will undoubtedly be another action movie, so I&#8217;m still waiting for a science fiction with some humanity to it, like the real franchise has, like Babylon 5 has, and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jam head</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-2/#comment-158429</link>
		<dc:creator>jam head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158429</guid>
		<description>@Kahless

Ya I am more familiar with the next generation, I like all of those movies but thought Nemeses fell short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kahless</p>
<p>Ya I am more familiar with the next generation, I like all of those movies but thought Nemeses fell short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSamBeckett</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-2/#comment-158372</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSamBeckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158372</guid>
		<description>ST: The Final Frontier may be a terrible film but it is worth a look, they were attempting to do something amazing but just couldnt work out the story.

Plus it has several great scenes, the opening with Kirk climbing the mountain, and the hillarious ending &quot; What would God want with a starship?&quot;

And in regards to deaths in Star trek (2009), the ships Doctor was killed, as were presumably others, when Nero attacks the Enterprise above Vulcan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ST: The Final Frontier may be a terrible film but it is worth a look, they were attempting to do something amazing but just couldnt work out the story.</p>
<p>Plus it has several great scenes, the opening with Kirk climbing the mountain, and the hillarious ending &#8221; What would God want with a starship?&#8221;</p>
<p>And in regards to deaths in Star trek (2009), the ships Doctor was killed, as were presumably others, when Nero attacks the Enterprise above Vulcan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John "Kahless" Taylor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-2/#comment-158243</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Kahless" Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158243</guid>
		<description>@jam head
ST6:Undiscovered Country was pretty good (had a cameo by Christian Slater), and if you have seen any of TNG, ST8:First Contact is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jam head<br />
ST6:Undiscovered Country was pretty good (had a cameo by Christian Slater), and if you have seen any of TNG, ST8:First Contact is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jam head</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-2/#comment-158240</link>
		<dc:creator>jam head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158240</guid>
		<description>@Kahless

Thanks man! I wont waste my time on it then...I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing 1-4 for old time sake, I remember The Voyage home but thats about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kahless</p>
<p>Thanks man! I wont waste my time on it then&#8230;I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing 1-4 for old time sake, I remember The Voyage home but thats about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John "Kahless" Taylor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-2/#comment-158178</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Kahless" Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158178</guid>
		<description>@jam head
ST5 was the worst Trek movie of them all, IMHO. I wouldn&#039;t waste 2 hours on it if I were you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jam head<br />
ST5 was the worst Trek movie of them all, IMHO. I wouldn&#8217;t waste 2 hours on it if I were you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the old man</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-158134</link>
		<dc:creator>the old man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158134</guid>
		<description>Very true DrSamBeckett however to be fair, antodav was talking about the Enterprise crew. We also can&#039;t forget all the lives lost on the starships that warped into Vulcan&#039;s space not having the benefit of Kirk&#039;s insight. Really a lot of lives lost in both stories. Hard to take a body count when your in the middle of a fire fight though, especially an IMAX one...  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true DrSamBeckett however to be fair, antodav was talking about the Enterprise crew. We also can&#8217;t forget all the lives lost on the starships that warped into Vulcan&#8217;s space not having the benefit of Kirk&#8217;s insight. Really a lot of lives lost in both stories. Hard to take a body count when your in the middle of a fire fight though, especially an IMAX one&#8230;  <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSamBeckett</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-158103</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSamBeckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158103</guid>
		<description>And as for no casualties, I doubt the population of Vulcan would agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And as for no casualties, I doubt the population of Vulcan would agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSamBeckett</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-158102</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSamBeckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158102</guid>
		<description>Star Trek didnt take place over a couple of days, If I remember rightly, and I do. 

It starts with Kirk and Spock as kids, jumps forward to the barfight sequence, then three years later when they are in the acedemy. Then the main story begins.

Not to mention the opening on the Kelvin!

