Comments on: Spider-Man 4 Planned For Early March 2010 Start

By: Tobey Maguire Says Spider-Man 4 Will Shoot Early 2010 « The Studio Gates

Tobey Maguire Says Spider-Man 4 Will Shoot Early 2010 « The Studio Gates — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:08:35 +0000

[...] release date of May 6th, 2011 for the highly-anticipated Spider-Man 4, we’ve heard word of a shooting start date of March, 2010. That word came just last month from Spidey director, Sam Raimi, who was quoted as saying, [...]

By: Tobey Maguire Says Spider-Man 4 Will Shoot Early 2010 « MovieDriver – Hollywood Teamster

Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:00:25 +0000

By: Tobey Maguire Says Spider-Man 4 Will Shoot Early 2010 - Screen Rant

Tobey Maguire Says Spider-Man 4 Will Shoot Early 2010 - Screen Rant — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:25:43 +0000

By: Bob

Bob — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:34:41 +0000

@ Shamose

Thank you.

By: Shamose

Shamose — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:28:19 +0000

@ John K

“i really don`t know what to say, seriously, i really don`t.”

be quiet then, we have all heard your opinions it doesnt mtter how often or how inarticulately you present them, they are your opinions… they hold no more weight than anyone elses

By: Sam Raimi Discusses Spider-Man 4 Villains - Screen Rant

Sam Raimi Discusses Spider-Man 4 Villains - Screen Rant — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:46:21 +0000

[...] been receiving plenty of buzz in recent times with announcements and confirmations of it going into production next year for a 2011 release. On top of that, we’ve had countless reports and speculation about what [...]

By: John K.

John K. — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:00:14 +0000

Ok, i just read all articles that have been posted about Sm3 in the past before the movie came out. Seriously, i wish these could just be some normal, dark, scary, intense movies made for the big screen. I wish these movies have been treated normally with some dramatic stories in them and the right villains in them, and instead it`s all been turned into ****. Seriously, i don`t know what to think, they`ve treated Spiderman so wrongly using villains in movies that didn`t belong and showing too much of Spiderman`s superstrength from scenes in SM1 and 2 where Peter`s lifting the kiids in the carnival ride and spidey stopping the train. after what`s happened to Spiderman and Maguire being too old i really don`t know what to say, seriously, i really don`t.

By: John K.

John K. — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:40:30 +0000

And NO venom spinoff WTF!!!

By: John K.

John K. — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:37:49 +0000

Alright, maybe like again i can get excited for this movie if they don`t use up the “classic” comic book villains and stuff and if it makes everything look like SM3 didn`t exist, but i don`t know.

By: chrisj

chrisj — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:00:10 +0000

@ Dr. Sambeckett
If you hate all the Spider-man films, why bother goin to anymore then? are you that difficult to impress? Dont tell me you expect the films to be takin place in a real world kinda franchise.

By: John K.

John K. — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:56:12 +0000

By the way, i`m just saying, what`s gonna happen, i mean isn`t Stan Lee gonna die soon?

By: Gigan300

Gigan300 — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:26:00 +0000

I would say that Dunst got more attractive throughout the films. But, after “Spider-man 2″ there was nothing more they can do with her character. And should have focused more on Gwen Stacy. From what I have heard about this film they are making all the wrong decisions, again. They are bringing back MJ though there is nothing they can do with her character, its rumored they will bring in Uncle Ben’s killer, so they will possibly be focusing on Uncle Ben….again. They also don’t even know who the villain is. When they wrote “Spider-man 2″, they KNEW who the villain would be.

By: DrSamBeckett

DrSamBeckett — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:03:23 +0000

The spiderman films have been a bit of a disaster, 1 was far too power rangery, 2 was a quantum leap forward for all involved, and the less said about 3 ruining one of the best comic sagas of all time.
I think Rami has lost his way as a director, Drag Me To Hell was one of the least scary pieces of trash i have ever seen.
And what is there left to do with Spiderman, they killed off Harry, the only interesting character.
Has anyone else noticed how Kirsten Dunst got less attractive in each film? She looked hot in 1, by the time 3 ended I would have gone off with Gwen Stacy instead!

By: John K.

John K. — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:20:12 +0000

Oh yeah when i said people`s opinions on 3 were “crap” i meant they really don`t know what they mean, till i saw all it`s “errors”. And when i said “all” superhero franchises seem to be cursed, i meant “most”, i`m not sure if the Superman franchise had an actual “curse” since it came bak as the first comic book franchise, Superman Returns i believe may have had a tiny bit of flaws but i don`t remember because the movie just sucked, and YES, i agree, i even saw some flaws in TDK as well, but when a movie has too many flaws, everyone looks mysterious to watch the movie no matter how great the “action” in the film was, even if it doesn`t have that many flaws a flaw can still be a very affective thing like in SM3 some things didn`t make sense, maybe it doesn`t matter if it doesn`t have that many flaws but when it comes to a hero like Spiderman, you can`t focus too much on having all this type of stuff in there with mysterous things happening to the superhero, because then it gets uglier from point to point. There has to be some movies that live without any flaws, or else how it`ll recover? Anyway, i really can`t get excited about this movie at all, i`ll never recover from the mistakes made on SM3, ever. I hate saying that, i used to enjoy the film, but people might be surprised that there`s even going to be a SM4 instead of a reboot, why they even starting with a SM5? Anyway, that`s all i`m saying.

By: chrisj

chrisj — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:22:07 +0000

@ John K
I know its tough to make a movie without any flaws. Point i was makin was people being too picky over that issue. And theres no perfect directors whether its someone like Chris Nolan or James Cameron. Even Cameron had a film that sucked. Its just my opinion some people over exaggerate how bad a film is.

By: John K.

John K. — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:02:28 +0000

Chrisj,
It`s kind of tough to make a movie without any flaws. Things got really lethal-looking in Sm3 though, which is why they have to try focusing on not putting too much drama in there. They just had to be active enough since they were gonna survive through hell at the end.

By: John K.

John K. — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:55:42 +0000

I`m not complaining about SM4 being made, i just don`t want them to turn Spiderman into a bigger pile of junkhouse, that`s all.

By: Gigan300

Gigan300 — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:53:08 +0000

“I have to say Spidey 3 wasnt all that bad.”

Nah, it wasn’t that bad. Just one of the worst comic book films ever made, thats all.

By: chrisj

chrisj — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:32:04 +0000

Spidey 4 might make up for how Spidey 3 turned out, sorry for the mistype

By: chrisj

chrisj — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:30:31 +0000

I cant believe people are complaining so much over Spidey 3 and Spidey 4 being made. Especially the 4th film when they dont know jack about the film yet. my opinion it make up for how spidey 3 turned out. I have to say Spidey 3 wasnt all that bad. Yes peter cried, so what? Wolverine cried in the
X-men film or was ready to so has Batman etc. And peter’s dancing on the sidewalk scene was dumb but its not like it lasted 10 mins. Every movie is gonna have its flaws. There even things in TDK but i still enjoyed the movie. It would be nice if people try little more to just enjoy the film and not think too much about its flaws.