<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Look At Sideswipe From Transformers 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:13:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bioglare</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-146793</link>
		<dc:creator>bioglare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-146793</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve loved stingrays for the longest time, and I like this new one, but that asside Ive seen the movie but seriously they could have given a little more story behind side swipe, and I only saw one scene that really had him doing anything If number 3 doesnt have a little more of him Ill be mad, I love corvettes but theyre giving side swipe a bad name!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve loved stingrays for the longest time, and I like this new one, but that asside Ive seen the movie but seriously they could have given a little more story behind side swipe, and I only saw one scene that really had him doing anything If number 3 doesnt have a little more of him Ill be mad, I love corvettes but theyre giving side swipe a bad name!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nejihyugaxx</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-106735</link>
		<dc:creator>nejihyugaxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-106735</guid>
		<description>its the 1 movie that i like its very aweome the car that i like is sideswipe chau ...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its the 1 movie that i like its very aweome the car that i like is sideswipe chau &#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transformers 2: The Complete Character Guide - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-92816</link>
		<dc:creator>Transformers 2: The Complete Character Guide - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-92816</guid>
		<description>[...] Sideswipe (Corvette Stingray Concept): A new slick addition to the team, Sideswipe features wheeled feet similar to Bonecrusher from the first movie, and arm blades as weapons. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] Sideswipe (Corvette Stingray Concept): A new slick addition to the team, Sideswipe features wheeled feet similar to Bonecrusher from the first movie, and arm blades as weapons. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keyes</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-63536</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-63536</guid>
		<description>@ Shamus,

On one of our Transformers 2 threads, Adrian kindly pointed out in a comment that the names of the twins are:

Mudflap: Chevrolet Trax
Skids: Chevrolet Spark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Shamus,</p>
<p>On one of our Transformers 2 threads, Adrian kindly pointed out in a comment that the names of the twins are:</p>
<p>Mudflap: Chevrolet Trax<br />
Skids: Chevrolet Spark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamus</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-62411</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-62411</guid>
		<description>Anyone else think his face reminds them of Kup?  Just me?  Are there names for the twins yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else think his face reminds them of Kup?  Just me?  Are there names for the twins yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Look At The Fallen From Transformers 2 - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-62379</link>
		<dc:creator>First Look At The Fallen From Transformers 2 - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-62379</guid>
		<description>[...] the movie. Some of the characters we&#8217;ve gotten sneak peaks of through the toys so far include Sideswipe, Soundwave and a new tank variant of Megatron (who director Michael Bay later said would not be in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] the movie. Some of the characters we&#8217;ve gotten sneak peaks of through the toys so far include Sideswipe, Soundwave and a new tank variant of Megatron (who director Michael Bay later said would not be in [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fallout</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-62196</link>
		<dc:creator>Fallout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-62196</guid>
		<description>you know I agree..he needs to be red...otherwise i have no problem with him but new aditions to the cast...the twins or whatever ...when I think twins I think sunny and sides..and maybe that&#039;s just me... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know I agree..he needs to be red&#8230;otherwise i have no problem with him but new aditions to the cast&#8230;the twins or whatever &#8230;when I think twins I think sunny and sides..and maybe that&#8217;s just me&#8230; <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transformers 2 Behind The Scenes Pictures - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-61991</link>
		<dc:creator>Transformers 2 Behind The Scenes Pictures - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-61991</guid>
		<description>[...] the images you&#8217;ll see the Autobots that we already know about (including newbies Sideswipe, Jolt and the Twins) and a great shot of the popular Ice Cream truck which has people talking all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] the images you&#8217;ll see the Autobots that we already know about (including newbies Sideswipe, Jolt and the Twins) and a great shot of the popular Ice Cream truck which has people talking all [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Look At The Twins From Transformers 2 - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-2/#comment-61002</link>
		<dc:creator>First Look At The Twins From Transformers 2 - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-61002</guid>
		<description>[...] Two brothers are unique in that can combine together in vehicle mode to form such wonderful super vehicles as a rumored Ice Cream truck. No Joke, however it was also later rumored the infamous ice cream truck could be a Decepticon. These two new additions join the original Autobot cast along with Jolt, Arcee and Sideswipe. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] Two brothers are unique in that can combine together in vehicle mode to form such wonderful super vehicles as a rumored Ice Cream truck. No Joke, however it was also later rumored the infamous ice cream truck could be a Decepticon. These two new additions join the original Autobot cast along with Jolt, Arcee and Sideswipe. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-58331</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-58331</guid>
		<description>Heh, I&#039;m the opposite, I like the Silver, don&#039;t like the design. Like I said, the back is ok because it resembles an old Stingray Corvette, but the front looks like they cut the front off a Cadillac CTS and glued it onto a Corvette body...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, I&#8217;m the opposite, I like the Silver, don&#8217;t like the design. Like I said, the back is ok because it resembles an old Stingray Corvette, but the front looks like they cut the front off a Cadillac CTS and glued it onto a Corvette body&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keyes</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-58262</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-58262</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the design, I would prefer the colour to be Red as opposed to the bland silver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the design, I would prefer the colour to be Red as opposed to the bland silver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psyko</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-58229</link>
		<dc:creator>Psyko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-58229</guid>
		<description>Ewwwwwwwww, that&#039;s just about the most hideous Corvette concept anybody could have come up with.