Voyager was the worst assualt on television ever! Seriously, space indians!!!! Sorry space native americans. How it ran for seven years is, and always shall be, a mystery!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Trek didnt take place over a couple of days, If I remember rightly, and I do. </p>
<p>It starts with Kirk and Spock as kids, jumps forward to the barfight sequence, then three years later when they are in the acedemy. Then the main story begins.</p>
<p>Not to mention the opening on the Kelvin!</p>
<p>Voyager was the worst assualt on television ever! Seriously, space indians!!!! Sorry space native americans. How it ran for seven years is, and always shall be, a mystery!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the old man</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-158101</link>
		<dc:creator>the old man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158101</guid>
		<description>antodav says: &quot;STXI took place over the course of a matter of days—during which time the Enterprise crew managed to endure no casualties whatsoever&quot;

Actually one of the crew fell to his death attempting to land on the mining platform over Vulcan and the movie is somewhat over rated in my opinion. The Kobayashi Maru scene could have been ten times better. You can&#039;t hear Corvette tires squeal on sand and dirt as if you were on blacktop, the Enterprise bridge looked like it should have had an APPLE logo emblazoned somewhere and they fell somewhat short, casting for Sulu, and Chekov, and I thought the comic prequel was as good or better than the movie just to name a few things.

Of course it would be unfair to be negative all the time the trailers for the movie were cool, especially the Enterprise going to warp. In fact I would say that some of last year and this has been &#039;the year of the trailers.&#039; 

If J.J. would ask me to take lunch with Harlan I would ask Harlan how much he wanted to pitch a story and an outline together? Then I would ask him to get with his lawyer and draw up the terms of a contract to do a story with as many rewrites as it took to make it work. I&#039;d tell him to put in the contract what ever he thought was fair. I would then tell him that the contract him and his lawyer draws up will be the basis of a negotiation for a working contract. Set a time limit for them to set an appointment with J.J.&#039;s team for the negotiation and when he could make the pitch and report back to J.J.

If you could combine the intellect of a story from Harlan with the energy and action from Kurtzman and Orci you&#039;d have lightning in a bottle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>antodav says: &#8220;STXI took place over the course of a matter of days—during which time the Enterprise crew managed to endure no casualties whatsoever&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually one of the crew fell to his death attempting to land on the mining platform over Vulcan and the movie is somewhat over rated in my opinion. The Kobayashi Maru scene could have been ten times better. You can&#8217;t hear Corvette tires squeal on sand and dirt as if you were on blacktop, the Enterprise bridge looked like it should have had an APPLE logo emblazoned somewhere and they fell somewhat short, casting for Sulu, and Chekov, and I thought the comic prequel was as good or better than the movie just to name a few things.</p>
<p>Of course it would be unfair to be negative all the time the trailers for the movie were cool, especially the Enterprise going to warp. In fact I would say that some of last year and this has been &#8216;the year of the trailers.&#8217; </p>
<p>If J.J. would ask me to take lunch with Harlan I would ask Harlan how much he wanted to pitch a story and an outline together? Then I would ask him to get with his lawyer and draw up the terms of a contract to do a story with as many rewrites as it took to make it work. I&#8217;d tell him to put in the contract what ever he thought was fair. I would then tell him that the contract him and his lawyer draws up will be the basis of a negotiation for a working contract. Set a time limit for them to set an appointment with J.J.&#8217;s team for the negotiation and when he could make the pitch and report back to J.J.</p>
<p>If you could combine the intellect of a story from Harlan with the energy and action from Kurtzman and Orci you&#8217;d have lightning in a bottle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Easilymused</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-158017</link>
		<dc:creator>Easilymused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158017</guid>
		<description>Watched Star Trek:  TOS first run on TV when I was barely a  teenager.  Have seen it many times in syndication.  I think Reboot is terrific.  For me it&#039;s all about the characters.  And they got the characters spot on.  That is what is brilliant about Reboot.

Oh, yeah, if you don&#039;t suspend belief sometimes, you&#039;ll never like a movie.  LoL  Have to just go with the flow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched Star Trek:  TOS first run on TV when I was barely a  teenager.  Have seen it many times in syndication.  I think Reboot is terrific.  For me it&#8217;s all about the characters.  And they got the characters spot on.  That is what is brilliant about Reboot.</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, if you don&#8217;t suspend belief sometimes, you&#8217;ll never like a movie.  LoL  Have to just go with the flow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-158016</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-158016</guid>
		<description>Antodav, yep your totally correct it was late and had a few beers.   

 I still hated the latest Trek and I&#039;m totally sober right now,,,    ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antodav, yep your totally correct it was late and had a few beers.   </p>
<p> I still hated the latest Trek and I&#8217;m totally sober right now,,,    <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jam head</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-157958</link>
		<dc:creator>jam head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-157958</guid>
		<description>@Gil James + &quot;Kanless,

yip your total right! i was thinking of ST5 its been a long time since I have seen any of the originals. as for Ellison&#039;s meeting god joke sure i get it now! oh ya it was an alien and not god in ST5, its only been 20 years since i ve seen that one. I still remember it being lame...maybe i&#039;ll give it another view?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gil James + &#8220;Kanless,</p>
<p>yip your total right! i was thinking of ST5 its been a long time since I have seen any of the originals. as for Ellison&#8217;s meeting god joke sure i get it now! oh ya it was an alien and not god in ST5, its only been 20 years since i ve seen that one. I still remember it being lame&#8230;maybe i&#8217;ll give it another view?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antodav</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-157919</link>
		<dc:creator>antodav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-157919</guid>
		<description>*Star Trek: Year Four, my bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Star Trek: Year Four, my bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antodav</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-157917</link>
		<dc:creator>antodav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-157917</guid>
		<description>STXI was the best Star Trek movie yet made. It may not have dealt with all of the important philosophical/social/political issues that previous Trek films touched on, but it was also far more entertaining than any of the previous Trek films—which was the point, in case you missed it, to make Trek into something that people besides just Trekkies could appreciate again. In that respect, it succeeded enormously, and I see no reason to let Orci &amp; Kurtzman go (though they did screw up badly in writing the sequel to their previous biggest blockbuster hit, Transformers). I would however extend an offer to D.C. Fontana to participate in the writing process; her Star Trek: Year One comics contain some interesting themes that I&#039;d like to see show up in the sequel.

@790 You must have watched a different Star Trek: Voyager than I did. In the episode that you&#039;re referring to, Captain Annorax was not seeking revenge—he was trying to resurrect his dead wife and by extension his homeworld by wiping out other civilizations from history and hopefully changing the timeline in his favor. Furthermore, while the Voyager episode took place over the course of a year, STXI took place over the course of a matter of days—during which time the Enterprise crew managed to endure no casualties whatsoever, as opposed to the Voyager crew who ended up having to sacrifice themselves to save billions. Finally, &quot;Year of Hell&quot; ended with a reset button, which caused the entire story to be erased from history, per se; STXI did not resort to any such cop-out, much to the irritation of Trekkies who did not want to see an alternate reality created. So there are huge differences between the two stories; to say Abrams/Orci/Kurtzman ripped off the writers of that episode is quite a stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STXI was the best Star Trek movie yet made. It may not have dealt with all of the important philosophical/social/political issues that previous Trek films touched on, but it was also far more entertaining than any of the previous Trek films—which was the point, in case you missed it, to make Trek into something that people besides just Trekkies could appreciate again. In that respect, it succeeded enormously, and I see no reason to let Orci &amp; Kurtzman go (though they did screw up badly in writing the sequel to their previous biggest blockbuster hit, Transformers). I would however extend an offer to D.C. Fontana to participate in the writing process; her Star Trek: Year One comics contain some interesting themes that I&#8217;d like to see show up in the sequel.</p>
<p>@790 You must have watched a different Star Trek: Voyager than I did. In the episode that you&#8217;re referring to, Captain Annorax was not seeking revenge—he was trying to resurrect his dead wife and by extension his homeworld by wiping out other civilizations from history and hopefully changing the timeline in his favor. Furthermore, while the Voyager episode took place over the course of a year, STXI took place over the course of a matter of days—during which time the Enterprise crew managed to endure no casualties whatsoever, as opposed to the Voyager crew who ended up having to sacrifice themselves to save billions. Finally, &#8220;Year of Hell&#8221; ended with a reset button, which caused the entire story to be erased from history, per se; STXI did not resort to any such cop-out, much to the irritation of Trekkies who did not want to see an alternate reality created. So there are huge differences between the two stories; to say Abrams/Orci/Kurtzman ripped off the writers of that episode is quite a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil James Bavel</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-157900</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil James Bavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-157900</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Romulan Dude&quot; is named Nero.  It&#039;s much shorter.  Please stop writing like you&#039;re eight.  It makes you sound puerile.
It says right there in the article that the whole &quot;Enterprise meeting God&quot; thing (which was Shatner&#039;s idea for ST5, itself originally an idea that was thrown away for TOS because it was way too stupid) WAS A JOKE on Ellison&#039;s part.
He has continued to write and win awards for his work (a movie about his life and work came out last year) the entire time, it&#039;s not like he just stopped writing.  He has plenty left in the tank and was creative consultant to Babylon-5 to keep the material in check so they didn&#039;t go off the rails.