I&#039;d much rather see a ZR1 fill the role. They are rather gorgeous cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewwwwwwwww, that&#8217;s just about the most hideous Corvette concept anybody could have come up with.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d much rather see a ZR1 fill the role. They are rather gorgeous cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keyes</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-57788</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-57788</guid>
		<description>Ken, you&#039;re right on about the unions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, you&#8217;re right on about the unions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INK</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-57783</link>
		<dc:creator>INK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-57783</guid>
		<description>@Ken

Once again, I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ken</p>
<p>Once again, I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-57693</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-57693</guid>
		<description>I am personally against the whole bail out thing, but am willing to make an exception to GM since it&#039;s not their fault they are in the hole they are in. BUT I don&#039;t want this to be the normal process, so I would rather it FIX the problem instead of just give them another few years before they are back where they are now.

So I&#039;m in favor of them getting this bail out ONLY AFTER they get to file for bankruptcy to get out of the labor union contracts and start hiring people under their own, fairer, terms. If these people don&#039;t want the decrease in pay, they can be unemployed, go find another job, or get an education. Most of them would take the offer to stay in their current job outside of labor union terms just so they can keep making an income.

Then the government should investigate these union leaders and their structure and place strict regulations on how much influence they have. Hey, these people are all for federal regulation, so I don&#039;t see how they can justify being against this idea. But they will be against it anyhow. Watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am personally against the whole bail out thing, but am willing to make an exception to GM since it&#8217;s not their fault they are in the hole they are in. BUT I don&#8217;t want this to be the normal process, so I would rather it FIX the problem instead of just give them another few years before they are back where they are now.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m in favor of them getting this bail out ONLY AFTER they get to file for bankruptcy to get out of the labor union contracts and start hiring people under their own, fairer, terms. If these people don&#8217;t want the decrease in pay, they can be unemployed, go find another job, or get an education. Most of them would take the offer to stay in their current job outside of labor union terms just so they can keep making an income.</p>
<p>Then the government should investigate these union leaders and their structure and place strict regulations on how much influence they have. Hey, these people are all for federal regulation, so I don&#8217;t see how they can justify being against this idea. But they will be against it anyhow. Watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-57692</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-57692</guid>
		<description>Yah INK, taxes fix everything! And if criminals are not following current laws, pass new ones! LMAO :-D

Oh the logic of idiots never stop to amuse me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah INK, taxes fix everything! And if criminals are not following current laws, pass new ones! LMAO <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Oh the logic of idiots never stop to amuse me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INK</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-57594</link>
		<dc:creator>INK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-57594</guid>
		<description>Just a visual to go along with Ken&#039;s auto company statements:

&lt;b&gt;GM sales in 2007: 9,370,000 vehicles 
Toyota sales in 2007: 9,366,418 vehicles

GM profit/loss in 2007: -$38,730,000,000 (-$4,055 per car) 
Toyota profit in 2007: +$17,146,000,000 (+$1,874 per car)&lt;/b&gt;

But, what the hell, let&#039;s just give more of tax money to bail them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a visual to go along with Ken&#8217;s auto company statements:</p>
<p><b>GM sales in 2007: 9,370,000 vehicles<br />
Toyota sales in 2007: 9,366,418 vehicles</p>
<p>GM profit/loss in 2007: -$38,730,000,000 (-$4,055 per car)<br />
Toyota profit in 2007: +$17,146,000,000 (+$1,874 per car)</b></p>
<p>But, what the hell, let&#8217;s just give more of tax money to bail them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INK</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-57592</link>
		<dc:creator>INK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-57592</guid>
		<description>@Ken