If you think Harlan is too old or doesn&#039;t have the chops to make a serious contribution to the new ST film, you either are too young to know who he is or just plain have a bias.  Racist?  The guy marched in Montgomery, Alabama with MLK!  He&#039;s Jewish!  How racist can the guy be?  His story for &quot;City on the edge of Forever&quot; got ruined by episodic television AND STILL WON THE WRITERS&#039; GUILD AWARD.  The script called for huge standing stones with runes and the secretary didn&#039;t know what runes were so she put &quot;ruins&quot;.

This, where there was supposed to be a shining, ancient city, glimmering on a hill in the distance.  They gutted the story because it called for a guy selling space drugs of some kind (which they ended up more or less using on TNG) because Roddenberry, who had been a cop, felt there would be no more drug use in the future.

So, instead, McCoy, who is the chief medical officer on the flagship of the fleet, slips, and shoots himself with the entire contents of a hypospray.

AND IT STILL WON AN EMMY.

No, friends, the problem ain&#039;t with Ellison.  His biggest problem was that he was a late, late adopter of the Internet and didn&#039;t realize what he was getting into by suing Time/Warner/AOL because they illegally allowed the copying of his work onto AOL--he didn&#039;t realize what a juggernaut they were, and spent the rest of his considerable fortune losing that suit, which he should have won (and as it is, Time/Warner took the AOL out of their name).

JJ Abrams, Orci and Kurtzmann could do a lot worse than to have Harlan Ellison either pitch an idea to them, rework &quot;City&quot; into ST2, or simply be in the writing room while they&#039;re working on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Romulan Dude&#8221; is named Nero.  It&#8217;s much shorter.  Please stop writing like you&#8217;re eight.  It makes you sound puerile.<br />
It says right there in the article that the whole &#8220;Enterprise meeting God&#8221; thing (which was Shatner&#8217;s idea for ST5, itself originally an idea that was thrown away for TOS because it was way too stupid) WAS A JOKE on Ellison&#8217;s part.<br />
He has continued to write and win awards for his work (a movie about his life and work came out last year) the entire time, it&#8217;s not like he just stopped writing.  He has plenty left in the tank and was creative consultant to Babylon-5 to keep the material in check so they didn&#8217;t go off the rails.</p>
<p>If you think Harlan is too old or doesn&#8217;t have the chops to make a serious contribution to the new ST film, you either are too young to know who he is or just plain have a bias.  Racist?  The guy marched in Montgomery, Alabama with MLK!  He&#8217;s Jewish!  How racist can the guy be?  His story for &#8220;City on the edge of Forever&#8221; got ruined by episodic television AND STILL WON THE WRITERS&#8217; GUILD AWARD.  The script called for huge standing stones with runes and the secretary didn&#8217;t know what runes were so she put &#8220;ruins&#8221;.</p>
<p>This, where there was supposed to be a shining, ancient city, glimmering on a hill in the distance.  They gutted the story because it called for a guy selling space drugs of some kind (which they ended up more or less using on TNG) because Roddenberry, who had been a cop, felt there would be no more drug use in the future.</p>
<p>So, instead, McCoy, who is the chief medical officer on the flagship of the fleet, slips, and shoots himself with the entire contents of a hypospray.</p>
<p>AND IT STILL WON AN EMMY.</p>
<p>No, friends, the problem ain&#8217;t with Ellison.  His biggest problem was that he was a late, late adopter of the Internet and didn&#8217;t realize what he was getting into by suing Time/Warner/AOL because they illegally allowed the copying of his work onto AOL&#8211;he didn&#8217;t realize what a juggernaut they were, and spent the rest of his considerable fortune losing that suit, which he should have won (and as it is, Time/Warner took the AOL out of their name).</p>
<p>JJ Abrams, Orci and Kurtzmann could do a lot worse than to have Harlan Ellison either pitch an idea to them, rework &#8220;City&#8221; into ST2, or simply be in the writing room while they&#8217;re working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John "Kahless" Taylor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-157892</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Kahless" Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-157892</guid>
		<description>@jam head
Ok, I&#039;m totally confused. When you say the first Star Trek, are you talking about Star Trek: The Motion Picture? If so, they never met God in that movie. In fact, they never met God in any of the movies. Maybe you are refering to Star Trek 5, where they go to the center of the galaxy? Even in there, they find out it isn&#039;t God but some powerful alien who has been imprisoned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jam head<br />
Ok, I&#8217;m totally confused. When you say the first Star Trek, are you talking about Star Trek: The Motion Picture? If so, they never met God in that movie. In fact, they never met God in any of the movies. Maybe you are refering to Star Trek 5, where they go to the center of the galaxy? Even in there, they find out it isn&#8217;t God but some powerful alien who has been imprisoned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Garth, Formerly of Izar</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-157888</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Garth, Formerly of Izar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-157888</guid>
		<description>Ellison is a brilliant Sci Fi writeer and creator. Pairing his temperment, intelligence and gravitas with the short attention span, Ipodish, popcorn blockbuster sensabilities of the Orcman and The Kurtzman might make for a magnificent script. Way the f*&amp;k not giver er a try?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellison is a brilliant Sci Fi writeer and creator. Pairing his temperment, intelligence and gravitas with the short attention span, Ipodish, popcorn blockbuster sensabilities of the Orcman and The Kurtzman might make for a magnificent script. Way the f*&amp;k not giver er a try?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jam head</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-sequel-harlan-ellison-kofi-36051/comment-page-1/#comment-157874</link>
		<dc:creator>jam head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=36051#comment-157874</guid>
		<description>@Dan Zee

you asked why the Romulan dude waited 20 years for Spock and didn&#039;t just go save Romulus....the answer is red matter! which he needed to carry out his revenge and then i am assuming to save Romulus...hmmm seems &quot;logical&quot; also are saying that Ellison the one who pitched the idea of the enterprise meeting god is the one to put logic into Star Trek? do you really think meeting god on some planet in space makes for good logic..WTF. sorry but the first Star Trek is my least favorite, I liked it up in tell they met god and then was like &quot;WOW thats dum&quot;! I do think Ellison could put some good ideas in to it but don&#039;t think he should be the lead writer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan Zee</p>
<p>you asked why the Romulan dude waited 20 years for Spock and didn&#8217;t just go save Romulus&#8230;.the answer is red matter! which he needed to carry out his revenge and then i am assuming to save Romulus&#8230;hmmm seems &#8220;logical&#8221; also are saying that Ellison the one who pitched the idea of the enterprise meeting god is the one to put logic into Star Trek? do you really think meeting god on some planet in space makes for good logic..WTF. sorry but the first Star Trek is my least favorite, I liked it up in tell they met god and then was like &#8220;WOW thats dum&#8221;! I do think Ellison could put some good ideas in to it but don&#8217;t think he should be the lead writer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