I agree and might I add that while the technology has improved to a point where a lot of the manufacturing is automated thus, supposedly, making it more cost efficient to make the automobiles the companies CANNOT fire the union workers who occupied the jobs taken over by the &quot;robots.&quot; So there are UAW members literally sitting around in lounge areas twiddling there thumbs while earning $50-$75 an hour.
Ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ken</p>
<p>I agree and might I add that while the technology has improved to a point where a lot of the manufacturing is automated thus, supposedly, making it more cost efficient to make the automobiles the companies CANNOT fire the union workers who occupied the jobs taken over by the &#8220;robots.&#8221; So there are UAW members literally sitting around in lounge areas twiddling there thumbs while earning $50-$75 an hour.<br />
Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlameStrike</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-57581</link>
		<dc:creator>FlameStrike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-57581</guid>
		<description>&quot;Have you ever posted anything positive about any movie?&quot;

Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Have you ever posted anything positive about any movie?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/sideswipe-transformers-2-rob-4972/comment-page-1/#comment-57560</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=4972#comment-57560</guid>
		<description>Actually Rob, the concept of American cars not selling is a misconception. GM and Ford both are selling pretty well, the problem is they are not profiting from those sales. Ford is doing OK, not great, but GM is doing very poorly. The reason why they are not profiting is because of the immense costs of building cars compared to foreign manufactures. And you have the American labor unions to thank for that. Did you know the average salary for a factory worker in GM is $50,000-$70,000? These are labor work that doesn&#039;t even require a high school education and these people are getting paid more than most college grads. Before the last time they filed for bankruptcy to void the labor union contracts, they had a guy who swept the floor that was getting $75 an hour...

Foreign car companies don&#039;t have to worry about this. The only reason why Ford is not in need of a bail out is because of their European sales. They have almost the same labor union problem here in the USA as GM. Labor unions are corrupt. Most studies prove that less than 2% of the money they collect through compulsory member dues are used in collective bargaining or negotiation. The rest either goes (illegally) to campaign financing or into the pockets of the corrupt mob-related union leaders. Legally, only moneys raised through PACs (Political Action Committees) are allowed to be used donated to political campaigns. But it is a well known fact that labor unions ignore this rule and nobody dares to do anything about it. Not only is this illegal, but it&#039;s a slap in the face for the people who are contributing to these dues since statistically 40% of the members of these unions (meaning the workers, and yes 40% is the majority, a lot are independent or undecided) are of the opposite political party of where all of the money is being donated.

They are corrupt and cannot be trusted with the amount of power and influence they have. Unfortunately currently most of the current congress is in their back pocket...

James Hoffa is still head of the Teamsters... Sure this isn&#039;t the same &quot;Jimmy&quot; Hoffa we know to be a huge mobster that disappeared, but you&#039;ll have to be naive to think that his son has nothing to do with that lifestyle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Rob, the concept of American cars not selling is a misconception. GM and Ford both are selling pretty well, the problem is they are not profiting from those sales. Ford is doing OK, not great, but GM is doing very poorly. The reason why they are not profiting is because of the immense costs of building cars compared to foreign manufactures. And you have the American labor unions to thank for that. Did you know the average salary for a factory worker in GM is $50,000-$70,000? These are labor work that doesn&#8217;t even require a high school education and these people are getting paid more than most college grads. Before the last time they filed for bankruptcy to void the labor union contracts, they had a guy who swept the floor that was getting $75 an hour&#8230;</p>
<p>Foreign car companies don&#8217;t have to worry about this. The only reason why Ford is not in need of a bail out is because of their European sales. They have almost the same labor union problem here in the USA as GM. Labor unions are corrupt. Most studies prove that less than 2% of the money they collect through compulsory member dues are used in collective bargaining or negotiation. The rest either goes (illegally) to campaign financing or into the pockets of the corrupt mob-related union leaders. Legally, only moneys raised through PACs (Political Action Committees) are allowed to be used donated to political campaigns. But it is a well known fact that labor unions ignore this rule and nobody dares to do anything about it. Not only is this illegal, but it&#8217;s a slap in the face for the people who are contributing to these dues since statistically 40% of the members of these unions (meaning the workers, and yes 40% is the majority, a lot are independent or undecided) are of the opposite political party of where all of the money is being donated.</p>
<p>They are corrupt and cannot be trusted with the amount of power and influence they have. Unfortunately currently most of the current congress is in their back pocket&#8230;</p>
<p>James Hoffa is still head of the Teamsters&#8230; Sure this isn&#8217;t the same &#8220;Jimmy&#8221; Hoffa we know to be a huge mobster that disappeared, but you&#8217;ll have to be naive to think that his son has nothing to do with that lifestyle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
